28.06.2018 Views

En Voyage_Issue#11_Flickbook

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

UP TO YOUR NECK IN RISK<br />

MITIGATION? LEARN FROM<br />

SOMEONE SUBMERGED IN IT<br />

Business<br />

BY WAYNE ATKINSON, GROUP PARTNER, COLLAS CRILL.<br />

I’m conscious you’re probably reading this on a<br />

plane to pass the time and don’t really want to hear<br />

about compliance. With that in mind I want to tell<br />

you about the most impressive speech I ever saw.<br />

It was given by a man called Jarrod Jablonksi who<br />

Wikipedia describes as a “record-setting cave diver”<br />

and who once undertook a dive traversing 11km of<br />

continuous cave which required his team to spend 21<br />

hours underwater. Unsurprisingly, cave diving is, by<br />

its nature, very dangerous. If something goes wrong<br />

in a submerged cave, a diver can’t surface without<br />

making their way out of the cave. Normal diving<br />

issues become more complicated with the added risk<br />

of getting lost or stuck and drowning. Lots of cave<br />

divers drown and amongst their community there<br />

are, as a result, strong opinions about the best (ie<br />

safest) way to cave dive. Jablonksi had some strong<br />

opinions and in his<br />

THE KEY TO<br />

SUCCESS IS TRULY<br />

UNDERSTANDING<br />

THE RISKS IN<br />

YOUR BUSINESS<br />

ENVIRONMENT AND,<br />

LIKE JABLONKSI,<br />

WORKING OUT<br />

HOW TO REDUCE<br />

UNNECESSARY RISK AS<br />

FAR AS POSSIBLE<br />

speech he answered the<br />

questions of what might<br />

be called a sceptical<br />

crowd explaining how<br />

he had formed those<br />

opinions and why.<br />

The answer to each<br />

question followed a<br />

pattern. When asked<br />

why he did something<br />

a certain way, Jablonski<br />

responded by pointing<br />

to the risks in the<br />

environment and the activity and explained how his<br />

team had approached comparing and mitigating the<br />

specific risks involved. What was impressive about the<br />

talk wasn’t that Jablonksi’s approach was risk-free; it<br />

could never be risk-free – he was spending hours at<br />

a time kilometres inside underwater caves. What was<br />

impressive was Jablonksi’s depth of understanding of<br />

the risks and how best to mitigate them. Everything<br />

he did or didn’t do, wear or take with him had a<br />

rationale attached and had been considered. He<br />

added that he wouldn’t work with anyone who<br />

didn’t operate to the same standards as him. It<br />

was the ultimate in taking a risk-based approach.<br />

I often reflect on that talk when I talk to financial<br />

services businesses about their approach to<br />

compliance. No-one is going to drown in our<br />

industry but CI businesses still deal with risk<br />

every day and manage that risk. We embrace<br />

innovative technologies such as blockchain or<br />

crypto-currencies, we share our expertise with<br />

emerging economies and markets and work with<br />

new clients every day. Meanwhile even the most<br />

vanilla of structures is open to abuse. The key to<br />

success is not having compliance policies which<br />

cut your risk to zero; that is impossible, not to<br />

mention uncommercial. Rather the key to success<br />

is truly understanding the risks in your business<br />

environment and, like Jablonksi, working out how<br />

to reduce unnecessary risk as far as possible.<br />

Mitigating risk in business requires directors to<br />

understand that risk and requires compliance<br />

teams to engage with the business environment<br />

a company is operating in. Some local businesses<br />

rely on outsourced compliance providers, others<br />

enact policies sent forth from head office whilst<br />

many more have in-house compliance teams. All<br />

these approaches can work but boards should<br />

consider their own (and their compliance team’s)<br />

understanding of the business’s risk structure<br />

and adapt their documentation and activity to it.<br />

Conducting a fulsome business risk assessment<br />

is the best way to do this (which is why regulators<br />

require and often focus on them). An accurate<br />

assessment allows a business to tailor their processes<br />

and policies to address specific concerns whereas<br />

a generic off-the-shelf precedent document may<br />

not even identify the concerns in question. Detailed<br />

consideration of the issues in question can often<br />

allow more streamlined, appropriate and successful<br />

approaches to managing risk to be taken. Having<br />

done so, one is in a position to obtain team buy-in<br />

ensuring everyone works to the same safe standard.<br />

At Collas Crill we frequently work with teams from<br />

businesses who rely on us to help them control<br />

their risk. Our first step is always the same; trying to<br />

understand their business. Off-the-shelf solutions<br />

don’t work for innovative, fast moving businesses<br />

and when they don’t work, people get frustrated and<br />

ignore them, compounding the problems, reducing<br />

cohesion in the business and increasing the risk<br />

exposure. Beautifully crafted documents prepared<br />

by lawyers with no understanding of a business’s<br />

day-to-day activity are unlikely to be a perfect fit; as<br />

with a diver in a cave, practicality and functionality<br />

in a specific situation are what really matter and to<br />

achieve that we work with clients to understand their<br />

operations. The world of cave diving is pretty far<br />

from the world of business compliance but maybe,<br />

just maybe we can take some lessons from it.<br />

101

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!