14.12.2012 Views

Intensification Area Urban Design Guidelines - City of Barrie

Intensification Area Urban Design Guidelines - City of Barrie

Intensification Area Urban Design Guidelines - City of Barrie

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong><br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong><br />

<strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

prepared by:<br />

Brook McIlroy/<br />

October 2012<br />

DRAFT


DRAFT


Table <strong>of</strong> Contents<br />

i Executive Summary vii<br />

i. Study Overview i<br />

ii. Application <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Guidelines</strong> i<br />

iii. Existing Conditions iii<br />

iv. <strong>Intensification</strong> Vision iii<br />

v. <strong>Intensification</strong> Typologies iii<br />

vi. Mixed-Use and Residential Avenues iv<br />

vii. Mixed-Use Main Streets v<br />

viii. Established Neighbourhood Streets vi<br />

ix. <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes vii<br />

x. Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>s viii<br />

1.0 Introduction x<br />

1.1 Study Overview 1<br />

1.2 Study Process 1<br />

1.2.1 <strong>Intensification</strong> Typologies 2<br />

1.3 Application <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Guidelines</strong> 2<br />

1.4 Document Structure 3<br />

1.5 Existing Planning Framework 4<br />

2.0 Evolution <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s 6<br />

2.1 Introduction 8<br />

2.2 Existing Conditions 9<br />

2.2.1 Auto-Oriented Commercial Districts 11<br />

2.2.2 Corridor Residential Districts 13<br />

2.2.3 Core Districts 15<br />

2.2.4 <strong>City</strong>-Wide Issues 17<br />

2.3 Public and Stakeholder Consultation 18<br />

2.4 Vision and Guiding Principles 19<br />

2.4.1 Vision for the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s 19<br />

2.4.2 Priority Directions 20<br />

2.5 <strong>Intensification</strong> Typologies 21<br />

2.5.1 Mixed-Use and Residential Avenues 23<br />

2.5.2 Mixed-Use Main Streets 25<br />

DRAFT<br />

2.5.3 Established Neighbourhood Streets 27<br />

3.0 Public Realm <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> 30<br />

3.1 Natural Heritage Feature, Parks and Open Spaces 31<br />

3.1.1 Natural Heritage Features 32<br />

3.1.2 Parks and Open Spaces 33<br />

3.1.3 Semi-Private Open Spaces 34<br />

3.1.4 Multi-Use Trails 35<br />

3.2 Streets and Streetscapes 36<br />

3.2.1 Green Street <strong>Design</strong> 37<br />

3.2.2 Boulevard <strong>Design</strong> 39<br />

3.2.3 Crosswalks 41<br />

3.2.4 Street Furniture 42<br />

3.2.5 Public Art 43<br />

3.2.6 Signage 44<br />

3.2.7 Transit Amenities 45<br />

3.2.8 Lighting 46<br />

3.2.9 Utilities 47<br />

3.3 Parking 48<br />

3.3.1 On-Street Parking 49<br />

3.3.2 Bicycle Parking 50


Table <strong>of</strong> Contents Cont.<br />

4.0 Private Realm <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> 52<br />

4.1 Development <strong>of</strong> Large Parcels 53<br />

4.1.1 Community Structure 54<br />

4.1.2 Lot Size Variety 56<br />

4.1.3 Transit Supportive <strong>Design</strong> 57<br />

4.2 Access and Parking 58<br />

4.2.1 Surface Parking 59<br />

4.2.2 Structured Parking 61<br />

4.2.3 Lanes and Alleys 63<br />

4.2.4 Servicing and Loading 64<br />

4.3 General Building <strong>Guidelines</strong> 65<br />

4.3.1 Building Orientation and Site Layout 66<br />

4.3.2 Building Heights 67<br />

4.3.3 Minimum Ground Floor Height 68<br />

4.3.4 Front Façade Step-backs 69<br />

4.3.5 Side Building Set-backs 70<br />

4.3.6 Side Building Step-backs 71<br />

4.3.7 Transition to Neighbourhoods 72<br />

4.3.8 Building Articulation 72<br />

4.3.9 Ro<strong>of</strong>s and Ro<strong>of</strong>scapes 74<br />

4.3.10 Materials 75<br />

5.0 <strong>Area</strong>-Specific <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> 78<br />

5.1 Mixed-Use and Residential Avenue <strong>Guidelines</strong> 79<br />

5.1.1 Prominent Streets 80<br />

5.1.2 Boulevard <strong>Design</strong> 81<br />

5.1.3 Crosswalks 82<br />

5.1.4 Demonstration Plan: Bayfield Street (at Livingstone Street) 83<br />

5.1.5 Demonstration Plan: Bayfield Street (south <strong>of</strong> Highway 400) 85<br />

5.2 Mixed-Use Main Street <strong>Guidelines</strong> 87<br />

5.2.1 Pedestrian-Supportive Uses 88<br />

5.2.2 Parks and Open Spaces 88<br />

5.2.3 Boulevard <strong>Design</strong> 89<br />

5.2.4 Heritage Context Infill 90<br />

5.2.5 Demonstration Plan: Bradford Street (between John Street and Victoria Street) 93<br />

5.3 Established Residential Street <strong>Guidelines</strong> 95<br />

DRAFT<br />

5.3.1 Boulevard <strong>Design</strong> 96<br />

5.3.2 New Residential Buildings 96<br />

5.3.3 Demonstration Plan: Duckworth Street (at Grove Street) 97<br />

5.4 <strong>Intensification</strong> Node <strong>Guidelines</strong> 99<br />

5.5 Gateway <strong>Area</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> 101<br />

5.6 Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> 103<br />

5.7 Historic Allandale Neighbourhood <strong>Guidelines</strong> 107<br />

5.8 Lakeshore Drive 109<br />

6.0 Implementation Recommendations 112<br />

6.1 Overview 113<br />

6.1.1 Policy and Zoning Amendments 114<br />

6.1.2 Education Programs 118<br />

6.1.3 Implementation, Monitoring and Updating Processes 118


List <strong>of</strong> Figures<br />

Figure 1: <strong>Intensification</strong> Typologies ii<br />

Figure 2: Mixed-Use and Residential Avenue Rendering iv<br />

Figure 3: Mixed-Use Main Street Rendering v<br />

Figure 4: Established Neighbourhood Streets Rendering vi<br />

Figure 5: <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes Rendering vii<br />

Figure 6: Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong> Rendering viii<br />

Figure 7: Schedule I: <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s 7<br />

Figure 8: Existing typologies within<br />

the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s 10<br />

Figure 9: Existing Auto-Oriented<br />

Commercial Districts within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s 12<br />

Figure 10: Existing Corridor Residential<br />

Districts within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s 14<br />

Figure 11: Existing Core Districts within<br />

the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s 16<br />

Figure 12: <strong>Barrie</strong> Transit Network 17<br />

Figure 13: Large-Format Retail (Surface Parking <strong>Area</strong>s) 17<br />

Figure 14: <strong>Intensification</strong> Typologies 22<br />

Figure 15: <strong>Intensification</strong> Typologies<br />

(Mixed-Use and Residential Avenues) 24<br />

Figure 16: <strong>Intensification</strong> Typologies (Mixed-Use<br />

Main Streets) 26<br />

Figure 17: <strong>Intensification</strong> Typologies (Established<br />

Residential Streets) 28<br />

Figure 18: Neighbourhood Park Demonstration Site 33<br />

Figure 19: Green Street Rendering 37<br />

Figure 20: Boulevard Components 39<br />

Figure 21: Boulevard Rendering 40<br />

Figure 22: Mid-Block Connections 54<br />

Figure 23: Street Network Structure 55<br />

Figure 24: Lot Size Variety 56<br />

Figure 25: Parking Courts 60<br />

Figure 26: Evolution <strong>of</strong> Structured Parking 62<br />

Figure 27: Rear Transition to Neighbourhoods 63<br />

Figure 28: Mechanical Penthouse Placement 63<br />

Figure 29: Building Location at Street Edge 66<br />

Figure 30: Maximum Building Heights 67<br />

Figure 31: Maximum Ground Floor Height 68<br />

Appendices<br />

Appendix A: Existing Policy Framework<br />

Appendix B: <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> Glossary<br />

Appendix C: <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> Checklist<br />

Figure 32: Front Façade Step-backs 69<br />

Figure 33: Side Building Step-backs 70<br />

Figure 34: Side Building Step-backs 71<br />

Figure 35: Tall Street Wall 71<br />

Figure 36: Porous Street Wall 71<br />

Figure 37: Transition to Neighbourhoods 72<br />

Figure 38: Sample Building Articulation 73<br />

Figure 39: Mechanical Penthouse Placement 74<br />

Figure 40: Mixed-Use and Residential<br />

Avenue Rendering 79<br />

Figure 41: Prominent Street Rendering 80<br />

Figure 42: Boulevard Widths 81<br />

Figure 43: Bayfield Street (at Livingstone Street)<br />

Demonstration Plan - Axonometric View 83<br />

Figure 44: Bayfield Street (at Livingstone Street)<br />

Demonstration Plan - Plan View 84<br />

Figure 45: Bayfield Street (South <strong>of</strong> Highway 400)<br />

Demonstration Plan - Axonometric View 85<br />

Figure 46: Bayfield Street (South <strong>of</strong> Highway 400)<br />

Demonstration Plan - Plan View 86<br />

Figure 47: Mixed-Use Main Street Rendering 87<br />

Figure 48: Parks and Open Space Demonstration Site 88<br />

Figure 49: Heritage Infill Set-back 90<br />

Figure 50: Heritage Streetwall 91<br />

Figure 51: Bradford Street Demonstration<br />

Plan - Axonometric View 93<br />

Figure 52: Bradford Street Demonstration<br />

Plan - Plan View 94<br />

Figure 53: Established Residential Street Rendering 95<br />

Figure 54: Duckworth Street Demonstration<br />

Plan - Axonometric View 97<br />

Figure 55: Duckworth Street Demonstration<br />

Plan - Plan View 98<br />

Figure 56: <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes Rendering 99<br />

Figure 57: <strong>City</strong> Gateway Rendering 101<br />

Figure 58: Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong> Rendering 103<br />

Figure 59: Sample Station <strong>Area</strong> Rendering 1 105<br />

Figure 60: Sample Station <strong>Area</strong> Rendering 2 106<br />

DRAFT


DRAFT


DRAFT<br />

vii<br />

i<br />

Executive Summary<br />

The <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> provide a vision, a<br />

set <strong>of</strong> priority directions, and detailed design guidelines, to direct new development<br />

within the <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes and Corridors, <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, and Major<br />

Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>s identified in the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> Official Plan.


i <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

i. Study Overview<br />

These urban design guidelines direct new development<br />

within the <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes and Corridors, <strong>Urban</strong> Growth<br />

Centre, and Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>s identified in the <strong>City</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> Official Plan. The guidelines present a vision, and a<br />

set <strong>of</strong> priority directions, to ensure that new development is<br />

compatible with the existing built fabric, creates an attractive<br />

and safe pedestrian realm, supports alternative modes<br />

<strong>of</strong> transportation (i.e. walking, cycling and transit), and is<br />

environmentally sustainable.<br />

To implement the recommendations <strong>of</strong> these guidelines,<br />

policy and zoning amendments will be required, including:<br />

• As-<strong>of</strong>-Right Zoning;<br />

• Set Maximum Allowable Heights at 8-Storeys;<br />

• Increase Allowable Heights at Key Opportunity Sites;<br />

• Require a Minimum Building Height <strong>of</strong> 2 to 3-Storeys;<br />

• Incorporate Built Form Criteria to Regulate Building Mass;<br />

• Require a Minimum Ground Floor Height <strong>of</strong> 4.5 Metres and<br />

Active Ground Floor Uses in the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s;<br />

• Secure a Minimum Building Set-back to Ensure a 4.8<br />

metre Boulevard; and,<br />

• Prohibit Drive-Through Uses within the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth<br />

Centre.<br />

In addition, tools provided through the Planning Act should be<br />

applied, including:<br />

• Establishing Minimum and Maximum Standards in the<br />

Zoning By-Law;<br />

• Height and Density Bonusing;<br />

• Cash in Lieu <strong>of</strong> Parking;<br />

• Cash in Lieu <strong>of</strong> Parkland;<br />

• Site Plan Controls (with exterior design controls or not);<br />

• Development Permit System; and,<br />

• Community Improvement Plans.<br />

ii. Application <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

This document is intended to assist <strong>City</strong> Planning Staff, land<br />

owners, developers and the public with clear tools to guide<br />

intensification on private land, as well as public infrastructure,<br />

such as utilities, pump houses, hydro substations, fire halls,<br />

arenas, and other public buildings and structures.<br />

The guidelines apply to development applications that are<br />

submitted following the adoption <strong>of</strong> the guidelines. Where<br />

applications are in process at the time the guidelines are<br />

adopted, the <strong>City</strong> should work with the developer to determine<br />

if the directions <strong>of</strong> the guidelines can be met.<br />

Those using the guidelines should locate their site within the<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> Typologies outlined on the following page, and<br />

refer to the respective section <strong>of</strong> the document. In addition,<br />

general Public Realm <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> and Private<br />

Realm <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> are provided. These guidelines<br />

apply to all projects within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s.<br />

Developments within the <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes are guided by<br />

the <strong>Intensification</strong> Typology in which they are located, as well<br />

as the additional guidelines provided in Section 5.4.<br />

It is the responsibility <strong>of</strong> the user to reference all sections that<br />

are relevant to their application.<br />

DRAFT


Miller Dr.<br />

Livingstone St. W.<br />

Figure 1: <strong>Intensification</strong> Typologies<br />

Cundles Rd. W.<br />

DUNLOP STREET<br />

Anne St. S.<br />

ESSA ROAD<br />

BAYFIELD STREET<br />

DUCKWORTH STREET<br />

Grove St. E.<br />

KEMPENFELT BAY<br />

Little Ave.<br />

YONGE STREET<br />

DRAFT<br />

Big Bay Point Rd.<br />

Mapleview Dr. E.<br />

Mixed-Use & Residential Avenues<br />

Mixed-Use Main Streets<br />

Established Residential Streets<br />

Lakeshore Drive & Waterfront<br />

Allandale Neighbourhood<br />

Primary Node<br />

Secondary Node<br />

Major Transit Station<br />

0m 500m 1km<br />

2km<br />

ii


iii <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

iii. Existing Conditions<br />

Three common types <strong>of</strong> development exist within the<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, including:<br />

• Auto-Oriented Commercial Districts, including Bayfield<br />

Street (north <strong>of</strong> Highway 400), Dunlop Street (at Miller<br />

Drive), Essa Road (at Mapleview Drive), and Yonge Street<br />

(at Little Avenue).<br />

• Core Districts, including Collier Street, and Dunlop Street<br />

East.<br />

• Corridor Residential Districts, including Duckworth Street<br />

(south <strong>of</strong> Grove Street), Essa Road, and Dunlop Street<br />

(east <strong>of</strong> Anne Street).<br />

iv. <strong>Intensification</strong> Vision<br />

Building on the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> <strong>Intensification</strong> Strategy (2009),<br />

and in consultation with the community, the following<br />

describes the vision/goal for the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s:<br />

“New development and revitalization within the <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

<strong>Area</strong>s will result in active, pedestrian-supportive streets that are<br />

compatible with, and enhance, adjacent land uses. Mixed-Use and<br />

Residential Avenues, Mixed-Use Main Streets and Established<br />

Neighbourhood Streets will be characterized by wide boulevards,<br />

abundant landscaping, large, mature street trees, public art, and<br />

active at-grade uses.”<br />

v. <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

Typologies<br />

As intensification occurs, these Auto-Oriented Commercial<br />

Districts, Core Districts, and Corridor Residential Districts<br />

should evolve to reflect higher density, more urban conditions,<br />

defined as:<br />

• Mixed-Use and Residential Avenues<br />

• Mixed-Use Main Streets<br />

DRAFT<br />

• Established Neighbourhood Streets<br />

Together, these typologies comprise the <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes<br />

and Corridors, the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, and the Major Transit<br />

Station <strong>Area</strong>s as identified in the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> Official Plan.


vi. Mixed-Use and<br />

Residential Avenues<br />

The majority <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Intensification</strong> Corridors (and the Primary<br />

and Secondary <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes located along them)<br />

should evolve into Mixed-Use and Residential Avenues,<br />

including Duckworth Street (north <strong>of</strong> Grove Street), Bayfield<br />

Street, Dunlop Street, Essa Road, and Yonge Street. Please<br />

refer to the Demonstration Sites on page 84 and 86.<br />

Key opportunities include:<br />

• Redevelopment <strong>of</strong> underutilized parcels for streetoriented<br />

mixed-use development in low to mid-rise<br />

buildings.<br />

• Subdivision <strong>of</strong> large blocks into smaller, walkable blocks<br />

through walkways, drive-aisles, and where feasible, new<br />

roads.<br />

• Opportunities to redefine the existing street and boulevard<br />

within the right-<strong>of</strong>-way.<br />

Key recommendations include:<br />

• In the short-term, redevelopment should be focused at<br />

the <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes.<br />

• Ultimately, the <strong>Intensification</strong> Corridors should transition<br />

to major transportation streets, balancing functional<br />

requirements with the provision <strong>of</strong> an active, pedestriansupportive<br />

streetscape.<br />

• Human-scaled, mixed-use buildings should line the street,<br />

providing “eyes on the street,” and enhancing safety and<br />

activity at all hours.<br />

• Wide boulevards should accommodate street trees,<br />

landscaping, continuous sidewalks, seating, signage and<br />

public art.<br />

• Spill-out retail uses at grade (i.e. restaurants, cafes), and<br />

open spaces (i.e. small parks/plazas on infill sites, or<br />

within the building set-back), will <strong>of</strong>fer opportunities for<br />

pedestrians to gather and socialize.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Figure 2: Mixed-Use and Residential Avenue Rendering<br />

The Mixed-Use and Residential Avenues should evolve into street-oriented, mixed-use development at a low to mid-rise scale.<br />

iv


v <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

vii. Mixed-Use Main<br />

Streets<br />

Generally, streets within the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre (with the<br />

exception <strong>of</strong> the Historic Allandale Neighbourhood) should<br />

evolve into Mixed-Use Main Streets, including Dunlop Street,<br />

Bradford Street, Toronto Street, Collier Street, etc. Please<br />

refer to the Demonstration Sites on page 94.<br />

Key opportunities include:<br />

• Additions and renovations to existing buildings.<br />

• Redevelopment <strong>of</strong> vacant or underutilized sites (i.e.<br />

single-storey buildings).<br />

• Development <strong>of</strong> vacant parcels.<br />

Key Recommendations include:<br />

• <strong>Intensification</strong> should be compatible with the existing<br />

heritage fabric (i.e. Dunlop Street) with respect to building<br />

height, scale, façade design and key architectural<br />

characteristics.<br />

• Mixed-Use Main Streets should maintain a tight-knit grid<br />

<strong>of</strong> streets and blocks, and a consistent streetwall height<br />

that reflects the scale and heritage character <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Downtown<br />

• Mixed-use buildings, with retail at grade and residential<br />

and <strong>of</strong>fice above, will allow residents to live, work and<br />

recreate within the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, creating “eyes<br />

on the street,” and enhancing safety and activity at all<br />

hours.<br />

• Wide boulevards should accommodate street trees,<br />

landscaping, continuous sidewalks, seating, signage and<br />

public art.<br />

• New civic open spaces (where possible), and<br />

enhancements to existing open spaces, are encouraged<br />

to provide opportunities for pedestrian to gather and<br />

socialize.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Figure 3: Mixed-Use Main Street Rendering<br />

Mixed-use Main Streets should encourage human-scaled, mixed-use buildings that are compatible with adjacent existing buildings.


viii. Established<br />

Neighbourhood Streets<br />

Portions <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Intensification</strong> Corridors, including Duckworth<br />

Street (south <strong>of</strong> Grove Street) and Dunlop Street (east <strong>of</strong><br />

Anne Street), are currently well established residential<br />

neighbourhoods. With the exception <strong>of</strong> the conversion <strong>of</strong><br />

dwellings, there is limited potential for intensification on<br />

Established Neighbourhood Streets. Please refer to the<br />

Demonstration Sites on page 96.<br />

Key opportunities include:<br />

• On larger-scale sites, opportunities may exist for the<br />

incorporation <strong>of</strong> higher density residential buildings in<br />

low to mid-rise building forms (i.e. townhouses and walkup<br />

apartments), and potentially mixed-use buildings with<br />

convenience retail at grade.<br />

• The creation <strong>of</strong> walkable, complete neighbourhoods<br />

through intensification that can support associated retail<br />

and community uses.<br />

Key recommendations include:<br />

• As intensification occurs, these areas should incorporate<br />

buildings that are compatible with, and transition to,<br />

adjacent stable residential neighbourhhoods.<br />

• Building heights that ensure compatible built form<br />

transitions to adjacent neighbourhoods.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Figure 4: Established Neighbourhood Streets Rendering<br />

Where opportunities for intensification exist on Established Residential Streets, higher-density housing forms (i.e. townhouses and walk-up apartments)<br />

are encouraged with appropriate transitions to adjacent residential neighbourhoods.<br />

vi


vii <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

ix. <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes<br />

Within the <strong>Intensification</strong> Corridors are a series <strong>of</strong> Primary and<br />

Secondary <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes located at the intersection<br />

<strong>of</strong> major transportation corridors, including:<br />

Primary Nodes - Dunlop Street (at Anne Street), Yonge Street<br />

(at Little Avenue, Big Bay Point Road and Mapleview Drive),<br />

and Duckworth Street (at Grove Street).<br />

Secondary Nodes - Bayfield Street (at Grove Street, Cundles<br />

Road, and Livingstone Street), and Dunlop Street (at Miller<br />

Drive).<br />

Key opportunities include:<br />

• The creation <strong>of</strong> key destinations along the <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

Corridors.<br />

• Promoting arrival into the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> through<br />

appropriate gateway design.<br />

• Linking the key destinations within the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong>,<br />

including the <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes, the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth<br />

Centre, and the lakefront.<br />

Key recommendations include:<br />

• Focus the short-term redevelopment <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

Corridors on the <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes to spur development<br />

on the remainder <strong>of</strong> the corridor.<br />

• Create attractive gateways, characterized by landmark<br />

buildings, and wide pedestrian-supportive boulevards,<br />

signifying arrival to the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong>.<br />

• Locate the highest densities along the <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

Corridors, through a mix <strong>of</strong> land uses.<br />

• Where appropriate, encourage taller buildings (at a 1:1<br />

ratio with the right-<strong>of</strong>-way width) at <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes<br />

to indicate the prominence <strong>of</strong> these sites.<br />

• Support <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes as centres <strong>of</strong> information,<br />

including wayfinding signage that promotes key locations<br />

throughout the <strong>City</strong> (i.e. the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, the<br />

waterfront, and key parks and open spaces), temporary<br />

advertising (i.e. banners) for <strong>City</strong> events, etc.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Figure 5: <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes Rendering<br />

At the <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes, new development should follow the recommendations <strong>of</strong> their respective <strong>Intensification</strong> Typologies, with taller, landmark<br />

buildings at the corners.


x. Major Transit Station<br />

<strong>Area</strong>s<br />

Within the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong>, there are three Major Transit Station<br />

<strong>Area</strong>s, including one on an <strong>Intensification</strong> Corridor (South<br />

<strong>Barrie</strong> GO Station) and two within the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre<br />

(the Downtown Transit Terminal, and the Allandale Waterfront<br />

GO Station).<br />

Key opportunities include:<br />

• Increased densities concentrated within a ten-minute<br />

(500 metre) walking distance <strong>of</strong> Major Transit Station<br />

<strong>Area</strong>s will help to support a viable transit network, and<br />

promote walking, cycling and transit.<br />

Key recommendations include:<br />

• As intensification occurs at or around the Major Transit<br />

Station <strong>Area</strong>s, they should generally evolve to reflect a<br />

Mixed-Use and Residential Avenue, or a Mixed-Use Main<br />

Street, depending on the <strong>Intensification</strong> Typology in which<br />

they are located.<br />

• A mix <strong>of</strong> residential, employment and retail uses are<br />

encouraged near the station rather than dispersed,<br />

segregated uses.<br />

• Auto dependent uses should be discouraged within Major<br />

Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>s, such as drive through retail and car<br />

wash facilities.<br />

• Bus shelters, sidewalk canopies and bicycle parking is<br />

particularly important at Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>s to<br />

support active transportation.<br />

• Transit facilities should be located at public places such<br />

as community centres, parks and public open spaces,<br />

schools, and community facilities such as a library or<br />

gallery.<br />

• Trails and bicycle routes should link to transit facilities.<br />

Secure bicycle parking and storage space should also be<br />

provided where appropriate.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Figure 6: Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong> Rendering<br />

At Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>s, new development should follow the recommendations <strong>of</strong> their respective <strong>Intensification</strong> Typologies, with transit amenities<br />

integrated into a well established urban fabric.<br />

viii


DRAFT


DRAFT<br />

1.0<br />

Introduction<br />

The <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> will ensure that new<br />

development is compatible with the existing built fabric, creates an attractive and safe<br />

pedestrian realm, supports alternative modes <strong>of</strong> transportation, and is environmentally<br />

sustainable.


