Program & Abstract Book - EPFL Latsis Symposium 2009
Program & Abstract Book - EPFL Latsis Symposium 2009
Program & Abstract Book - EPFL Latsis Symposium 2009
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>EPFL</strong> <strong>Latsis</strong> <strong>Symposium</strong> <strong>2009</strong>: Understanding Violence<br />
P-18<br />
72<br />
February 11-13 <strong>2009</strong><br />
ca m u s \’ \”st r a n g e r \”: wh y cr i m e s<br />
pr o s e e D<br />
Galyona, Eugene 1<br />
1 Karazin Kharkov National University, Ukraine<br />
As any literature which has a crime as central event, in “Stranger” it is<br />
made attempt to understand: what is the crime and why does it exist.<br />
In “Stranger” Camus criticize European system of justice. It should be<br />
noticed that the judicial system was not always been total resource of the<br />
violence prevention. As the majority ethnographers said there was nothing<br />
in archaic societies that reminds modern judicial system. Rene Girard<br />
results the following gradation of institutions of internal conflicts settlement:<br />
revenge, religious ritual, court. In his opinion efficiency of modern<br />
judicial system has led to disappearance (or more truly to dissolution in<br />
other institutions) of the sacrifice. However up to the XX-th century these<br />
three institutions were represented by three various practices of the conflict<br />
resolution: revenge (duel), religious ritual (Christian ethics) and court<br />
(the state law). In the XX-th century the judicial system becomes the only<br />
powerful institution of the violence prevention but just to its efficiency Camus<br />
had questions.<br />
From the ethological point of view (Konrad Lorenz) intraspecific aggression<br />
is the reason of an individualization and formation of the subject (through<br />
the pacification and greeting rituals). Thus thanks to violence there is<br />
the certain order generated by system of distinctions. When this order is<br />
broken, there is a situation which Girard names «sacrificial crisis» that is<br />
always accompanied by violence. Girard and Lorentz underline value of<br />
asymmetries. It not the violence apologia, it shows that the system which<br />
have to resists to it does not function; that the murder censure, without<br />
studying of deep sources of the violence, and any equality declared by democracy<br />
and humanistic ideas ignore by-effect of themselves that loosens<br />
basis on which they are generated.