08.08.2018 Views

41_1-8

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2<br />

No.<strong>41</strong> AUGUST 9, 2018<br />

DAY AFTER DAY<br />

WWW.DAY.KIEV.UA<br />

By Solomiia NYKOLAIEVYCH, Den’s<br />

Summer School of Journalism, 2018<br />

Has the old conflict between the<br />

two neighboring countries been<br />

finally settled? Does a common<br />

problem help unite the parties<br />

concerned? These and other<br />

questions were posed to Polish Ambassador<br />

Jan Pieklo by young journalists of Den’s<br />

Summer School of Journalism. “Poland is<br />

criticizing Russia for its aggression in the<br />

east of Ukraine and for the annexation of<br />

Crimea,” said Mr. Pieklo. He went on to<br />

assure those present that Poland and<br />

Ukraine would “continue to cooperate” and<br />

help each other. He noted that the Polish<br />

government is already trying to slow down<br />

the launch of the construction of Nord<br />

Stream 2. This gas pipeline is apparently<br />

not as important for Poland as it is for<br />

Donald Trump the businessman. Mr. Pieklo<br />

said that Poland and Ukraine share their<br />

national heritage which is enormous,<br />

invaluable, and indivisible on a world and<br />

local scope. The Polish diplomat stressed<br />

that Poles must stand shoulder to shoulder<br />

with Ukrainians in building a joint nonstereotyped<br />

future.<br />

● EU APPROVES OF UKRAINE’S<br />

REFORMS<br />

Solomiia NYKOLAIEVYCH, Lesia<br />

Ukrainka Eastern European National<br />

University: “How would you briefly describe<br />

the Polish view on the recent EU-<br />

Ukraine and NATO summits, particularly<br />

the meeting between Vladimir Putin<br />

and Donald Trump?”<br />

“Remarkably, three such events took<br />

place within one week. This wasn’t planned<br />

that way, but just happened. I think the<br />

EU-Ukraine summit in Brussels had an effect<br />

on the NATO summit that was attended<br />

by your president and his Georgian<br />

counterpart. The meeting between<br />

Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump was interesting,<br />

considering that it lasted for<br />

about two hours and that we know nothing<br />

about what happened in Helsinki then.<br />

Both presidents were accompanied by interpreters<br />

and no one else. No one knows<br />

what they spoke about. There was a news<br />

conference after their meeting. Putin<br />

said a few words about Ukraine and noted<br />

that Donald Trump doesn’t recognize<br />

the annexation of Crimea. The US president<br />

didn’t mention Ukraine at all, and nor<br />

did he mention what was happening in that<br />

European country. As for the EU-Ukraine<br />

summit, preparations were made and<br />

everyone knew what would happen. President<br />

Petro Poroshenko wanted Ukraine to<br />

be part of EU activities and the EU and<br />

Ukraine to come out jointly against Project<br />

Nord Stream 2. This didn’t happen.<br />

The Ukrainian president also wanted to<br />

discuss Schengen [visas], but it was impossible.<br />

Instead, the EU approved of<br />

Ukraine’s progress in making reforms,<br />

particularly in regard to the Anticorruption<br />

Court, as required by the IMF to issue<br />

the next tranche. In other words,<br />

that summit passed without surprises. At<br />

the NATO summit, Hungary blocked the<br />

meeting of the Ukraine-NATO Commission.<br />

The Georgia-Ukraine Black Sea format<br />

was adopted instead. Of course, this<br />

wasn’t what Ukraine and some NATO<br />

countries wanted, but the important fact<br />

was the presence at the summit of the<br />

Ukrainian and Georgian presidents. Getting<br />

back to the meeting between Putin<br />

and Trump, one wonders about the choice<br />

of Helsinki as the site, considering that<br />

the Final Act [of the Conference on Security<br />

and Cooperation in Europe] was<br />

signed there, providing for the inviolability<br />

of frontiers. Symbolically, the two<br />

presidents met in Helsinki after Putin had<br />

breached all of Russia’s agreements on<br />

this inviolability. However, their meeting<br />

was very important. It meant that Russia<br />

wants to take part in global politics. We<br />

don’t know what decisions were made<br />