1 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

1.1 Study Overview<br />

Places to Grow: The Growth Plan for the Greater Golden<br />

Horseshoe (2006) directs all new growth in the Province to<br />

key <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, including <strong>Intensification</strong> Corridors,<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centres, and Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>s. The<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> and Brook McIlroy have prepared these urban<br />

design guidelines to help direct new development within the<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s identified in the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> Official<br />

Plan. The guidelines present a vision for the <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

<strong>Area</strong>s, and a set <strong>of</strong> priority directions, to ensure that new<br />

development is compatible with the existing built fabric,<br />

creates an attractive and safe pedestrian realm, supports<br />

alternative modes <strong>of</strong> transportation (i.e. walking, cycling and<br />

transit), and is environmentally sustainable.<br />

This initiative is an important step towards achieving the<br />

Province and the <strong>City</strong>’s long-term vision for high quality growth.<br />

To implement the recommendations <strong>of</strong> these guidelines,<br />

policy and zoning amendments will be required, and tools<br />

provided through the Planning Act should be applied (please<br />

refer to Section 6).<br />

1.2 Study Process<br />

Recognizing the common characteristics between the<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, a typology was developed to distinguish<br />

between the three predominant types <strong>of</strong> built form, including:<br />

• Auto-Oriented Commercial Districts, such as Bayfield<br />

Street (north <strong>of</strong> Highway 400), Dunlop Street (at Miller<br />

Drive), Essa Road (at Mapleview Drive), and Yonge Street<br />

(at Little Avenue).<br />

• Core Districts, such as Collier Street, and Dunlop Street<br />

East).<br />

• Corridor Residential Districts, such as Duckworth Street<br />

(south <strong>of</strong> Grove Street), Essa Road, and Dunlop Street<br />

(east <strong>of</strong> Anne Street).<br />

Please refer to Section 2.2 for a detailed description <strong>of</strong> the existing<br />

conditions that define each <strong>of</strong> these typologies.<br />

DRAFT


1.2.1 <strong>Intensification</strong> Typologies<br />

Each <strong>of</strong> these <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s was examined in<br />

detail, through site visits and consultation with the <strong>City</strong>,<br />

local stakeholders, and the community, to examine their<br />

characteristics and role in the urban structure and to<br />

identify opportunities for intensification and urbanization.<br />

As intensification occurs, the Auto-Oriented Commercial<br />

Districts, Core Districts, and Corridor Residential Districts<br />

should evolve into more pedestrian-supportive streets and<br />

blocks, described throughout this document as:<br />

• Mixed-Use and Residential Avenues, including Bayfield<br />

Street, Dunlop Street, Essa Road, and Yonge Street.<br />

• Mixed-Use Main Streets, including streets within the<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre.<br />

• Established Residential Streets, including Duckworth<br />

Street, Dunlop Street (east <strong>of</strong> Highway 400), and the<br />

historic Allandale neighbourhood.<br />

Together, these typologies comprise the <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes<br />

and Corridors, the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, and the Major Transit<br />

Station <strong>Area</strong>s as identified in the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> Official Plan.<br />

Demonstration sites were prepared based on best practices<br />

to show how intensification could occur on existing sites in<br />

each <strong>of</strong> these typologies.<br />

1.3 Application <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

The recommendations <strong>of</strong> this study apply to the <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

<strong>Area</strong>s outlined in the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> Official Plan, including the<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, <strong>Intensification</strong> Corridors, and Major<br />

Transit Stations <strong>Area</strong>s. The document is intended to assist<br />

<strong>City</strong> Planning Staff, land owners, developers and the public<br />

with clear tools to guide intensification on private land, as well<br />

as public infrastructure, such as utilities, pump houses, hydro<br />

substations, fire halls, arenas, and other public buildings and<br />

structures.<br />

The guidelines apply to development applications that are<br />

submitted following the adoption <strong>of</strong> the guidelines. Where<br />

applications are in process at the time the guidelines are<br />

adopted, the <strong>City</strong> should work with the developer to determine<br />

if the directions <strong>of</strong> the guidelines can be met.<br />

Those using the guidelines should locate their site within the<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> Typologies outlined on Page 22, and refer to<br />

the respective section <strong>of</strong> the document. In addition, general<br />

Public Realm <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> and Private Realm<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> are provided. These guidelines<br />

apply to all projects within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s.<br />

Developments within the <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes are guided by<br />

the <strong>Intensification</strong> Typology in which they are located, as well<br />

as the additional guidelines provided in Section 5.4.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Users should reference all sections that are relevant to their<br />

application.<br />

2


3 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

The guidelines outlined in this document may be implemented<br />

through future revisions to the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> Official Plan<br />

and Zoning By-laws, as well as action items, that can be<br />

implemented pending further study.<br />

The design guidelines should not be so prescriptive as<br />

to preclude excellent design and development options<br />

consistent with the directions <strong>of</strong> the guidelines. As the<br />

recommendations become common practice, they should<br />

evolve. It is recommended that the guidelines be reviewed,<br />

and amended as necessary, every five years.<br />

The illustrative examples shown throughout the document<br />

demonstrate one example <strong>of</strong> how the guidelines can be<br />

applied, and are not intended to exclude other standards that<br />

meet the intent <strong>of</strong> the guidelines.<br />

1.4 Document Structure<br />

The <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong><br />

<strong>Guidelines</strong> are divided into six sections.<br />

Section One: Introduction – Provides an introduction to<br />

the design guidelines, including an overview <strong>of</strong> the study<br />

and process, and the application <strong>of</strong> the guidelines. Also<br />

includes a brief summary <strong>of</strong> the existing planning framework<br />

and supporting documents that govern development and<br />

intensification within the Province and the <strong>City</strong> (i.e. the<br />

Planning Act, the Growth Plan, the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> Official Plan).<br />

Section Two: Evolution <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s –<br />

Describes the evolution <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, including<br />

a brief description <strong>of</strong> the existing conditions, including<br />

their general characteristics and key issues; the priority<br />

directions from the community consultation; and, the vision<br />

for the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, including the key intensification<br />

typologies.<br />

DRAFT


Section Three: Public Realm <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> –<br />

Provides design guidelines that are applicable to development<br />

within the public realm, including natural heritage features,<br />

parks and open spaces, streets and streetscapes, pedestrian<br />

and bicycle circulation, and parking.<br />

Section Four: Private Realm <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> –<br />

Provides guidelines that are applicable to development within<br />

the private realm, including the development <strong>of</strong> large parcels,<br />

access and parking, and general building guidelines.<br />

Section Five: <strong>Area</strong> Specific <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> –<br />

Provides guidelines that are specific to the intensification<br />

typologies, as well as other unique areas, including Major<br />

Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>s, the historic Allandale Neighbourhood,<br />

and Lakeshore Drive.<br />

Section Six: Implementation Recommendations – Provides<br />

recommendations for a variety <strong>of</strong> implementation strategies<br />

to assist in the adoption <strong>of</strong> these guidelines.<br />

1.5 Existing Planning<br />

Framework<br />

The planning framework that guides development and<br />

intensification within the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> and the <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

<strong>Area</strong>s consists <strong>of</strong> policy documents and supporting<br />

guiding documents. Broadly, this framework encourages<br />

intensification within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, providing it<br />

is compatible with existing development. The documents<br />

reviewed as part <strong>of</strong> this study include:<br />

Policy Documents:<br />

• Provincial Policy Statement (2005)<br />

• Places to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden<br />

Horseshoe (2006)<br />

• Lake Simcoe Protection Plan (2009)<br />

• The <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> Official Plan (2009)<br />

• <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> Comprehensive Zoning Bylaw (2009)<br />

Supporting Documents:<br />

• Downtown <strong>Barrie</strong>: The Next Wave (2004)<br />

• <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> Downtown Commercial Master Plan (2006)<br />

• <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> <strong>Intensification</strong> Study (2009)<br />

• Historic Neighbourhoods Strategy (2010)<br />

Please refer to the appendix for a detailed summary <strong>of</strong> the<br />

above-mentioned documents, including their relationship to<br />

the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, and their general recommendations<br />

regarding intensification.<br />

DRAFT<br />

4


DRAFT


2.0<br />

Evolution <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s<br />

DRAFT<br />

A variety <strong>of</strong> typologies exist within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, including Auto-Oriented<br />

Commercial Districts, Corridor Residential Districts, and Core Districts. Through<br />

intensification, these areas will evolve into active, pedestrian-supportive Mixed-Use<br />

and Residential Avenues, Mixed-Use Main Streets and Established Residential Streets.


7 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

Figure 7: Schedule I: <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s<br />

Source: <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> Official Plan (April, 2010)<br />

DRAFT<br />

Note: This Major Transit<br />

Node does not include<br />

lands within the “Annexed<br />

area” south <strong>of</strong> Mapleview<br />

Drive.


2.1 Introduction<br />

The <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> Official Plan identifies key <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

<strong>Area</strong>s, including:<br />

• The <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre – Generally bounded by Berczy<br />

Street and Kempenfelt Bay in the east, Codrington Street<br />

and Sophia Street to the north, Bradford Street to the<br />

west, and Burton Avenue to the south.<br />

• Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>s – Includes the South <strong>Barrie</strong> GO<br />

Station, the Downtown Transit Terminal, and the Allandale<br />

Waterfront GO Station.<br />

• <strong>Intensification</strong> Corridors – Includes Duckworth Street,<br />

Bayfield Street, Dunlop Street, Essa Road and Yonge<br />

Street. Key intersecting streets within these corridors<br />

are classified as Primary and Secondary <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

Nodes.<br />

Within these <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, a variety <strong>of</strong> conditions<br />

exist. For instance, the main street character <strong>of</strong> Collier<br />

Street and Dunlop Street in the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre differs<br />

significantly from the large format retail uses on Bayfield<br />

Street, and again from the existing stable residential uses on<br />

Duckworth Street. However, there are a number <strong>of</strong> conditions<br />

that occur regularly throughout the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s. The<br />

following typologies outline the three predominant types <strong>of</strong><br />

development within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s (please refer to<br />

the Map on Page 10):<br />

• Auto-Oriented Commercial Districts, such as Bayfield<br />

Street (north <strong>of</strong> Highway 400, including the Secondary<br />

Nodes at Cundles Road and Livingstone Street), Dunlop<br />

Street (at and between the Secondary Node at Miller<br />

Drive and the Primary Node at Anne Street), Essa Road<br />

(at Mapleview Drive), Yonge Street (including the Primary<br />

Nodes at Little Avenue and Big Bay Point Road), and the<br />

Primary Node at Duckworth Street and Grove Street.<br />

• Core Districts, such as Collier Street, Dunlop Street East,<br />

and the <strong>Barrie</strong> Bus Terminal.<br />

• Corridor Residential Districts, such as Duckworth Street<br />

(south <strong>of</strong> Grove Street), Essa Road, and Dunlop Street<br />

(east <strong>of</strong> Anne Street).<br />

Each <strong>of</strong> these typologies have unique opportunities for<br />

intensification, including vacant or underutilized properties,<br />

compatible infill, and additions and renovations to existing<br />

buildings. As these areas evolve, they should intensify to<br />

reflect a new, more urban form <strong>of</strong> development, characterized<br />

by the following typologies:<br />

• Mixed-Use and Residential Avenues, including Bayfield<br />

Street, Dunlop Street, Essa Road, and Yonge Street.<br />

• Mixed-Use Main Streets, including streets within the<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre.<br />

DRAFT<br />

• Established Residential Streets, including Duckworth<br />

Street, Dunlop Street (east <strong>of</strong> Highway 400), and the<br />

historic Allandale neighbourhood.<br />

The sections that follow will outline the evolution <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Urban</strong><br />

Growth Centre, the <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes and Corridors, and<br />

the Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>s, describing their existing<br />

conditions and opportunities for intensification.<br />

8


9 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

2.2 Existing Conditions<br />

The <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> is located on the western edge <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Kempenfelt Bay with it’s historic Downtown at the edge <strong>of</strong><br />

the waterfront. Narrow streets and small blocks characterize<br />

the Downtown, and have significant opportunities for<br />

redevelopment on vacant and underutilized land.<br />

Five major Arterial Roads radiate out from the Bay, and lead<br />

into the <strong>City</strong>. They are: Duckworth Street, Bayfield Street,<br />

Dunlop Street, Essa Road, and Yonge Street. The existing<br />

conditions on these streets include large-format commercial,<br />

smaller commercial retail units, mixed-use main streets, and<br />

stable residential areas.<br />

Each <strong>of</strong> these areas will be described in greater detail in the<br />

following sections as Auto-Oriented Commercial Districts,<br />

Corridor Residential Districts, and Core Districts.<br />

The following typologies focus on lands with the greatest<br />

development potential and exclude natural heritage features (i.e.<br />

woodlots) and stable, low-rise residential areas.<br />

<strong>Barrie</strong> from above looking south.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Photo By: Alex Von Bredow


Figure 8: Existing typologies within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s<br />

DUNLOP STREET<br />

DUNLOP STREET<br />

BAYFIELD BAYFIELD STREET STREET<br />

ESSA ROAD<br />

Auto-oriented Commercial Auto-oriented Districts Commercial Districts Corridor Residential Corridor Districts Residential Districts Cone District Cone District<br />

Major Transit Stations Major Transit Stations<br />

BAYFIELD BAYFIELD STREET STREET<br />

ESSA ROAD<br />

DUCKWORTH STREET<br />

DUCKWORTH STREET<br />

KEMPENFELT KEMPENFELT BAY BAY<br />

YONGE STREET<br />

Secondary Nodes Secondary Nodes<br />

YONGE STREET<br />

DRAFT<br />

Major Transit Stations Major Transit Stations<br />

10


11 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

2.2.1 Auto-Oriented Commercial Districts<br />

The <strong>Intensification</strong> Corridors (including the <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

Nodes) can predominantly be described as Auto-Oriented<br />

Commercial Districts. This includes sections <strong>of</strong> Bayfield<br />

Street, Dunlop Street, Essa Road, and Yonge Street. In<br />

addition, streets within the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, including<br />

Bradford Street and streets adjacent to Major Transit Station<br />

<strong>Area</strong>s, are also Auto-Oriented Commercial Districts.<br />

Bayfield Street, Dunlop Street, Essa Road and Yonge Street<br />

are all wide major Arterial Roads and key transportation<br />

routes between the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, Highway 400, and<br />

the Annexed Lands.<br />

The uses along these corridors range from large format<br />

commercial and auto-related uses on Bayfield Street (i.e. the<br />

Georgian Mall) to smaller commercial retail units on Dunlop<br />

Street and Essa Road. Most <strong>of</strong> these corridors have been<br />

developed within the last 5-10 years and will take longer to<br />

substantially redevelop.<br />

In both cases, the sites are characterized by typically largeformat<br />

or low-rise buildings that are set back significantly<br />

from the street to accommodate an abundance <strong>of</strong> front and<br />

side-yard surface parking.<br />

The boulevards along these streets are typically very narrow,<br />

with little or no buffer between pedestrian and vehicle traffic.<br />

The boulevards have little landscaping, very few street<br />

trees, and lack basic pedestrian amenities (i.e. seating,<br />

bicycle parking). Often, the main façade <strong>of</strong> the building<br />

fronts on to the side-yard parking area, providing a blank or<br />

featureless façade adjacent to the street. The frequent curbcuts<br />

associated with the large surface parking areas, and<br />

the general lack <strong>of</strong> landscaping and pedestrian amenities,<br />

results in a discontinuous, unattractive and uncomfortable<br />

pedestrian environment.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Looking north down Bayfield Street.


Figure 9: Existing Auto-Oriented Commercial Districts within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s<br />

DUNLOP STREET<br />

DUNLOP STREET<br />

BAYFIELD BAYFIELD STREET STREET<br />

ESSA ROAD<br />

BAYFIELD BAYFIELD STREET STREET<br />

ESSA ROAD<br />

DUCKWORTH STREET<br />

DUCKWORTH STREET<br />

KEMPENFELT KEMPENFELT BAY BAY<br />

YONGE STREET<br />

YONGE STREET<br />

DRAFT<br />

Auto-oriented Commercial Auto-oriented Districts Commercial Districts Major Transit Stations Major Transit Stations Secondary Nodes Secondary Nodes Major Transit Stations Major Transit Stations<br />

12


13 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

2.2.2 Corridor Residential Districts<br />

Existing stable residential areas along the <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

Corridors, and within the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, can be<br />

described as Corridor Residential Districts. This includes<br />

sections <strong>of</strong> Duckworth Street (including the Primary Node at<br />

Grove Street), Dunlop Street (including part <strong>of</strong> the Primary<br />

Node at Anne Street), Essa Road, and streets within the<br />

historic Allandale neighbourhood, including Burton Avenue.<br />

Corridor Residential Districts are characterized by existing,<br />

stable residential neighbourhoods that generally consist <strong>of</strong><br />

single and semi-detached dwellings between 1 and 3-storeys.<br />

Some higher density townhouses exist on Duckworth Street<br />

(north <strong>of</strong> Grove Street), as well as some low-rise apartment<br />

buildings on Dunlop Street (east <strong>of</strong> Anne Street).<br />

Dwellings in Corridor Residential Districts generally have<br />

large, landscaped front yard set-backs. The front yard <strong>of</strong><br />

most properties include large, mature trees, which results<br />

in a relatively consistent tree canopy along Duckworth<br />

Street and Essa Road and throughout the historic Allandale<br />

neighbourhood. No street trees exist on the narrow boulevard<br />

<strong>of</strong> Dunlop Street.<br />

On all three streets, the streetscapes and boulevards are<br />

characterized by narrow sidewalks, boulevards, and frequent<br />

residential curb-cuts. Dunlop Street and Essa Road have<br />

sidewalks on both sides <strong>of</strong> the street, while Duckworth<br />

Street (from Codrington Street to Melrose Avenue) has a<br />

sidewalk on the west side only. Within the historic Allandale<br />

neighbourhood, sidewalks alternate between one and both<br />

sides <strong>of</strong> the street.<br />

Duckworth Street - looking south.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Bayfield Street - looking north.<br />

Burton Avenue - looking east.


Figure 10: Existing Corridor Residential Districts within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s<br />

DUNLOP STREET<br />

BAYFIELD STREET<br />

DUNLOP STREET<br />

ESSA ROAD<br />

Corridor Residential Corridor DistrictsResidential<br />

Districts<br />

BAYFIELD STREET<br />

Burton St.<br />

ESSA ROAD<br />

DUCKWORTH STREET<br />

Berczy St.<br />

Codrington St.<br />

Burton St.<br />

DUCKWORTH STREET<br />

Berczy St.<br />

Codrington St.<br />

Primary Nodes<br />

KEMPENFELT KEMPENFELT BAY BAY<br />

DRAFT<br />

Primary Nodes<br />

14


15 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

2.2.3 Core Districts<br />

Core Districts in the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s include streets<br />

within the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, particularly in the historic<br />

Downtown, that have a stable, main street character, such<br />

as Dunlop Street, Bayfield Street, Collier Street, and streets<br />

adjacent to the <strong>Barrie</strong> Bus Terminal within the Major Transit<br />

Station <strong>Area</strong><br />

These streets are characterized by mixed-use buildings, with<br />

commercial uses at grade, and <strong>of</strong>fice and residential uses<br />

above. Buildings range in height throughout the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth<br />

Centre, alternating between 2 to 3-storeys on Dunlop Street,<br />

with some 4-storey buildings east <strong>of</strong> Owen Street. On Collier<br />

Street, which has a more financial district character, buildings<br />

range between 1 to 5-storeys.<br />

Typically, the early buildings within the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre<br />

are located within a tight, interconnected street and block<br />

network, and address the street well with large amounts<br />

<strong>of</strong> glazing on the ground floor, façade variation, and main<br />

entrances located <strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> primary streets.<br />

There are a number <strong>of</strong> buildings within the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth<br />

Centre, particularly along Dunlop Street, that have heritage<br />

significance. The Historic Neighbourhoods Study has<br />

recognized the entire Downtown as a historic neighbourhood<br />

and envisions its evolution into a thriving commercial<br />

neighbourhood and cultural centre that appeals to residents<br />

and visitors alike.<br />

Streets within Core Districts are framed well by buildings,<br />

but <strong>of</strong>ten have narrow boulevards and lack basic pedestrian<br />

amenities (i.e. street trees, public art, benches). On-street<br />

parking is provided on both sides <strong>of</strong> the street. Access and<br />

servicing is sometimes provided from rear lanes or parking<br />

areas.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Looking south at Lakeshore Drive<br />

Photo By: Alex Von Bredow


Figure 11: Existing Core Districts within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s<br />

DUNLOP STREET<br />

Cone District<br />

BAYFIELD BAYFIELD STREET STREET<br />

DUNLOP STREET<br />

Cone District<br />

Ross St.<br />

BAYFIELD BAYFIELD STREET STREET<br />

Ross St.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Major Transit Stations Major Transit Stations<br />

16<br />

KEMPENFELT KEMPENFELT BAY


17 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

2.2.4 <strong>City</strong>-Wide Issues<br />

There are a number <strong>of</strong> city-wide issues that apply to each <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, including:<br />

Inefficient Active Transportation Network – Transit in the<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> requires all buses to return to the <strong>Barrie</strong> Bus<br />

Terminal before heading to their destination resulting in<br />

both long travel and wait times. Recommendations in these<br />

guidelines promote active transportation and encourage<br />

vibrant and active streets that support future improvements<br />

to the transit system, and should be read in conjunction with<br />

the <strong>City</strong>’s new transit strategy (Mayor’s Plan for Transit, 2012).<br />

Large Surface Parking <strong>Area</strong>s – There are many large surface<br />

parking lots throughout the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, particularly<br />

on Bayfield Street, but also within the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre<br />

and other <strong>Intensification</strong> Corridors. Ultimately, as transit and<br />

active transportation improves in the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, the<br />

demand for parking will decrease and will be accommodated<br />

within structured and underground parking facilities. In the<br />

interim, options will be explored to minimize the impacts <strong>of</strong><br />

large surface parking areas.<br />

Disconnected Open Spaces – There are many open spaces<br />

within, or near, the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, including Centennial<br />

Park, Queen’s Park, Shear Park, and Heritage Park. There<br />

is however, little connectivity between these open space<br />

features, particularly to areas outside <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth<br />

Centre (i.e. Yonge Street, Essa Road). As redevelopment occurs<br />

along the <strong>Intensification</strong> Corridors, existing natural features<br />

(i.e. Lover’s Creek Ravine) should be utilized to accommodate<br />

a network <strong>of</strong> trails that link to the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre.<br />

The active transportation guidelines provided in this<br />

document, including boulevard recommendations, cycling<br />

provisions, and transit recommendations, will help to tie open<br />

spaces, trails, and natural heritage features together, creating<br />

a well connected network <strong>of</strong> parks and open spaces.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Figure 12: <strong>Barrie</strong> Transit Network<br />

<strong>Barrie</strong>’s current Bus Transit Network consists mostly <strong>of</strong> looped routes that<br />

return to the <strong>Barrie</strong> Bus Terminal. The <strong>City</strong> is planning to implement a more<br />

efficient transit system.<br />

Figure 13: Large-Format Retail (Surface Parking <strong>Area</strong>s)<br />

Large format commercial areas along Bayfield Street with expansive<br />

surface parking lots.


2.3 Public and Stakeholder<br />

Consultation<br />

The <strong>City</strong>, local residents, and the business community were<br />

given frequent opportunities to provide feedback on the<br />

evolution <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, including:<br />

• One-on-One Stakeholder Interviews (February 14,<br />

2011) – Interviews were conducted at the beginning <strong>of</strong><br />

the process, both by phone and in person, to determine<br />

the concerns <strong>of</strong> those who have a vested interest in the<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, including land and business owners,<br />

community groups, emergency services, and developers.<br />

• Public/Landowner Workshop # 1 (March 10, 2011) –<br />

An initial public workshop was held to Introduce the<br />

urban design guidelines process to the community,<br />

engage community members, stakeholders and the<br />

development community, and gather feedback on how<br />

the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s should evolve. Participants<br />

were asked to engage in discussions based on a provided<br />

worksheet, and were encouraged to provide comments/<br />

feedback on the materials provided.<br />

• Public/Landowner Workshop # 2 (April 27, 2011) –<br />

A second public workshop was held to update the<br />

community on the progress <strong>of</strong> the urban design<br />

guidelines, engage community members, stakeholders<br />

and the development community, and gather feedback<br />

on what form intensification in <strong>Barrie</strong> should take, using<br />

three demonstration sites. Participants were asked to<br />

discuss and provide comments/recommendations on the<br />

demonstration plans.<br />

Please refer to the Appendix for a detailed summary <strong>of</strong> the public<br />

and stakeholder consultation sessions. The summaries can also<br />

be found on the <strong>City</strong>’s website at:<br />

http://www.barrie.ca/<strong>City</strong>%20Hall/growth/Pages/default.aspx<br />

Residents and stakeholders participate in the public workshops at the<br />

Southshore Community Centre.<br />

DRAFT<br />

18


19 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

2.4 Vision and Guiding<br />

Principles<br />

The objective <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> is to provide a<br />

framework for review <strong>of</strong> development applications within the<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s that results in a high standard <strong>of</strong> urban<br />

design, and supports the vision <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong>’s residents and<br />

stakeholders.<br />

2.4.1 Vision for the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s<br />

The Vision Statement described in the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong><br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> Strategy (2009) is,<br />

“The <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> will encourage new development in the<br />

higher density categories in appropriate areas throughout the<br />

Municipality while continuing to support the integrity <strong>of</strong> stable<br />

neighbourhoods. It is anticipated that the majority <strong>of</strong> residential<br />

and employment intensification will occur within the <strong>City</strong>’s<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre with additional intensification occurring in<br />

appropriate nodes and corridors. Higher density uses will be <strong>of</strong> a<br />

higher quality design and will encourage a mix <strong>of</strong> uses.”<br />

Building on this Vision Statement, and in consultation with<br />

the community, the following describes the vision/goal for the<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s:<br />

New development within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s should result in pedestrian-supportive streets.<br />

New development and revitalization<br />

within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s will<br />

result in active, pedestrian-supportive<br />

streets that are compatible with, and<br />

enhance, adjacent land uses. Mixed-<br />

Use and Residential Avenues, Mixed-<br />

Use Main Streets and Established<br />

Neighbourhood Streets will be<br />

characterized by wide boulevards,<br />

abundant landscaping, large, mature<br />

street trees, public art, and active atgrade<br />

uses.<br />

DRAFT


2.4.2 Priority Directions<br />

The following priority directions will guide all new development<br />

within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s.<br />

• <strong>Intensification</strong> should be achieved by built form that is<br />

compatible with the scale <strong>of</strong> adjacent properties, where<br />

such development is <strong>of</strong> good quality and is part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>City</strong>’s desirable building fabric.<br />

• Where underutilized blocks exceed 100 metres in depth<br />

and 250 metres in length, consider opportunities to<br />

subdivide these blocks into more manageable, walkable<br />

land parcels.<br />

• In the Mixed-Use Main Street areas, Taller buildings above<br />

8-storeys may be appropriate on sites where lot size, setbacks,<br />

step-backs and building transitions can be made<br />

to respect the neighbouring properties. Taller building<br />

sites are anticipated adjacent to the waterfront where<br />

existing tall buildings are located, and at primary street<br />

intersections (subject to additional studies to ensure<br />

minimal shadowing, and disruption to views to Kempenfelt<br />

Bay).<br />

• In the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, proposed mid-rise buildings<br />

are considered to be 4 to 8-storeys in height (a reduction<br />

from the existing 10-storey allowance).<br />

• An expanded public transit system will act as a catalyst<br />

for growth and contribute to the <strong>City</strong>’s vitality.<br />

• A diversity <strong>of</strong> built form and land uses will improve public<br />

safety, and the vitality <strong>of</strong> business and development in the<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s.<br />

• Mixed-use development, including retail, employment<br />

and residential uses, promote opportunities for live-work<br />

relationships, minimizing reliance on the automobile.<br />

• Consider opportunities to integrate open space in the<br />

form <strong>of</strong> parks, civic spaces, or semi-private open space<br />

within longer redevelopments.<br />

Please refer to the following sections for area-specific priority<br />

directions.<br />

Mixed-use streetscape is active and pedestrian friendly.<br />

DRAFT<br />

High-quality public realm creates a comfortable and active pedestrian<br />

environment.<br />

Corner building with additional height above the mixed-use podium.<br />

20


21 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

2.5 <strong>Intensification</strong> Typologies<br />

As new development occurs within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, the Auto-Oriented<br />

Commercial Districts, Corridor Residential Districts and Core Districts buildings<br />

and site design should evolve to reflect a higher density, more urban condition.<br />

This development will take a number <strong>of</strong> forms based on location and existing<br />

context. The <strong>Intensification</strong> Typologies, described in detail in the following<br />

section, comprise all <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes and Corridors, Major Transit Station<br />

<strong>Area</strong>s, and the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, and carry through the remainder <strong>of</strong> the<br />

document.<br />

DRAFT


Miller Dr.<br />

Livingstone St. W.<br />

Figure 14: <strong>Intensification</strong> Typologies<br />

Cundles Rd. W.<br />

DUNLOP STREET<br />

Anne St. S.<br />

ESSA ROAD<br />

BAYFIELD STREET<br />

DUCKWORTH STREET<br />

Grove St. E.<br />

KEMPENFELT BAY<br />

Little Ave.<br />

YONGE STREET<br />

DRAFT<br />

Big Bay Point Rd.<br />

Mixed-Use & Residential Avenues<br />

Mixed-Use Main Streets<br />

Established Residential Streets<br />

Lakeshore Drive & Waterfront<br />

Allandale Neighbourhood<br />

Primary Node<br />

Secondary Node<br />

Major Transit Station<br />

Mapleview Dr. E.<br />

0m 500m 1km<br />

2km<br />

22


23 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

2.5.1 Mixed-Use and Residential Avenues<br />

As new development occurs within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s,<br />

Duckworth Street, Bayfield Street, Dunlop Street, Essa Road,<br />

and Yonge Street, as well as the <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes located<br />

within them, should evolve into Mixed-Use and Residential<br />

Avenues.<br />

Opportunities for intensification within the Mixed-Use and<br />

Residential Avenues include:<br />

• Redevelopment <strong>of</strong> underutilized parcels (i.e. large surface<br />

parking areas, single-storey development) for streetoriented<br />

mixed-use development in low to mid-rise<br />

buildings.<br />

• Subdivision <strong>of</strong> large blocks into smaller, walkable blocks<br />

through walkways, drive-aisles, and where feasible, new<br />

roads.<br />

• Opportunities to redefine the existing boulevard within<br />

the right-<strong>of</strong>-way through building set-backs, bumpout<br />

parking, or narrowing <strong>of</strong> the street pavement where<br />

feasible.<br />

In the short-term, redevelopment should be focused at the<br />

Primary and Secondary <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes, including:<br />

• Bayfield Street (at Grove Street, Cundles Road, and<br />

Livingstone Street).<br />

• Dunlop Street (at Anne Street and Miller Drive).<br />

• Yonge Street (at Little Avenue, Big Bay Point Road and<br />

Mapleview Drive).<br />

In time, as these areas urbanize and become more vital<br />

and pedestrian-supportive through greater amenity and<br />

residential/retail opportunities, land values will increase and<br />

spur future intensification opportunities.<br />

Ultimately, these corridors should transition to major<br />

transportation corridors that balance the functional<br />

requirements <strong>of</strong> the street with the provision <strong>of</strong> an active,<br />

pedestrian-supportive streetscape. Human-scaled, mixeduse<br />

buildings should line the street, providing “eyes on the<br />

street,” and enhancing safety and activity at all hours. Wide<br />

boulevards should accommodate street trees, landscaping,<br />

continuous sidewalks, seating, signage and public art. Spillout<br />

retail uses at grade (i.e. restaurants, cafes), and public<br />

open spaces, will <strong>of</strong>fer opportunities for pedestrians to gather<br />

and socialize.<br />

Priority Directions<br />

• Establish building height transitions where taller buildings<br />

frame primary street intersections and transition to mid<br />

and low-rise heights adjacent to stable residential areas.<br />

• Recognize the long-term evolution/change <strong>of</strong> these mixeduse<br />

corridors, through short-term design that supports<br />

longer term development opportunities.<br />

• Focus initial development at the street edge and at key<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes.<br />

DRAFT<br />

• The design <strong>of</strong> the street right-<strong>of</strong>-way should balance<br />

the requirements for vehicles, transit, and cycling while<br />

providing pedestrian amenities on the boulevards.<br />

• Consider long-term options to subdivide large/deep land<br />

parcels into smaller blocks. These blocks may initially be<br />

drive aisles within surface parking areas.<br />

• When surface parking lots are developed for new buildings<br />

or public open space, plan for the relocation <strong>of</strong> parking in<br />

structured facilities, including parking decks and below<br />

grade.


