07.07.2018 Views

Saheeh Seerah Al Albaanee English

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ibn Is-ḥaaq also said: <strong>Al</strong>-Waleed Ibn al-Mugheerah was standing talking with the<br />

Messenger of <strong>Al</strong>laah ﷺ while he ﷺ was addressing him, wishing to convert him to<br />

Islaam; at that moment, Ibn Umm Maktoom `Aatikah Bint `Abdullaah Ibn Ankthah,<br />

passed by. Ibn Umm Maktoom, who was blind, addressed the Messenger of <strong>Al</strong>laah<br />

and began asking him to recite the Qur’aan. This upset the Messenger of <strong>Al</strong>laah ﷺ<br />

to the point of angering him, and this was because he was interfering with the ﷺ<br />

Prophet’s efforts to convert al-Waleed to Islaam as he was hoping. When Ibn Umm<br />

Maktoom kept persisting, the Prophet ﷺ turned away from him frowning and<br />

ignored him. So <strong>Al</strong>laah تعاىل revealed:<br />

‏﴿عَبَسَ‏ ‏ُوَتَوَىلَّىُ*ُأَنُجَاءَُه ‏ُاِّل ‏َع مَى﴾ُإىلُقولهُ﴿مَّر ف وعَة ‏ُمُّطَهَّرَة ﴾<br />

{(The Prophet (Peace be upon him)) frowned and turned away, Because there came<br />

to him the blind man (i.e. `Abdullaah Ibn Umm Maktoom, who came to the Prophet<br />

(Peace be upon him) while he was preaching to one or some of the Quraish chiefs)…}<br />

till the saying of <strong>Al</strong>laah تعاىل {Exalted (in dignity), purified} [Surah `Abasa (80): 1-14] 281<br />

be receiving our share from it. And if what we have is better than what you have brought, then you will be<br />

participating with us in our affair, and you will be receiving your share from it.’ So, <strong>Al</strong>laah تعاىل revealed the<br />

Surah….” The chain of this narration is “Mursal Ṣaḥeeḥ” (i.e. the chain till Sa`eed Ibn Mainaa’ is “Ṣaḥeeḥ”). This is<br />

further strengthened by the Ḥadeeth of Ibn `Abbaas: “The Quraish promised the Messenger of <strong>Al</strong>laah ﷺ that<br />

they would give him wealth…” till the end of the Ḥadeeth. The complete narration will be mentioned later in this<br />

chapter.<br />

281 (Shaikh al-<strong>Al</strong>baanee said): Reported by Ibn Is-ḥaaq in “al-<strong>Seerah</strong>” (1/389-390) in a “Mu`allaq” form. Ibn Sa`d<br />

connected its chain in “al-Ṭabaqaat al-Kubraa” (4/208), from the route of Hishaam Ibn `Urwah, from his father,<br />

who said: “The Messenger of <strong>Al</strong>laah ﷺ was sitting with a group of people from Quraish, among them were<br />

`Utbah Ibn Rabee`ah, and some elites from the Quraish…” then he narrated the rest of the Ḥadeeth. The chain of<br />

this narration is “Ṣaḥeeḥ Mursal”. Furthermore, al-Tirmidhee connected the chain in his “Sunan” (3331), and Ibn<br />

Jareer (30/50), and al-Ḥaakim (3896), from another route, from Hishaam Ibn `Urwah, from his father, from<br />

`Aaishah ‏,رضيُاهللُعنها who said… and then they mentioned the Ḥadeeth. <strong>Al</strong>-Tirmidhee said: “The Ḥadeeth is “Ḥasan<br />

Ghareeb”. <strong>Al</strong>-Ḥaakim said: “It is “Ṣaḥeeḥ as per the condition of the Shaikhain”, but a group of scholars said it is<br />

“Mursal” from the narrations of Hishaam Ibn `Urwah”, and al-Dhahabee said: “that (it being “Mursal”) is more<br />

correct”.<br />

I (al-<strong>Al</strong>baanee) say: But there are supporting chains which strengthen this Ḥadeeth, which have been mentioned<br />

by al-Suyooṭee in “al-Durr” (6/314-315), from them are what Ibn Jareer mentioned in his “Tafseer” (30/51), and<br />

Ibn Mardawaih, from Ibn `Abbaas ‏ُاهلل ‏ُعنهما ‏,رضي who said: “While the Messenger of <strong>Al</strong>laah ﷺ was addressing<br />

`Utbah Ibn Rabee`ah, Abu Jahl Ibn Hishaam, `Abbaas Ibn `Abdul Muṭṭalib - he ﷺ was concentrating on them a<br />

lot and presenting them evidences so that they would believe – at that moment a blind man came to him…” and<br />

the rest of the Ḥadeeth is similar to the previous one.<br />

Ilm4all.blogspot Page 208

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!