15.12.2012 Views

Transcriptional regulation of meiosis in budding yeast

Transcriptional regulation of meiosis in budding yeast

Transcriptional regulation of meiosis in budding yeast

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

y the 26S proteasome (Guttmann-Raviv and Kassir, 2002). In the absence <strong>of</strong> Ime1, Sok2<br />

represses the transcription <strong>of</strong> IME1, lead<strong>in</strong>g to a decrease <strong>in</strong> IME1 mRNA. It is not known<br />

whether the negative feedback <strong>regulation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ime2 on the transcription <strong>of</strong> IME1 is mediated only<br />

through its effect on Ime1. S<strong>in</strong>ce the transcription <strong>of</strong> IME2 depends on Ime1 (Mitchell et al.,<br />

1990; Yoshida et al., 1990) and the half-life <strong>of</strong> Ime2 is very short (Bolte et al., 2002; Guttmann-<br />

Raviv and Kassir, 2002), there are sufficient levels <strong>of</strong> Ime1 to relieve repression by S<strong>in</strong>3<br />

(Washburn and Esposito, 2001) and to activate transcription <strong>of</strong> EMG. In the absence <strong>of</strong> Ime1 lack<br />

<strong>of</strong> these two functions leads to shutt<strong>in</strong>g down the transcription <strong>of</strong> EMG. The transcription <strong>of</strong><br />

MMG and LMG depends on Ime2 (Chu et al., 1998; Chu and Herskowitz, 1998; Friesen et al.,<br />

1997; Hepworth et al., 1998; Kihara et al., 1991; Ozsarac et al., 1997; Smith and Mitchell, 1989).<br />

In cells depleted for Ime1, Ime2 is absent, and the transcription <strong>of</strong> the early late and late genes is<br />

closed.<br />

VIII. Conclud<strong>in</strong>g remark. The choice between developmental pathways<br />

S. cerevisiae is a simple eukaryote with limited developmental options. Diploid cells may chose<br />

between growth <strong>in</strong> <strong>yeast</strong> or pseudohyphal forms, and <strong>meiosis</strong>. Two crucial mechanisms regard<strong>in</strong>g<br />

developmental decisions are required for faithful growth, entry <strong>in</strong>to a specific developmental<br />

pathway should take place only <strong>in</strong> response to specific signals, and should be a signal to block<br />

entry <strong>in</strong>to an alternative pathway. Concomitant entry <strong>in</strong>to two developmental pathways could lead<br />

to chaos. In S. cerevisiae, the MATa and MATα gene products as well as the pachytene<br />

surveillance mechanisms ensure that only diploid cells can <strong>in</strong>itiate <strong>meiosis</strong>. This is a crucial<br />

decision, because <strong>meiosis</strong> <strong>in</strong> haploid cells would lead to the formation <strong>of</strong> uneuploid gametes.<br />

In S. cerevisiae, the meiotic cycle ends with the formation <strong>of</strong> dormant spores resistant to<br />

hazardous conditions. The decision to exit the mitotic cell cycle depends on the availability <strong>of</strong><br />

nutrients. Entry <strong>in</strong>to the meiotic cycle <strong>in</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> nutrients can be a “waste”. Several<br />

redundant mechanisms ensure that <strong>in</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> glucose the meiotic pathway will be<br />

repressed: i. The transcription <strong>of</strong> IME1 is repressed <strong>in</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> glucose due to the presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> dist<strong>in</strong>ct negative elements (i.e. UASru, IREu, UCS1), each respond<strong>in</strong>g to a different signal<br />

pathway. Thus, if one signal pathway is malfunction<strong>in</strong>g, the activity <strong>of</strong> the additional signal<br />

pathways will ensure repression. Moreover, several UAS elements (i.e. UASru, IREu, UASrm),<br />

each regulated <strong>in</strong> a dist<strong>in</strong>ct manner, activates transcription <strong>in</strong> the absence <strong>of</strong> glucose. ii. The<br />

activity <strong>of</strong> Ime1 is repressed <strong>in</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> glucose by two dist<strong>in</strong>ct mechanisms. a.<br />

Phosphorylation <strong>of</strong> Ime1 by the Cln/Cdc28 k<strong>in</strong>ase sequesters the prote<strong>in</strong> from the nucleus, and b.<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!