DUNLOP STREET<br />

ESSA ROAD<br />

BAYFIELD STREET<br />

DUCKWORTH STREET<br />

Figure 15: <strong>Intensification</strong> Typologies (Mixed-Use and Residential Avenues)<br />

KEMPENFELT BAY<br />

YONGE STREET<br />

DRAFT<br />

Mixed-Use & Residential Avenues<br />

Primary Node<br />

Secondary Node<br />

Major Transit Station<br />

0m 500m 1km<br />

2km<br />

24


25 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

2.5.2 Mixed-Use Main Streets<br />

As redevelopment occurs within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s,<br />

streets within the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre (i.e. Dunlop Street,<br />

Bradford Street, Toronto Street, Collier Street) should transition<br />

to Mixed-Use Main Streets, or downtown commercial streets<br />

with active, pedestrian-supportive streetscapes.<br />

Opportunities for intensification within the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth<br />

Centre include:<br />

• Additions and renovations to existing buildings.<br />

• Redevelopment <strong>of</strong> vacant or underutilized sites (i.e.<br />

single-storey buildings).<br />

• Development on vacant parcels.<br />

In each case, intensification must be compatible with the<br />

existing heritage fabric with respect to building height, scale,<br />

façade design and key architectural characteristics. New<br />

developments should reinforce the neighbourhoods and land<br />

uses identified in the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> Downtown Commercial<br />

Master Plan (2006), including:<br />

• Collier Street - Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Services/Financial<br />

• Dunlop Street - Main Shopping<br />

• Mulcaster Street - Artistic/Old Market Square <strong>Area</strong><br />

• Bayfield Street - Cultural/Arrival<br />

• Lakeshore Drive - Promenade<br />

• Bradford Street - Entertainment<br />

Similar to the existing conditions on Dunlop Street, Mixed-<br />

Use Main Streets should maintain a tight-knit grid <strong>of</strong> streets<br />

and blocks, and a consistent streetwall height that reflects<br />

the heritage character <strong>of</strong> the Downtown. This is particularly<br />

important to the south <strong>of</strong> the historic Downtown, where the<br />

existing conditions are more vehicle-oriented.<br />

Mixed-use buildings, with retail at grade and residential and<br />

<strong>of</strong>fice above, will allow residents to live, work and play within<br />

the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, creating “eyes on the street,” and<br />

enhancing safety and activity at all hours.<br />

Additional building set-backs (and pavement narrowing where<br />

feasible) should accommodate wide boulevards with street<br />

trees, landscaping, continuous sidewalks, seating, signage<br />

and public art. Smaller civic open spaces are encouraged to<br />

provide opportunities for pedestrian to gather and socialize.<br />

Priority Directions<br />

• Ensure a consistent, high-quality urban frontage along<br />

the waterfront and Downtown main streets.<br />

• New buildings, open space and street design will build<br />

on the unique character <strong>of</strong> the Downtown (i.e. a humanscaled<br />

building base, street trees, active at-grade uses,<br />

waterfront views, etc.), adjacent neighbourhoods and the<br />

waterfront setting by being context specific, appropriately<br />

scaled, and containing an appropriate mix <strong>of</strong> uses.<br />

DRAFT<br />

• In the Mixed-Use Main Street areas, Taller buildings<br />

above 8-storeys may be appropriate on sites where lot<br />

size, set-backs, step-backs and building transitions (i.e.<br />

step-backs) can be made to respect the neighbouring<br />

properties. Taller building sites are anticipated adjacent<br />

to the waterfront where existing tall buildings are located,<br />

and at primary street intersections.<br />

• Ensure building mass and height, and street and open<br />

space design, contributes to compatible development<br />

within the existing downtown and waterfront. Additional<br />

studies are recommended to ensure new buildings do<br />

not limit sunlight access to waterfront parks, or views to<br />

Kempenfelt Bay.


Dunlop St. W.<br />

Anne St. S.<br />

Sophia St. E.<br />

Figure 16: <strong>Intensification</strong> Typologies (Mixed-Use Main Streets)<br />

Essa Rd.<br />

Berczy St.<br />

KEMPENFELT BAY<br />

DRAFT<br />

Mixed-Use Main Streets<br />

Major Transit Station<br />

0m 500m 1km<br />

2km<br />

26


27 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

2.5.3 Established Neighbourhood Streets<br />

As redevelopment occurs on the <strong>Intensification</strong> Corridors,<br />

Duckworth Street (south <strong>of</strong> Grove Street), Dunlop Street (east<br />

<strong>of</strong> Anne Street), and Bayfield Street (at Grove Street) should<br />

transition to Established Neighbourhood Streets. Within<br />

the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, streets in the historic Allandale<br />

neighbourhood should also transition to Established<br />

Neighbourhood Streets.<br />

With the exception <strong>of</strong> the conversion <strong>of</strong> dwellings, there<br />

is limited potential for intensification within Established<br />

Neighbourhood Streets. If larger-scale sites become available<br />

for redevelopment, however, opportunities exist for the<br />

incorporation <strong>of</strong> higher density residential buildings (i.e.<br />

townhouses and walk-up apartments), and potentially mixeduse<br />

buildings with convenience retail at grade.<br />

As intensification occurs, it should reinforce these areas<br />

as Established Neighbourhood Streets through buildings<br />

that are compatible with, and transition to, adjacent stable<br />

residential neighbourhhoods.<br />

Priority Directions<br />

• Development should be designed to integrate with the<br />

stable and low-rise residential character <strong>of</strong> these areas.<br />

Buildings should therefore consider reasonable height<br />

transitions. For example, 4 to 5-storeys is appropriate<br />

directly adjacent to 2-storeys (provided all other<br />

guidelines within this document are achieved), while 6 to<br />

8-storeys is too tall.<br />

• Where feasible, new housing development should<br />

contribute to higher density residential form, including<br />

townhouses and apartments.<br />

DRAFT


Dunlop St.W.<br />

Figure 17: <strong>Intensification</strong> Typologies (Established Residential Streets)<br />

Essa Rd.<br />

Duckworth St.<br />

Codrington St.<br />

Lakeshore Dr.<br />

Burton Av.<br />

DRAFT<br />

KEMPENFELT BAY<br />

Established Residential Streets<br />

Allendale Neighbourhood<br />

Primary Node<br />

0m 500m 1km<br />

2km<br />

28


DRAFT


3.0<br />

Public Realm<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

DRAFT<br />

The public realm urban design guidelines are applicable to all the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s,<br />

and apply to development within streets, parks and open spaces, and consider natural<br />

heritage features, parks and open spaces, streets and streetscapes, pedestrian and<br />

bicycle circulation, and parking.


3.1 Natural Heritage Feature, Parks and Open Spaces<br />

Within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, there is an extensive foundation <strong>of</strong> natural<br />

heritage features, parks and open spaces, including Kempenfelt Bay, large<br />

expanses <strong>of</strong> natural heritage features (i.e. woodlots) along the <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

Corridors, as well as a number <strong>of</strong> smaller parks in and around the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth<br />

Centre, including Allandale Station Park, Queens Park, Centennial Park, Shear<br />

Park, and Brock Park. Where intensification occurs adjacent to these areas,<br />

urban design consideration should capitalize on this relationship.<br />

DRAFT


3.1.1 Natural Heritage Features<br />

There is a significant amount <strong>of</strong> existing natural heritage<br />

features in the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, particularly Kempenfelt<br />

Bay and the waterfront in the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre and the<br />

large woodlots along Yonge Street and sections <strong>of</strong> Essa Road.<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> on these corridors should provide strong<br />

visual and physical links to these features as part <strong>of</strong> an overall<br />

system <strong>of</strong> parks, open spaces and natural heritage features.<br />

a) Environmental Protection <strong>Area</strong>s in the <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

<strong>Area</strong>s must be preserved. To protect natural vegetation,<br />

ecological functions and the cultural landscape, all other<br />

natural heritage features should be preserved where<br />

possible.<br />

b) Streets, cycling infrastructure, and multi-use trails should<br />

be used to connect adjacent natural heritage features,<br />

parks and open spaces.<br />

c) Sensitive natural heritage features must be adequately<br />

buffered and linked to other features to ensure that the<br />

natural heritage system is protected, enhanced and<br />

restored, and that ecological systems are not negatively<br />

impacted by intensification.<br />

32<br />

d) Opportunities to develop appropriately designed higher<br />

density buildings adjacent to natural heritage features<br />

should be explored to maximize views and awareness <strong>of</strong><br />

the landscape. Such developments must comply with the<br />

built form recommendations provided in this document,<br />

and must demonstrate compatibility with adjacent land<br />

uses with respect to sunlight access, views and privacy.<br />

e) Natural drainage networks must be maintained to retain<br />

functional surficial drainage and watercourses and to<br />

support storm water management infrastructure such as<br />

storm water management ponds and in accordance to the<br />

Lake Simcoe Protection Plan.<br />

For additional guidelines related to natural heritage features in<br />

the Mixed-Use and Residential Avenues, please refer to Section<br />

5.1.<br />

For additional guidelines related to natural heritage features in<br />

the Mixed-Use Main Streets, please refer to Section 5.2.<br />

DRAFT


33 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

3.1.2 Parks and Open Spaces<br />

Parks and open spaces should be provided as new<br />

development occurs within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s. Within<br />

the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, there will be opportunities for<br />

neighbourhood parks, as well as smaller urban parks and civic<br />

spaces. These features should form part <strong>of</strong> a larger network <strong>of</strong><br />

natural heritage features, parks and open spaces.<br />

a) Where it does not limit recreational activities, a significant<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> the perimeter <strong>of</strong> parks should be bounded by<br />

streets to maximize public access, views, and safety.<br />

b) Parks should be distributed within a 10-minute (500<br />

metre)walk <strong>of</strong> the majority <strong>of</strong> residents.<br />

c) New parks and open spaces should link with existing<br />

natural heritage features, parks and open spaces, to<br />

form a network <strong>of</strong> safe recreation and movement options<br />

between the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s.<br />

d) Parks and open spaces should be designed to serve the<br />

diverse needs <strong>of</strong> the community, including facilities<br />

for passive (e.g. walking trails, community gardens,<br />

seating areas, park pavilions, interpretive displays,<br />

etc.) and active recreation (e.g. sports fields, skating<br />

rinks, etc.). This should be accomplished through new<br />

parks, enhancements to existing parks adjacent to<br />

new development, and improvements to existing park<br />

amenities (i.e. at Riverwood Park, Kozlov Park).<br />

e) As the most optimal growing conditions in the<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s will occur in new parks and open<br />

spaces, larger tree species are encouraged to enhance<br />

the overall tree canopy. The species <strong>of</strong> tree should be<br />

determined based on available planting space.<br />

f) Park entrance design should provide amenities including<br />

pedestrian scale lighting, and signage to assist in<br />

orientation and use <strong>of</strong> park amenities.<br />

g) Walkways and internal roads should be flexible, to<br />

accommodate maintenance and emergency vehicles as<br />

required.<br />

For additional guidelines related to parks and open spaces in the<br />

Mixed-Use and Residential Avenues, please refer to Section 5.1.<br />

For additional guidelines related to parks and open spaces within<br />

the Mixed-Use Main Streets, please refer to Section 5.2.2.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Figure 18: Neighbourhood Park Demonstration Site<br />

In this demonstration plan, Bayfield Street (between Hamner Street &<br />

Livingstone Street) incorporates a large neighbourhood park between midrise<br />

development.


3.1.3 Semi-Private Open Spaces<br />

Semi-private open space is landscaping and/or open space<br />

within private property that is perceived to be shared public<br />

amenity space. These spaces provide opportunities for<br />

socialization and can function as gathering spaces within an<br />

intimate, semi-private environment.<br />

a) Semi-private open spaces should be directly accessible<br />

from public sidewalks.<br />

b) Features within semi-private open spaces (e.g. paving,<br />

seating, public art, etc.) should be constructed <strong>of</strong> materials<br />

equal in quality and appearance with those <strong>of</strong> the main<br />

buildings.<br />

c) Semi-private open spaces should be in view <strong>of</strong> occupied<br />

indoor areas.<br />

d) Where easy internal access can be provided, buildings<br />

are encouraged to include semi-private open space in the<br />

form <strong>of</strong> ro<strong>of</strong>top amenity space.<br />

e) Interior courtyards <strong>of</strong> buildings should be designed to<br />

maximize sun exposure through the massing and location<br />

<strong>of</strong> taler building elements.<br />

f) Paving materials should be high quality, easily replaceable<br />

and low maintenance.<br />

g) Site furnishings (e.g. play equipment, public art, shelters,<br />

signage, fencing, etc.) should be manufactured from high<br />

quality, durable materials.<br />

h) Plant materials used in landscaping should be low<br />

maintenance, pest and disease resistant and placed to<br />

ensure clear views into and out <strong>of</strong> semi-private open<br />

spaces.<br />

For additional guidelines related to semi-private open space<br />

within the Mixed-Use Main Streets, please refer to Section 5.2.<br />

Enhanced landscaping between housing and the boulevard.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Accessible gardens and courtyards between buildings.<br />

Public art contributes to the enjoyment and quality <strong>of</strong> semi-private open<br />

spaces.<br />

34


35 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

3.1.4 Multi-Use Trails<br />

There is an excellent opportunity for a well-connected network<br />

<strong>of</strong> multi-use trails within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, including<br />

the <strong>Barrie</strong> Waterfront Trail, which runs along the lakefront<br />

throughout the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, as well as the large<br />

natural heritage areas along the Mixed Use and Residential<br />

Avenues.<br />

New development within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s should<br />

connect to the <strong>City</strong>’s existing trail network, as well as optimize<br />

opportunities for the expansion <strong>of</strong> the network through the<br />

creation <strong>of</strong> new multi-use trails.<br />

a) New recreational trails should connect to existing trail<br />

networks, streets, parks, open spaces and natural heritage<br />

features to create a linked trail network that provides<br />

pedestrians and cyclists with connections and recreation<br />

opportunities.<br />

b) Trails should link to core activity areas such as the <strong>Urban</strong><br />

Growth Centre, Primary and Secondary <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

Nodes, and the lakefront. They should create strong links<br />

between new communities, open space, and appropriate<br />

natural heritage features.<br />

c) The design <strong>of</strong> the recreational trail should reflect the<br />

function and nature <strong>of</strong> the type <strong>of</strong> open space it occupies.<br />

However, trail widths should range from 3-4 metres wide<br />

to allow for two way cyclist or pedestrian passage.<br />

d) Multi-use trails should be designed to distinguish<br />

between walking and cycling/roller blading areas to<br />

minimize conflicts.<br />

e) Nature trails should include multiple access points. The<br />

design <strong>of</strong> access points should consider that people arrive<br />

by a variety <strong>of</strong> means, including car, foot, bicycle, or transit.<br />

Entrances should also be designed to accommodate<br />

persons with physical disabilities and therefore include<br />

stable yet permeable surfaces.<br />

f) Where appropriate, trails should include adequate<br />

amenities, such as seating, waste receptacles, lighting,<br />

signage, route information, and educational and historic<br />

information. Amenities should be designed according to<br />

site-specific conditions.<br />

g) Trails located within sensitive natural environments<br />

should be constructed <strong>of</strong> low impact materials that are<br />

porous and stable, such as crushed rock, wood chip paths,<br />

or board walks. All trails should be designed according to<br />

site-specific conditions.<br />

DRAFT<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> should look to link or expand existing trails and pathways.


3.2 Streets and Streetscapes<br />

Streets within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s should be pedestrian-supportive,<br />

including large, mature street trees, ample landscaping, and wide boulevards<br />

that accommodate opportunities for active uses at grade, including spill-out<br />

retail, patio seating, etc.<br />

DRAFT<br />

36


37 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

3.2.1 Green Street <strong>Design</strong><br />

The <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s are intended to transition into<br />

tree-lined avenues and main streets. Green streets include<br />

significant landscaping and large, mature street trees, and<br />

will greatly enhance the visual and environmental qualities<br />

<strong>of</strong> streets within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s. Street trees<br />

provide shade and comfort to pedestrians, reduce the urban<br />

heat island effect, and provide a buffer between vehicle and<br />

pedestrian traffic.<br />

a) As new development occurs, all streets within the<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s should include enhanced landscape<br />

design through tree planting and landscaping in the public<br />

and private right-<strong>of</strong>-way.<br />

b) Street trees should be placed to grow to maturity under<br />

urban soil conditions (e.g. tree pits, minimal space, etc.).<br />

A mix <strong>of</strong> species should be used within each street for<br />

variety and in case <strong>of</strong> disease.<br />

c) Streets aligning and leading to the Bay (i.e. Lakeshore<br />

Drive), and key entrances to the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre,<br />

should ensure a high proportion <strong>of</strong> tree planting. Closely<br />

spaced (6 to 8 metres apart, or double rows) will emphasize<br />

the urban tree canopy along these streets and walkways.<br />

More ornamental tree species may be used to reinforce<br />

the importance <strong>of</strong> these areas.<br />

d) Existing thriving street trees should be preserved wherever<br />

possible, as mature street trees create a greater sense <strong>of</strong><br />

enclosure along streets.<br />

e) Supplemental street trees should be considered where<br />

the existing tree canopy is reaching the end <strong>of</strong> its lifecycle.<br />

f) Street trees should be planted with appropriate soil<br />

volume in continuous tree trenches to allow for full growth<br />

and to ensure their long-term viability.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Figure 19: Green Street Rendering<br />

The above rendering demonstrates some <strong>of</strong> the key features <strong>of</strong> a green street, including mature street trees, significant landscaping, and active<br />

transportation facilities. Where possible, streets should directly connect to open spaces to enhance safety through casual surveillance.


g) Where occasional compaction <strong>of</strong> planting soil is<br />

anticipated, the use <strong>of</strong> soil cells should be considered.<br />

h) Where possible, soil infrastructure should be improved on<br />

boulevards where trees will be planted. This will ensure<br />

the long term health <strong>of</strong> the tree and benefits to the<br />

community.<br />

i) Street trees should generally be located within the<br />

boulevard and should be <strong>of</strong>fset a minimum <strong>of</strong> 1.5 metres<br />

from the curb to accommodate snow storage, large<br />

vehicle movements and minimize salt damage. Where this<br />

is not possible, street trees should be located between<br />

the sidewalk and the public right-<strong>of</strong>-way. For streets<br />

with wider boulevards where the distance between the<br />

sidewalk edge and back <strong>of</strong> curb was greater than 3 metres,<br />

the distance between curb edge and the street tree would<br />

have a greater setback proportionally.<br />

j) Trees should be spaced consistently at 6.0 to 9.0 metre<br />

intervals (ideally) based on mature size. Additional<br />

distance may be required (10.0 to 12.0 metres) to ensure<br />

appropriate clearances from utilities, street lights and<br />

sight triangles. Sight lines should also be considered in<br />

the location <strong>of</strong> trees planted at intersections.<br />

k) Consider the type and location <strong>of</strong> trees to ensure that<br />

higher branching trees do not interfere with large vehicles.<br />

l) Street trees and landscaping should be locally adapted<br />

species. Plants that grow naturally in the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong><br />

are adapted to the local climate and soil conditions and<br />

can survive with minimum maintenance, use <strong>of</strong> fertilizer,<br />

pesticide or irrigation.<br />

m) Shrub and ground cover planting should be utilized in<br />

open tree pits, provided the minimum pedestrian clearway<br />

dimension is available.<br />

n) All shrubs and ground cover should be tolerant <strong>of</strong> urban<br />

conditions, should be noninvasive and be completely nontoxic,<br />

appropriate for use in public areas.<br />

o) Seasonal appeal, especially for the winter months should<br />

be considered for all planting.<br />

For additional guidelines related to green streets on Lakeshore<br />

Drive, please refer to Section 5.8.<br />

DRAFT<br />

In-boulevard bio-swales slow release <strong>of</strong> rain water into the <strong>City</strong>’s<br />

infrastructure while filtering contaminants and feeding the planting areas.<br />

38


39 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

3.2.2 Boulevard <strong>Design</strong><br />

The boulevard refers to the area <strong>of</strong> the street between the<br />

front property line or building face, and the edge <strong>of</strong> the<br />

curb. Well designed boulevards are important throughout<br />

the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s to accommodate the significant<br />

increase in pedestrian traffic associated with intensification,<br />

while ensuring streets that are pedestrian-supportive.<br />

The individual components <strong>of</strong> the boulevard include:<br />

Street Furniture and Landscape Zone: The Street Furniture<br />

and Landscape Zone should be located directly between the<br />

sidewalk and vehicle traffic. The zone contains landscaped<br />

areas with site furnishings, and infrastructure facilities such<br />

as benches, bicycle locks, transit shelters, and utilities.<br />

Sidewalk: Dedicated to the movement <strong>of</strong> pedestrians, the<br />

sidewalk can be a multi-use trail or a pedestrian clear path.<br />

Sidewalks should be located adjacent to building frontages<br />

or the property line, or following a transition zone where<br />

present. The sidewalk should remain clear <strong>of</strong> obstructions,<br />

horizontally and vertically, at all times.<br />

Transition Zone: Located between the sidewalk and the<br />

building or property line, this zone provides a dedicated area<br />

for window shopping, spill-out retail, building entrances,<br />

street furniture and signage.<br />

Streetscape <strong>Design</strong> Elements<br />

front property line<br />

DRAFT<br />

Transition<br />

Zone<br />

Patios<br />

Signage<br />

Landscaping<br />

<strong>Barrie</strong>r Free<br />

Public Art<br />

Bus Shelters<br />

Sidewalk<br />

<strong>Barrie</strong>r Free<br />

Boulevard Elements<br />

Street<br />

Furniture and<br />

Landscape<br />

Zone<br />

Street Trees<br />

Landscaping<br />

Site Furnishings<br />

Drainage<br />

Public Art<br />

Bus Shelters<br />

On-Street<br />

Parking Lane<br />

Cycling<br />

Lane<br />

The illustrati on above depicts those roadway and boule<br />

Figure 20: Boulevard Components


a) Boulevards should reflect their adjacent land use. For<br />

example, wide pedestrian-supportive boulevards are<br />

encouraged in areas with retail uses at grade.<br />

b) Continuous sidewalks should be provided on both sides <strong>of</strong><br />

all streets.<br />

c) Sidewalks should be at least 2.1 metres wide.<br />

d) The sidewalk should be constructed <strong>of</strong> brushed concrete<br />

to facilitate pedestrian movement and barrier-free<br />

accessibility.<br />

e) Where sidewalks cross driveways, they should be<br />

continuous.<br />

f) Limited use <strong>of</strong> feature paving bands constructed <strong>of</strong><br />

materials other than asphalt (including pavers or<br />

concrete) may be used. These materials may continue<br />

across driveways and signalized intersections to indicate<br />

pedestrian priority.<br />

g) Boulevards should be planted with street trees located in<br />

the Street Furniture and Landscape Zone.<br />

h) Benches, bicycle locks, and pedestrian lighting should be<br />

located within the Street Furniture and Landscape Zone.<br />

i) In areas with retail at grade, a 1.1 metre wide transition<br />

zone should be situated between the sidewalk and the<br />

private property boundary to accommodate opportunities<br />

for spill-out retail and active at-grade uses.<br />

j) Where possible, the principles <strong>of</strong> low impact development<br />

(LID) should be applied to control stormwater on-site and<br />

minimize discharge to the <strong>City</strong>’s sewer system.<br />

For additional guidelines related to boulevard design within the<br />

Mixed-Use and Residential Avenues, please refer to Section 5.1.2.<br />

For additional guidelines related to boulevard design with Mixed-<br />

Use Main Streets, please refer to Section 5.2.3.<br />

DRAFT<br />

40<br />

Figure 21: Boulevard Rendering<br />

Wide, pedestrian-supportive boulevards will provide the room necessary for<br />

barrier-free walking, and the orderly location <strong>of</strong> street furniture.


