Stream-Profile Analyses Using a Step-Backwater Model for ... - USGS
Stream-Profile Analyses Using a Step-Backwater Model for ... - USGS Stream-Profile Analyses Using a Step-Backwater Model for ... - USGS
Stream-Profile Analyses Using a Step-Backwater Model for Selected Reaches in the Chippewa Creek Basin in Medina, Wayne, and Summit Counties, Ohio By David E. Straub and Andrew D. Ebner Abstract The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Chippewa Subdistrict of the Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District, performed hydrologic and hydraulic analyses of selected reaches of three streams in the Chippewa Creek basin in Medina, Wayne, and Summit Counties, Ohio to aid in the assessment of alternatives for channel improvements for mitigating flood hazards. Peak flows with a 50-percent annual exceedance probability (the 2-year flood) were estimated from regional regression equations as an approximation of bankfull discharges. Drainage areas of the three stream reaches studied ranged from 29.6 to 188 square miles. The Hydrologic Engineers Center’s River Analysis System step-backwater model was used to compute water-surfaceelevation profiles for the 2-year flood along selected reaches of the streams. The base model was modified to determine the effects of reducing main-channel roughness coefficients (Manning’s n) by 5, 10, 15, and 20 percent on the computed water-surface profiles. Reach-averaged reductions in watersurface elevations ranged from 0.11 to 1.29 feet over the four roughness reduction scenarios. Introduction The Chippewa Creek valley was a series of swamps until channel modifications drained it and turned it into a productive agricultural region by 1900. Without a systematic maintenance program, the channels reverted back to their natural conditions and flooding became a problem. In June 1956, the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) developed a watershed-protection and flood-control plan (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1956) that called for 33.2 miles of modified channels and 8 floodwater-retention structures (fig.1). The channel modifications included straightening the channel of selected stream reaches of Chippewa Creek, Westfield Ditch, Little Chippewa Creek, and River Styx. A trapezoidal channel geometry was constructed to increase the efficiency of the channel to convey the floodwater out of the basin. The floodwater-retention structures were designed to attenuate flood-peak streamflows. The effects of these flood-control features were estimated to reduce the annual average flooded area by approximately 4,210 acres. (Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District, 1961). After three amendments to the original plan, in which the primary changes were the locations of conservation pools upstream from the floodwater-retention structures, the final version of the Chippewa Subdistrict’s Official Plan (Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District, 1961) was adopted in March 1977. All channel modifications and floodwater-retention structures of this plan were completed by 1980. The floodwater-retention structures have been maintained by the Chippewa Subdistrict of Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District (MWCD). Over time, however, the streams have developed significant tree and brush growth along the channel, thus decreasing the ability of the stream to convey floodwaters out of the basin. In 2007, a section of Chippewa Creek between Shorle Road and Miller Road was cleared of debris, trees, and brush (figure 2). The downstream channel reach of Chippewa Creek still (as of 2010, figure 3) has appreciable tree and brush growth along the channel banks. The Chippewa Creek basin is undergoing significant development pressure in several areas of the watershed. Traditionally, communities could make use of Flood Insurance Studies (FIS) as an important tool for determining areas that should not be developed. A majority of FIS’s conducted by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in the Medina County portion of the Chippewa Creek basin were completed in the mid-to-late 1980’s. A FIS for Medina County and incorporated areas (Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2008) was released on August 4, 2008, but no new detailed studies were completed as part of this new study. The flood-hazard-inundation areas of the older studies were redelineated over new digital base map information provided by Medina County. A FIS for Wayne County and incorporated areas (Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2009) was adopted on August 18, 2009, and it included new detailed flood profiles that were developed for Chippewa Creek and River Styx for recurrence intervals of 10, 50, 100, and 500 years.
- Page 1 and 2: In cooperation with the Chippewa Su
- Page 3 and 4: Stream-Profile Analyses Using a Ste
- Page 5 and 6: Contents Abstract .................