then, but we’ll learn soon enough. Some<br />

believe that a decision was made that<br />

would be bad for Ukraine and negative for<br />

Poland and Europe. Still, we don’t know<br />

what decisions were made. Your colleagues,<br />

US journalists, ranging from<br />

Conservative to Republican, were very<br />

critical about that meeting and the press<br />

conference. That conference was the only<br />

chance to learn something about what<br />

was happening. We’ll see.”<br />

“Poland is and will remain<br />

Ukraine’s strategic partner”<br />

Ambassador Jan PIEKLO met with Den’s Summer School<br />

students, answered complicated questions, and shared<br />

his ideas about ways to preserve the common heritage<br />

Polish President Andrzej Duda made<br />

a very strong statement at the NATO<br />

summit. Would you care to comment?<br />

“For Ukraine, it means that Poland<br />

will continue to support Ukraine’s NATO<br />

and EU membership aspirations; that<br />

Poland is criticizing Russia’s aggression<br />

against Ukraine and the annexation of<br />

Crimea. The Polish president simply<br />

stressed the good old postulates: Poland’s<br />

stand in the matter of Ukraine, criticism<br />

of Russia’s aggression and annexation of<br />

Crimea, as well as the maintaining of<br />

sanctions [against Russia]. Poland is and<br />

will remain Ukraine’s strategic partner.<br />

Neighbors are neighbors. We may quarrel<br />

now and then, but we have common interests<br />

in terms of security, business, and<br />

economy. Our countries are interested in<br />

learning from each other’s experience.”<br />

● “I’M AN OPTIMIST, I KNOW<br />

THAT WE MAY BLOCK<br />

NORD STREAM 2”<br />

Yuliia DOVHAICHUK, Taras<br />

Shevchenko National University, Kyiv:<br />

“Ukraine, Poland, and the Baltic states are<br />

blocking the launch of the construction of<br />

Nord Stream 2. Poland is a member of the<br />

EU, so what is there to prevent it from using<br />

means of stopping the process?”<br />

“We’re trying to do just that, but it’s<br />

a very sophisticated process. Germany is<br />

a powerful EU member and it is very interested<br />

in Nord Stream 2, because very big<br />

money is involved in the project and it<br />

spells big profits for Germany and Russia.<br />

There is also the EU energy directive and<br />

we want to use it. Denmark is the only<br />

country required to build Nord Stream 2,<br />

considering that the pipeline, if built, will<br />

pass through its territorial waters. Denmark<br />

is still undecided. So far, everything<br />

is being done in accordance with the<br />

law, including the EU laws. However,<br />

these laws can be interpreted in various<br />

ways. Denmark will make its decision.<br />

You and me wouldn’t want this decision to<br />

be in favor of Nord Stream 2. The Danish<br />

government is under a great deal of pressure<br />

from some EU countries and Russia.<br />

I’m an optimist, I know that we may block<br />

Nord Stream 2. It’s interesting to note<br />

what US President Donald Trump told<br />

Russian President Vladimir Putin, concerning<br />

the sanctions that will be imposed<br />

on those who will take part in the construction<br />

of Nord Stream 2. It is interesting<br />

because it’s about money that will be<br />

lost. Part of German society – particularly<br />

the Greens – is resolutely opposed to<br />

Nord Stream 2. For them, environmental<br />

reasons come first and politics next. They<br />

are very active in the European Parliament,<br />

so we need an alliance.”<br />

Viktoriia HONCHARENKO, Law<br />

School, Dnipro: “How reliable is the US<br />

stand in the matter of Nord Stream 2, considering<br />

its resolute opposition to the<br />

project before Donald Trump and Vladimir<br />

Putin met, and the fact that this resolute<br />

opposition was veiled during the press conference<br />

while describing Putin as just a<br />

competitor?”<br />

“That’s an interesting situation, considering<br />

that Donald Trump isn’t a professional<br />

politician but a businessman.<br />

Some believed from the outset that he<br />

would take a different, businesslike stand<br />

in the matter. The US-Russia trade ratio is<br />

rather low and the US can transport gas to<br />

other countries. In this sense, Russia is<br />