41 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

3.2.3 Crosswalks<br />

New development within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s will create<br />

a significant amount <strong>of</strong> vehicular and pedestrian traffic,<br />

particularly at the Primary and Secondary <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

Nodes, and in the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre. A continuous system<br />

<strong>of</strong> crosswalks is essential to ensure the safe coexistence <strong>of</strong><br />

vehicles and pedestrian traffic.<br />

a) Crosswalks should be continuous and connected to<br />

adjacent sidewalks.<br />

b) The location <strong>of</strong> crosswalks and design <strong>of</strong> curb cuts should<br />

conform to the policies inherent in the Ontarians with<br />

Disabilities Act.<br />

c) Crosswalks should be clearly designated for safety, with<br />

appropriate surface markings or variation in surface<br />

treatment and signage where appropriate.<br />

d) Additional mid-block pedestrian signals and courtesy<br />

crossings with specialized markings and signage may be<br />

considered at locations with high pedestrian volumes.<br />

e) Traffic signals that accommodate pedestrians should be<br />

timed such that pedestrians have adequate time to clear<br />

the crossing. Audible signals and pedestrian countdown<br />

devices will be considered on a case-by-case basis.<br />

Visible and patterned crossings contribute to a safe and attractive<br />

streetscape.<br />

DRAFT


3.2.4 Street Furniture<br />

Street furniture contributes to the creation <strong>of</strong> a unique<br />

streetscape, and can be used to identify significant<br />

destinations within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, such as<br />

Lakeshore Drive and the waterfront, the historic Downtown,<br />

the Primary and Secondary <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes, the historic<br />

Allandale neighbourhood, etc. In addition, street furniture is an<br />

essential component <strong>of</strong> a pedestrian-supportive streetscape,<br />

<strong>of</strong>fering opportunities for rest, social interaction, and casual<br />

surveillance.<br />

a) Street furnishings should be developed within an overall<br />

concept and should provide a consistent and unified<br />

streetscape appearance that is appropriate for the area<br />

context.<br />

b) Street furnishings should be placed in a coordinated<br />

manner that does not obstruct pedestrian or vehicular<br />

circulation.<br />

c) Street furniture should be placed so as not to impact<br />

sidewalk maintenance, particularly snow removal.<br />

For additional guidelines related to street furniture within the<br />

Mixed-Use Main Streets, please refer to Section 5.2.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Street furnishings help to provide a functional and attractive environment<br />

for pedestrians and cyclists.<br />

42


43 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

3.2.5 Public Art<br />

The inclusion <strong>of</strong> public art will enhance the character within<br />

the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s and contributes to the culture<br />

and history <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> as a whole. Public art is encouraged<br />

throughout the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, particularly at the<br />

Primary and Secondary Nodes, on prominent streets within<br />

the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, in parks and open spaces, along<br />

trails and in other highly visible locations.<br />

a) Public art pieces should be durable and easily maintained.<br />

b) Public art should be place-specific and explore<br />

opportunities to celebrate historic and cultural events <strong>of</strong><br />

local, national and international significance.<br />

c) Public art should be both physically and visually accessible<br />

and barrier free.<br />

d) Sites with public art pieces should include landscaping<br />

that complements and enhances the piece.<br />

e) Sites may be reserved for groupings <strong>of</strong> complementary<br />

pieces, including temporary installations.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Public art helps to activate and beautify the public realm.


3.2.6 Signage<br />

A hierarchy <strong>of</strong> signage should be implemented uniformly<br />

throughout the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, and should encompass<br />

street signs, directional signage and commercial signage.<br />

This will reduce the overall amount <strong>of</strong> street clutter, while<br />

ensuring that wayfinding signage is highly visible and easy to<br />

understand.<br />

a) A comprehensive wayfinding strategy for the<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s should be developed, including<br />

mapping at key locations, such as <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes,<br />

the waterfront, and within the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre.<br />

b) Signs should be carefully located to ensure they do<br />

not impede sightlines for drivers as well as important<br />

sightlines to Kempenfelt Bay.<br />

c) Kiosks should be conveniently located in highly active<br />

pedestrian areas to attract users and provide security.<br />

d) Information<br />

circulation.<br />

kiosks should not impede pedestrian<br />

e) Information kiosks should be limited in size to minimize<br />

visual impacts while providing adequate space in which to<br />

post information.<br />

f) Street furniture should not include signage (i.e. benches<br />

with advertisements) with the exception <strong>of</strong> small,<br />

unobtrusive plaques to indicate the source <strong>of</strong> funding for<br />

the streetscape item.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Clear and attractive signage helps to provide an identity to the area and<br />

orient the public.<br />

44


45 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

3.2.7 Transit Amenities<br />

Successful intensification is dependent on the provision <strong>of</strong><br />

an efficient active transportation network. Streets within the<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s should support active transportation,<br />

including walking, cycling and transit, through the provision<br />

<strong>of</strong> safe, accessible transit amenities.<br />

a) Transit shelters should include basic amenities, including<br />

seating, waste receptacles, lighting, and route information.<br />

b) In high pedestrian traffic areas, such as <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

Nodes, the waterfront and the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, transit<br />

stops should include a shelter for weather protection and<br />

seating.<br />

c) Sidewalks should connect directly to transit shelters to<br />

encourage active transit use and to ensure safety and<br />

convenience.<br />

d) Transit stops should have barrier-free access and be<br />

located in a way that does not interfere with pedestrian<br />

movement.<br />

e) Transit shelters located on the sidewalk or boulevard<br />

should be located 300 millimeters from the sidewalk in<br />

order to allow sufficient space for snow clearing.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Well-designed and attractive bus shelters encourage transit use and<br />

beautify the streetscape.


3.2.8 Lighting<br />

Downcast, pedestrian-scaled lighting enhances safety and<br />

visibility on streets. In key areas, such as the Primary and<br />

Secondary <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes, waterfront or the heritage<br />

Downtown, lighting can be used to accent special features,<br />

such as buildings, heritage properties, landscaping, signage,<br />

etc.<br />

a) The design and location <strong>of</strong> lighting should consider<br />

sustainability and the impacts <strong>of</strong> light pollution, including:<br />

• energy efficiency;<br />

• directional lighting that reduces wasted energy;<br />

• induction lighting;<br />

• solar power; and,<br />

• street reflectors and sensors (to help regulate brightness<br />

and when lights turn on and <strong>of</strong>f).<br />

b) Downcast pedestrian-scale lighting should be provided in<br />

high traffic pedestrian areas.<br />

c) All lighting should be located within the Street Furniture<br />

and Landscape Zone.<br />

d) Consideration should be given to providing additional<br />

pedestrian-scale lighting in areas with a high volume<br />

<strong>of</strong> pedestrian activity, such as <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes,<br />

the waterfront, transit stops, trail crossings, mid-block<br />

connections, etc.<br />

e) New lighting design should comply with the <strong>City</strong>’s Dark<br />

Sky Policy.<br />

DRAFT<br />

High-quality lighting fixtures increase safety and provide attractive lighting<br />

to the public realm.<br />

46


47 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

3.2.9 Utilities<br />

The coordinated design <strong>of</strong> utilities will contribute to the visual<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> streetscapes within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s.<br />

Utilities must be considered as an integrated component in<br />

building design and the public realm.<br />

a) Where possible, utilities should be buried below grade,<br />

typically in the boulevard section <strong>of</strong> the right-<strong>of</strong>-way, where<br />

feasible. The use <strong>of</strong> a joint utility trench is encouraged for<br />

access and maintenance benefits.<br />

b) Opportunities should be identified for grouping above<br />

grade utilities in single locations where feasible.<br />

c) Utilities, including utility cabinets, transformer vaults,<br />

hydro metres and gas metres, should be incorporated into<br />

Above ground utilities on Yonge Street clutter the public realm.<br />

building design. Where this is not feasible, utilities should<br />

be placed in discrete locations and/or screened from<br />

public view, where they will not interfere with pedestrian<br />

movement or transit stops.<br />

d) New and innovative solutions for integrated utility services<br />

can result in reduced street clutter. For instance, poles that<br />

incorporate both street lighting and telecommunication<br />

facilities within the same pole. Although the <strong>City</strong> currently<br />

does not practice such integration, these opportunities<br />

should be considered when developing large sites, or<br />

making streetscape improvements for the long-term<br />

benefit <strong>of</strong> the public realm.<br />

DRAFT


3.3 Parking<br />

On-street parking in the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s should be permitted, wherever<br />

possible, to animate the street, reduce vehicle speeds and serve as a buffer<br />

between pedestrians and vehicles.<br />

DRAFT<br />

48


49 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

3.3.1 On-Street Parking<br />

On-street parking in the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s should be<br />

permitted, wherever possible, to animate the street, reduce<br />

vehicle speeds and serve as a buffer between pedestrians<br />

and vehicles particularly on streets with at-grade retail. To<br />

encourage on street parking, appropriate design standards<br />

for roadways, including bump-outs, should be developed.<br />

a) Parallel on-street parking is preferred over perpendicular<br />

or angled parking to minimize the overall width <strong>of</strong> the<br />

roadway and optimize sightlines.<br />

b) On-street parking may be situated within bump-outs,<br />

where appropriate.<br />

c) Bump-outs should be landscaped with street trees or low<br />

level ground cover and be designed to accommodate snow<br />

loading.<br />

d) Where appropriate, permeable paving should be<br />

considered to promote drainage and enhance the street<br />

edge.<br />

On-street parking provides buffer between traffic and the boulevard.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Where appropriate, bump-outs and parking infrastructure should be welllandscaped.


3.3.2 Bicycle Parking<br />

Creating a network <strong>of</strong> parks, open spaces, streets and trails<br />

for cyclists that connect to the Primary and Secondary<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes, the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, and the<br />

lakefront, should establish cycling as a major mode <strong>of</strong><br />

transportation in the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong>. The accommodation <strong>of</strong><br />

convenient bicycle parking is essential to support this option<br />

and ensure it remains a long-term transportation alternative.<br />

a) Bicycle parking should be provided at regular intervals<br />

in the Primary and Secondary <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes, the<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, and other areas <strong>of</strong> high pedestrian<br />

activity.<br />

b) Bicycle parking should be located close to building<br />

entrances and should be sheltered. Short-term visitor<br />

bicycle parking should also be provided.<br />

c) The placement <strong>of</strong> bicycle posts within the pedestrian<br />

realm should not impede pedestrian movement.<br />

d) Post-and-ring bicycle parking, constructed <strong>of</strong> aluminium<br />

or galvanized steel, is preferred as larger units can impede<br />

pedestrian movement and snow clearing.<br />

e) Bicycle storage facilities should be provided at public<br />

parks and open spaces to encourage alternative modes <strong>of</strong><br />

transport.<br />

50<br />

Bicycle parking should be conveniently located within areas <strong>of</strong> high<br />

pedestrian activity, including Primary and Secondary <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes,<br />

the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, and the lakefront. A simple post-and-ring,<br />

or similar style is recommended to minimize disturbance to pedestrian<br />

circulation.<br />

DRAFT


DRAFT


4.0<br />

Private Realm<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

DRAFT<br />

The private realm urban design guidelines are applicable to all the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s,<br />

and apply to development within private properties, considering the development <strong>of</strong><br />

large parcels, access and parking, and general building guidelines.


4.1 Development <strong>of</strong> Large Parcels<br />

The redevelopment <strong>of</strong> large parcels or a group <strong>of</strong> consolidated parcels should<br />

be designed as an integral part <strong>of</strong> the adjacent neighbourhoods and land uses,<br />

including parks and open spaces and natural heritage features.<br />

DRAFT


4.1.1 Community Structure<br />

Dunlop Street, and the historic Downtown area, is a successful on a grid pattern that is modified in response to natural<br />

example <strong>of</strong> a well-established urban neighbourhood open space, built heritage or existing street conditions.<br />

characterized by well-connected streets and blocks, streetoriented<br />

buildings and attractive boulevards. New large d) A variety <strong>of</strong> block sizes and shapes should be provided in<br />

developments in the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, particularly on<br />

the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s to accommodate diversity in the<br />

the <strong>Intensification</strong> Corridors, should achieve a similar scale<br />

built form.<br />

and allocation <strong>of</strong> land uses to ensure people can comfortably<br />

e) Block lengths should not exceed 250 metres.<br />

walk, bike or take transit to where they live, work and play.<br />

f) Where blocks exceed 250 metres, a mid-block pedestrian<br />

a) Expand the existing road network to improve connectivity,<br />

connection should be provided. This can take the form<br />

and allow traffic to dissipate to local destinations.<br />

<strong>of</strong> a walkway, parkette, or other publicly accessible open<br />

b) A connected network <strong>of</strong> streets and blocks reflective <strong>of</strong><br />

space.<br />

Downtown will reduce congestion, improve public transit<br />

g) Mid-block pedestrian connections should be a minimum<br />

and emergency vehicle access, and promote walking and<br />

width <strong>of</strong> 3.5 metres.<br />

cycling.<br />

h) Rear lanes should be considered to help reduce the need<br />

c) To maximize connections for vehicular, cyclist, and<br />

for street driveways <strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> high traffic roadways.<br />

especially pedestrian traffic, new streets should be based<br />

DRAFT<br />

BLOCK<br />

STREET<br />

Not longer than 250 metres<br />

Figure 22: Mid-Block Connections<br />

Provide mid-block pedestrian connections where blocks exceed 250 metres.<br />

Mid-block<br />

connection<br />

54


Sites along Bayfield Street, north <strong>of</strong> HWY 400 <strong>of</strong>fer the potential<br />

for large-scale redevelopment.<br />

Use existing drive lanes and intersections to determine a<br />

street network while providing connections to adjacent<br />

neighbourhoods.<br />

Using a well-connected street network as a foundation for new<br />

well-scaled development sites, buildings and open spaces will<br />

evolve over time.<br />

Figure 23: Street Network Structure<br />

DRAFT


4.1.2 Lot Size Variety<br />

There are a variety <strong>of</strong> lot sizes and shapes within the<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, including large commercial properties<br />

along Bayfield Street (north <strong>of</strong> HWY 400), small urban<br />

properties in the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, and residential<br />

properties along Duckworth Street (south <strong>of</strong> Grove Street).<br />

Continuing to provide a variety <strong>of</strong> lot sizes in larger scale<br />

development parcels helps to promote a diversity <strong>of</strong> built<br />

form and use.<br />

a) Lot shapes should be rectilinear where possible to<br />

maximize design and siting potential. Exceptions may be<br />

considered in order to address issues <strong>of</strong> slope, existing<br />

property boundaries or density requirements.<br />

b) Corner lots should be adequately sized so development<br />

within them can abide by set-back requirements on both<br />

streets.<br />

c) Lots adjacent to amenity areas such as community<br />

centres, transit facilities, parks or other natural or urban<br />

destinations should be designed to support higher density<br />

development.<br />

DRAFT<br />

56<br />

Figure 24: Lot Size Variety<br />

A mix <strong>of</strong> lot depths and widths along Bayfield Street encourages a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

built form and a mix <strong>of</strong> uses.


57 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

4.1.3 Transit Supportive <strong>Design</strong><br />

Transit use must be promoted and encouraged, through<br />

consideration <strong>of</strong> the urban structure and the design <strong>of</strong> the<br />

public realm, to ensure successful intensification in the <strong>City</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong>. New development within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s<br />

should achieve a density that supports transit use throughout<br />

the <strong>City</strong>. New development should also look to create a range <strong>of</strong><br />

complimentary uses at key destinations, and take advantage<br />

<strong>of</strong> and support high levels <strong>of</strong> pedestrian activity.<br />

a) A mix <strong>of</strong> land uses and higher densities should be<br />

promoted around key locations, including Major Transit<br />

Station <strong>Area</strong>s, <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes, and the waterfront,<br />

in order to create the critical mass required to make<br />

transit a viable option.<br />

b) Access to local transit routes should be located within a<br />

10-minute (500 metre) walking distance <strong>of</strong> most residents.<br />

c) Auto dependent uses such as drive thorough retail and<br />

car washes should be discouraged in the <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

<strong>Area</strong>s.<br />

d) Transit facilities should be located at public places such<br />

as parks and open spaces, community centres, schools,<br />

and community facilities such as libraries and galleries.<br />

e) Trails and bicycle routes should link to transit facilities.<br />

f) Secure bicycle parking and storage space is provided<br />

where appropriate.<br />

For additional guidelines related to transit supportive design at<br />

the Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>s, please refer to Section 5.6.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Transit facilities should be situated at key destinations, where pedestrian activity is high, and where sufficient pedestrian connections are provided.


4.2 Access and Parking<br />

Much <strong>of</strong> the urban form within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s is defined by surface<br />

parking. In the short-term, enhanced design is important to improve their<br />

appearance from the street. In the mid to long-term, these surface parking<br />

areas will become viable opportunities for intensification with the majority <strong>of</strong><br />

parking located in structured decks or below grade.<br />

DRAFT<br />

58


59 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

4.2.1 Surface Parking<br />

Much <strong>of</strong> the urban form within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s is<br />

defined by large surface parking lots. This is particularly<br />

evident on Bayfield Street (south <strong>of</strong> Highway 400), but is also<br />

a common condition throughout the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre.<br />

In the mid to long-term, surface parking areas will be<br />

prime candidates for intensification. In the short-term, the<br />

enhanced design <strong>of</strong> surface parking lots is important to<br />

minimize their impacts on the public realm.<br />

a) Large areas <strong>of</strong> uninterrupted parking should be avoided.<br />

The overall number <strong>of</strong> parking spaces should be minimized<br />

by sharing the parking between adjacent properties -<br />

especially in the evenings, weekends and other <strong>of</strong>f-peak<br />

times.<br />

b) Surface parking should be located at the rear <strong>of</strong> buildings.<br />

If the lot is not deep enough, the parking should be located<br />

at the side <strong>of</strong> the building.<br />

c) Where parking areas are adjacent to a public sidewalk,<br />

buffers such as landscaping, trees or bollards should be<br />

provided between the parking area and the sidewalk. This<br />

buffer should be located within the private realm to not<br />

reduce the total sidewalk width.<br />

d) Planting strips, landscaped traffic islands and/or paving<br />

articulation should be used to define vehicle routes and<br />

smaller parking courts that provide pedestrian walkways,<br />

improve edge conditions and minimize the aesthetic<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> surface parking.<br />

e) Where surface parking lots are located within close<br />

proximity to the waterfront, the principles <strong>of</strong> low impact<br />

development (LID) should be applied to control stormwater<br />

on-site and minimize discharge to Kempenfelt Bay.<br />

f) The amount <strong>of</strong> landscaping should be proportionate to<br />

the overall parking lot size, but generally, 1 tree for every 8<br />

parking spaces is recommended.<br />

g) Landscaping, or other parking area screening devices,<br />

should not obstruct the primary building façade or total<br />

visibility <strong>of</strong> the parking area.<br />

h) Distinctive pavement and/or markings may be used to<br />

indicate pedestrian crossings.<br />

i) Pedestrian-scaled lighting should be provided along<br />

pathways to enhance visibility and security.<br />

j) Preferential parking for bicycles, energy efficient vehicles<br />

and car-share services are encouraged.<br />

k) Service and drop-<strong>of</strong>f area circulation should not interfere<br />

with pedestrian circulation.<br />

l) Where appropriate, permeable paving should be<br />

considered to promote drainage.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Well landscaped parking areas provide shade/cooling as well as visual<br />

interest.


snow storage area<br />

landscaped traffic island<br />

with 1 tree for every 8<br />

parking spaces<br />

parking space<br />

demarcation lines<br />

permeable surface<br />

(where appropriate)<br />

planting buffer<br />

between parked<br />

vehicles and sidewalk<br />

building<br />

DRAFT<br />

Figure 25: Parking Courts<br />

Parking areas should be designed to reflect smaller parking<br />

courts through landscaped islands and clear pedestrian<br />

pathways.<br />

pedestrian walkway<br />

demarcation lines<br />

or change in paving<br />

material<br />

min. 1.5m<br />

pedestrian walkway<br />

with paving<br />

articulation<br />

clearly marked<br />

pedestrian crossing<br />

sidewalk<br />

60


61 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

4.2.2 Structured Parking<br />

Underground parking may not always be an economically<br />

viable option. As a large surface parking lot is undesirable,<br />

above-ground structured parking should be considered.<br />

Above-ground structured parking can be incorporated into<br />

new mixed-use buildings, maintaining a positive urban<br />

environment and allowing for a greater number <strong>of</strong> spaces and<br />

a more efficient use <strong>of</strong> land.<br />

a) When a parking structure fronts onto a street or open<br />

space it should be developed with an active at-grade use<br />

with an attractive façade that animates the streetscape<br />

and enhances pedestrian safety.<br />

b) At a minimum, 50% <strong>of</strong> the ground floor should be occupied<br />

by a use other than parking. In the case <strong>of</strong> a corner lot, 50%<br />

<strong>of</strong> the front and side <strong>of</strong> the building should be occupied by<br />

an alternative use.<br />

c) A vertical mix <strong>of</strong> parking, residential and/or <strong>of</strong>fice above<br />

should be considered a preferred development model,<br />

with parking on the lower floors and residential or <strong>of</strong>fice<br />

above. Shallow retail or <strong>of</strong>fice units should face the street<br />

minimizing the visual impacts <strong>of</strong> the structured parking<br />

lots.<br />

d) Vehicular access to parking structures should be located<br />

at the rear and/or side <strong>of</strong> buildings away from main<br />

building frontages and major streets.<br />

e) Pedestrian entrances for parking structures should be<br />

located adjacent to main building entrances, public<br />

streets or other highly visible locations.<br />

f) Parking within a structure should be screened from<br />

view at sidewalk level and the street-level wall should<br />

be enhanced through architectural detailing and<br />

landscaping.<br />

Please note: Additional structured parking recommendations<br />

may result from the <strong>City</strong>’s CPTED study (underway).<br />

Structured parking should contain active uses at grade in order to provide<br />

attractive façades, and to animate the streetscape.<br />

DRAFT<br />

The street wall <strong>of</strong> a parking structure should be enhanced through<br />

architectural detailing and landscaping.


1st phase intensification is supported initially by the surplus<br />

surface parking it replaces.<br />

Structured parking is incorporated into 2nd Phase buildings,<br />

providing easy sheltered access to adjacent uses without<br />

sacrificing overall parking spaces<br />

Once the 3rd phase buildings become viable, it is likely that<br />

underground parking will be financially feasible to incorporate<br />

into the base <strong>of</strong> the new structure. The majority <strong>of</strong> parking can be<br />

structured at this stage, allowing for new open spaces for visitors<br />

and residents.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Figure 26: Evolution <strong>of</strong> Structured Parking<br />

62


hood<br />

63 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

4.2.3 Lanes and Alleys<br />

Public lanes are recommended to service the commercial<br />

uses within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, and to provide access<br />

to structured and below-grade parking away from primary<br />

streets to minimize interference with pedestrian circulation<br />

(i.e. curb cuts).<br />

a) The paved area <strong>of</strong> laneways should provide adequate<br />

space for emergency vehicles.<br />

b) <strong>Area</strong>s at the end <strong>of</strong> laneways should be reserved for snow<br />

storage.<br />

c) Laneways should provide some variety in building form<br />

and set-backs. Long stretches <strong>of</strong> blank facing or rear<br />

building façades should be discouraged.<br />

d) Where laneways or alleys are used as pedestrian corridors<br />

(i.e. Dunlop Street), the rear façade <strong>of</strong> buildings should be<br />

similar in quality (i.e. materials, articulation) to the front<br />

façade.<br />

e) Where feasible, laneways should be considered as places<br />

to accommodate infrastructure, to allow for future<br />

intensification with addresses on the laneway (i.e. granny<br />

flats).<br />

f) Where laneways are required to provide access to<br />

residential parking facilities, the primary façade <strong>of</strong> the<br />

building should not face the laneway, nor should at-grade<br />

access be provided.<br />

g) Where residential units overlook a laneway, it should be<br />

designed to be aesthetically pleasing, including highquality<br />

paving, pedestrian scaled lighting and street trees.<br />

45 o<br />

Avenue<br />

7.5m<br />

rear property line<br />

10m<br />

Figure 27: Rear Transition to Neighbourhoods<br />

45 o<br />

7.5m<br />

Figure 28: Mechanical Penthouse Placement<br />

Neighbourhood<br />

Avenue<br />

DRAFT<br />

rear property line<br />

10m<br />

Neighbourhood


4.2.4 Servicing and Loading<br />

Where servicing and loading areas are required, they should<br />

not be visually obtrusive.<br />

a) Loading docks and service areas should be located at<br />

the side or rear <strong>of</strong> buildings and should be screened from<br />

public view.<br />

b) Where possible, garbage storage areas should be<br />

accommodated internally.<br />

c) Servicing enclosures should be constructed <strong>of</strong> materials<br />

that complement the main building (e.g. no chain link<br />

fencing).<br />

d) Service and refuse areas should be paved with an<br />

impervious surface <strong>of</strong> asphalt or concrete to minimize the<br />

potential for infiltration <strong>of</strong> harmful materials.<br />

e) Service and refuse areas should not encroach into the<br />

exterior side or front yard set-back.<br />

f) Loading and service areas may occupy the full rear yard<br />

if adequate landscape edge and buffer treatments are<br />

provided.<br />

Servicing enclosures should be constructed <strong>of</strong> materials that complement<br />

the main building.<br />

DRAFT<br />

64


65 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

4.3 General Building <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

New buildings within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s should be designed to address and<br />

frame streets and open spaces. Generally, new buildings should be appropriately<br />

massed and articulated to minimize their presence from adjacent streetscapes,<br />

and provide appropriate transitions to nearby residential neighbourhoods.<br />

DRAFT


4.3.1 Building Orientation and Site Layout<br />

The relationship <strong>of</strong> buildings to one another, and to streets<br />

and open spaces, influences the amount <strong>of</strong> energy they<br />

consume, the comfort <strong>of</strong> pedestrians at the street, and the<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> interior spaces. Buildings should frame streets and<br />

open spaces, and preserve desirable views.<br />

a) Buildings should be positioned to frame abutting streets,<br />

internal drive aisles, sidewalks, parking areas and amenity<br />

areas. On corner sites, buildings should be designed to<br />

frame both the primary and the secondary street.<br />

b) Where a building abuts a natural heritage feature or open<br />

space, the interface should create opportunities for easy<br />

public access and viewing from streets and adjacent<br />

developments. It is therefore encouraged that where<br />

possible, new developments in this condition face and<br />

open towards the public open space.<br />

66<br />

c) Main building entrances should be directly accessible<br />

from public sidewalks.<br />

d) The front streetwall <strong>of</strong> buildings should be built to the<br />

front property line, or applicable set-back line, to create a<br />

continuous streetwall.<br />

e) A minimum <strong>of</strong> 75% <strong>of</strong> a building’s frontage should be built<br />

to the applicable set-back line.<br />

f) The remaining 25% <strong>of</strong> the building frontage can be set<br />

back a maximum <strong>of</strong> 5 metres to accommodate lobby<br />

entrances, bicycle parking, or outdoor marketting areas<br />

(i.e. cafe seating, display areas, etc.).<br />

DRAFT<br />

Figure 29: Building Location at Street Edge<br />

Buildings should be appropriately located to frame streets and open spaces, with the primary entrance directly accessible from the sidewalk. On corner<br />

sites, buildings should be designed to frame both the primary and the secondary street.


