11.07.2018 Views

RUST magazine: RUST#37

2019 Beta Enduro's tested, GS Trophy 2018, Honda Africa Twin, Ducati Multistrada 1200 Enduro ridden, Husqvarna FE350 Long termer, Project Suzuki V-Strom 650 XT, Triumph Street Twin update, Zard Exhaust , kit reviews and loads more!

2019 Beta Enduro's tested, GS Trophy 2018, Honda Africa Twin, Ducati Multistrada 1200 Enduro ridden, Husqvarna FE350 Long termer, Project Suzuki V-Strom 650 XT, Triumph Street Twin update, Zard Exhaust , kit reviews and loads more!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

LATEST GEAR<br />

Stuff<br />

Scott Prospect Mojave and WFS goggle<br />

Standard Prospect goggle: RRP: £80.00 / €99.95<br />

Limited edition Mojave: RRP: £110.00 / €139.95<br />

WFS: RRP: £100.00 / €129.95<br />

For US prices see local stockists<br />

Contact: www.scott-sports.com<br />

22<br />

hours and counting – here’s<br />

my first impression of the<br />

Scott Prospect Limited<br />

Edition Mojave and WFS goggles. WFS,<br />

by the way, stands for Works Film<br />

System – Scott’s version of a roll-off.<br />

The weather being as unpredictable<br />

as a pimply teenager this year I decided<br />

to take both pairs of Scott goggles with<br />

me for the week’s riding and testing in<br />

Portugal. By the end of the week the<br />

Mojave’s made it out for only a brief<br />

outing on day one for about three<br />

hours while for the rest of the time<br />

I favoured the WFS version. Just as<br />

well because in the varying weather<br />

conditions I used both rolls of film that<br />

came new in the box.<br />

Given that the WFS shares the same<br />

base features and frame as the standard<br />

Prospect goggle (and in this case the<br />

fancy coloured Mojave) this review<br />

will be only slightly varied if you’re<br />

considering the use of alternate lenses<br />

and frames.<br />

Out of the box my first impression<br />

was how deep the triple layered foam<br />

surround at the rear of the frame was.<br />

These goggles are not only big but<br />

pretty deep, too. I did wonder if they<br />

would fit into the Bell Moto 9 Flex I<br />

would be wearing. They did, but the fit<br />

was snug and if the outriggers weren’t<br />

articulated and able to move I doubt<br />

they would have.<br />

I liked that the WFS system was<br />

located behind the outriggers. I<br />

can confirm Scott’s claim that the<br />

Prospect goggles offer one of the<br />

biggest fields of vision on the market<br />

today. The forward and peripheral<br />

vision is excellent, and not just for a<br />

roll off system, the vision is good –<br />

period. The extra height of the lens is<br />

noticeable as is the wider film (50 mm)<br />

but the three most notable features<br />

were 1. the secure clip-in canisters,<br />

2. the top film protector under which<br />

the film slides across the lens extends<br />

under the canisters and is sealed in<br />

when the canister is clipped into<br />

place, and 3. the nonslip grid which is<br />

placed over the lens works effectively<br />

at keeping dirt and water from getting<br />

between the film and the lens.<br />

I would rate the WFS system as the<br />

best on the market today, not only for<br />

quality and design but for price too.<br />

I think they offer excellent value for<br />

money. As for the Prospect goggles<br />

themselves they offer a fantastic field of<br />

vision, are comfortable and feel secure<br />

and safe.<br />

But this test isn’t over – I’m going to<br />

spend more time with the non-WFS<br />

Prospect goggles and test the lens<br />

variations and I’ll let you know how I<br />

get on.<br />

Warren Malschinger<br />

For a full-length version of this test go to www.rustsports.com/stuff<br />

46<br />

www.rustsports.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!