Semrock Master Catalog 2018

More documents

Recommendations

Info

StopLine ® Multi-notch Filters Polarizers Mirrors NIR Filters Edge Filters Dichroic Beamsplitters Laser-line Filters Laser Diode Filters Laser Wavelengths Semrock’s unique multi-notch filters meet or exceed even the most demanding requirements of our OEM customers. These include dual-, triple-, and even quadruple-notch filters for a variety of multilaser instruments. Applications include: Laser-based fluorescence instruments Confocal and multi-photon fluorescence microscopes Analytical and medical laser systems Laser-line Blocking Glass Thickness Housed Size (Diameter x Thickness) Part Number Price Dual-notch Filters 229 & 244 nm OD > 4 2.0 mm 25 mm x 3.5 mm NF01-229/244-25 $1045 488 & 647 nm OD > 6 3.5 mm 25 mm x 5.0 mm NF01-488/647-25x5.0 $1045 532 & 1064 nm OD > 6 2.0 mm 25 mm x 3.5 mm NF03-532/1064E-25 $945 Quadruple-notch Filters 400 − 410, 488, 532, & 631 − 640 nm OD > 6 2.0 mm 25 mm x 3.5 mm NF03-405/488/532/635E-25 $1045 400 − 410, 488, 561, & 631 − 640 nm OD > 6 2.0 mm 25 mm x 3.5 mm NF03-405/488/561/635E-25 $1045 Transmission (%) 100 80 60 40 20 NF03-532/1064E-25 Dual-notch Filter Our advanced manufacturing process allows for notch wavelengths that are not integer multiples of the other. For multi-notch common specifications, please see www.semrock.com for full details. ACTUAL MEASURED DATA FROM TYPICAL FILTERS IS SHOWN Transmission (%) 100 NF03-405/488/561/635E-25 Quad-notch Filter 80 60 40 20 Notch Filters 0 350 550 750 950 1150 1350 1600 Wavelength (nm) 0 350 550 750 950 1150 1350 1600 Wavelength (nm) For complete graphs, ASCII data, and the latest offerings, go to www.semrock.com. Lamp Clean-up Filters More 104
TECHNICAL NOTE Filter Spectra at Non-normal Angles of Incidence Many of the filters in this catalog (with the exception of dichroic beamsplitters, polarization, and the MaxMirror ® ) are optimized for use with light at or near normal incidence. However, for some applications it is desirable to understand how the spectral properties change for a non-zero angle of incidence (AOI). There are two main effects exhibited by the filter spectrum as the angle is increased from normal: 1. the features of the spectrum shift to shorter wavelengths; 2. two distinct spectra emerge – one for s-polarized light and one for p-polarized light. As an example, the graph at the right shows a series of spectra derived from a typical RazorEdge long-wave-pass (LWP) filter design. Because the designs are so similar for all of the RazorEdge filters designed for normal incidence, the set of curves in the graph can be applied approximately to any of the filters. Here the wavelength λ is compared to the wavelength λ 0 of a particular spectral feature (in this case the edge location) at normal incidence. As can be seen from the spectral curves, as the angle is increased from normal incidence the filter edge shifts toward shorter wavelengths and the edges associated with s- and p-polarized light shift by different amounts. For LWP filters, the edge associated with p-polarized light shifts more than the edge associated with s-polarized light, whereas for short-wave-pass (SWP) filters the opposite is true. Because of this polarization splitting, the spectrum for unpolarized light demonstrates a “shelf” near the 50% transmission point when the splitting significantly exceeds the edge steepness. However, the edge steepness for polarized light remains very high. The shift of almost any spectral feature can be approximately quantified by a simple model of the wavelength λ of the feature vs. angle of incidence θ, given by the equation: = where neff is called the effective index of refraction, and λ 0 is the wavelength of the spectral feature of interest at normal incidence. Different shifts that occur for different spectral features and different filters are described by a different effective index. For the RazorEdge example above, the shift of the 90% transmission point on the edge is described by this equation with n eff = 2.08 and 1.62 for s- and p-polarized light, respectively. Other types of filters don’t necessarily exhibit such a marked difference in the shift of features for s- and p-polarized light. For example, the middle graph shows a series of spectra derived from a typical MaxLine laser-line filter design curve. As the angle is increased from normal incidence, the center wavelength shifts toward shorter wavelengths and the bandwidth broadens slightly for p-polarized light while narrowing for s-polarized light. The center wavelength shifts are described by the above equation with n eff = 2.19 and 2.13 for s- and p-polarized light, respectively. The most striking feature is the decrease in transmission for s-polarized light, whereas the transmission remains quite high for p-polarized light. As another example, the graph at the right shows a series of spectra derived from a typical E-grade StopLine notch filter design curve. As the angle is increased from normal incidence, the