67 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

4.3.2 Building Heights<br />

opposite R.O.W. property line<br />

The ability <strong>of</strong> buildings maximum to height fit into the existing context, and<br />

contribute positively to the character <strong>of</strong> the streetscape,<br />

is imperative to ensuring 80% <strong>of</strong> successful R.O.W. new width buildings 45 in the<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s. Generally, new buildings should have<br />

a mid-rise scale (4 to 8-storeys) that promotes humanscaled<br />

development, minimizes adverse impacts on adjacent<br />

streetscapes, and provides appropriate transitions to nearby<br />

residential neighbourhoods.<br />

o<br />

opposite R.O.W. property line<br />

R.O.W. width<br />

maximum height<br />

R.O.W. width<br />

front property line<br />

80% <strong>of</strong> R.O.W. width<br />

front property line<br />

45 o<br />

max. 5m<br />

a) Buildings within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s should generally<br />

be limited to a mid-rise scale, ranging between 4 to<br />

8-storeys.<br />

b) The maximum height (8-storeys) may only be achieved if<br />

the built form demonstrates compliance with all other<br />

design guidelines (i.e. step-backs, angular planes, etc.).<br />

45 o<br />

max. 5m<br />

45 o<br />

10.5m<br />

DRAFT<br />

Figure 30: Maximum Building Heights<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> angular set-backs, step-backs and angular planes help to shape the built form.<br />

10.5m<br />

7.5m<br />

7.5m<br />

rear property line<br />

rear property line


c) Buildings taller than 8-storeys are encouraged in key<br />

areas, including:<br />

• Within the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, adjacent to Lakeshore<br />

Drive, where existing tall buildings are located and new<br />

buildings can capitalize on key views to the Lake. The<br />

location and massing <strong>of</strong> these buildings (and taller building<br />

elements) should allow for continuous sunlight on adjacent<br />

waterfront parks, and views to Kempenfelt Bay.<br />

• At Primary and Secondary <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes,<br />

where taller buildings will act as landmarks along the<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> Corridors, and enhance wayfinding<br />

throughout the <strong>City</strong>.<br />

• On large lots, on a case-by-case basis, where appropriate<br />

transitions can be made to adjacent properties and all<br />

other guidelines in this section can be met.<br />

d) Taller buildings above 8-storeys should be limited to<br />

the sites above where lot size, set-backs, step-backs<br />

and building transitions can be made to respect the<br />

neighbouring properties.<br />

New development within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s will<br />

strengthen communities, and accommodate many new<br />

residents and jobs. To ensure the most efficient use <strong>of</strong> existing<br />

infrastructure, and create a vibrant streetscape, a minimum<br />

level <strong>of</strong> development is also required. To accomplish this, the<br />

<strong>City</strong> should require a minimum building height.<br />

e) All new buildings must achieve a minimum height <strong>of</strong> 7.5<br />

metres (2-storeys) to promote intensification and ensure<br />

the most efficient use <strong>of</strong> existing infrastructure.<br />

4.3.3 Minimum Ground Floor Height<br />

68<br />

Floor heights for commercial uses are generally greater than a<br />

typically residential floor. Recognizing that ground floor retail<br />

will not be immediately viable throughout the <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

<strong>Area</strong>s, a flexible ground floor height is recommended in order<br />

to accommodate future conversion to retail uses where<br />

appropriate.<br />

a) Ground floor heights should be a minimum <strong>of</strong> 4.5 metres to<br />

accommodate retail uses and provide sufficient clearance<br />

for loading areas.<br />

b) Ground levels should be free <strong>of</strong> any significant grade<br />

changes to promote barrier-free access and retail activity.<br />

DRAFT<br />

min.<br />

4.5m<br />

Figure 31: Maximum Ground Floor Height<br />

New buildings should have a minimum ground floor height <strong>of</strong> 4.5 metres.


69 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

4.3.4 Front Façade Step-backs<br />

The podium created through a step-back above the building<br />

base creates maximum a human-scaled heightstreetwall<br />

and mitigates<br />

the overall impacts <strong>of</strong> the building height on adjacent<br />

streetscapes. The remainder 80% <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> R.O.W. the building width envelope should 45<br />

be carefully considered to allow for a minimum <strong>of</strong> 5 hours <strong>of</strong><br />

sunlight per day on boulevards across the street within the<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s from March 21st (spring equinox) to<br />

September 21st (Fall Equinox) to ensure pedestrian comfort<br />

and encourage active use <strong>of</strong> the streetscapes.<br />

o<br />

opposite R.O.W. property line<br />

For more information on how a sun and shadow analysis can be<br />

used to ensure the 5 hour minimum is achieved, please refer to<br />

Section 6: Implementation Recommendations.<br />

opposite R.O.W. property line<br />

R.O.W. width<br />

maximum height<br />

80% <strong>of</strong> R.O.W. width<br />

R.O.W. width<br />

front property line<br />

front property line<br />

Figure 32: Front Façade Step-backs<br />

Example <strong>of</strong> building height responding to the angular plane.<br />

45 o<br />

a) A 45-degree angular plane should be applied at a height<br />

equivalent to 80% <strong>of</strong> the width <strong>of</strong> the right-<strong>of</strong>-way. Above<br />

this 80% height, building envelopes must step-back to<br />

adhere to the angular plane.<br />

b) On wider right-<strong>of</strong>-ways, a 45-degree angular plane applied<br />

at 80% <strong>of</strong> the right-<strong>of</strong>-way width will result in a step-back<br />

at the upper floors <strong>of</strong> the building. In this case, an additional<br />

“pedestrian perception step-back” is recommended to<br />

achieve a human-scaled building podium.<br />

c) Step-backs should be a minimum <strong>of</strong> 1.5 metres. 3 metres is<br />

recommended to ensure usable outdoor amenity spaces.<br />

DRAFT


Side Property Line<br />

min.<br />

5.5m<br />

4.3.5 Side Building Set-backs<br />

New developments in the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s should<br />

maintain as continuous a streetwall as possible, while<br />

respecting the adjacent properties access to natural light<br />

and air. As a result, new buildings should apply a minimum<br />

distance from existing buildings with side windows.<br />

a) Where a new building is adjacent to a vacant lot, buildings<br />

should be built to the side property line (with no windows)<br />

to allow for a continuous streetwall in the future.<br />

b) New buildings must maintain a minimum 5.5 metre<br />

distance from existing adjacent buildings that have<br />

windows on their side-facing walls.<br />

Side Property Line<br />

min.<br />

5.5m<br />

Existing buildings New building (no side Existing buildings<br />

with side windows windows permitted) with side windows<br />

New Building: Existing<br />

Existing New Building:<br />

New Existing Building:<br />

No Side Windows Building with<br />

Building No Side withWindows<br />

Some Building Side with<br />

Permitted Side Windows<br />

Side Permitted Windows<br />

Figure 33: Side Building Step-backs<br />

Windows Side Windows Permitted<br />

Side Property Line<br />

5.5m<br />

Side Property Line<br />

5.5m<br />

Side Property Line<br />

5.5m<br />

New building (side Existing buildings<br />

windows permitted) with side windows<br />

New Building: Existing<br />

Existing New Building:<br />

Some Side Building with<br />

Building with Some Side<br />

Windows Side Permitted Windows Side Windows Windows Permitted<br />

Side Property Line<br />

5.5m<br />

3.0m 2.5m<br />

70<br />

c) When the new building is set back at least 5.5 metres<br />

from the property line, it should incorporate glazing where<br />

possible.<br />

d) Additional set-backs will be required when the existing<br />

building has its primary windows on the side face. The<br />

distance <strong>of</strong> the set-back in these instances will be<br />

determined on a case-by-case basis.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Side Property Line<br />

5.5m<br />

3.0m 2.5m<br />

New building (some side<br />

windows permitted)<br />

New Existing Building: No<br />

New Building: Exis<br />

Building Side Windows with<br />

Side Windows Buildin<br />

Side Permitted Windows<br />

Permitted Side W


71 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

4.3.6 Side Building Step-backs<br />

It is important to maintain views and sunlight penetration<br />

to public boulevards through the articulation <strong>of</strong> the sides <strong>of</strong><br />

the building. Providing breaks in the streetwall on the upper<br />

levels achieves this, and mitigates the “canyon effect” on<br />

longer corridors.<br />

a) Where properties have wider frontages, the building’s<br />

uppermost storeys can step back sideways - allowing for<br />

the application <strong>of</strong> glazing, thereby reducing the amount <strong>of</strong><br />

blank sidewalls, should that building be built ahead <strong>of</strong> its<br />

neighbours.<br />

b) Narrow sites will not be able to reasonably achieve side<br />

step-backs at the upper levels, and as a result may not<br />

achieve their maximum permitted height.<br />

Figure 34: Side Building Step-backs<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

1<br />

2<br />

5 storey maximum sidewall<br />

Setback additional storeys and mechanical penthouse above<br />

Same requirements apply to future development<br />

3<br />

side property<br />

line<br />

Figure 35: Tall Street Wall<br />

Example where a tall street wall is desirable.<br />

DRAFT<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

side property<br />

line<br />

5.5m<br />

max. 80%<br />

height<br />

<strong>of</strong> R.O.W.<br />

5.5m<br />

min. 3 storey<br />

and 10.5 m<br />

side property<br />

line<br />

side property<br />

line<br />

Figure 36: Porous Street Wall<br />

Example where a more porous street wall is desirable, side stepbacks<br />

are encouraged.


4.3.7 Transition to Neighbourhoods<br />

Where <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s are adjacent to stable residential<br />

neighbourhoods, the application <strong>of</strong> an angular plane is<br />

recommended to provide a transition in height from mid-rise<br />

buildings to low residential homes to reduce shadow impacts<br />

on the residential properties, as well as the perception <strong>of</strong><br />

height.<br />

max. 5m<br />

a) Above 80% <strong>of</strong> the building’s permitted height, the property<br />

should step-back sideways 5.5 metres to provide sky<br />

views and sunlight penetration to the sidewalks in the<br />

right-<strong>of</strong>-way, and to other nearby properties.<br />

b) When a more “porous” 45street wall is preferred, side stepbacks<br />

should be encouraged above the minimum building<br />

height for that area.<br />

o<br />

c) Upper storey side step-backs are not required for buildings<br />

that are 20 metres (6 storeys) or less.<br />

max. 5m<br />

45 o<br />

10.5m<br />

10.5m<br />

7.5m<br />

7.5m<br />

rear property line<br />

rear property line<br />

Figure 37: Transition to Neighbourhoods<br />

Front, side, and rear property angular planes are recommended to ensure<br />

appropriate transitions to adjacent stable low rise residential development.<br />

4.3.8 Building Articulation<br />

72<br />

The aesthetic qualities <strong>of</strong> the building, it’s façade, ro<strong>of</strong> line,<br />

windows, and access points are all vital factors in how the<br />

public perceive a building, and how that building impacts<br />

their experience <strong>of</strong> the street.<br />

a) The façades <strong>of</strong> large buildings should be designed to<br />

express individual commercial or residential units through<br />

distinct architectural detailing, including entrance and<br />

window design.<br />

b) Despite the use <strong>of</strong> various architectural styles within<br />

the <strong>City</strong>, the design and material quality should be<br />

consistent and building materials and finishes should be<br />

complementary.<br />

c) Lots that face on to parks and open spaces should be<br />

subject to architectural and landscaping controls in order<br />

to provide an optimal interface.<br />

d) Corner buildings at key intersections should emphasize<br />

the focal nature and visibility <strong>of</strong> these buildings through<br />

elements such as bay windows, projections, recesses,<br />

special materials, and other architectural details.<br />

DRAFT<br />

e) Buildings should incorporate architectural details such<br />

as vestibules, recessed entrances, covered walkways,<br />

canopies and awnings to provide weather protection.<br />

f) A significant amount <strong>of</strong> the building frontage on the<br />

ground floor and at building base levels should be glass to<br />

allow views <strong>of</strong> the indoor uses and create visual interest<br />

for pedestrians. Clear glass is preferred to promote the<br />

highest level <strong>of</strong> visibility.<br />

g) Building elements should be oriented to maximize views<br />

to Kempenfelt Bay.


73 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

h) Building entrances should work in conjunction with retail<br />

uses and can be expressed and detailed in a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

ways including large entry awnings, canopies or doubleheight<br />

glazing. Retractable awnings and canopies may<br />

encroach into the public right-<strong>of</strong>-way provided a minimum<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2.7 metres <strong>of</strong> vertical clearance is provided. Permanent<br />

awnings or canopies that encroach into the public right<strong>of</strong>-way<br />

may require a permit.<br />

i) Where residential uses are included above retail uses,<br />

separate entrances should be provided.<br />

ro<strong>of</strong>top amenity space<br />

and/or green ro<strong>of</strong><br />

transition to adjacent<br />

neighbourhood<br />

(angular plane & setbacks)<br />

rear lane access /<br />

limit vehicle<br />

interruption on the<br />

min. 7.5m /<br />

2 storey<br />

building<br />

base<br />

lot depth<br />

(ideal 30m min.)<br />

streetwall<br />

up to<br />

4 storeys<br />

25.5m / 8 storeys<br />

max. building<br />

height<br />

tall<br />

ground<br />

floor<br />

3m min. step-back<br />

above streetwall<br />

45 o<br />

continuity <strong>of</strong> streetwall<br />

(lot frontage - ideal 30m min.)<br />

animated ground<br />

floor<br />

80% <strong>of</strong><br />

R.O.W. width<br />

Avenue allow for sunlight on the<br />

opposite sidewalk<br />

SIDE STREET<br />

Figure 38: Sample Building Articulation<br />

Diagram depicts some <strong>of</strong> the key components <strong>of</strong> the guidelines affecting the built form.<br />

j) Secondary entrances should not be the dominant<br />

entrance. However, they should be easily accessible and<br />

convenient for service, loading and parking areas.<br />

k) When building frontages exceed 12 metres in width they<br />

should be divided into functionally and visually smaller<br />

units through the use <strong>of</strong> façade articulation, internal<br />

courtyards, and networks <strong>of</strong> connected walkways and<br />

landscaping.<br />

wide sidewalk<br />

with trees<br />

mechanical penthouse<br />

(within angular plan)<br />

DRAFT<br />

AVENUE


4.3.9 Ro<strong>of</strong>s and Ro<strong>of</strong>scapes<br />

Mechanical penthouses that extend above the maximum<br />

height limit, but maximum fall within the height recommended angular planes,<br />

will not impact shadowing, will generally not be visible from<br />

adjacent sidewalks, 80% and <strong>of</strong> are R.O.W. minimally width visible from 45the opposite sidewalk.<br />

o<br />

opposite R.O.W. property line<br />

a) Mechanical penthouses may exceed the maximum<br />

height limit by up to 5 metres, but may not penetrate the<br />

recommended angular planes.<br />

b) All mechanical penthouses should be designed and<br />

clad with materials that complement the main building<br />

façades.<br />

opposite R.O.W. property line<br />

R.O.W. width<br />

maximum height<br />

R.O.W. width<br />

front property line<br />

80% <strong>of</strong> R.O.W. width<br />

front property line<br />

45 o<br />

Figure 39: Mechanical Penthouse Placement<br />

Example <strong>of</strong> mechanical penthouse placement within all angular planes.<br />

45 o<br />

max. 5m<br />

45 o<br />

10.5m<br />

10.5m<br />

7.5m<br />

7.5m<br />

rear property line<br />

rear property line<br />

74<br />

c) The portion <strong>of</strong> the building ro<strong>of</strong> that is not used for a<br />

mechanical penthouse max. 5m should be occupied by green ro<strong>of</strong>s<br />

and/or useable outdoor amenity space.<br />

d) Sustainable technologies, such as photovoltaic panels,<br />

are encouraged on the ro<strong>of</strong>s <strong>of</strong> buildings. These panels<br />

must fit within the prescribed angular planes.<br />

DRAFT


75 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

4.3.10 Materials<br />

The choice <strong>of</strong> building materials is integral to the appearance<br />

and function <strong>of</strong> new buildings within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s.<br />

Particular attention should be paid to buildings podiums, as<br />

this is the portion <strong>of</strong> the building that is most visible from the<br />

streetscape.<br />

a) All new buildings and developments should utilize building<br />

materials chosen for their functional and aesthetic<br />

qualities, as well as their energy and maintenance<br />

efficiency.<br />

b) All exterior building finishes should demonstrate a<br />

high quality <strong>of</strong> workmanship, durability and ease <strong>of</strong><br />

maintenance.<br />

c) Building materials should be used as they are intended<br />

(i.e. colour, texture, etc.), and should not be used to mimic<br />

other materials.<br />

d) Finished materials should extend to all sides <strong>of</strong> the<br />

building, including building projections and mechanical<br />

penthouses.<br />

e) The ground floor should incorporate a minimum <strong>of</strong> 60%<br />

glazing to enhance safety through casual surveillance.<br />

f) Building materials and finishes on building façades facing<br />

onto or visible from public streets and public spaces<br />

should not include synthetic siding sytems, mirror/heavily<br />

tinted glass panels, and unadorned concrete block.<br />

g) Blank walls or unfinished materials along property lines<br />

where new developments are adjacent to existing parking<br />

areas or smaller-scaled buildings should be avoided.<br />

h) Where possible, construction materials should be recycled<br />

to reduce the environmental impacts <strong>of</strong> extracting and<br />

manufacturing new materials.<br />

i) If no salvageable materials are available, efforts should<br />

be made to purchase materials from demolition sales,<br />

salvage contractors and used materials dealers.<br />

j) New construction materials should be locally sourced to<br />

reduce the impacts <strong>of</strong> transportation. Canadian products<br />

are generally designed to withstand our climate.<br />

DRAFT


Brick<br />

Prefinished Metal Panel<br />

Samples <strong>of</strong> preferred architectural materials.<br />

Man-made or natural stone<br />

Wood<br />

DRAFT<br />

76


DRAFT


5.0<br />

<strong>Area</strong>-Specific<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

DRAFT<br />

The area-specific urban design guidelines supplement the general intensification<br />

guidelines provided in the previous sections, providing recommendations that are<br />

specific to Mixed-Use and Residential Avenues, Mixed-Use Main Streets, Established<br />

Residential Streets, Primary and Secondary <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes, Major Transit<br />

Station <strong>Area</strong>s, the historic Allandale neighbourhood, and Lakeshore Drive.


79 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

5.1 Mixed-Use and Residential Avenue <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

As new development occurs on the <strong>Intensification</strong> Corridors, Duckworth Street<br />

(north <strong>of</strong> Grove Street), Bayfield Street, Dunlop Street (to south <strong>of</strong> Anne Street),<br />

Essa Road, and Yonge Street should evolve into Mixed-Use and Residential<br />

Avenues, or “major transportation corridors that balance the functional<br />

requirements <strong>of</strong> the street with the provision <strong>of</strong> an active, pedestrian-supportive<br />

streetscape.”<br />

DRAFT<br />

Figure 40: Mixed-Use and Residential Avenue Rendering<br />

The above streetscape rendering demonstrates the character that could be achieved on a street such as Dunlop Street as it evolves into a Mixed-Use and<br />

Residential Avenue.


5.1.1 Prominent Streets<br />

The Mixed-Use and Residential Avenues are key entrances<br />

into the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong>, and the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, from<br />

Highway 400. They will be responsible for forming the first<br />

impression <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> for most visitors and should be designed<br />

accordingly.<br />

a) Prominent streets should create a sense <strong>of</strong> entrance and<br />

arrival, contributing to community image and identity.<br />

Elements contributing to prominent streets may include:<br />

landmark buildings, street trees and other landscaping,<br />

feature lighting, special paving, and public art.<br />

b) Taller buildings, typically at a 1:1 ratio with the width <strong>of</strong><br />

the right-<strong>of</strong>-way, are permitted to concentrate density at<br />

key areas along prominent streets (i.e. Highway 400, and<br />

the <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes) and indicate the prominence <strong>of</strong><br />

these sites.<br />

80<br />

c) Development on prominent streets should meet a high<br />

standard <strong>of</strong> design, and be appropriately oriented to the<br />

public realm.<br />

d) The most prominent entrance features, including special<br />

landmark buildings, should be located adjacent to<br />

Highway 400, where the entrance to the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth<br />

Centre begins, and at the <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes.<br />

e) Minor entrances should be located on Duckworth Street,<br />

Bayfield Street, and Dunlop Street, to signal the transition<br />

into the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre. Minor entrances on Yonge<br />

Street and Essa Road should signal the transition to the<br />

historic Allandale Neighbourhood. Appropriate entrance<br />

features include landscaping, special paving, unique light<br />

standards and public art.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Figure 41: Prominent Street Rendering<br />

Prominent streets in the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s should have the highest quality <strong>of</strong> design, including street trees, special paving, unique street furniture, and<br />

public art, in order to announce arrival into the <strong>City</strong>, and character areas within the <strong>City</strong> (i.e. the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre).


81 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

5.1.2 Boulevard <strong>Design</strong><br />

As the major transportation routes in the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong>,<br />

the Mixed-Use and Residential Avenues will continue to<br />

accommodate high levels <strong>of</strong> vehicle traffic. It is essential<br />

that this be balanced with enhanced treatments within<br />

the boulevard, and that these streets be urbanized to<br />

support all types <strong>of</strong> active transportation and transit use.<br />

The place-specific design <strong>of</strong> the boulevard will be integral<br />

in the transition <strong>of</strong> these streets to attractive, pedestriansupportive<br />

destinations.<br />

a) On streets with right-<strong>of</strong>-way widths greater than 30<br />

metres, the minimum boulevard width should be 6 metres<br />

to provide a variety <strong>of</strong> street treatments Min. and 3.3 an m Wide appropriate<br />

Pedestrian Sidewalk<br />

buffer between pedestrian and vehicular traffic.<br />

0.8 m<br />

Edge<br />

Zone<br />

1.8 m<br />

Open Pit<br />

Tree Trench<br />

b) In special areas, such as prominent streets, <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

Nodes, and areas with a significant amount <strong>of</strong> retail uses,<br />

the minimum boulevard width should be 8 metres to<br />

accommodate a double row <strong>of</strong> street trees and a transition<br />

zone for active, at-grade uses (i.e. patio seating, display<br />

areas, etc.).<br />

For general guidelines related to boulevard design, please<br />

refer to Section 3.2.2.<br />

Building Face<br />

0.8 m<br />

Edge<br />

Zone<br />

1.8 m<br />

Open Pit<br />

Tree Trench<br />

0.8 m<br />

Edge<br />

Zone<br />

3.9m 2.0mm<br />

Min. 2.1 m Wide<br />

Pedestrian Sidewalk<br />

6.0 m<br />

8.0 m<br />

Boulevard Zone Boulevard Zone<br />

DRAFT<br />

1.8 m<br />

Open Pit<br />

Tree Trench<br />

6.0 m<br />

Boulevard Zone<br />

1.8 m Min. 1.1 m<br />

Open Pit<br />

Tree Trench<br />

Min. 3.3 m Wide<br />

Pedestrian Sidewalk<br />

to Building<br />

Face<br />

Figure 42: Boulevard Widths<br />

On streets with a right-<strong>of</strong>-way width greater than 30 metres, wider boulevard<br />

widths are recommended to accommodate enhance streetscape features.<br />

Building Face<br />

Building Face<br />

0.8 m<br />

Edge<br />

Zone T


5.1.3 Crosswalks<br />

Large right-<strong>of</strong>-way widths, and significant levels <strong>of</strong> vehicular<br />

traffic, make crossing Bayfield Street, Essa Road, Dunlop<br />

Street and Yonge Street difficult. As these streets transition<br />

to Mixed-Use and Residential Avenues, there will be a<br />

significant increase in pedestrian activity, and it is important<br />

that pedestrians can safely and efficiently move from one<br />

side <strong>of</strong> the street to the other.<br />

a) On large development sites where intensification will<br />

result in more people living and working along the street,<br />

additional mid-block crosswalks with signals should be<br />

provided to ensure safe pedestrian crossing opportunities<br />

every 100-215 metres is recommended.<br />

b) The use <strong>of</strong> concrete or painted lines for the crosswalk<br />

is preferred over unit pavers where crosswalk length is<br />

significant.<br />

For general guidelines related to crosswalks, please refer to<br />

Section 3.2.3.<br />

DRAFT<br />

82


83 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

5.1.4 Demonstration Plan: Bayfield Street (at<br />

Livingstone Street)<br />

The Bayfield Street (at Livingstone Street) Demonstration<br />

Plan shows how a typical large-format retail site, such as the<br />

Georgian Mall, can evolve into a long-term redevelopment<br />

area<br />

Key features <strong>of</strong> the plan include:<br />

• Proposed intensification within a generally mid-rise built<br />

form.<br />

• A revised street and block structure that connects<br />

redevelopment to the adjacent neighbourhoods and<br />

surrounding commercial development.<br />

• Smaller blocks to provide appropriate development<br />

parcels for a range <strong>of</strong> commercial, mixed-use and<br />

residential land uses.<br />

Figure 43: Bayfield Street (at Livingstone Street) Demonstration Plan - Axonometric View<br />

• Development forms that face the street with a defined<br />

building base podium and upper-storeys that step back<br />

to promote a generally mid-rise building height <strong>of</strong> 4 to<br />

8-storeys.<br />

• Where surface parking is lost, additional parking is<br />

provided in either structured decks above grade, or below<br />

proposed buildings (please refer to Page 62).<br />

• The integration <strong>of</strong> community-scale and smaller civic<br />

park spaces to accommodate a variety <strong>of</strong> public events,<br />

including festivals, outdoor markets. When appropriate,<br />

these areas can also provide interim parking.<br />

• The location <strong>of</strong> taller building elements at <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

Nodes (i.e. Bayfield Street and Livingstone Street).<br />

• The integration <strong>of</strong> mid-block pedestrian walkways to<br />

create a fine grain <strong>of</strong> walking opportunities throughout<br />

the area.<br />

DRAFT


Duckworth 1:1000 0 5 25 50m<br />

Duckworth 1:2000<br />

Bradford 1:2000<br />

Bay�eld 1:4000<br />

Bay�eld South 1:4000<br />

0 10 50 100m<br />

0 10 50 100m<br />

0 20 100 200 300m<br />

0 20 100 200 300m<br />

DRAFT<br />

84<br />

Figure 44: Bayfield Street (at Livingstone Street)<br />

Demonstration Plan - Plan View


85 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

5.1.5 Demonstration Plan: Bayfield Street (south<br />

<strong>of</strong> Highway 400)<br />

The Bayfield Street (south <strong>of</strong> Highway 400) Demonstration Plan<br />

illustrates the transition <strong>of</strong> this area to a mixed-use avenue<br />

that is well connected to the surrounding neighbourhoods<br />

and the YMCA community centre.<br />

Key characteristics <strong>of</strong> the plan include:<br />

• Proposed intensification within a generally mid-rise built<br />

form.<br />

• Redevelopment generally fronts onto Bayfield Street with<br />

a low to mid-rise building form.<br />

Figure 45: Bayfield Street (South <strong>of</strong> Highway 400) Demonstration Plan - Axonometric View<br />

NORTH<br />

BAYFIELD ST.<br />

• The tallest buildings (up to 9-storeys) are focused at<br />

the Bayfield Street and Highway 400 intersection where<br />

the lots are deepest and development has the smallest<br />

impact on adjacent low-rise residential areas.<br />

• The existing stable, high-quality housing south <strong>of</strong> Grove<br />

Street is preserved.<br />

• Buildings are set back from the property line to allow for<br />

expanded tree planting within the boulevard.<br />

DRAFT


orth 1:1000 0 5 25 50m<br />

orth 1:2000<br />

rd 1:2000<br />

ld 1:4000<br />

ld South 1:4000<br />

0 10 50 100m<br />

0 10 50 100m<br />

0<br />

20 100 200 300m<br />

0 20 100 200 300m<br />

DRAFT<br />

86<br />

Figure 46: Bayfield Street (South <strong>of</strong> Highway 400)<br />

Demonstration Plan - Plan View


87 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

5.2 Mixed-Use Main Street <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

As redevelopment occurs within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, streets within the<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre (i.e. Dunlop Street, Bradford Street, Toronto Street, Collier<br />

Street) should transition to Mixed-Use Main Streets, or “downtown commercial<br />

streets with active, pedestrian-supportive streetscapes.”<br />

DRAFT<br />

Figure 47: Mixed-Use Main Street Rendering<br />

The character that could be achieved on a street such as Bradford Street, particularly south <strong>of</strong> Dunlop Street, should reflect the best examples <strong>of</strong> existing<br />

streets within the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre (i.e. Dunlop Street).


