[James_H._Harlow]_Electric_Power_Transformer_Engin(BookSee.org)
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
L ijo = N i N j ijo (3.10.31)<br />
1.4<br />
where ijo is the average flux cutting each conductor in section i due to the current I j , and where N is the<br />
number of turns in each section, then the inductance (L ij , H) as a function of frequency is:<br />
1.3<br />
L<br />
ij<br />
Lijo<br />
b<br />
tanh( 1<br />
j)<br />
b<br />
( 1<br />
j)<br />
a<br />
a<br />
(3.10.32)<br />
The impedance (Z prox,ij , ) is obtained by multiplying the inductance by the complex variable s. Using<br />
the same notation as in Equation 3.10.29, the impedance of the conductor due to the proximity effect<br />
is given as<br />
H<br />
PER UNIT CAPACITANCE<br />
1.2<br />
1.1<br />
1<br />
BEFORE AGING<br />
AFTER AGING<br />
Z s L ijo<br />
prox<br />
tanh <br />
(3.10.33)<br />
ij<br />
<br />
3.10.7.2 Core Losses<br />
The effect of eddy currents in the core have been represented in various works [26,48,49] by the welltested<br />
formula:<br />
where<br />
(3.10.34)<br />
x= d j <br />
(3.10.35)<br />
2<br />
and where<br />
l = length of the core limb (axial direction), m<br />
d = thickness of the lamination, m<br />
= permeability of the material, H/m<br />
N = number of turns in the coil<br />
A = total cross-sectional area of all laminations<br />
= frequency, rad/sec<br />
This formula represents the equivalent impedance of a coil wound around a laminated iron core limb.<br />
The expression was derived [49] by solving Maxwell’s equations assuming the electromagnetic field<br />
distribution is identical in all laminations and an axial component of the magnetic flux.<br />
The total hysteresis loss in core volume, V, in which the flux density is everywhere uniform and varying<br />
cyclically at a frequency of , can be expressed as:<br />
where<br />
N A<br />
Z 4 2<br />
x x<br />
ld<br />
2 tanh<br />
P h = total hysteresis loss in core<br />
= constant, a function of material<br />
V = core volume<br />
= flux density<br />
n = exponent, dependent upon material, 1.6 to 2.0<br />
= frequency, rad/sec<br />
P h = 2 V n max (3.10.36)<br />
PER UNIT CONDUCTANCE, LOG(G)<br />
0.9<br />
0.8<br />
10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 7<br />
FREQUENCY, LOG(F)<br />
10 4<br />
10 3<br />
10 2<br />
10 1<br />
10 0<br />
AFTER AGING<br />
10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 7<br />
FREQUENCY, LOG(F)<br />
FIGURE 3.10.7 Top) Oil-soaked paper capacitance as a function of frequency; bottom) Oil-soaked paper conductance<br />
as a function of frequency.<br />
3.10.7.3 Dielectric Losses<br />
The capacitive structure of a transformer has associated with it parallel losses. At low frequency, the effect<br />
of capacitance on the internal voltage distribution can be ignored. As such, the effect of the losses in the<br />
dielectric structure can be ignored. However, at higher frequencies the losses in the dielectric system can<br />
have a significant effect on the transient response. Batruni et al. [50] explore the effect of dielectric losses<br />
on the impedance-vs.-frequency characteristic of the materials in power transformers. These losses are<br />
frequency dependent and are shown in Figure 3.10.7.<br />
3.10.8 Winding Construction Strategies<br />
BEFORE AGING<br />
3.10.8.1 Design<br />
The successful design of a commercial transformer requires the selection of a simple structure so that<br />
the core and coils are easy to manufacture. At the same time, the structure should be as compact as<br />
possible to reduce required materials, shipping concerns, and footprint. The form of construction should<br />
© 2004 by CRC Press LLC<br />
© 2004 by CRC Press LLC