18.06.2018 Views

Semrock Master Catalog 2018

Semrock Master Catalog 2018

Semrock Master Catalog 2018

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

BrightLine ® Fluorescence Filters<br />

Hard-coated Durability − The No Burn-out Promise<br />

Can be cleaned and handled, even with acetone<br />

Impervious to humidity, insensitive to temperature<br />

No soft coatings – no exceptions<br />

No Burn-out, No Periodic Replacement Needed<br />

Competitor<br />

Premium DAPI Exciter<br />

After < 300 hours<br />

Degraded!<br />

<strong>Semrock</strong><br />

DAPI Exciter<br />

After 1000 hours<br />

No Change!<br />

Stands up to intense xenon, mercury,<br />

metal halide, LED, and halogen light sources<br />

No adhesives in the optical path to darken,<br />

degrade, or autofluoresce<br />

Made with the same refractory materials as<br />

our high “laser damage threshold” laser optics<br />

Extremely dense, sputtered coatings do not<br />

absorb moisture and are insensitive to temperature<br />

Tests were performed to illustrate the resistance to optical damage of <strong>Semrock</strong>’s hard-coated filters as compared to that of a<br />

leading competitor’s soft-coated and absorbing glass filters. Continous irradiation from a conventional xenon arc lamp was used<br />

for the testing.<br />

The graph on the bottom left shows how a leading competitor’s DAPI exciter filter can become severely burned out even after<br />

only one day of exposure to 8 W/cm² of total intensity – here the transmission has dropped by 42%. By contrast, the <strong>Semrock</strong><br />

DAPI exciter is unchanged. Exposure of these two filters was continued with 1 W/cm² of total intensity (closely simulating the intensity<br />

seen by an exciter near the arc lamp source in a typical fluorescence microscope). The photographs above show that the competitor’s<br />

DAPI exciter failed catastrophically after 300 hours – both the large crack and burn-out degradation go all the way through the filter.<br />

The <strong>Semrock</strong> filter is again unchanged even after more than 1000 hours of exposure.<br />

The graph at bottom right shows that a leading competitor’s soft-coated filters for visible wavelengths also show significant<br />

degradation after optical exposure, even at the intensity levels typical of most fluorescence microscopes. The transmission of<br />

these filters drops, and the spectra shift in wavelength. As always, the <strong>Semrock</strong> hard-coated filter shows no change.<br />

Transmission (%)<br />

100<br />

<strong>Semrock</strong><br />

90 DAPI<br />

Exciter<br />

80<br />

Before<br />

70<br />

After 1 day<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

320 330 340 350 360 370 380 390 400 410 420<br />

Wavelength (nm)<br />

Competitor<br />

DAPI<br />

Exciter<br />

Transmission (%)<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

<strong>Semrock</strong><br />

FITC<br />

Exciter<br />

Competitor<br />

GFP<br />

Exciter<br />

Before<br />

After 5 days<br />

Competitor<br />

TexRed<br />

Exciter<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625<br />

Wavelength (nm)<br />

Transmission spectra of DAPI exciters before (blue) and after (red)<br />

exposure to 8 W/cm 2<br />

(over 15 mm diameter) for 1 day.<br />

Transmission spectra of soft-coated exciters (for GFP and Texas Red)<br />

compared to a <strong>Semrock</strong> hard-coated exciter (for FITC) before (blue)<br />

and after (red) exposure to 1 W/cm² (over 25 mm diameter) for 5 days.<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!