Peace in the Face of War

monkofthebritishisles
from monkofthebritishisles More from this publisher
29.06.2018 Views

which they were bound up comes to an end, when the accustomed social order is destroyed, and the social class to which they belong is overthrown. Cries that the Antichrist has come all too often greet anything unpopular. Presentiments of the end of imperial Russia, which was flying headlong into the abyss, provoked eschatological sentiments and predictions.... Only one thing is sure and unquestionable. We live in an era of catastrophic historic upheaval, where we must not judge contemporary events by old standards. The weakness of politicians in our time can be explained by the fact that they remain stuck under the influence of their old, historic polemics, which have been swept away in the intervening struggle. Problems with the Apocalypse Of all the books of the New Testament, the Apocalypse always provokes a cautious attitude [especially among the Orthodox]; [liturgically] it has been completely ignored. This book is an unpleasant reminder of the catastrophic End, about which people prefer not to think although they do everything they can to prepare for it. A specialist literature of commentary on the Apocalypse exists, but it remains of a rather low quality. It is usually in the form of a completely arbitrary explanation of the symbolism of the Apocalypse, and is obscurantist in nature. In order to approach the Apocalypse critically, one must establish the principal by which we approach the text of Holy Scripture. We can no longer naively credit the literal text of holy books with a sense of infallibility as we once did. The voice of God, the word of God, comes down to us through a muddy, dark, human medium, i.e. one conformed to the spiritual condition of people and the structure of their consciousness. The word of God is not assimilated by people automatically, always in the same way and passively, independent of what sort of people they are. Man is also active in the perception of revelation. And this activity can often be negative, reflecting people’s lower nature. A human interpretation of the word of God brings with it elements of distorted sociomorphism. For this reason there is a constant need to purify, spiritualize and humanize the means of assimilating God’s word. An immense spiritual effort is needed to hear God’ s word in its purity. In this process of purification, biblical criticism, objective historical study, and creative philosophical thinking can be immensely important. An anthropomorphic (in the bad sense) and socio-morphic perception of the word of God, corresponding to the enslaved condition of human societies, has left its distinctive mark on the apocalyptic books too. A vindictive eschatology took shape. The most interesting pre-Christian apocalyptic book, excluded from the Biblical canon, the Book of Enoch, is permeated with themes of revenge by the righteous, by good people on evil sinners. It describes judgement on sinners, carried out in the presence of the righteous, who sit as it were over the sinner in judgement 22

and relish the cruel punishments to which they have been condemned. The end of the world is a terrible bloodletting, a bitter war. An element of vengeful, cruel eschatology is found also in the Christian Apocalypse. There is no greater contradiction in spirit and style than exists between the Apocalypse and the Gospel according to St John. It is difficult to countenance that these two books were written by the same author. Vengeful eschatological motifs also play a large part in the teaching of blessed Augustine in the Two Cities. For him, the earthly city begins with murder – with the business of Cain – and ends with murder, war, death and hell. In an interpretation that is often acknowledged as authoritative, the Apocalypse, made to conform to the conditions of this world, essentially acquires a materialistic hue. This was an interpretation formed by enslavement to the spirit of this world, where determinism and Fate prevail. It could not have been otherwise, because the Apocalypse is, before all else, a perception of the immanent consequences of the paths of evil, paths that are contrary to those of the Kingdom of God. Therefore rays of light from the ‘new heaven and new earth’ only occasionally break through into the darkness of the End, and the vision of punishment dominates over any vision of transfiguration. Herein lies the conditionality of apocalyptic prophecies.... The fundamental problem facing us here is the problem of the relationship between Christian eschatology and progress. The Apocalypse prophesies about the paths of evil, the appearing of Anti-Christ, and the destruction of this world. Undoubtedly, pessimistic interpretations of the Apocalypse prevail. A philosophy of the Apocalypse, which is a philosophy of history, leads to the following fundamental problem. Are we to understand the Apocalypse as Fate, as an inexorable Divine sentence with regard to human destiny, as a denial of human freedom? I think that such a fatal understanding of the Apocalypse runs deeply counter to Christianity, the religion of God-manhood. The final destiny of humanity depends on both God and human beings. Human freedom and human creativity play their part in preparing for the End: the co-operation of both divine and human at the End of things. The End of history and of the world is not just something happening to human beings, but it is accomplished by them. We venture forth to meet the Second Coming of Christ through works we have accomplished, and acts of our free creativity pave the way for the Kingdom of God. Christ comes in power and glory to humanity, which has prepared itself for His coming. One must not think of God’s action with regard to humankind and the world as some kind of deus ex machina. Our attitude to the End of the world cannot be simply one of hope. It must also include our activity, our creative deed. Least justifiable of all would be human passivity, or any withdrawal that refuses to be creative on the supposition 23

which <strong>the</strong>y were bound up comes to an end, when <strong>the</strong> accustomed social<br />

order is destroyed, and <strong>the</strong> social class to which <strong>the</strong>y belong is overthrown.<br />

