15.12.2012 Views

Transcriptional regulation of meiosis in budding yeast

Transcriptional regulation of meiosis in budding yeast

Transcriptional regulation of meiosis in budding yeast

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4. The SIN3, UME6, and RPD3 genes. UME6 encodes a C6Zn2 prote<strong>in</strong> that b<strong>in</strong>ds the<br />

URS1 sequence present <strong>in</strong> many genes <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g EMG (Anderson et al., 1995; Strich et al.,<br />

1994). The C6Zn2 doma<strong>in</strong> is sufficient for b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g, and is required for its repression activity<br />

(Anderson et al., 1995; Strich et al., 1994). Deletion <strong>of</strong> UME6 causes high expression <strong>of</strong> EMG, as<br />

well as additional non-meiotic genes carry<strong>in</strong>g the URS1 element, <strong>in</strong> vegetative growth conditions<br />

(Bowdish and Mitchell, 1993; Lopes et al., 1993; Park et al., 1992; Strich et al., 1994). In<br />

addition, Ume6 functions as a transcriptional repressor when tethered to heterologous genes<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g its fusion to lexA (Kadosh and Struhl, 1997). This repression activity <strong>of</strong> Ume6 depends<br />

on the availability <strong>of</strong> S<strong>in</strong>3 (Ume4, Rpd1) and Rpd3 (Kadosh and Struhl, 1997).<br />

Coimmunoprecipitation and two-hybrid assays demonstrate physical association between<br />

Ume6(515-530) and S<strong>in</strong>3(426-472) (the PAH2 doma<strong>in</strong>), as well as between S<strong>in</strong>3 and Rpd3<br />

(Kadosh and Struhl, 1997; Kasten et al., 1997; Washburn and Esposito, 2001).<br />

S<strong>in</strong>3 functions as a transcriptional repressor when tethered to heterologous genes follow<strong>in</strong>g its<br />

fusion to lexA (Wang and Stillman, 1993). The repression activity <strong>of</strong> S<strong>in</strong>3 depends on Rpd3<br />

(Kadosh and Struhl, 1997; Kasten et al., 1997). In accord, the double mutant s<strong>in</strong>3 rpd3 have the<br />

same phenotype as either s<strong>in</strong>gle mutant (Vidal and Gaber, 1991).<br />

RPD3 encodes histone deacetylase whose deletion, similar to SIN3 deletion, causes an <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

<strong>in</strong> acetylation <strong>of</strong> lys<strong>in</strong>es 5 and 12 <strong>in</strong> histone H4 <strong>in</strong> various genes carry<strong>in</strong>g the URS1 element<br />

(Burgess et al., 1999; Rundlett et al., 1998). Recruitment <strong>of</strong> the S<strong>in</strong>3/Rpd3 complex by Ume6 to<br />

DNA results <strong>in</strong> decreased acetylation <strong>of</strong> histone H3 and H4 <strong>in</strong> a restricted region, up to two<br />

nucleosomes from the b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g site <strong>of</strong> Ume6 (Kadosh and Struhl, 1998).<br />

5. The ISW2 gene. Isw2 <strong>in</strong> a complex with Itc1 functions as an ATP dependent chromat<strong>in</strong>remodel<strong>in</strong>g<br />

factor that is required for the repression <strong>of</strong> EMG under vegetative growth conditions<br />

(Goldmark et al., 2000). Isw2 functions <strong>in</strong> parallel to the S<strong>in</strong>3/Rpd3 histone deacetylase complex,<br />

as deduced from the observation that the level <strong>of</strong> expression <strong>of</strong> EMG are dramatically <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

<strong>in</strong> the s<strong>in</strong>3 isw2 double mutant <strong>in</strong> comparison to the s<strong>in</strong>gle mutants (Goldmark et al., 2000). Isw2<br />

physically associates with Ume6, and s<strong>in</strong>ce it’s b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g to the URS1 element depends on Ume6,<br />

it was concluded that Ume6 recruits the Isw2 complex to URS1 (Goldmark et al., 2000). DNaseI<br />

and micrococcal nuclease digestion <strong>of</strong> the chromat<strong>in</strong> near the EMG REC104 show dependence on<br />

Isw2, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that the Isw2 complex forms an <strong>in</strong>accessible chromat<strong>in</strong> structure near the URS1<br />

element (Goldmark et al., 2000). These results suggest that Isw2 would be localized to the<br />

nucleus <strong>in</strong> vegetative growth media. However, this is not the case, Isw2 is localized to the<br />

cytoplasm <strong>in</strong> vegetative growth cultures, and to the nucleus, the cytoplasmic and sp<strong>in</strong>dle<br />

microtubuli, <strong>in</strong> meiotic cultures (Trachtulcova et al., 2000). There is no good explanation to<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!