5.2.1 Pedestrian-Supportive Uses<br />

Mixed-Use Main Streets will be characterized by active,<br />

pedestrian-supportive streetscapes. To support this vision, it<br />

is important that auto dependent uses, such as drive through<br />

retail and car wash facilities, are prohibited within Mixed-Use<br />

Main Streets. This can be accomplished through amendments<br />

to the Zoning By-Law (please refer to Section 6.1.1).<br />

5.2.2 Parks and Open Spaces<br />

Figure 48: Parks and Open Space Demonstration Site<br />

Semi-private mid-block open spaces complement a network <strong>of</strong> pedestrian streets and public open spaces.<br />

88<br />

In addition to the previously mentioned natural heritage<br />

features, there are a number <strong>of</strong> smaller parks within walking<br />

distance <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, including Shear Park,<br />

Queen’s Park, Heritage Park, and Centennial Park on the<br />

waterfront. As intensification occurs, and more people live<br />

and work in the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, it is important that<br />

Mixed-Use Main Streets are supported by new open spaces<br />

that are created to ensure all residents have access to outdoor<br />

recreational areas.<br />

a) <strong>Urban</strong> parks should be located throughout the <strong>Urban</strong><br />

Growth Centre to ensure all residents are within a<br />

10-minute (500 metre) walking distance <strong>of</strong> outdoor<br />

amenity space.<br />

b) Corner lots, some mid-block lots, and irregularly shaped<br />

lots can be developed into small urban parks where<br />

appropriate.<br />

DRAFT


89 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

c) <strong>Urban</strong> parks can be as small as one or two lots, but should<br />

5.2.3 Boulevard <strong>Design</strong><br />

Particularly on Dunlop Street, the <strong>City</strong>’s heritage main street,<br />

be at least 0.15 hectares in size.<br />

a consistent character has been established within the <strong>Urban</strong><br />

d) Parks and open spaces should connect to natural heritage<br />

features through multi-use trails and tree-lined streets<br />

to provide connections to the waterfront and throughout<br />

the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre to contribute to an active<br />

Growth Centre. This includes heritage style light standards,<br />

street signage, banners and street planters. New development<br />

on the Mixed-Use Main Streets should reflect and build on<br />

this pedestrian-supportive main street character.<br />

transportation network.<br />

a) On streets with right-<strong>of</strong>-way widths less than 30 metres,<br />

the minimum width <strong>of</strong> the boulevard should be 4.8 metres<br />

e) Wherever possible, higher-density developments should<br />

to provide an appropriate buffer between pedestrian and<br />

provide semi-private open spaces, including at-grade<br />

vehicular traffic.<br />

parks and plazas, as well as ro<strong>of</strong>top amenity space. This is<br />

particularly important for those who live in higher-density b) Pedestrian amenities within the boulevard, including<br />

buildings and do not have access to private open spaces street furniture, signage, light standards, and transit<br />

(i.e. large back yards).<br />

shelters, should reflect the existing heritage character<br />

within the downtown.<br />

f) Where sufficient open space exists in close proximity<br />

to a development, under Section 37 <strong>of</strong> the Planning Act, c) Public art, including special paving standards are<br />

a developer may provide cash-in-lieu <strong>of</strong> parkland, or a encouraged at key intersections to celebrate the heritage<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> smaller on-site open space and cash-in- <strong>of</strong> the Downtown.<br />

lieu. These funds should be used for enhancements to<br />

nearby parks.<br />

To achieve an appropriate sidewalk width <strong>of</strong> at least 4.8<br />

metres in the Mixed-Use Main Street areas, where the<br />

For general guidelines related to parks and open spaces, current sidewalk width is narrower, consider the following<br />

please refer to 3.1.2.<br />

approaches:<br />

For general guidelines related<br />

DRAFT<br />

to semi-private open spaces, d) Where possible, new development should be set back to<br />

please refer to 3.1.3. accommodate the increased boulevard requirements.<br />

e) Where feasible, opportunities to narrow the street<br />

pavement may be explored with the <strong>City</strong>’s Engineering<br />

Department.<br />

f) “Bump-Out” parking could accommodate wider<br />

boulevards at key locations along the street between the<br />

on-street parking spaces.<br />

g) Removing on-street parking is not recommended to<br />

accommodate a wider boulevard.<br />

h) Narrow boulevards may need to be retained where the<br />

above options are not possible. In this case, all efforts<br />

should be made to satisfy the general recommendations<br />

outlined in Sections 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 within the spatial<br />

limitations <strong>of</strong> the boulevard.<br />

For general guidelines related to boulevard design, please<br />

refer to 3.2.2.


5.2.4 Heritage Context Infill<br />

In the Historic Neighbourhood Strategy, the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth<br />

Centre is comprised <strong>of</strong> three historic neighbourhoods, including<br />

Downtown, Brock Park and Allandale. As intensification occurs<br />

within the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre and these neighbourhoods,<br />

careful consideration should be given to ensure that new<br />

buildings strike a balance between heritage character and<br />

creative, context-sensitive architectural design.<br />

Building Orientation<br />

a) Alterations to existing buildings should match the preestablished<br />

set-back <strong>of</strong> adjacent buildings to ensure a<br />

continuous street wall. This is especially beneficial on<br />

sites where buildings are currently set back from the<br />

street or are missing altogether.<br />

b) Where streets lack a continuous building frontage<br />

and there is no negative impact on the identified<br />

character defining elements <strong>of</strong> a heritage property, new<br />

developments should contain a set-back which reflects<br />

an average between those <strong>of</strong> adjacent buildings.<br />

existing heritage<br />

building<br />

setback a<br />

Scale, Height and Massing<br />

90<br />

c) Infill buildings and renovations to existing buildings within<br />

the historic neighbourhoods should not mimic adjacent<br />

heritage properties, but should have sympathetic scale,<br />

massing, and height.<br />

d) Heritage buildings should be retained and restored.<br />

Retaining the façade is not an acceptable substitute to<br />

the retention <strong>of</strong> the whole structure.<br />

e) Heritage properties should generally be limited to their<br />

existing height, not including the cornice or parapet, to<br />

encourage the retention <strong>of</strong> these key features.<br />

f) On blocks with significant heritage frontages, new<br />

buildings should have a height-to-width ratio that is<br />

similar to existing buildings.<br />

DRAFT<br />

infill building existing heritage existing<br />

building<br />

building<br />

setback b<br />

(average <strong>of</strong> a & c)<br />

setback c<br />

Figure 49: Heritage Infill Set-back<br />

Where infill is adjacent to two buildings with differing set-backs, the new building should achieve a set-back that is the average <strong>of</strong> the two adjacent buildings.


91 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

Building Articulation and Detailing<br />

g) New buildings within the historic neighbourhoods should<br />

not mimic adjacent heritage properties, but should have<br />

sympathetic window alignment, ro<strong>of</strong>-lines, entrance<br />

location, ground floor treatment and materials.<br />

h) The original façade materials on buildings within the<br />

historic neighbourhoods should not be changed or covered.<br />

Façade renovation should be in keeping with the original<br />

building articulation, using those elements that are intact<br />

and replacing those that are missing or damaged (i.e.<br />

columns, cornices, openings, windows, doors, etc.).<br />

i) Wherever possible, existing windows and doors should be<br />

restored and made energy efficient. Their replacement<br />

should be seen as a last resort.<br />

New Addition<br />

3-4 storey infill<br />

Figure 50: Heritage Streetwall<br />

New development within a heritage context should maintain continuity in streetwall heights and rhythm.<br />

Street Elevation<br />

3-4 storey infill<br />

New Building New Addition Ne<br />

j) Buildings should not be altered through embellishment<br />

or other decorative means against their initial stylistic<br />

intent.<br />

k) Additions or renovations in the historic neighbourhoods<br />

should reintegrate key aspects <strong>of</strong> heritage design that<br />

have been lost through degradation or previous renovation.<br />

l) In the historic neighbourhoods, storefront design should<br />

maintain a heritage rhythm and character through<br />

recessed entries and large bay windows.<br />

DRAFT<br />

New Building New Building<br />

Street Elevation


Materials<br />

m) Additions or renovations within a historic neighbourhhod<br />

should use materials that match or enhance the original<br />

structure (e.g. color, texture, scale, etc.).<br />

n) Where appropriate, heritage structures should be retained<br />

and incorporated into new developments, through<br />

adaptive re-use.<br />

o) In all renovations/alterations to properties within<br />

historic neighbourhoods, a heritage pr<strong>of</strong>essional should<br />

be involved to ensure the most appropriate renovation<br />

techniques and materials are employed.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Recommended materials include, from left to right: brick, stone, wood, and glass and brick.<br />

92


93 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

5.2.5 Demonstration Plan: Bradford Street<br />

(between John Street and Victoria Street)<br />

This area <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, between Bradford<br />

Street and Lakeshore Drive, has a number <strong>of</strong> large, vacant and<br />

underutilized parcels and presents a significant opportunity<br />

for the creation <strong>of</strong> a comprehensive development plan for the<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre and the waterfront.<br />

Key characteristics <strong>of</strong> the demonstration plan include:<br />

• Proposed intensification within a generally mid-rise built<br />

form.<br />

• A general transition <strong>of</strong> building heights with the<br />

tallest buildings fronting onto Lakeshore Drive and the<br />

waterfront, and transitioning towards the low-rise fabric<br />

to the west.<br />

• The creation <strong>of</strong> a street and block network that reflects<br />

the tight-knit fabric within the historic Downtown.<br />

Figure 51: Bradford Street Demonstration Plan - Axonometric View<br />

• The integration <strong>of</strong> pedestrian walkways that connect<br />

east-west to a linear park system, the waterfront and the<br />

<strong>Barrie</strong> Waterfront Trail.<br />

• The integration <strong>of</strong> semi-private open space at the centre<br />

<strong>of</strong> developments.<br />

• Enhanced streetsacape treatments, including double<br />

rows <strong>of</strong> trees, for streets and walkways leading to the<br />

waterfront.<br />

• Development <strong>of</strong> a 2 to 4-storey building base that is<br />

flexible to allow for both residential and/or at-grade retail<br />

opportunities.<br />

• Articulation <strong>of</strong> façades that reflects the scale and<br />

dimension <strong>of</strong> adjacent built form.<br />

DRAFT


Duckworth 1:1000 0 5 25 50m<br />

Duckworth 1:2000<br />

Bradford 1:2000<br />

Bay�eld 1:4000<br />

0 10 50 100m<br />

0 10 50 100m<br />

0 20 100 200 300m<br />

DRAFT<br />

Figure 52: Bradford Street Demonstration Plan - Plan View<br />

94


95 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

5.3 Established Residential Street <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

As redevelopment occurs within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, Duckworth Street<br />

(south <strong>of</strong> Grove Street), Dunlop Street (east <strong>of</strong> Anne Street), and Bayfield Street<br />

(at Grove Street) should transition to Established Residential Neighbourhoods<br />

characterized by buildings that are compatible with, and transition to, adjacent<br />

stable residential neighbourhhoods.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Figure 53: Established Residential Street Rendering<br />

The above streetscape rendering demonstrates the character that could be achieved on a street such as Duckworth Street, at Grove Street, as the street<br />

intensifies in a form that is consistent with adjacent residential uses.


5.3.1 Boulevard <strong>Design</strong><br />

The boulevard conditions that currently exist in the Established<br />

Neighbourhood Streets reflect a suburban condition,<br />

characterized by narrow sidewalks, large landscaped setbacks,<br />

and frequent curb-cuts. Where opportunities for<br />

intensification exist within the Established Neighbourhood<br />

Streets, the design <strong>of</strong> the boulevard should create a more<br />

urban condition.<br />

For general guidelines related to boulevard design, please<br />

refer to Section 3.2.2.<br />

Boulevards in Established Residential Streets should reflect a more urban<br />

condition, including wide sidewalks, street furniture, street trees, and spillout<br />

retail where appropriate.<br />

5.3.2 New Residential Buildings<br />

As intensification occurs within Established Residential<br />

Streets, there will be opportunities for higher density forms<br />

<strong>of</strong> residential development, including town houses, walk-up<br />

apartments, and where feasible, mixed-use buildings with<br />

retail at grade.<br />

a) Rear yard parking accessed from a lane is preferred over<br />

front yard parking to allow for greater flexibility in the<br />

design <strong>of</strong> the front façade and front yard.<br />

b) For residential units on the ground floor with direct access<br />

from the street, privacy should be enhanced through the<br />

creation <strong>of</strong> a private and/or semi-private outdoor amenity<br />

space.<br />

c) The minimum lot frontage for townhouse units with front<br />

attached garages should be 6 metres with the garage not<br />

exceeding 50% <strong>of</strong> the width <strong>of</strong> the building’s frontage. The<br />

end units are recommended to be wider to balance the<br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> house and garage to overall frontage.<br />

d) End units in a townhouse should place windows and<br />

entrances facing the public street and along pedestrian<br />

walkways to encourage these areas to be visible, active<br />

and safe.<br />

DRAFT<br />

e) Public walkways within townhouse developments should<br />

provide safe and direct access between public streets,<br />

parking and other site areas.<br />

f) Common open space such as children’s playgrounds<br />

should be provided, where possible and where public<br />

facilities are not available nearby.<br />

For general guidelines related to building design, please refer<br />

to Section 4.3.<br />

96


97 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

5.3.3 Demonstration Plan: Duckworth Street (at<br />

Grove Street)<br />

The Duckworth Street (at Grove Street) Demonstration Plan<br />

illustrates how redevelopment at a Primary Node on a Mixed-<br />

Use and Residential Avenue, can be integrated adjacent<br />

to a generally low-rise residential neighbourhood on an<br />

Established Residential Street.<br />

Key characteristics <strong>of</strong> the plan include:<br />

• Proposed intensification <strong>of</strong> a large, consolidated lot<br />

through a generally mid-rise built form.<br />

• Building heights in the range <strong>of</strong> 6-storeys fronting onto<br />

Duckworth Street and transitioning to 3-storeys directly<br />

adjacent to the established residential neighbourhood to<br />

the east.<br />

• The subdivision <strong>of</strong> the existing commercial plaza to<br />

create two smaller redevelopment parcels through a<br />

north-south and east-west street that connects Grove<br />

Street to Bernick Drive.<br />

• Opportunities to integrate either parking or open space<br />

at the rear.<br />

• A public rear-lane that allows for positive building<br />

frontage onto the new north-south street.<br />

• All streets and site edges have enhanced landscaped<br />

treatments.<br />

• Development <strong>of</strong> a 2 to 4-storey building base that is<br />

flexible to allow for both residential and/or at-grade<br />

commercial opportunities to support the adjacent<br />

student housing.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Figure 54: Duckworth Street Demonstration Plan - Axonometric View<br />

The demonstration plan illustrates the build out <strong>of</strong> one quadrant, based on the guidelines within this document. Should properties consolidate within<br />

the other quadrants, a similar build out would be encouraged.


th 1:1000 0 5 25 50m<br />

rth 1:2000<br />

0 10 50 100m<br />

DRAFT<br />

Figure 55: Duckworth Street Demonstration Plan - Plan View<br />

98


99 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

5.4 <strong>Intensification</strong> Node <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

As new development occurs on the <strong>Intensification</strong> Corridors, the Primary and<br />

Secondary <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes should evolve into intensive, pedestriansupportive<br />

destinations within the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong>.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Figure 56: <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes Rendering<br />

The above streetscape rendering demonstrates the character that could be achieved at a Key <strong>Intensification</strong> Node, such as Bayfield Street and Cundles<br />

Road, including taller landmark buildings at the corner, transitioning to lower-scale buildings on the rest <strong>of</strong> the corridor.


The <strong>Intensification</strong> Corridors include a series <strong>of</strong> Primary and<br />

Secondary <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes located at the intersection<br />

<strong>of</strong> major transportation corridors. These are defined as:<br />

Primary Nodes - Bayfield Street (at Grove Street), Dunlop<br />

Street (at Anne Street), Yonge Street (at Little Avenue, Big Bay<br />

Point Road and Mapleview Drive), and Duckworth Street (at<br />

Grove Street).<br />

Secondary Nodes - Bayfield Street (at Cundles Road, and<br />

Livingstone Street), and Dunlop Street (at Miller Drive).<br />

As the key destinations along the <strong>Intensification</strong> Corridors, and<br />

the major entrances to the <strong>City</strong> and the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre,<br />

the <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes should feature taller landmark<br />

buildings, significant public art displays (i.e. sculptures,<br />

murals, etc.), urban plazas, etc. These features should be<br />

accommodated on wide, pedestrian-supportive boulevards<br />

with active at-grade uses. Office and residential uses above<br />

will help to ensure safety through casual surveillance.<br />

a) As new development occurs on the <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

Corridors, the <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes should evolve to<br />

reflect the characteristics <strong>of</strong> a Mixed-Use and Residential<br />

Avenue (please refer to Sections 2.51. and 5.1).<br />

b) Where possible, the short-term redevelopment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> Corridors should be focused on the<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes. As the most accessible areas<br />

within the <strong>Intensification</strong> Corridors, these areas are key<br />

to establishing the standard for design that will spur<br />

development on the remainder <strong>of</strong> the corridor.<br />

c) Development in the <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes should<br />

collectively, through built form and streetscape design,<br />

create attractive gateways, characterized by landmark<br />

buildings, and wide pedestrian-supportive boulevards,<br />

signifying arrival to the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong>.<br />

d) <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes should function as neighbourhood<br />

focal points comprising higher density mixed-use<br />

buildings with uses that meet the convenience commercial<br />

needs <strong>of</strong> local residents.<br />

100<br />

e) The highest densities along the <strong>Intensification</strong> Corridors<br />

should be located at the <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes. A mix <strong>of</strong><br />

land uses is encouraged to encourage people to live, work<br />

and shop in the <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes, in order to support<br />

alternative modes <strong>of</strong> transportation.<br />

f) Taller buildings, typically at a 1:1 ratio with the width <strong>of</strong><br />

the right-<strong>of</strong>-way, are encouraged at <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes<br />

to indicate the prominence <strong>of</strong> these sites.<br />

g) Corner buildings at the <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes should<br />

emphasize the focal nature and visibility <strong>of</strong> these buildings<br />

through elements such as bay windows, projections,<br />

recesses, special materials, and other architectural<br />

details.<br />

h) Taller buildings should be limited to sites where lot size,<br />

set-backs, step-backs and building transitions can be<br />

made to respect adjacent properties.<br />

i) The minimum boulevard width at <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes<br />

should be 8 metres to accommodate a variety <strong>of</strong> elements,<br />

including a double row <strong>of</strong> street trees and a transition<br />

zone for active, at-grade uses (i.e. patio seating, display<br />

areas, etc.).<br />

DRAFT<br />

j) The <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes should be centres <strong>of</strong><br />

information, promoting key locations throughout the <strong>City</strong>,<br />

including the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, the waterfront, and<br />

key parks and open spaces. This can be accomplished<br />

through wayfinding signage, mapping, etc.<br />

k) Cycling facilities should be provided to link the<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong><br />

transportation.<br />

Nodes, and encourage active<br />

l) Where possible, <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes should be<br />

connected to key destinations in the <strong>City</strong> to encourage<br />

active transportation. This can be accomplished through<br />

existing and new trails, open spaces, and natural heritage<br />

features.


101 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

5.5 Gateway <strong>Area</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

The <strong>City</strong>’s gateway areas should be a gradual transition to the <strong>City</strong> and Downtown<br />

areas, and should be reinforced by the quality <strong>of</strong> built form and public open<br />

spaces to signify the importance and public role <strong>of</strong> the area.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Figure 57: <strong>City</strong> Gateway Rendering<br />

The above rendering demonstrates the potential build-out <strong>of</strong> a gateway into the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong>, including a landmark building and enhanced landscaping<br />

and streetscaping features.


The <strong>City</strong>’s major gateways are located along the <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

Corridors, and in some instances, within the <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

Nodes. Two types <strong>of</strong> gateways exist, including:<br />

<strong>City</strong>-Wide Gateways - Identify key arrival points to the <strong>City</strong><br />

from Highway 400. <strong>City</strong>-wide gateways are located on Essa<br />

Road, Dunlop Street, Bayfield Street, and Duckworth Street.<br />

Downtown Gateways - Identify key arrival points to the<br />

Downtown, and the waterfront. Downtown gateways are<br />

located on Yonge Street, Essa Road, Dunlop Street, Bayfield<br />

Street, Duckworth Street, and along the waterfront (i.e.<br />

Lakeshore Drive, Simcoe Street, Dunlop Street).<br />

These gateway locations should not be limited to a specific<br />

intersection, and should instead be defined by a gradual<br />

change in character and building fabric. For example, the<br />

recommendations provided throughout this document for the<br />

Mixed-Use and Residential Avenues will result in attractive,<br />

pedestrian-supportive streets, suggesting arrival to the <strong>City</strong><br />

from Highway 400. Likewise, approaching the core, a more<br />

close-knit building fabric will signify entry to the Downtown.<br />

Within gateway areas, this transition should be reinforced by<br />

both the quality <strong>of</strong> built form and public open space design to<br />

express the importance and public role <strong>of</strong> the area.<br />

a) Gateway areas should be highlighted through a<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> public/private initiatives. The scale <strong>of</strong><br />

these initiatives may vary depending on redevelopment<br />

potential, and availability <strong>of</strong> public space.<br />

b) New development within gateway areas should create<br />

memorable landmarks to assist with <strong>City</strong>-wide wayfinding,<br />

including uniquely designed buildings, parks and urban<br />

plazas, and/or special boulevard paving.<br />

102<br />

c) Where possible, gateway areas should have a higher order<br />

<strong>of</strong> streetscaping, including double rows <strong>of</strong> trees on either<br />

side <strong>of</strong> the roadway, decorative planting within medians,<br />

and wide sidewalks and boulevards. It is recognized that<br />

due to right-<strong>of</strong>-way limitations, this will not be possible at<br />

all gateway locations.<br />

d) Gateway areas should function as meeting and gathering<br />

spaces, and should include a variety <strong>of</strong> public amenities<br />

within the boulevard, including seating, wayfinding and<br />

informational signage, pedestrian-scaled lighting, and<br />

waste receptacles.<br />

e) Wayfinding signage within <strong>City</strong>-wide gateway areas should<br />

provide directions to key <strong>City</strong> destinations (i.e. Downtown,<br />

waterfront). Within Downtown gateway areas, wayfinding<br />

signage should provide more specific guidance (i.e. key<br />

buildings, districts, parks, etc.).<br />

f) Wayfinding signage should be considered early in the<br />

development process to ensure it is well-integrated into<br />

buildings, public art pieces, etc. to minimize visual clutter.<br />

g) Landscaping within gateway areas may accommodate<br />

more decorative species provided an effective<br />

maintenance program is implemented.<br />

DRAFT<br />

h) Opportunities for significant public art pieces are<br />

encouraged within gateway areas.<br />

i) Gateways may be specially lit to highlight unique features<br />

at night.


103 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

5.6 Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

As new development occurs in the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, it is essential that some<br />

<strong>of</strong> the greatest densities are concentrated within a ten-minute (500 metre)<br />

walking distance <strong>of</strong> the Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>s to support a viable transit<br />

network, and promote an active community where residents are encouraged to<br />

walk, cycle and take public transit as an alternative to personal vehicles.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Figure 58: Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong> Rendering<br />

The above streetscape rendering demonstrates the character that could be achieved at a Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>, such as the <strong>Barrie</strong> Waterfront Station,<br />

to create a more intensive, urban area that is well integrated into the adjacent urban fabric.


According to the Growth Plan, Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>s are<br />

“the area including and around an existing or planned higher<br />

order transit station within a settlement area; or the area<br />

including and around a major bus depot in an urban core.”<br />

In <strong>Barrie</strong>, there are three Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>s located<br />

in the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, including the South <strong>Barrie</strong> GO<br />

Station (Yonge Street and Mapleview Drive), the Downtown<br />

Transit Terminal (Maple Avenue), and the Allandale Waterfront<br />

GO Station (Lakeshore Drive).<br />

As intensification occurs at or around the Major Transit<br />

Station <strong>Area</strong>s, they should generally evolve to reflect the<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> Typology that they are situated within. For<br />

additional guidelines related to the individual Major Transit<br />

Stations, please refer to:<br />

• South <strong>Barrie</strong> GO Station - Mixed-Use and Residential<br />

Avenue (Section 5.1).<br />

• Downtown Transit Terminal - Mixed-Use Main Streets<br />

(Section 5.2).<br />

• Allandale Waterfront GO Station - Mixed-Use Main<br />

Streets (Section 5.2).<br />

General<br />

104<br />

a) Ensure a high concentration <strong>of</strong> density and people working<br />

and/or living within a 10 minute walk (500 metre) walking<br />

distance <strong>of</strong> the station. High densities may be achieved<br />

through a variety <strong>of</strong> building forms.<br />

b) Plans should encourage a mix <strong>of</strong> uses near the station<br />

rather than dispersed, segregated uses. These uses<br />

should encourage activity in the area at all times <strong>of</strong> day,<br />

and should include convenience retail uses that support<br />

transit passengers, including cafés, dry cleaners, etc.<br />

DRAFT


105 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

Site <strong>Design</strong><br />

c) New local roads should be provided, where necessary, to<br />

ensure efficient pedestrian, cycling, transit and vehicle<br />

circulation through the Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>.<br />

d) Clear, weather protected outdoor paths should be<br />

provided to ensure comfortable connections for those<br />

transferring between different modes <strong>of</strong> transportation.<br />

As development occurs in Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>s,<br />

these connections can be integrated into new buildings.<br />

e) Local trails and bicycle routes should provide direct links<br />

to transit facilities.<br />

f) Auto dependent uses should be discouraged within Major<br />

Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>s, such as drive through retail and car<br />

wash facilities.<br />

g) Limiting surface parking should be a key objective at Major<br />

Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>s. A variety <strong>of</strong> opportunities should be<br />

explored, including bucycle parking and storage adjacent<br />

to building entrances, preferential parking for auto-share<br />

and hybrid vehicles, shuttles to/from key locations within<br />

the <strong>City</strong>, etc.<br />

h) Transit facilities should be located at public places in<br />

Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>s, such as community centres,<br />

parks and public open spaces, schools, and community<br />

facilities such as a library or gallery.<br />

Streets and Open Spaces<br />

i) Streetscape improvements should provide a clearly<br />

defined pedestrian route to/from the Major Transit Station<br />

<strong>Area</strong>. This route should be distinguished from vehicular<br />

traffic areas by easily navigated, barrier free sidewalks,<br />

open spaces, walkways and/or well-marked crosswalks.<br />

j) At Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>s, social activities should be<br />

fostered through the inclusion <strong>of</strong> streetscape elements<br />

such as high quality street furniture.<br />

k) Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>s should include public open<br />

spaces, including parks and plazas, that serve as<br />

gathering/recreational spaces for the local and wider<br />

community.<br />

l) Wayfinding signage should be located throughout Major<br />

Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>s, ensuring easy navigation for those<br />

arriving to the CIty by transit.<br />

m) Public art, enhanced landscaping, and other landmark<br />

features should be provided at Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>s<br />

to reinforce the significance <strong>of</strong> these sites.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Figure 59: Sample Station <strong>Area</strong> Rendering 1<br />

Station entrances within Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>s should have a variety <strong>of</strong> amenities for those using transit (i.e. signage, ticket machines, etc.) as well as<br />

those waiting for transit (i.e. food, seating, public art, etc.).


