RUST magazine: RUST#37
2019 Beta Enduro's tested, GS Trophy 2018, Honda Africa Twin, Ducati Multistrada 1200 Enduro ridden, Husqvarna FE350 Long termer, Project Suzuki V-Strom 650 XT, Triumph Street Twin update, Zard Exhaust , kit reviews and loads more!
2019 Beta Enduro's tested, GS Trophy 2018, Honda Africa Twin, Ducati Multistrada 1200 Enduro ridden, Husqvarna FE350 Long termer, Project Suzuki V-Strom 650 XT, Triumph Street Twin update, Zard Exhaust , kit reviews and loads more!
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
LATEST GEAR<br />
Stuff<br />
Scott Prospect Mojave and WFS goggle<br />
Standard Prospect goggle: RRP: £80.00 / €99.95<br />
Limited edition Mojave: RRP: £110.00 / €139.95<br />
WFS: RRP: £100.00 / €129.95<br />
For US prices see local stockists<br />
Contact: www.scott-sports.com<br />
22<br />
hours and counting – here’s<br />
my first impression of the<br />
Scott Prospect Limited<br />
Edition Mojave and WFS goggles. WFS,<br />
by the way, stands for Works Film<br />
System – Scott’s version of a roll-off.<br />
The weather being as unpredictable<br />
as a pimply teenager this year I decided<br />
to take both pairs of Scott goggles with<br />
me for the week’s riding and testing in<br />
Portugal. By the end of the week the<br />
Mojave’s made it out for only a brief<br />
outing on day one for about three<br />
hours while for the rest of the time<br />
I favoured the WFS version. Just as<br />
well because in the varying weather<br />
conditions I used both rolls of film that<br />
came new in the box.<br />
Given that the WFS shares the same<br />
base features and frame as the standard<br />
Prospect goggle (and in this case the<br />
fancy coloured Mojave) this review<br />
will be only slightly varied if you’re<br />
considering the use of alternate lenses<br />
and frames.<br />
Out of the box my first impression<br />
was how deep the triple layered foam<br />
surround at the rear of the frame was.<br />
These goggles are not only big but<br />
pretty deep, too. I did wonder if they<br />
would fit into the Bell Moto 9 Flex I<br />
would be wearing. They did, but the fit<br />
was snug and if the outriggers weren’t<br />
articulated and able to move I doubt<br />
they would have.<br />
I liked that the WFS system was<br />
located behind the outriggers. I<br />
can confirm Scott’s claim that the<br />
Prospect goggles offer one of the<br />
biggest fields of vision on the market<br />
today. The forward and peripheral<br />
vision is excellent, and not just for a<br />
roll off system, the vision is good –<br />
period. The extra height of the lens is<br />
noticeable as is the wider film (50 mm)<br />
but the three most notable features<br />
were 1. the secure clip-in canisters,<br />
2. the top film protector under which<br />
the film slides across the lens extends<br />
under the canisters and is sealed in<br />
when the canister is clipped into<br />
place, and 3. the nonslip grid which is<br />
placed over the lens works effectively<br />
at keeping dirt and water from getting<br />
between the film and the lens.<br />
I would rate the WFS system as the<br />
best on the market today, not only for<br />
quality and design but for price too.<br />
I think they offer excellent value for<br />
money. As for the Prospect goggles<br />
themselves they offer a fantastic field of<br />
vision, are comfortable and feel secure<br />
and safe.<br />
But this test isn’t over – I’m going to<br />
spend more time with the non-WFS<br />
Prospect goggles and test the lens<br />
variations and I’ll let you know how I<br />
get on.<br />
Warren Malschinger<br />
For a full-length version of this test go to www.rustsports.com/stuff<br />
46<br />
www.rustsports.com