notch center wavelength shifts to shorter wavelengths; however, the shift is greater for p-polarized light than it is for s-polarized light. The shift is described by the above equation with n eff = 1.71 and 1.86 for p- and s-polarized light, respectively. Further, whereas the notch depth and bandwidth both decrease as the angle of incidence is increased for p-polarized light, in contrast the notch depth and bandwidth increase for s-polarized light. Note that it is possible to optimize the design of a notch filter to have a very deep notch even at a 45° angle of incidence. Transmission (%) Transmission Optical Density (%) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 RazorEdge RazorEdge ® Design Spectra vs. AOI AOI 0 0.88 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1.00 1.02 1.04 1.06 1.08 Relative Wavelength (λ/λ 0 ) l(q) l 1 – (sinq/n 0 eff ) 2 0 100 1 90 80 0° 2 0° 70 10° 10° s s 10° 10° avg avg 360 10° 10° p 30° 30° s s 50 30° avg 4 30° avg 30° 40 30° p 45° 45° s 530 45° 45° avg avg 45° 45° p 20 6 10 7 0.88 0 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1.00 1.02 1.04 1.06 1.08 0.88 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1.00 1.02 1.04 1.06 1.08 Interested in seeing how a Semrock standard filter behaves at a particular angle of incidence, state of polarization or cone half angle of illumination? Simply click the button on the Semrock website. Click for MyLight Tool Optical Density 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MaxLine ® Design Spectra vs. AOI Relative Wavelength (λ/λ 00 )) 0° 10° s 10° avg 10° p 30° s 30° avg 30° p 45° s 45° avg 45° p StopLine StopLine ® E Grade ® E-grade Design Spectra vs. vs. AOI AOI 8 0.88 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1.00 1.02 1.04 1.06 1.08 Relative Wavelength (λ/λ 0 ) 0° 10° s 10° avg 10° p 30° s 30° avg 30° p 45° s 45° avg 45° p NIR Filters Mirrors Polarizers Edge Filters Dichroic Beamsplitters Laser-line Filters Laser Diode Filters Notch Filters Lamp Clean-up Filters 105 More
Page 1 and 2:
Semrock 2018 Master Catalog Everyth
Page 3 and 4:
Welcome to the 2018 Master Catalog
Page 5 and 6:
T T T T Laser & Optical System Filt
Page 7 and 8:
SearchLight Optimization Calculator
Page 9 and 10:
The Semrock Advantage Proven Reliab
Page 11 and 12:
BrightLine ® Single-band Sets When
Page 13 and 14:
BrightLine ® Single-band Sets for
Page 15 and 16:
BrightLine ® Multiband Sets for Po
Page 17 and 18:
BrightLine ® Single-band Sets Filt
Page 19 and 20:
TECHNICAL NOTE Ultraviolet (UV) Flu
Page 21 and 22:
BrightLine ® Single-band Sets for
Page 23 and 24:
Qdot ® Single-band Filter Sets Fil
Page 25 and 26:
BrightLine ® FRET Single-band Sets
Page 27 and 28:
BrightLine ® Basic TM Best-value S
Page 29 and 30:
(continued from previous page) Fluo
Page 31 and 32:
BrightLine ® Multiband LED Filter
Page 33 and 34:
BrightLine ® Multiband Fluorescenc
Page 35 and 36:
BrightLine ® Multiband Fluorescenc
Page 37 and 38:
Fluorescence Filter Cubes See onlin
Page 39 and 40:
BrightLine ® Laser Filter and Set
Page 41 and 42:
BrightLine ® Laser Fluorescence Mu
Page 43 and 44:
BrightLine ® Laser Fluorescence Fi
Page 45 and 46:
TECHNICAL NOTE Sputtered Thin-film
Page 47 and 48:
BrightLine ® Multiphoton LaserMUX
Page 49 and 50:
Multiphoton Filters Common Specific
Page 51 and 52:
BrightLine ® Single-band Bandpass
Page 53 and 54:
BrightLine ® Single-band Bandpass
Page 55 and 56: BrightLine ® Single-band Bandpass
Page 57 and 58: BrightLine ® Single-band Bandpass
Page 59 and 60: BrightLine ® Long / Short pass Sin
Page 61 and 62: BrightLine ® Multiband Bandpass Fi
Page 63 and 64: BrightLine ® Multiband Bandpass Fi
Page 65 and 66: BrightLine ® Single-edge Dichroic
Page 67 and 68: BrightLine ® Multiedge Dichroic Be
Page 69 and 70: BrightLine ® Dichroic Beamsplitter
Page 71 and 72: Single-band Sets Fluorophores (cont
Page 73 and 74: BrightLine ® Super-resolution / TI
Page 75 and 76: BrightLine ® Laser Multiedge Dichr
Page 77 and 78: LaserMUX TM Beam Combining Filters
Page 79 and 80: TECHNICAL NOTE Measurement of Optic
Page 81 and 82: VersaChrome ® Tunable Filters TECH
Page 83 and 84: VersaChrome ® Tunable Bandpass Fil
Page 85 and 86: VersaChrome Edge TM Tunable Filters
Page 87 and 88: Laser Wavelength Reference Table La
Page 89 and 90: Polarization Filters Common Specifi
Page 91 and 92: General Purpose Mirrors Semrock gen
Page 93 and 94: EdgeBasic TM Long / Short Wave Pass
Page 95 and 96: Edge Steepness and Transition Width
Page 97 and 98: RazorEdge ® Common Specifications
Page 99 and 100: Filter Types for Raman Spectroscopy
Page 101 and 102: MaxLine ® Laser-line Spectra and S
Page 103 and 104: Near Infrared Bandpass Filters Tran
Page 105: StopLine ® Single-notch Filter Com
Page 109 and 110: Working with Optical Density Optica
Page 111 and 112: LEARN MORE WITH OUR VIDEO COLLECTIO
Page 113 and 114: The Physics of Pixel Shift Pixel sh
Page 115 and 116: Get the Right Solution, Right Now W
show all

Semrock Master Catalog 2018

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?