America’s rival, considering that America<br />

would want to sell gas to Europe. Poland<br />

and Lithuania have built coast terminals to<br />

accommodate such US gas deliveries. This<br />

is an economic interest, not just politics.<br />

Russia is using gas as a political weapon,<br />

so this is a political matter for us while it<br />

is an economic as well as political one for<br />

the United States.”<br />

● MINSK AGREEMENTS:<br />

APPARENTLY INEFFECTIVE<br />

Photo by Ruslan KANIUKA, The Day<br />

Vladyslava SHEVCHENKO, Kyiv-<br />

Mohyla Academy National University:<br />

“You said in an interview that the Minsk<br />

Agreements aren’t working the way you’d<br />

want them to. Why aren’t Europe and the<br />

United States taking any steps to change<br />

the format?”<br />

“I remember a meeting dedicated to<br />

the Minsk Agreements and discussing the<br />

matter with the German ambassador. He’d<br />

been for the agreements from day one and<br />

I said it was time to think of a new format.<br />

Let’s face it: the Minsk Agreements are ineffective<br />

and it’s also true that the US is involved<br />

in the process. Some believe a UN<br />

peacekeeping force should be deployed. I<br />

have my experience of working with a<br />

UN peacekeeping mission. I was a journalist<br />

during the war in the Balkans and I<br />

was badly shaken by the Srebrenica massacre<br />

– considering that the Bosnian Muslims<br />

were slaughtered when the UN peacekeepers<br />

were in position. It is also true that<br />

the conflict in the Balkans wouldn’t be ended<br />

without NATO support – America’s support,<br />

to be precise. I don’t think that the<br />

Balkan case is closed. We’ve seen Russia<br />

try to topple the Montenegrin administration.<br />

It didn’t work and Montenegro is<br />

now a NATO member despite all Russia’s<br />

attempts to the contrary. There is no decision<br />

on a UN peacekeeping mission in<br />

Donbas and only its possibility is being discussed.<br />

No one has come up with a proposal<br />

on how this could be accomplished. We<br />

don’t know whether this new concept was<br />

discussed in Helsinki.”<br />

Mykola SIRUK: “There are recent<br />

media reports about Vladimir Putin allegedly<br />

saying, during a meeting with<br />

diplomats, that he can see a referendum in<br />

the east [of Ukraine].”<br />

“That’s incredible. Vladimir Putin<br />

says what he thinks is best for Russia. Donald<br />

Trump follows suit in his own way. He<br />

says something [today] and will say something<br />

different in 24 hours. Putin isn’t totally<br />

sure how to handle Trump. I think he<br />

did what Trump usually does, that if he said<br />

that they had discussed ways to hold a referendum<br />

in Russia, it was his wishful<br />

thinking, although I don’t buy it.”<br />

● CAPITALIZING<br />

ON HISTORICAL ISSUES<br />

Iryna LADYKA, Ivan Franko National<br />

University, Lviv: “There existed a<br />

please-forgive-us-we-forgive-you consensus<br />

between our countries for a certain period<br />

of time. Our president used this formula<br />

addressing the Polish Sejm in 2014.<br />

However, no events in history, not even the<br />

most dramatic ones, can divide our nations.<br />

Polish politicians have been using<br />

such historical issues for political purposes<br />

of late. Why?”<br />

“I think it’s a balanced matter. You also<br />

have such politicians. Ukraine is a<br />

strategic partner of Poland. We know<br />

that a secure Ukraine means a secure<br />

Poland, and a secure European Union.<br />

Building a [better] future is the most important<br />

thing. You’ll have elections and so<br />

will we. Some politicians believe they can<br />

capitalize on historical issues and win<br />

more votes. There is a part of history that<br />

relates to the Second World War. There are<br />

many interpretations. I think this part<br />

should be discussed and written about, but<br />

our future is the most important thing. We<br />

must build a common future. President Andrzej<br />

Duda said that ‘our goal is Ukraine’s<br />

prospects for EU and NATO membership.’<br />

This is also Ukraine’s goal.”<br />

● A DIFFERENT CONCEPT<br />

OF HONORING THE MEMORY<br />

OF THOSE WHO HELPED<br />