- Page 7: Conversion Factors and Abbreviation
- Page 11 and 12: Figure 2. Chippewa Creek looking up
- Page 13 and 14: 82°0'0"W 41°15'0"N 41°10'0"N 41
- Page 15 and 16: Study Methods 7 Table 3. Summary of
- Page 17 and 18: Study Methods 9 Table 5. Basin char
- Page 19 and 20: References Cited 11 Table 6. Averag
- Page 21 and 22: Appendix 1. Descriptions of Benchma
- Page 23 and 24: KY1726’OF A 36-FOOT CONCRETE BRID
- Page 25 and 26: KY1827 STATION RECOVERY (1971) KY18
- Page 27 and 28: KY1829 KY1829’RECOVERY NOTE BY OH
- Page 29 and 30: MB1307_SP_SET: SET IN TOP OF CONCRE
- Page 31 and 32: MB1317_U.S. NATIONAL GRID SPATIAL A
- Page 33 and 34: E 281 1 National Geodetic Survey, R
- Page 35 and 36: CHIP 1 National Geodetic Survey, Re
- Page 37 and 38: KY1839’CONCRETE POST WHICH PROJEC
- Page 39: KY1710_SETTING: 7 = SET IN TOP OF C
- Page 42 and 43: 34 Stream-Profile Analyses Using a
- Page 44 and 45: 36 Stream-Profile Analyses Using a
- Page 46 and 47: 38 Stream-Profile Analyses Using a
- Page 48 and 49: 40 Stream-Profile Analyses Using a
- Page 50 and 51: 42 Stream-Profile Analyses Using a
- Page 52 and 53: 44 Stream-Profile Analyses Using a
- Page 54 and 55: 46 Stream-Profile Analyses Using a
- Page 56 and 57: 48 Stream-Profile Analyses Using a
<strong>Stream</strong>-<strong>Profile</strong> <strong>Analyses</strong> <strong>Using</strong> a <strong>Step</strong>-<strong>Backwater</strong> <strong>Model</strong><br />
<strong>for</strong> Selected Reaches in the Chippewa Creek Basin<br />
in Medina, Wayne, and Summit Counties, Ohio<br />
By David E. Straub and Andrew D. Ebner<br />
Abstract<br />
The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the<br />
Chippewa Subdistrict of the Muskingum Watershed Conservancy<br />
District, per<strong>for</strong>med hydrologic and hydraulic analyses<br />
of selected reaches of three streams in the Chippewa Creek<br />
basin in Medina, Wayne, and Summit Counties, Ohio to aid in<br />
the assessment of alternatives <strong>for</strong> channel improvements <strong>for</strong><br />
mitigating flood hazards. Peak flows with a 50-percent annual<br />
exceedance probability (the 2-year flood) were estimated from<br />
regional regression equations as an approximation of bankfull<br />
discharges. Drainage areas of the three stream reaches studied<br />
ranged from 29.6 to 188 square miles.<br />
The Hydrologic Engineers Center’s River Analysis System<br />
step-backwater model was used to compute water-surfaceelevation<br />
profiles <strong>for</strong> the 2-year flood along selected reaches<br />
of the streams. The base model was modified to determine<br />
the effects of reducing main-channel roughness coefficients<br />
(Manning’s n) by 5, 10, 15, and 20 percent on the computed<br />
water-surface profiles. Reach-averaged reductions in watersurface<br />
elevations ranged from 0.11 to 1.29 feet over the four<br />
roughness reduction scenarios.<br />
Introduction<br />
The Chippewa Creek valley was a series of swamps until<br />
channel modifications drained it and turned it into a productive<br />
agricultural region by 1900. Without a systematic maintenance<br />
program, the channels reverted back to their natural conditions<br />
and flooding became a problem. In June 1956, the Soil<br />
Conservation Service (SCS) developed a watershed-protection<br />
and flood-control plan (U.S. Department of Agriculture,<br />
1956) that called <strong>for</strong> 33.2 miles of modified channels and 8<br />
floodwater-retention structures (fig.1). The channel modifications<br />
included straightening the channel of selected stream<br />
reaches of Chippewa Creek, Westfield Ditch, Little Chippewa<br />
Creek, and River Styx. A trapezoidal channel geometry was<br />
constructed to increase the efficiency of the channel to convey<br />
the floodwater out of the basin. The floodwater-retention<br />
structures were designed to attenuate flood-peak streamflows.<br />
The effects of these flood-control features were estimated<br />
to reduce the annual average flooded area by approximately<br />
4,210 acres. (Muskingum Watershed Conservancy<br />
District, 1961).<br />
After three amendments to the original plan, in which<br />
the primary changes were the locations of conservation<br />
pools upstream from the floodwater-retention structures,<br />
the final version of the Chippewa Subdistrict’s Official Plan<br />
(Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District, 1961) was<br />
adopted in March 1977. All channel modifications and floodwater-retention<br />
structures of this plan were completed by 1980.<br />
The floodwater-retention structures have been maintained<br />
by the Chippewa Subdistrict of Muskingum Watershed Conservancy<br />
District (MWCD). Over time, however, the streams<br />
have developed significant tree and brush growth along the<br />
channel, thus decreasing the ability of the stream to convey<br />
floodwaters out of the basin. In 2007, a section of Chippewa<br />
Creek between Shorle Road and Miller Road was cleared of<br />
debris, trees, and brush (figure 2). The downstream channel<br />
reach of Chippewa Creek still (as of 2010, figure 3) has appreciable<br />
tree and brush growth along the channel banks.<br />
The Chippewa Creek basin is undergoing significant<br />
development pressure in several areas of the watershed.<br />
Traditionally, communities could make use of Flood Insurance<br />
Studies (FIS) as an important tool <strong>for</strong> determining areas<br />
that should not be developed. A majority of FIS’s conducted<br />
by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)<br />
in the Medina County portion of the Chippewa Creek basin<br />
were completed in the mid-to-late 1980’s. A FIS <strong>for</strong> Medina<br />
County and incorporated areas (Federal Emergency Management<br />
Agency, 2008) was released on August 4, 2008,<br />
but no new detailed studies were completed as part of this<br />
new study. The flood-hazard-inundation areas of the older<br />
studies were redelineated over new digital base map in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
provided by Medina County. A FIS <strong>for</strong> Wayne County<br />
and incorporated areas (Federal Emergency Management<br />
Agency, 2009) was adopted on August 18, 2009, and it<br />
included new detailed flood profiles that were developed <strong>for</strong><br />
Chippewa Creek and River Styx <strong>for</strong> recurrence intervals of<br />
10, 50, 100, and 500 years.