10.07.2018 Views

Adrian_Sampath_Overseas_Case Study_Jan_2017

A case study following the diagnostic imaging for a bicep rupture.

A case study following the diagnostic imaging for a bicep rupture.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Why MRI<br />

<strong>Adrian</strong> <strong>Sampath</strong><br />

00040384<br />

MRI is the modality of choice querying soft tissue injuries. The imaging service it provides,<br />

gives conclusive information to determine a client’s next phase of treatment.<br />

The various pulse sequences cause different molecules of tissue in the affected area to be<br />

excited and then relax at different times. The energy released from the excited molecules in<br />

the tissue is captured by gradient coils which acts like the camera. It then transferred the raw<br />

information to the MRI computer as digital MR images.<br />

Slices of the affected anatomy acquired from different pulse sequences are looked at on the<br />

monitor clearly seeing the tissues. The images do not need to undergo any image<br />

reconstruction since MRI images can be viewed in different planes.<br />

A CT scan could have been done to visualize the area through image reconstruction software,<br />

but the exposure to the ionizing radiation would have negated any possible benefits of<br />

achieving the image. The image quality may be of high quality but the area of interest may not<br />

be visualized enough to conclude the extent of the rupture, thus CT would not be used.<br />

Ultrasound maybe be used to identify the rupture, however the image quality may not be of<br />

diagnostic quality, leaving only MRI as the modality of choice for this case.<br />

Page 4 of 17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!