Built Form<br />

n) The station building within a Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong><br />

should be designed and massed as a landmark building<br />

to reinforce the importance <strong>of</strong> the site, and assist with<br />

wayfinding throughout the <strong>City</strong>.<br />

o) Buildings within Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>s should<br />

include canopies (and other weather protection at the<br />

building edge), and internal passages where feasible, to<br />

ensure a continuous, weather-protected connection to<br />

the station.<br />

p) It is particularly important that buildings within the Major<br />

Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>s have a pedestrian scaled building<br />

base (up to 4-storeys), in order to ensure an environment<br />

where pedestrians can comfortably walk or cycle to and<br />

from the station area<br />

Station <strong>Design</strong><br />

Figure 60: Sample Station <strong>Area</strong> Rendering 2<br />

Weather protected access to transit stations should be provided in Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>s.<br />

106<br />

q) The main entrances at transit stations should include<br />

transit-related amenities (i.e. signage, ticket machines,<br />

etc.), as well as amenities for those who may be waiting<br />

for a connection (i.e. public art, seating, food, etc.).<br />

r) Transit stations should include an abundance <strong>of</strong> bicycle<br />

parking and storage facilities, in order to encourage<br />

users to connect to the station through active modes <strong>of</strong><br />

transportation (i.e. cycling).<br />

s) Station design should adhere to the principles <strong>of</strong> Crime<br />

Prevention Through Environmental <strong>Design</strong> (CPTED) to<br />

ensure the safe usage <strong>of</strong> the station at all times <strong>of</strong> day.<br />

DRAFT


107 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

5.7 Historic Allandale Neighbourhood <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

The historic Allandale neighbourhood warrants special consideration due to<br />

its rich history. As opportunities for intensification occur within the Allandale<br />

neighbourhood, new development should provide a careful balance between<br />

Mixed-Use Main Streets on Tiffin Street and Essa Road, and Established<br />

Residential Neighbourhoods throughout the remainder <strong>of</strong> the community.<br />

DRAFT


The historic Allandale neighbourhood is located within<br />

the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre. Due to it’s rich history however,<br />

particularly in relation to the rail industry, and the existing<br />

stable heritage neighbourhood, it warrants special<br />

consideration. As opportunities for intensification occur<br />

within the Allandale neighbourhood, new development should<br />

provide a careful balance between Mixed-Use Main Streets<br />

on Essa Road, and Established Neighbourhood Streets<br />

throughout the remainder <strong>of</strong> the community.<br />

The historic Allandale neighbourhood is loosely bounded by<br />

Essa Road, Gowan Street and Burton Avenue. The streets<br />

within the neighbourhood include Arterial Roads (i.e. Burton<br />

Avenue, Essa Road), Minor Collectors (i.e. Gowan Street) and<br />

Local Roads (i.e. Cumberland Street) with planned right-<strong>of</strong>way<br />

widths that range between 20-30 metres.<br />

Currently, the historic Allandale neighbourhood can be<br />

predominantly described as a Corridor Residential District<br />

(please refer to Section 2.2.2.). With the exception <strong>of</strong> Essa<br />

Road, streets within the Allandale neighbourhood are lined<br />

with stable residential neighbourhoods that generally consist<br />

<strong>of</strong> single and semi-detached dwellings.<br />

The dwellings in the Allandale neighbourhood are typically<br />

set back from the property line, with well-landscaped frontyards.<br />

Large, mature trees both within private front-yards, and<br />

along the boulevards result in a dense and consistent urban<br />

tree canopy throughout the neighbourhood. All <strong>of</strong> the streets<br />

contain narrow sidewalks on one or both sides <strong>of</strong> the street.<br />

On-street parking is permitted on both sides <strong>of</strong> many streets,<br />

slowing traffic and providing a buffer between pedestrians<br />

and vehicles.<br />

108<br />

On Essa Road development reflects an Auto-Oriented<br />

Commercial District, as described previously (please refer to<br />

Section 2.2.1). These areas will have the greatest opportunities<br />

for intensification in the historic Allandale neighbourhood,<br />

through infill <strong>of</strong> large surface lots, and the redevelopment<br />

<strong>of</strong> underutilized parcels. They should evolve into Mixed-Use<br />

Main Streets that reflect the conditions proposed throughout<br />

the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, including a tight-knit fabric <strong>of</strong> midrise,<br />

mixed-use buildings that transition appropriately to the<br />

remainder <strong>of</strong> the Allandale neighbourhood.<br />

In the remainder <strong>of</strong> the Allandale neighbourhood, there is<br />

limited potential for intensification. However, if larger-scale<br />

sites become available for redevelopment, opportunities exist<br />

for the incorporation <strong>of</strong> higher density residential buildings (i.e.<br />

townhouses and walk-up apartments), and potentially mixeduse<br />

buildings with convenience retail at-grade. Any such use<br />

should reinforce these areas as Established Neighbourhood<br />

Streets through buildings that are compatible with, and<br />

transition to, adjacent stable residential neighbourhoods.<br />

For guidelines that apply to intensification on Essa Road,<br />

please refer to Sections 3.0, 4.0 and 5.1.<br />

DRAFT<br />

For guidelines that apply to intensification within the<br />

remainder <strong>of</strong> the historic Allandale neighbourhood, please<br />

refer to Sections 3.0, 4.0 and 5.3.


109 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

5.8 Lakeshore Drive<br />

Lakeshore Drive is one <strong>of</strong> the most significant streets within the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong>.<br />

Planned as a Parkway in the Official Plan, Lakeshore Drive has the potential<br />

to become both a scenic drive through the downtown, as well as a significant<br />

pedestrian destination on the waterfront.<br />

DRAFT


Lakeshore Drive is one <strong>of</strong> the most significant streets within<br />

the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong>. Planned as a Parkway in the Official Plan<br />

Roads Plan (Schedule D), Lakeshore Drive has the potential to<br />

become both a scenic drive through the downtown, as well as<br />

a significant destination on the waterfront.<br />

A continuous waterfront park system runs immediately<br />

parallel to Lakeshore Drive, including Centennial Park,<br />

Heritage Park, and Allandale Station Park, as well as the <strong>City</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> Marina. This network <strong>of</strong> parks represents the most<br />

significant pedestrian destination within the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong>.<br />

On the east side <strong>of</strong> the corridor, these parks combine with<br />

continuous sidewalks and well-landscaped medians to create<br />

an attractive and comfortable pedestrian realm.<br />

However, Lakeshore Drive is currently a major transportation<br />

corridor through the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, which is reflected<br />

on the west side <strong>of</strong> the street, which has a predominantly<br />

vehicle-oriented character. For the majority <strong>of</strong> the length <strong>of</strong><br />

the corridor, an abandoned railway bed results in a very wide<br />

set-back that is currently used for parking. This, combined<br />

with some rear yard surface parking lots on Ellen Street and<br />

Simcoe Street/Lakeshore Drive, limits buildings from fronting<br />

directly on to Lakeshore Drive.<br />

110<br />

The development parcels along Lakeshore Drive are<br />

located within the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, and therefore, as<br />

redevelopment occurs, Lakeshore Drive should generally<br />

transition to a Mixed-Use Main Street as described in Section<br />

2.5.2. However, to reflect the prominence <strong>of</strong> Lakeshore<br />

Drive and the waterfront, special design considerations are<br />

encouraged.<br />

a) Taller buildings are encouraged adjacent to Lakeshore<br />

Drive to take advantage <strong>of</strong> the views provided to<br />

Kempenfelt Bay, and to reinforce the waterfront as a<br />

prominent destination within the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre.<br />

b) Lakeshore Drive, and streets that connect directly to<br />

Lakeshore Drive, should have enhanced streetscape<br />

treatments, including double rows <strong>of</strong> street trees where<br />

possible.<br />

c) Along the waterfront, the boulevard width should be 8<br />

metres to accommodate a double row <strong>of</strong> street trees and a<br />

transition zone for active, at-grade uses (i.e. patio seating,<br />

display areas, etc.).<br />

For general guidelines related to development adjacent to<br />

Lakeshore Drive, please refer to Sections 3.0, 4.0, 5.2.<br />

DRAFT


DRAFT


6.0<br />

Implementation<br />

Recommendations<br />

DRAFT<br />

To realize the vision for the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, updated zoning and <strong>City</strong> procedures<br />

are required. Zoning that reflects the recommended guidelines will provide certainty<br />

for the <strong>City</strong> and the development community and will encourage intensification along<br />

<strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes and Corridors, within the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, and at<br />

Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>s.


113 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

6.1 Overview<br />

The success <strong>of</strong> the guidelines in positively shaping intensification will be<br />

directly related to the implementation process. To ensure long term success and<br />

applicability <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong>, the following implementation<br />

steps are recommended:<br />

1. Policy and zoning bylaw amendments;<br />

2. Education Programs; and,<br />

3. Implementation, Monitoring and Updating Processes.<br />

DRAFT


6.1.1 Policy and Zoning Amendments<br />

Policy and process amendments are encouraged to<br />

incorporate the recommendations <strong>of</strong> this document into the<br />

existing Zoning By-law.<br />

As-<strong>of</strong>-Right Zoning<br />

To ensure appropriately scaled and designed development<br />

within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong><br />

Comprehensive Zoning By-law should be amended to allow,<br />

as-<strong>of</strong>-right, developments that reflect the recommendations<br />

<strong>of</strong> these guidelines, including minimum and maximum<br />

building heights, permitted land uses (i.e. mixed-use),<br />

building massing recommendations (i.e. step-backs), etc.<br />

This will help to catalyze appropriate development within the<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s by:<br />

• Providing clear guidance to the development community<br />

on the type <strong>of</strong> built form that is preferred within the<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s;<br />

• Significantly shortening the approvals process when it<br />

can be demonstrated that proposed developments adhere<br />

to the guidelines; and,<br />

• Removing the potential for a rezoning process.<br />

By streamlining the approvals process, As-<strong>of</strong>-Right Zoning<br />

creates an incentive for the development <strong>of</strong> mid-rise buildings<br />

(generally up to 8-storeys), which are an appropriate scale<br />

within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s.<br />

To demonstrate that their proposal is consistent with the<br />

guidelines, developers should be required to submit a brief<br />

narrative that, at a minimum:<br />

• Demonstrates their understanding <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

Typologies;<br />

• Provides a brief description <strong>of</strong> the proposed development;<br />

and,<br />

• Provides an overview <strong>of</strong> how their development satisfies<br />

the recommendations related to the relevant typology.<br />

Zoning Amendments<br />

114<br />

This study recommends amendments to the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong><br />

Comprehensive Zoning By-law to encourage a more<br />

appropriate and feasible form <strong>of</strong> development within the<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, including mid-rise, mixed-use buildings<br />

that are well integrated into existing neighbourhoods. The<br />

recommended amendments to the Zoning By-law include:<br />

Set Maximum Allowable Heights at 8-Storeys<br />

All sites within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s may be developed<br />

to a maximum height <strong>of</strong> 8-storeys (or 25.5 metres), provided<br />

they meet all other requirements outlined in Section 4.3:<br />

General Building <strong>Guidelines</strong> <strong>of</strong> this document. Due to lot size<br />

limitations, location, etc. not all properties will be able to<br />

achieve the built form criteria, and therefore will not be able<br />

to achieve the maximum height.<br />

Increase Allowable Heights at Key Opportunity Sites<br />

As <strong>of</strong> right, this document recommends additional height at<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes, and on Lakeshore Drive adjacent to<br />

the waterfront up to a 1:1 ratio with the right-<strong>of</strong>-way width<br />

or 11-storeys (whichever is less). Above 11-storeys, buildings<br />

must demonstrate that lot size and depth can achieve the<br />

goals <strong>of</strong> the guidelines with respect to sunlight access, views<br />

and privacy, particularly with respect to adjacent residential<br />

areas.<br />

DRAFT<br />

<strong>Area</strong>s along Lakeshore Drive are already subject to a Height<br />

Control Review (Schedule C <strong>of</strong> Official Plan), requiring<br />

developers to submit a Block Plan and Context Plan with their<br />

site plan applications. It is recommended that this Height<br />

Control Review be extended to include the <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

Nodes.<br />

A Review <strong>of</strong> this maximum building height should be<br />

done on a regular basis, considering the rate/frequency/<br />

incremental nature <strong>of</strong> development to ensure relevancy and<br />

appropriateness as the <strong>City</strong> and it’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s<br />

develop.<br />

Require a Minimum Building Height <strong>of</strong> 2 to 3-Storeys<br />

At a minimum, all sites within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s<br />

should be developed at 2-storeys (or 7.5 metres) to<br />

promote intensification and ensure efficient use <strong>of</strong> existing<br />

infrastructure.


115 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

Incorporate Built Form Criteria to Regulate Building Mass<br />

In addition to the maximum height provisions, sites must<br />

comply with the requirements for in Section 4.3: General<br />

Building <strong>Guidelines</strong>, including building set-backs, step-backs,<br />

and angular planes, which work together to define a building<br />

envelope.<br />

Require a Minimum Ground Floor Height <strong>of</strong> 4.5 Metres and<br />

Active Ground Floor Uses in the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s<br />

Ground floor uses such as retail, commercial, <strong>of</strong>fice or<br />

community uses, will help to create a vibrant, pedestriansupportive<br />

streets. A minimum ground floor height <strong>of</strong><br />

4.5 metres allows flexible use <strong>of</strong> the building, and can<br />

accommodate loading and garbage storage internally.<br />

Secure a Minimum Building Set-back to Ensure a 4.8 metre<br />

Boulevard<br />

Boulevards within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s should be a<br />

minimum <strong>of</strong> 4.8 metres to encourage a pedestrian-supportive<br />

streetscape with seating, public art, spill-out retail, etc. In<br />

the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, where sidewalks are currently<br />

generally 2.1 metres, this should be accomplished through<br />

the requirements for additional building set-backs from the<br />

front property line.<br />

Prohibit Drive-Through Uses within the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre<br />

In order to support the active-transportation initiatives<br />

outlined in this report, and to support pedestrian priority<br />

within the Downtown, it is recommended that the existing<br />

Zoning Bylaw be amended to prohibit the development <strong>of</strong><br />

drive-through uses within the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre.<br />

Require Shadows Studies for Taller Buildings<br />

The recommendations <strong>of</strong> this report direct taller buildings<br />

(i.e. greater than 8-storeys) to strategic locations throughout<br />

the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, including at <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes,<br />

within the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre adjacent to Lakeshore Drive,<br />

and on a case-by-case basis on larger lots.<br />

Where these buildings are proposed, as part <strong>of</strong> the development<br />

application process, the <strong>City</strong> should require the completion<br />

<strong>of</strong> a shadow study to demonstrate that the building will not<br />

create adverse shadow impacts on the streetscape, adjacent<br />

parks and open spaces, and nearby residential uses.<br />

The shadow study should include, at a minimum:<br />

• A 3D massing model showing all streets and blocks within<br />

the range <strong>of</strong> the shadow impacts;<br />

• A series <strong>of</strong> images demonstrating the hourly shadow<br />

impacts throughout the day on March 21 and September<br />

21 (the specific time should be determined through an<br />

additional study).<br />

• A written description <strong>of</strong> the impacts <strong>of</strong> the shadows<br />

cast by the proposed building on adjacent streets, open<br />

spaces, and residential neighbourhoods, demonstrating<br />

that no area receives less than 5 hours <strong>of</strong> sunlight per day.<br />

Planning Act Tools<br />

The Planning Act provides several tools for municipalities<br />

to shape the character and design <strong>of</strong> urban form. Tools for<br />

shaping growth and urban character include:<br />

• Establishing Minimum and Maximum Standards in the<br />

Zoning By-Law;<br />

• Height and Density Bonusing;<br />

• Cash in Lieu <strong>of</strong> Parking;<br />

DRAFT<br />

• Cash in Lieu <strong>of</strong> Parkland;<br />

• Site Plan Controls (with exterior design controls or not);<br />

• Development Permit System; and,<br />

• Community Improvement Plans.<br />

Outlined below are summaries <strong>of</strong> the tools that best address<br />

the needs <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong>.<br />

Minimum / Maximum Standards in Zoning (Section 34)<br />

This includes determining not only minimum and maximum<br />

building heights, but also the minimum lot sizes required<br />

to accommodate an infill project. These recommendations<br />

will be essential to prohibit the construction <strong>of</strong> single storey<br />

buildings within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s. Preliminary<br />

recommendations are provided within this document (i.e.<br />

a generally 8-storey character), but should be augmented


y site or area specific studies, particularly where higher<br />

buildings are encouraged (i.e. at the <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes,<br />

on the waterfront, and on large, consolidated sites). The<br />

minimum and maximum standards should be incorporated<br />

into the <strong>City</strong>’s Zoning Bylaw.<br />

This tool is recommended for the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong>.<br />

Height and Density Bonusing (Section 37)<br />

Height and Density Bonusing affords additional development<br />

rights in exchange for the construction or installation <strong>of</strong><br />

public realm improvements (e.g. transit shelters, public art,<br />

etc) and/or new community facilities (e.g. parks, day-cares,<br />

community centres, etc). Height and Density Bonusing is<br />

a demand driven tool where the demand for development<br />

is sufficient to support an environment where the added<br />

community amenity is covered by the added value <strong>of</strong> having<br />

additional development rights.<br />

Currently, opportunities for Height and Density Bonusing are<br />

considered through Section 6.8 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> Official<br />

Plan, providing there a need exists for such community<br />

facilities, and the development complies with the <strong>Urban</strong><br />

<strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> <strong>of</strong> the plan. Additionally, buildings within<br />

the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s that are condidates for bonusing<br />

should have to comply with the recommendations <strong>of</strong> these<br />

guidelines.<br />

Providing additional height and density must be done in a<br />

cohesive and carefully considered manner, and should be<br />

considered on a site-by-site basis as it would have to exceed<br />

the existing prescribed zoning.<br />

This tool is for moderate use only.<br />

Cash in Lieu <strong>of</strong> Parking (Section 40)<br />

Under Section 40 <strong>of</strong> the Planning Act, the <strong>City</strong>, and the owner<br />

<strong>of</strong> a property, may enter into an agreement exempting the<br />

owner from the requirements <strong>of</strong> providing and maintaining<br />

the parking required through the Zoning Bylaw. In such cases,<br />

the provision <strong>of</strong> cash in lieu <strong>of</strong> parking is required, generally at<br />

a rate that equals the cost to supply/maintain each exempted<br />

parking spot.<br />

116<br />

This is a tool that is <strong>of</strong>ten applied within the downtown core<br />

<strong>of</strong> a city, where land for <strong>of</strong>f-street parking is limited - however,<br />

under the <strong>City</strong>’s current Zoning Bylaw, new developments<br />

within the C1 designation are exempt from parking<br />

requirements.<br />

Outside <strong>of</strong> the Downtown, this is a tool that could be applied<br />

along the <strong>Intensification</strong> Corridors, and particularly at the<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes (and gateway areas), to accommodate<br />

and encourage taller and higher-density buildings, and to<br />

support the active transportation initiatives outlined in this<br />

document.<br />

The funds obtained through the application <strong>of</strong> this tool should<br />

be used to provide and maintain municipal parking facilities.<br />

This tool is for moderate use only and is dependent on efficient<br />

transit access between the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s.<br />

Cash in Lieu <strong>of</strong> Parkland (Section 42 and Section 51)<br />

Under Section 42 <strong>of</strong> the Planning Act, and supported by<br />

the <strong>City</strong>’s Official Plan (Section 6.4), it is required that a<br />

percentage (2% for residential or institutional, and 5% for all<br />

others) <strong>of</strong> developable land be conveyed to the <strong>City</strong> for park or<br />

other public recreational purposes. Under Section 51, and at<br />

the <strong>City</strong>’s discretion, a cash payment equal to the value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

land required to be conveyed may be accepted in lieu <strong>of</strong> this<br />

conveyance.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Where cash is provided in lieu <strong>of</strong> parkland, these funds should<br />

be applied to create new parkland, or enhance existing<br />

parkland within walking distance <strong>of</strong> the development.<br />

Alternatively, for development along the <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

Corridors, cash in lieu funds may be allocated to support<br />

the larger open space initiatives outlined in this document,<br />

which would provide benefits at a <strong>City</strong>-wide scale. One such<br />

example would be the improvement and maintenance <strong>of</strong><br />

a trail network through the Lovers Creek Ravine to create a<br />

continuous connection from the <strong>Intensification</strong> Corridors to<br />

the Downtown. Similarly, trail connections between existing<br />

parks and open spaces could be created and/or enhanced.<br />

This tool is recommended for the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong>.


117 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

Site Plan Control – Implemented with Exterior <strong>Design</strong> Control<br />

(Section 41)<br />

Exterior <strong>Design</strong> Control is an essential tool in shaping the<br />

character, materiality and design <strong>of</strong> new buildings, site plans,<br />

and adjacent boulevards (i.e. street trees, furniture, etc.). It<br />

allows the <strong>City</strong> to implement these <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

through a mandatory review and commenting process. Using a<br />

design checklist (included in the Appendix), and the previously<br />

recommended development narrative (see As-<strong>of</strong>-Right<br />

Zoning), <strong>City</strong> Staff will be able to review the appropriateness<br />

<strong>of</strong> a building’s design and determine what amendments, if<br />

any, are needed.<br />

In the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> Official Plan, a number <strong>of</strong> Special Policy<br />

<strong>Area</strong>s require Site Plan Control. It is recommended that all<br />

areas within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s should be designated<br />

for Site Plan Control, to ensure that development is consistent<br />

with these guidelines.<br />

Development Permit System (Section 70)<br />

Based on a predetermined vision for an area, the Development<br />

Permit System streamlines and expedites the planning and<br />

approvals process by combining zoning, site plan, and minor<br />

variance processes into a single application. This allows<br />

the municipality, in consultation with the community, to<br />

implement a variety <strong>of</strong> planning and urban design objectives,<br />

including:<br />

• A particular architectural design style;<br />

• Heritage preservation;<br />

• Energy conservation;<br />

• Efficient use <strong>of</strong> land (i.e. compact development);<br />

• Brownfield redevelopment;<br />

• Enhanced streetscape features (i.e. trees, public art, wide<br />

boulevards); and,<br />

• Transit and pedestrian-oriented development.<br />

For developers, the Development Permit System provides<br />

greater certainty about the requirements for development,<br />

and ensures a much faster approval process.<br />

Taking advantage <strong>of</strong> the appeal <strong>of</strong> an expedited approvals<br />

process, the <strong>City</strong> may wish to apply the Development Permit<br />

System at the <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes in order to attract<br />

developers and direct the initial build-out <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

Corridors to these key areas as recommended throughout this<br />

document. Additional studies are encouraged to build on the<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> these guidelines, and to determine a<br />

specific vision for each <strong>Intensification</strong> Node.<br />

Similarly, the <strong>City</strong> may wish to initiate a Development Permit<br />

System to assist in the revitalization <strong>of</strong> specific Downtown<br />

areas.<br />

Subject to further study, this tool is recommended for the <strong>City</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong><br />

Community Improvement Plans (Section 28)<br />

A Community Improvement Plan affords a municipality the<br />

power to acquire, hold, clear, lease and sell land in designated<br />

areas and to provide grant or loan incentives for landowners<br />

and developers to undertake sustainable activities.<br />

There are currently a number <strong>of</strong> CIPs existing within the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Barrie</strong>, and in the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, including:<br />

• The ‘Next Wave’ Downtown Community Improvement Plan,<br />

focused on the Historic Downtown; and,<br />

DRAFT<br />

• The Allandale Centre Community Improvement Plan; and,<br />

• The Georgian College Neighbourhood Community<br />

Improvement Plan.<br />

Loan and grant packages are available for commercial<br />

and residential projects that increase the functionality <strong>of</strong><br />

existing building, promote the development <strong>of</strong> vacant and<br />

underutilized sites, and improve or restore exterior building<br />

façades and signage.<br />

It is recommended that opportunities be explored to<br />

incorporate Community Improvement Plans along the<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> Corridors, or segments <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

Corridors, where feasible.<br />

Funding for necessary infrastructure improvements to<br />

support intensification within the Community Improvement<br />

Plan areas should be investigated using Tax Increment<br />

Equivalent Financing Programs.


