15.12.2012 Views

Transcriptional regulation of meiosis in budding yeast

Transcriptional regulation of meiosis in budding yeast

Transcriptional regulation of meiosis in budding yeast

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

structure <strong>of</strong> hCDK2 reveals that cycl<strong>in</strong> A b<strong>in</strong>ds to two regions: PSTAIRE and the T-loop (Jeffrey<br />

et al., 1995). This b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g is required to <strong>in</strong>duce a conformational change that promotes activation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the k<strong>in</strong>ase. Ime2 does not carry the PSTAIRE sequence, but it shows 67% similarity and<br />

52.3% identity to the T-loop region <strong>of</strong> hCDK2 (Fig. 12). This homology raises the possibility that<br />

Ime2 might be activated by b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g to a cycl<strong>in</strong> like molecule, and that <strong>in</strong> the meiotic cycle it<br />

might replace Cdc28, the <strong>yeast</strong> CDK that regulates <strong>in</strong>itiation and progression <strong>in</strong> the cell cycle<br />

(Lew et al., 1997). The follow<strong>in</strong>g results support the hypothesis that <strong>in</strong> the meiotic cycle Ime2<br />

might replace Cdc28: i. Similarly to Cdc28, phosphorylation by Ime2 affects stability <strong>of</strong> Ime1<br />

Cdh1 and Sic1, the latter two prote<strong>in</strong>s are known substrates <strong>of</strong> Cdc28 <strong>in</strong> the mitotic cell cycle<br />

(Bolte et al., 2002; Dirick et al., 1998; Guttmann-Raviv and Kassir, 2002). ii. Ime2 is absolutely<br />

required for premeiotic DNA replication and meiotic recomb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> cdc28-4 cells <strong>in</strong>cubated at<br />

the non-permissive temperature (Guttmann-Raviv et al., 2001). However, there are no reports on<br />

any <strong>yeast</strong> prote<strong>in</strong>s that b<strong>in</strong>d to the T-loop like sequence <strong>in</strong> Ime2 and are required for its k<strong>in</strong>ase<br />

activity. Moreover, a recomb<strong>in</strong>ant Ime2 prote<strong>in</strong> isolated from E. coli is active <strong>in</strong> phosphorylat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

histone H1 (Donzeau and Bandlow, 1999), suggest<strong>in</strong>g that unlike Cdc28, Ime2 is active <strong>in</strong> the<br />

absence <strong>of</strong> additional <strong>yeast</strong> prote<strong>in</strong>s. However, phosphorylation <strong>of</strong> its native substrate, Gpa2 (see<br />

below) requires the isolation <strong>of</strong> Ime2 from <strong>yeast</strong> cells (Donzeau and Bandlow, 1999), suggest<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that specificity, for at least for some substrates, might require post-translation modification or the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> an activator.<br />

Ime2 is a positive regulator <strong>of</strong> <strong>meiosis</strong> required for multiple functions: the correct tim<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

high level transcription <strong>of</strong> early <strong>meiosis</strong>-specific genes, the transcription <strong>of</strong> middle and late genes<br />

(Mitchell et al., 1990; Yoshida et al., 1990), the correct tim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> entry <strong>in</strong>to premeiotic DNA<br />

replication meiotic recomb<strong>in</strong>ation and nuclear division (Benjam<strong>in</strong> et al., 2002; Foiani et al.,<br />

1996), as well as for ascus formation (Benjam<strong>in</strong> et al., 2002; Foiani et al., 1996; Mitchell et al.,<br />

1990; Yoshida et al., 1990). When Ime2 is over expressed, but only <strong>in</strong> the SK1 background, it<br />

bypasses the requirement for Ime1 for the transcription <strong>of</strong> EMG and sporulation (Mitchell et al.,<br />

1990), suggest<strong>in</strong>g an Ime1 <strong>in</strong>dependent pathway for activat<strong>in</strong>g the transcription <strong>of</strong> these genes<br />

(Mitchell et al., 1990). It is not known how Ime2, that encodes a k<strong>in</strong>ase, replaces a transcriptional<br />

activator, nor if under normal conditions this pathway has any contribution to the transcription <strong>of</strong><br />

these genes.<br />

Ime2 functions also as a negative regulator for the follow<strong>in</strong>g functions: i. Phosphorylation <strong>of</strong><br />

Ime1 by Ime2 leads to its degradation by the 26S proteasome (Guttmann-Raviv and Kassir,<br />

2002). It is possible that the absence <strong>of</strong> Ime1 reestablishes repression by Sok2 and S<strong>in</strong>3 [see<br />

sections IIIC1.1.2, IVB1.2, and (Shenhar and Kassir, 2001; Washburn and Esposito, 2001)],<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!