Adrian_Sampath_Overseas_Case Study_Jan_2017
A case study following the diagnostic imaging for a bicep rupture.
A case study following the diagnostic imaging for a bicep rupture.
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Why MRI<br />
<strong>Adrian</strong> <strong>Sampath</strong><br />
00040384<br />
MRI is the modality of choice querying soft tissue injuries. The imaging service it provides,<br />
gives conclusive information to determine a client’s next phase of treatment.<br />
The various pulse sequences cause different molecules of tissue in the affected area to be<br />
excited and then relax at different times. The energy released from the excited molecules in<br />
the tissue is captured by gradient coils which acts like the camera. It then transferred the raw<br />
information to the MRI computer as digital MR images.<br />
Slices of the affected anatomy acquired from different pulse sequences are looked at on the<br />
monitor clearly seeing the tissues. The images do not need to undergo any image<br />
reconstruction since MRI images can be viewed in different planes.<br />
A CT scan could have been done to visualize the area through image reconstruction software,<br />
but the exposure to the ionizing radiation would have negated any possible benefits of<br />
achieving the image. The image quality may be of high quality but the area of interest may not<br />
be visualized enough to conclude the extent of the rupture, thus CT would not be used.<br />
Ultrasound maybe be used to identify the rupture, however the image quality may not be of<br />
diagnostic quality, leaving only MRI as the modality of choice for this case.<br />
Page 4 of 17