EVERYONE AT A TIME<br />

OF ORDEAL<br />

Daria CHYZH, Borys Hrinchenko<br />

University, Kyiv: “Visiting Volyn, President<br />

Andrzej Duda said that some 100,000<br />

Poles died in that tragedy, compared to<br />

5,000 Ukrainians. This is a striking historical<br />

truth. However, a Ukrainian historian<br />

said in an interview that the Polish<br />

president had cited absolutely fictitious<br />

figures… Do you think that we should resort<br />

to such debates or leave the subject to<br />

historians?”<br />

“Like I said, you will have elections<br />

and so will we. As for the number of victims<br />

on both sides, I wrote an essay for the Lvivbased<br />

magazine ‘Yi.’ It was about Volyn<br />

[aka Volhynia. – Ed.], about Jedwabne, a<br />

Polish village where Jews were massacred<br />

during WW II, and about the war in<br />

former Yugoslavia. I demonstrated the<br />

same mechanism that triggered off such<br />

crimes, when villagers would be told that<br />

they could kill Poles living next door and<br />

take their property. We remember that the<br />

UPA [Ukrainian Insurgent Army – Ed.]<br />

wasn’t strong in Volyn, but the mechanism<br />

was there. The same was true of Jews in<br />

Poland and of interethnic conflicts in<br />

Bosnia. Everyone had to be killed, so there<br />

would be no eyewitnesses. This mechanism<br />

is so horrible, you can only try to imagine<br />

it. We must pay tribute to all victims, especially<br />

to all those mixed Polish-Ukrainian<br />

and Ukrainian-Polish families. They<br />

were traitors in the eyes of both sides. I saw<br />

the same thing in former Yugoslavia where<br />

a Serb married to a Croat or a Croat married<br />

to a Serb would be the first victim. The<br />

same is true of the Volhynia Massacre.<br />

There is a very good concept of honoring<br />

the memory of those who helped everyone<br />

at a time of ordeal. This concept exists in<br />

Poland and your president also says that<br />

one shouldn’t focus only on victims, but also<br />

praise those who helped fellow humans<br />

during that horrible war.”<br />

● EVERY EFFORT SHOULD<br />

BE MADE TO MAINTAIN<br />

A DIALOG<br />

Andriana BILA, Taras Shevchenko<br />

National University, Kyiv: “The Institute<br />

of National Memory resumed functioning<br />

in 2014, specializing in historical<br />

issues and historical legacy. For some<br />

reason, this institute is anything but popular<br />

in Poland. Does it really pose a threat<br />

to the Polish interests?”<br />

“I know Dr. Volodymyr Viatrovych<br />

personally and I don’t think that he can<br />

pose any threat. We speak to each other and<br />

speaking is necessary. I think that politicians<br />

can make rash statements now and<br />

then, but I also think that it is possible to<br />

speak with Mr. Viatrovych, just as it is possible<br />

to speak with the head of our Institute<br />

of National Remembrance [IPN]. I remember<br />

IPN head Jaroslaw Szarek’s visit<br />

to Kyiv last year. He met with Mr. Viatrovych<br />

and it was an enjoyable experience.<br />

They shook hands and spoke. Then there<br />

was a press conference and everyone agreed<br />

that we’d solve all problems. Everything<br />

was fine, but then things started happening.<br />

Every effort should be made to maintain<br />

a dialog. This is a very trying period<br />

for you and for us. We’re marking the 75th<br />

anniversary of the Volhynia Massacre.<br />

However, we take a joint stand in regarding<br />

Russia as a threat to our countries and<br />

to the Baltic states. We remember what<br />

happened in the past. When Poland,<br />

Lithuania, and Ukraine were at odds, Russia<br />

did as it pleased and divided those<br />

countries.”<br />

● TO DEVELOP AND<br />

IMPLEMENT A JOINT<br />

TOURIST PRODUCT<br />

Yana KHROMIAK, Borys<br />

Hrinchenko University, Kyiv: “Your<br />

country is actively supporting Polish<br />

culture in Ukraine. What is there to prevent<br />

a joint project like restoring the castle<br />

in Pidhirtsi where Polish nobility<br />

used to play host to kings, including the<br />

French one? There are many joint Ukrainian-Lithuanian<br />

projects. What about<br />

Ukrainian-Polish ones?”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!