15.12.2012 Views

Research Report Abstracts - Gesundheit

Research Report Abstracts - Gesundheit

Research Report Abstracts - Gesundheit

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WPT2011, <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>Abstracts</strong> eS1093<br />

Review Board prior to their participation.<br />

<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> Poster Display<br />

Number: RR-PO-312-10-Tue Tuesday 21 June 12:00<br />

RAI: Exhibit Halls 2&3<br />

VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF CENTER OF<br />

PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS USING THE<br />

NINTENDO WII BALANCE BOARD IN<br />

COMMUNITY-DWELLING ELDERLY<br />

INDIVIDUALS<br />

Elazzazi A., Bombard S., Llewellyn A., Rutkowski A.,<br />

Sanchez L., Sawica A., Vicencio J.<br />

Utica College, Physical Therapy, Utica, United States<br />

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine if the<br />

Nintendo Wii Balance Board (WBB) can accurately measure<br />

balance in community-dwelling elderly population using<br />

center of pressure (COP) measurements.<br />

Relevance: The force platform (FP) has been used to measure<br />

sway in static standing postures through using COP data.<br />

The WBB utilizes a similar technology to identify the COP<br />

of the individual standing on the board. The WBB, if valid,<br />

may be an economic alternative to FP in clinical practice and<br />

research.<br />

Participants: Fifteen community-dwelling elderly individuals<br />

over the age of 65 years agreed to participate and signed<br />

an Institutional Review Board approved informed consent.<br />

Participants were included if they were without major health<br />

condition, lower extremity disability, and can stand without<br />

an assistive device for at least 30 seconds.<br />

Methods: The participants were divided into two groups,<br />

with and without balance impairments using the Activities-<br />

Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale, and the Berg<br />

Balance scale (BBS). Participants were tested using the WBB<br />

and the FP. Each participant was asked to stand with feet<br />

together eyes opened and eyes closed for 30 seconds on the<br />

WBB and FP in a random order.<br />

Analysis: To determine the test–retest reliability, participants<br />

performed the same stances on WBB and FP three times.<br />

To determine the validity of the WBB, Pearson correlation<br />

coefficients were obtained for WBB, FP and BBS.<br />

Results: Data from 15 participants showed that the mediolateral<br />

COP sway demonstrated significant (p < .005) moderate<br />

correlation between FP eyes opened trials (r = .62) and highly<br />

correlated during the eyes closed condition (r = .91). The<br />

WBB showed significant (p < .05) high correlation between<br />

eyes opened trials (r = .92) and eyes closed trials (r = .96). In<br />

the anterior–posterior sway both FP and WBB showed significant<br />

(p < .005) and high correlations between trials (range<br />

r = .82–.92). The WBB also showed significant (p < .005)<br />

validity and was moderately correlated to the performance<br />

on the FP during the eyes opened on the anterior–posterior<br />

sway (range r = .5–.78) and high correlation during the eyes<br />

closed conditions (range r = .71–.81). Neither the FP nor the<br />

WBB was correlated to the BBS.<br />

Conclusions: The results indicate that the WBB is a valid tool<br />

when measuring COP sway in community-dwelling elderly<br />

individuals. As an emerging tool in the clinical setting, the<br />

WBB is able to provide clinicians with more objective data<br />

to incorporate into the examination and plan of care.<br />

Implications: Therefore, as compared to a FP, the WBB is an<br />

inexpensive and portable instrument that will aid clinicians<br />

in the identification of balance impairments.<br />

Keywords: Wii Balance Board; Force platform; Balance<br />

Funding acknowledgements: None.<br />

Ethics approval: Utica College Institutional Review Board.<br />

<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Report</strong> Poster Display<br />

Number: RR-PO-210-24-Thu Thursday 23 June 12:00<br />

RAI: Exhibit Halls2&3<br />

RESPIRATORY MUSCLE STRENGTH: A<br />

COMPARISON OF HEALTHY BOYS ENGAGED IN<br />

THREE SPORTING ACTIVITIES AND INACTIVE<br />

BOYS<br />

Santos Sanches V., Magalhães Fernandes J., Paula Santos<br />

G., Prudencio Goncalves M.V., Santos de Assuncao V.H.,<br />

Braulio Elosta M., Gimelli A.M., Pires Batiston A., Moraes<br />

dos Santos M.L.<br />

Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, DTA, Campo<br />

Grande, Brazil<br />

Purpose: To evaluate and compare the strength of respiratory<br />

muscles of healthy boys actively participating in swimming,<br />

judo or indoor soccer as well as inactive boys.<br />

Relevance: In the presence of chronic respiratory diseases,<br />

the respiratory muscles are overloaded and there is usually<br />

an indication for a strengthening program for this muscle<br />

group. Several methods of training can be used, and physical<br />

activity is regarded as one method with significant potential.<br />

In children, studies in this area are limited, especially with<br />

regard to the effects of different sports on the strength of<br />

respiratory muscles.<br />

Participants: One hundred and twenty healthy boys,<br />

eutrophic and aged 7–8 years.<br />

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted with<br />

120 healthy boys. They were divided into four groups of 30<br />

boys each: inactive (S); indoor soccer; judo and swimming.<br />

Physical activities were held twice a week. The maximal<br />

respiratory pressures were measured with an aneroid-type<br />

manometer, based on the recommendations by American<br />

Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (2002).<br />

Analysis: The comparison between respiratory muscle<br />

strength of the four groups was analyzed by a one-way<br />

ANOVA test, followed by the post-test Tukey Kramer, at the<br />

5% level of significance.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!