Cries that <strong>the</strong> Antichrist has come all too <strong>of</strong>ten greet anyth<strong>in</strong>g unpopular.<br />

Presentiments <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> imperial Russia, which was fly<strong>in</strong>g headlong <strong>in</strong>to<br />

<strong>the</strong> abyss, provoked eschatological sentiments and predictions.... Only one<br />

th<strong>in</strong>g is sure and unquestionable. We live <strong>in</strong> an era <strong>of</strong> catastrophic historic<br />

upheaval, where we must not judge contemporary events by old standards.<br />

The weakness <strong>of</strong> politicians <strong>in</strong> our time can be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong>y<br />

rema<strong>in</strong> stuck under <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir old, historic polemics, which have<br />

been swept away <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terven<strong>in</strong>g struggle.<br />

Problems with <strong>the</strong> Apocalypse Of all <strong>the</strong> books <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> New Testament,<br />

<strong>the</strong> Apocalypse always provokes a cautious attitude [especially among <strong>the</strong><br />

Orthodox]; [liturgically] it has been completely ignored. This book is an<br />

unpleasant rem<strong>in</strong>der <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> catastrophic End, about which people prefer not<br />

to th<strong>in</strong>k although <strong>the</strong>y do everyth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>y can to prepare for it. A specialist<br />

literature <strong>of</strong> commentary on <strong>the</strong> Apocalypse exists, but it rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> a ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

low quality. It is usually <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> a completely arbitrary explanation <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> symbolism <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Apocalypse, and is obscurantist <strong>in</strong> nature. In order to<br />

approach <strong>the</strong> Apocalypse critically, one must establish <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>cipal by which<br />

we approach <strong>the</strong> text <strong>of</strong> Holy Scripture. We can no longer naively credit <strong>the</strong><br />

literal text <strong>of</strong> holy books with a sense <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>fallibility as we once did. The voice<br />

<strong>of</strong> God, <strong>the</strong> word <strong>of</strong> God, comes down to us through a muddy, dark, human<br />

medium, i.e. one conformed to <strong>the</strong> spiritual condition <strong>of</strong> people and <strong>the</strong><br />

structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir consciousness. The word <strong>of</strong> God is not assimilated by people<br />

automatically, always <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same way and passively, <strong>in</strong>dependent <strong>of</strong> what<br />

sort <strong>of</strong> people <strong>the</strong>y are. Man is also active <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> perception <strong>of</strong> revelation. And<br />

this activity can <strong>of</strong>ten be negative, reflect<strong>in</strong>g people’s lower nature. A human<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpretation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> word <strong>of</strong> God br<strong>in</strong>gs with it elements <strong>of</strong> distorted sociomorphism.<br />

For this reason <strong>the</strong>re is a constant need to purify, spiritualize and<br />

humanize <strong>the</strong> means <strong>of</strong> assimilat<strong>in</strong>g God’s word. An immense spiritual effort<br />

is needed to hear God’ s word <strong>in</strong> its purity. In this process <strong>of</strong> purification,<br />

biblical criticism, objective historical study, and creative philosophical<br />

th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g can be immensely important. An anthropomorphic (<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bad<br />

sense) and socio-morphic perception <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> word <strong>of</strong> God, correspond<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

<strong>the</strong> enslaved condition <strong>of</strong> human societies, has left its dist<strong>in</strong>ctive mark on<br />

<strong>the</strong> apocalyptic books too. A v<strong>in</strong>dictive eschatology took shape. The most<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g pre-Christian apocalyptic book, excluded from <strong>the</strong> Biblical canon,<br />

<strong>the</strong> Book <strong>of</strong> Enoch, is permeated with <strong>the</strong>mes <strong>of</strong> revenge by <strong>the</strong> righteous, by<br />

good people on evil s<strong>in</strong>ners. It describes judgement on s<strong>in</strong>ners, carried out <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> righteous, who sit as it were over <strong>the</strong> s<strong>in</strong>ner <strong>in</strong> judgement<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!