Environmental Site Assessment Guidelines - Ohio Department of ...
Environmental Site Assessment Guidelines - Ohio Department of ...
Environmental Site Assessment Guidelines - Ohio Department of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
D.<br />
E.<br />
F.<br />
Property Tax Files<br />
These files are maintained by the local jurisdiction where the property is located and<br />
may include records <strong>of</strong> past ownership, appraisals, maps, sketches, photos, or other<br />
information pertaining to the property.<br />
Building Permits<br />
The local government agency in charge <strong>of</strong> building permits maintains records <strong>of</strong><br />
buildings and/or demolition on the property.<br />
Local History<br />
Local historical groups <strong>of</strong>ten write the history <strong>of</strong> their area and <strong>of</strong>ten include local<br />
businesses, both past and present, in these histories.<br />
7.1.4.3 Regulatory Records Review<br />
The activities involved in this section include further research <strong>of</strong> a parcel's regulatory history.<br />
This research involves completing a regulatory agency file review for each Phase I ESA site<br />
identified in the regulatory database search and summarizing relevant information. For<br />
example, if a site was identified on a USEPA, OEPA, and/or BUSTR database during the ESA<br />
Screening, then a regulatory agency file review must be conducted. Any pertinent registration,<br />
closure, corrective action, engineering controls, institutional controls, covenants, and/or release<br />
notification information should be reviewed, summarized, and documented in the report.<br />
Typically, copies <strong>of</strong> the chain <strong>of</strong> custodies, lab data already presented in a data table, QA/QC<br />
reports, etc. should not be included. This information is particularly important for sites where<br />
the regulating agencies have determined that no further actions are required. These sites<br />
typically achieve this status through a site specific risk assessment. The risk assessment does<br />
not address the waste status for these materials and they <strong>of</strong>ten have deed restrictions which<br />
will effect the construction and/or ROW acquisition for the transportation project. The pertinent<br />
raw data from the file review shall be included in an appendix to the report. Examples <strong>of</strong> this<br />
raw data includes, but is not limited to: soil and groundwater analytical data (tables <strong>of</strong><br />
laboratory results will suffice in place <strong>of</strong> rather lengthy laboratory analytical printouts, as long as<br />
all the laboratory results from the printouts are in the tables), maps that depict the location(s) <strong>of</strong><br />
the UST(s), pump island(s), vent pipes, contamination, monitoring wells, soil borings, etc. This<br />
data should be included even if the site has received an NFA. Typically, copies <strong>of</strong> the chain <strong>of</strong><br />
custodies, lab data already presented in a data table, QA/QC reports, etc. should not be<br />
included. If a regulatory database review was not conducted during the ESA Screening process<br />
through either an environmental database search firm or through an ODOT GIS search, then<br />
32