6.1.2 Education Programs<br />

Developer Information Package<br />

The recommendations <strong>of</strong> this document are intended to<br />

assist the evolution <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s into active,<br />

pedestrian-supportive streets. Accordingly, the built form<br />

recommended varies significantly from the standard practice<br />

in <strong>Barrie</strong>. Recognizing this, it is recommended that the <strong>City</strong><br />

work with local developers and home builders to facilitate the<br />

transition.<br />

The Executive Summary in this document summarizes the<br />

evolution <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes and Corridors, the<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, and the Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>s, as<br />

well as the key objectives for each <strong>Intensification</strong> Typology.<br />

The <strong>City</strong> should use this information at initial meetings to help<br />

developers to navigate the guidelines and identify the core<br />

principles that the <strong>City</strong> is looking for within the <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

<strong>Area</strong>s.<br />

<strong>Design</strong> Checklist<br />

An <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> Checklist has been prepared to allow for the<br />

review <strong>of</strong> development and design proposals/applications<br />

in reference to the recommendations in this document. The<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> the checklist is to facilitate the quick evaluation<br />

<strong>of</strong> designs to determine if a project conforms to the<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> these guidelines. It is recommended<br />

that designers evaluate their projects in advance <strong>of</strong> a<br />

submission to the <strong>City</strong> and identify any non-compliance on<br />

the checklist to be submitted with the application. This will<br />

assist <strong>City</strong> Staff with their evaluation and add transparency<br />

to the review process. A digital copy <strong>of</strong> the checklist should be<br />

made available on the <strong>City</strong>’s website.<br />

Regular Information Sessions<br />

On-going communication with residents, business owners<br />

and developers about the intensification guidelines should<br />

be undertaken, both before and after developments are<br />

proposed and built. A yearly update/discussion forum<br />

encourages public participation and education on the design<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s and is an opportunity to highlight<br />

examples <strong>of</strong> well executed developments that meet the <strong>City</strong>’s<br />

vision.<br />

<strong>Design</strong> Awards<br />

118<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> design awards acknowledge best practices and help<br />

to bring awareness to good urban design and its role in the<br />

community. It is recommended that the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> hosts<br />

urban design awards at least every three years, as this will<br />

provide the opportunity to celebrate successful pilot projects<br />

within the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s. These awards should be<br />

coordinated with regular information sessions. Recognizing<br />

successful design projects at any scale should be a priority as<br />

it creates awareness <strong>of</strong> the importance <strong>of</strong> good urban design.<br />

6.1.3 Implementation, Monitoring and Updating<br />

Processes<br />

Implementation<br />

Status Quo<br />

Staff will implement the design guidelines as part <strong>of</strong> their<br />

review <strong>of</strong> development applications and in consultation with<br />

the public and members <strong>of</strong> the development community. It is<br />

recommended that the <strong>City</strong> make use <strong>of</strong> peer reviews wherever<br />

a second opinion or expertise in a specific field is required. If<br />

the <strong>City</strong> is finding they require peer reviews more frequently,<br />

they could transition to a more formalized <strong>Design</strong> Review<br />

Panel which focuses on larger development applications (i.e.<br />

brownfield sites.).<br />

DRAFT<br />

Peer Review<br />

Peer Review is a review process between the municipality<br />

and a third party peer reviewer that takes place following<br />

the initial review <strong>of</strong> a proposal. A Peer Review is beneficial<br />

as it allows development applications to be reviewed for<br />

their compliance with the urban design guidelines, but also<br />

independently based on the merit <strong>of</strong> the proposal.<br />

The recommendations that result from a Peer Review focus<br />

on requirements that result in a high quality and integrated<br />

development, are achievable and financially feasible.<br />

The final recommendations <strong>of</strong> the peer review will be<br />

considered by the <strong>City</strong>’s Planning Director, Manager <strong>of</strong><br />

Development Control, and Manager <strong>of</strong> Policy in the issuance<br />

<strong>of</strong> delegated Site Plan Approval. The Director will weigh these<br />

comments as all others and make the final decision. The<br />

decision can be appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board, as<br />

is the current practice.


119 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

<strong>Design</strong> Review Panel<br />

An alternative option for reviewing large scale, complex<br />

applications could be a <strong>Design</strong> Review Panel to guide, evaluate<br />

and advise on the design <strong>of</strong> these larger developments (i.e.<br />

brownfield sites, etc.). Based on an application process, the<br />

Panel should be comprised <strong>of</strong> volunteers that are qualified<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essionals in the field <strong>of</strong> architecture, urban design,<br />

planning and landscape architecture and can review design<br />

applications at various stages <strong>of</strong> design, including concept,<br />

schematic design and design development.<br />

A Panel allows for greater flexibility in the application<br />

<strong>of</strong> the guidelines to achieve design excellence. The draft<br />

responsibilities and considerations for a <strong>Design</strong> Review Panel<br />

are outlined below:<br />

• Responsibilities<br />

Review <strong>of</strong> development proposals in accordance with the<br />

urban design guidelines outlined in this document.<br />

Review <strong>of</strong> projects proposed in the public realm (parks,<br />

streetscape treatments, municipally controlled parking,<br />

etc.).<br />

Provide design advice as needed.<br />

• Considerations<br />

Should the <strong>City</strong> decide to implement this process, the<br />

following are suggested considerations for the <strong>Design</strong><br />

Review Panel:<br />

• Pecuniary interest;<br />

• Tenure; and,<br />

• Composition <strong>of</strong> the Panel.<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong>er<br />

As part <strong>of</strong> the implementation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong><br />

<strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong>, it is strongly recommended that<br />

the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> create a full-time staff position for an<br />

urban designer. This could help to decrease the number <strong>of</strong><br />

peer reviews required, and could potentially take the place <strong>of</strong><br />

having a <strong>Design</strong> Review Panel.<br />

<strong>Design</strong> Guideline Updates & Monitoring<br />

Following the regular information sessions (outlined on the<br />

previous page) a meeting <strong>of</strong> <strong>City</strong> Staff from all applicable<br />

departments should be held to discuss the outcomes and<br />

feedback received at that meeting. All recurring issues or<br />

challenges with implementing the guidelines should also<br />

be discussed. A general file can be kept on the Guideline<br />

Update and should contain a summary <strong>of</strong> guideline issues as<br />

they arise. Required amendments to the guidelines should<br />

be identified as a part <strong>of</strong> that general meeting, and it is<br />

recommended that the guidelines be reviewed, and amended<br />

as required, every five years.<br />

As the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s develop, revisions to the<br />

guidelines should address any emergent issues that are not<br />

evident at this time.<br />

Exceptions to the <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

When implementing design guidelines it is important to<br />

recognize that exceptions can sometime be warranted and<br />

that at times a project that strives for excellence in design can<br />

demonstrate that a specific guideline is not appropriate in that<br />

instance. It is the responsibility <strong>of</strong> the designer/developer/<br />

builder to demonstrate to the <strong>City</strong> where this exception exists<br />

and it is at the discretion <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> to support or not support<br />

that justification. In cases where the <strong>City</strong> requires further<br />

review <strong>of</strong> applications, a Peer Review Process should be<br />

undertaken.<br />

DRAFT


DRAFT<br />

120


Appendix A<br />

Existing Policy Framework<br />

DRAFT


DRAFT


Existing Policy Framework<br />

Provincial Policy Statement (2005)<br />

The Provincial Policy Statement provides policy direction on<br />

matters <strong>of</strong> provincial interest related to land use planning and<br />

development. As a key part <strong>of</strong> Ontario’s policy-led planning<br />

system, the Provincial Policy Statement sets the policy<br />

foundation for regulating the development and use <strong>of</strong> land. It<br />

also supports the provincial goal to enhance the quality <strong>of</strong> life<br />

for the citizens <strong>of</strong> Ontario.<br />

The Provincial Policy Statement focuses growth within<br />

settlement areas and away from significant or sensitive<br />

resources and areas which may pose a risk to public health<br />

and safety. It recognizes that the wise management <strong>of</strong><br />

development may involve directing, promoting or sustaining<br />

growth. Land use must be carefully managed to accommodate<br />

appropriate development to meet the full range <strong>of</strong> current and<br />

future needs, while achieving efficient development patterns.<br />

Efficient development patterns optimize the use <strong>of</strong> land,<br />

resources and public investment in infrastructure and<br />

public service facilities. These land use patterns promote<br />

a mix <strong>of</strong> housing, employment, parks and open spaces, and<br />

transportation choices that facilitate pedestrian mobility<br />

and other modes <strong>of</strong> travel. They also support the financial<br />

well-being <strong>of</strong> the Province and municipalities over the long<br />

term, and minimize the undesirable effects <strong>of</strong> development,<br />

including impacts on air, water and other resources. Strong,<br />

liveable and healthy communities enhance social well-being<br />

and are economically and environmentally sound.<br />

Places to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden<br />

Horseshoe (2006)<br />

In Places to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden<br />

Horseshoe (The Growth Plan), the downtown and waterfront<br />

area <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> is identified as an <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, while<br />

the remainder <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> is designated Built-Up <strong>Area</strong> -<br />

Conceptual. The Growth Plan promotes future growth within<br />

these areas, where the infrastructure exists to support it,<br />

calling for the development <strong>of</strong> complete communities, with a<br />

mix <strong>of</strong> land uses, a range and mix <strong>of</strong> employment and housing<br />

types, high quality public open space and easy access to local<br />

stores and services.<br />

Specifically, the Growth Plan directs intensification in <strong>Urban</strong><br />

Growth Centres, along <strong>Intensification</strong> Corridors, and at Major<br />

Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>s. <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centres will be key<br />

focal points within the Region and should accommodate a<br />

minimum gross density <strong>of</strong> 150 residents and jobs combined<br />

per hectare by 2031. Through revitalization, the <strong>Urban</strong><br />

Growth Centre should become a vibrant, mixed-use, transitsupportive<br />

community. It should be linked to other <strong>Urban</strong><br />

Growth Centres in the Region through an extensive, multimodal<br />

transportation system.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>s will accommodate increased<br />

residential and employment densities to support existing<br />

and planned transit services. They will be characterized by<br />

a mix <strong>of</strong> uses, including residential, <strong>of</strong>fice, institutional and<br />

commercial and will encourage access from various modes <strong>of</strong><br />

transportation, including walking, cycling and transit.<br />

On <strong>Intensification</strong> Corridors (designated through the Official<br />

Plan), the Growth Plan advocates a mix <strong>of</strong> uses, and increased<br />

residential and employment densities, to support existing<br />

and planned transit levels. <strong>Intensification</strong> should focus on<br />

providing local services, including recreational, cultural and<br />

entertainment uses.<br />

iii


iv <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

The Growth Plan is developed under the Places to Grow Act.<br />

It builds on the Greenbelt Plan and the Provincial Policy<br />

Statement, providing a framework for growth in the Region<br />

until 2031. The plan focuses on transportation, infrastructure<br />

planning, land-use planning, urban form, housing, natural<br />

heritage and resource protection, in order to support the<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> Ontario’s vision for building stronger and more<br />

prosperous communities. The Growth Plan outlines broad<br />

parameters for intensification, and directs all municipalities<br />

to develop a detailed implementation strategy through their<br />

Official Plans and other supporting documents.<br />

The <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> Official Plan (June, 2009)<br />

The <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> Official Plan provides directions to ensure<br />

that future intensification does not compromise the <strong>City</strong>’s<br />

capacity to provide a healthy community environment. A<br />

key objective is to accommodate intensification needs in a<br />

way that achieves complete communities with a mix <strong>of</strong> jobs,<br />

local services, housing, open space, schools and recreation<br />

opportunities.<br />

The Official Plan directs intensification to a series <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s (Schedule I), at densities that are transit<br />

supportive and provide linkages to major transportation<br />

hubs and routes. The <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s include the <strong>Urban</strong><br />

Growth Centre, a series <strong>of</strong> Primary and Secondary Corridors<br />

and Nodes located along key Arterial Roads, and the Major<br />

Transit Stations (insert diagram <strong>of</strong> <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s).<br />

The <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre is further designated as a<br />

<strong>City</strong> Centre (Schedule A - Land Use), which encourages<br />

intensification through a mix <strong>of</strong> uses, including retail, service,<br />

<strong>of</strong>fice, institutional, and public uses, to accommodate a<br />

density target <strong>of</strong> 150 persons and jobs/hectare (for a potential<br />

population <strong>of</strong> 12,500 persons). This includes a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

housing types, at medium (40-53 units/hectare) and high<br />

densities (greater than 53 units/hectare), that promote the<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre as a vibrant and viable focal area.<br />

DRAFT<br />

A variety <strong>of</strong> land use designations (Schedule A) are found<br />

along the intensification corridors, as summarized:<br />

• Duckworth Street/Codrington Street - Residential with<br />

some Highway 400 Industrial.<br />

• Bayfield Street - <strong>City</strong> Centre east <strong>of</strong> Highway 400 with a mix<br />

<strong>of</strong> Commercial to the west (including General Commercial<br />

and Community Centre Commercial).<br />

• Dunlop Street - General Commercial with some General<br />

Industrial (west <strong>of</strong> Highway 400) and Residential (east <strong>of</strong><br />

Highway 400)


• Essa Road - A broad mix <strong>of</strong> uses, including Residential,<br />

General Commercial, Highway 400 Industrial, General<br />

Industrial and Institutional.<br />

• Yonge Street - General Commercial closest to <strong>Urban</strong><br />

Growth Centre, with Commercial and Institutional uses at<br />

key nodes and Residential between.<br />

Where the <strong>Intensification</strong> Corridors are designated<br />

Residential, the Official Plan encourages densities that<br />

support transit use and alternative modes <strong>of</strong> transportation,<br />

including medium (40-53 units/hectare) and high density<br />

(greater than 53 units/hectare) dwellings, such as triplexes,<br />

fourplexes, apartments, and townhouses. Such developments<br />

should have high-quality urban design that minimizes the<br />

impacts on adjacent stable neighbourhoods.<br />

Where the <strong>Intensification</strong> Corridors are designated<br />

Commercial, including General Commercial, Community<br />

Centre Commercial, and Regional Centre Commercial,<br />

intensification should support the <strong>City</strong>’s role as a primary<br />

commercial centre in the Region. It should preserve and<br />

enhance the provision <strong>of</strong>, and convenient access to, a mix <strong>of</strong><br />

employment opportunities. The design, appearance and scale<br />

<strong>of</strong> new commercial development should be compatible with<br />

adjacent land uses, including appropriate buffers between<br />

nearby residential areas.<br />

Sites along the <strong>Intensification</strong> Corridors that are designated<br />

General Industrial are generally reserved for manufacturing,<br />

processing, servicing, warehousing and associated<br />

commercial uses. Sites designated Highway 400 Industrial<br />

play a more significant role as a gateway to the <strong>City</strong> and<br />

should be characterized by <strong>of</strong>fice buildings and ancillary uses<br />

that are <strong>of</strong> a higher development standard, with industrial<br />

functions screened from the Highway.<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> Comprehensive Zoning Bylaw<br />

(August, 2009)<br />

The provisions <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> Comprehensive Zoning<br />

Bylaw typically favor intensification in residential areas<br />

along the Primary and Secondary Corridors. In the Primary<br />

and Secondary Nodes, height and set-back requirements<br />

potentially hinder intensification opportunities.<br />

A variety <strong>of</strong> zoning designations exist within the <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

<strong>Area</strong>s, as outlined below:<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong> Zoning <strong>Design</strong>ation<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre Commercial (C1-1, C1-2, C2-1,<br />

C2-2, C4) with Open Space (OS)<br />

along the waterfront<br />

Primary Corridors<br />

- Duckworth Street Residential (R2)<br />

- Bayfield Street Commercial (C2-1)<br />

- Dunlop Street Residential (RM2)<br />

- Essa Road Residential (RM2) and<br />

Commercial C4) at Highway 400.<br />

- Yonge Street A broad mix, including A, C3, C4,<br />

I-E, OS, R1, R3, RA2, RH, RM1,<br />

and RM2<br />

Secondary Corridors<br />

- Bayfield Street Commercial (C3 with special<br />

provisions, and C4)<br />

- Dunlop Street Commercial (C4), with some<br />

EM3 and Environmental<br />

Protection (EP)<br />

- Essa Road A broad mix, including C3, C4,<br />

EM4, I-E, OS, R1, R2, and RM2<br />

Primary Nodes<br />

- Duckworth Street at Residential (R2) and<br />

Grove Street<br />

Commercial (C4)<br />

- Bayfield Street at Grove Residential (RM1 and RA1) and<br />

Street<br />

Commercial (C2 with special<br />

provisions)<br />

- Dunlop Street at Anne Commercial (C4)<br />

Street<br />

- Yonge Street at Little Commercial (C4)<br />

Avenue<br />

DRAFT<br />

v


vi <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

The Residential Zones (including R1, R2, RM1) support<br />

opportunities for intensification by permitting converted<br />

dwellings (up to 4 units) with a 10% increase in the size <strong>of</strong><br />

the building. These zones are typically found on the corridors,<br />

between key nodes, where corridors are characterized by<br />

single-detached dwellings (i.e. Duckworth Street). This<br />

conversion can accommodate greater densities without<br />

compromising the character <strong>of</strong> the neighbourhood.<br />

Closer to the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, Residential uses are<br />

typically zoned RM2, which allows for higher density forms <strong>of</strong><br />

housing, including townhouses and walk-up apartments (at<br />

40-53 units/hectare) up to 10m (approximately 3-storeys).<br />

The <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre is typically zoned Commercial (C1<br />

and C2), allowing a wide variety <strong>of</strong> commercial uses, including<br />

mixed-use development. The maximum density permitted<br />

in these zones ranges between 4.0-6.0 FSI, but a maximum<br />

height requirement <strong>of</strong> 15m (approximately 4-storeys) hinders<br />

opportunities for well-designed infill that exceeds the existing<br />

streetwall height. In a large portion <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth<br />

Centre (C1), parking is not required.<br />

The Primary and Secondary Nodes are typically zoned<br />

Commercial (predominantly C4 with some C2 and C3) and<br />

permit a variety <strong>of</strong> commercial uses, as well as mixed-use<br />

development. The maximum density permitted in C2 Zones<br />

is 4.0 FSI, 0.6 FSI in C3 Zones, and there is no maximum<br />

density specified for C4 zones. However, the maximum height<br />

allowance in each <strong>of</strong> these zones is 14m (9m adjacent to a<br />

Residential Zone) which presents a potential barrier to<br />

intensification at the nodes. Similarly, the minimum 6m front<br />

yard set-back requirement limits opportunities for vibrant,<br />

active street-oriented development.<br />

On Dunlop Street and Essa Road, there are larger Industrial<br />

<strong>Area</strong>s (EM3 and EM4). These areas allow a wide variety<br />

<strong>of</strong> industrial, commercial, agricultural and institutional<br />

uses, generally excepting heavy industrial uses and uses<br />

with outside storage associated. Where land is available,<br />

these areas can accommodate new development up to 14m<br />

(approximately 4-storeys) or 9m (3-storeys) adjacent to a<br />

Residential Zone.<br />

DRAFT


<strong>Barrie</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

Supporting Document Summary<br />

Downtown <strong>Barrie</strong>: The Next Wave Community<br />

Improvement Plan (December, 2005)<br />

As one <strong>of</strong> the earlier documents to address the Downtown area,<br />

Downtown <strong>Barrie</strong>: The Next Wave Community Improvement<br />

Plan recognizes the importance <strong>of</strong> intensification within<br />

the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre. The study focuses on the portion<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre north <strong>of</strong> Vespra Street, with the<br />

exception <strong>of</strong> the properties west <strong>of</strong> Sophia Street.<br />

Broadly, the study focuses on the preservation, revitalization,<br />

and promotion <strong>of</strong> the historic downtown, as well as the<br />

strengthening <strong>of</strong> connections to the waterfront. While<br />

traditional development in <strong>Barrie</strong> is characterized by singlefamily<br />

dwellings on greenfield sites, the study recognizes that<br />

as these areas become limited, denser, more compact forms<br />

<strong>of</strong> housing should be directed to the downtown. Specifically,<br />

the study promotes mixed-use development, including<br />

affordable housing, in order to create a diverse, active and<br />

healthy Downtown. Structured parking is encouraged in<br />

the Downtown, and should be incorporated into mixed-use<br />

buildings with <strong>of</strong>fice or commercial uses at grade.<br />

Directly adjacent to the waterfront, the study recommends a<br />

height restriction <strong>of</strong> 5-storeys to maintain key views.<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> recommendations provided to enhance<br />

circulation throughout the Downtown, including widening<br />

sidewalks, relocating Lakeshore Drive to the former rail<br />

corridor, and closing Simcoe Street and Fred Grant Street<br />

around Memorial Square. Other recommendations, such as<br />

connecting Lakeshore Drive to Toronto Street, and connecting<br />

Simcoe Street to Bradford Street, have since been realized.<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> Downtown Commercial Master Plan<br />

(January, 2006)<br />

The <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> Downtown Commercial Master Plan<br />

encourages intensification through compatible infill<br />

development, and taller icon buildings on the waterfront. The<br />

Plan focuses on a small portion <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre,<br />

including the historic Downtown and the waterfront, bordered<br />

by Bradford Street/Maple Street in the west, Ross Street/<br />

Collier Street in the north, Poyntz Street in the east, and<br />

Kempenfelt Bay in the south.<br />

The recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Plan focus on transforming<br />

Downtown <strong>Barrie</strong> and its waterfront to a highly desirable<br />

place to live, work, enjoy and visit. This includes mixed-use<br />

development, and the preservation <strong>of</strong> the land fronting on<br />

Kempenfelt Bay as a public “front porch experience.”<br />

The Plan encourages built form and massing in the Downtown<br />

that is compatible with the existing built fabric, and preserves<br />

and enhances the existing heritage buildings. A 3-storey<br />

general height is encouraged, with taller, 8 to 10-storey icon<br />

buildings on the waterfront. Icon buildings should be designed<br />

to reflect this key role, and should be appropriately massed<br />

to limit shadows on adjacent properties, and to preserve key<br />

views to the waterfront.<br />

DRAFT<br />

The Plan establishes a series <strong>of</strong> distinctive character areas<br />

in the Downtown (i.e. Artistic Neighbourhood, Promenade<br />

Neighbourhood, Arrival Neighbourhood, Main Shopping<br />

Neighbourhood, Entertainment Neighbourhood, Pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

Neighbourhood, etc.) in order to give clear design direction<br />

to for public and private developments, and to reinforce the<br />

Vision and commercial viability.<br />

The Plan recommends pedestrian-oriented streets within<br />

the Downtown, assigning specific roles for individual streets,<br />

including Bayfield Street as the gateway to the Downtown and<br />

Simcoe Street as a scenic waterfront drive. The majority <strong>of</strong><br />

parking in the Plan is accommodated on-street and in parking<br />

structures.<br />

vii


viii <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

The <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> <strong>Intensification</strong> Study (April,<br />

2009)<br />

The <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> <strong>Intensification</strong> Study provides a framework<br />

to help the <strong>City</strong> accommodate the intensification targets<br />

recognized in the Provincial Policy Statement and the Growth<br />

Plan.<br />

The population projections in the Growth Plan predict an<br />

additional 40,468 residents in the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> by 2031. With<br />

limited greenfield development potential, the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong><br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> Study concludes that the majority <strong>of</strong> new<br />

growth (25,786 residents) will be accommodated through<br />

intensification within the Built Up <strong>Area</strong>. Of this intensification,<br />

the Study directs the majority (12,500 residents and 5,500<br />

jobs) to the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre to satisfy the density targets<br />

determined in the Growth Plan (150 person and jobs/hectare).<br />

In the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, the <strong>Intensification</strong> Study<br />

anticipates that new development will require densities<br />

typified by the high rise zoning category to meet the density<br />

targets. No maximum density is recommended for the <strong>Urban</strong><br />

Growth Centre, but a minimum density <strong>of</strong> 80 units/hectare<br />

should be adhered to. Specific opportunities for intensification<br />

are recognized on Bradford Street, Allendale Centre, Collier<br />

Street and Bayfield Street. All intensification projects should<br />

respect the scale and character <strong>of</strong> Dunlop Street as the<br />

historic main street and should respect Kempenfelt Bay as a<br />

significant <strong>City</strong> amenity.<br />

The remaining growth within the Built-Up <strong>Area</strong> should occur<br />

at key <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes and Corridors. At <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

Nodes, the Study recommends development at a minimum<br />

<strong>of</strong> 40 units/hectare and a maximum <strong>of</strong> 120 units/hectare,<br />

which corresponds to a 6 to 7-storey mid-rise apartment form<br />

(but could take other forms provided the overall density is<br />

achieved). Ground floor commercial is encouraged, provided<br />

high-quality urban design, commercial shopping, amenity<br />

areas, dining and entertainment opportunities are provided to<br />

make these areas viable.<br />

At <strong>Intensification</strong> Corridors, the Study recommends a minimum<br />

density <strong>of</strong> 40 units/hectare and a maximum density <strong>of</strong> 50<br />

units/hectare, which corresponds to a low-rise, 3 to 4-storey<br />

apartment building (but could take other forms provided the<br />

overall density is achieved). The corridors selected link major<br />

transit nodes and should encourage active transportation<br />

(i.e. walking, cycling and transit), and convenient access to<br />

community services, facilities and shopping.<br />

Two <strong>of</strong> the Major Transit Nodes, including the <strong>Barrie</strong> Waterfront<br />

GO Station and the <strong>Barrie</strong> Transit Terminal, are located within<br />

the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre and are subject to the density targets<br />

above. The third, the <strong>Barrie</strong> South GO Station is projected to<br />

accommodate densities at a minimum <strong>of</strong> 40 units/hectare<br />

and a maximum <strong>of</strong> 120 units/hectare, which corresponds to<br />

mid to high-rise apartments up to 7 to 10-storeys (but could<br />

take other forms provided the overall density is achieved). This<br />

area should intensify similar to the other key nodes, including<br />

mixed-use development, with high-quality urban design and<br />

opportunities for shopping, dining and entertainment.<br />

DRAFT


Historic Neighbourhoods Strategy (June, 2010)<br />

The Historic Neighbourhood Strategy supports a range <strong>of</strong><br />

intensification with the <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, from singlefamily<br />

infill in “Primarily Residential <strong>Area</strong>s” to higher-scale<br />

development in “Significant Transitional <strong>Area</strong>s.”<br />

The Strategy provides directions and recommendations to<br />

respond to and encourage appropriate intensification in<br />

<strong>Barrie</strong>’s older neighbourhoods, which extend from Oak Street<br />

in the north (The Grove) to Campbell and Baldwin Avenues in<br />

the south (Allandale), and as far west as Highway 400 (Queen’s<br />

Park and West Village), including the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre and<br />

three <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Intensification</strong> Corridors (Bayfield Street, Dunlop<br />

Street, and Essa Road).<br />

The majority <strong>of</strong> streets within the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre, as<br />

well as Bayfield Street and Essa Road to Highway 400, are<br />

classified as Transitional <strong>Area</strong>s, which encourages mediumscale<br />

development along minor collector roads, at smaller<br />

intersections and on vacant and underused sites, provided<br />

good architectural and urban design standards are adhered<br />

to.<br />

Anne Street at Essa Road (a Primary Node) is seen as<br />

Primarily Residential which can incorporate some growth<br />

through single-family infill and renovations/additions<br />

provided the residential character <strong>of</strong> the neighbourhood is<br />

not compromised.<br />

Bradford Street, and Anne Street at Dunlop Street (a<br />

Primary Node), are Significant Transitional <strong>Area</strong>s, which<br />

encourages medium-scale to higher-scale development<br />

along major arterial roads, at intersections, and on vacant and<br />

underutilized sites, provided good architectural and urban<br />

design standards are adhered to.<br />

The Strategy advocates that new development result in<br />

compact, complete communities that are easily accessible and<br />

encourage active transportation. Specific recommendations<br />

include a range <strong>of</strong> housing forms and sizes to accommodate a<br />

diverse population, community services and amenities within<br />

walking distance <strong>of</strong> the neighbourhoods, and pedestrianoriented<br />

streetscapes that are consistently designed and link<br />

the individual neighbourhoods.<br />

DRAFT<br />

ix


DRAFT


Appendix B<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> Glossary<br />

DRAFT


xii <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

The glossary definitions provided here are to be referenced for the purposes <strong>of</strong> this document only.<br />

Angular Plane<br />

Articulation<br />

Angular planes provide build-to<br />

envelopes to maintain and define<br />

the character <strong>of</strong> the street; ensure<br />

adequate access to sun and sky<br />

views; and govern relationships<br />

between adjacent differing built<br />

forms.<br />

Articulation refers to the layout<br />

or pattern <strong>of</strong> building elements,<br />

including walls, doors, ro<strong>of</strong>s,<br />

windows and decorative elements,<br />

such as cornices and belt-courses.<br />

Building Type A typical building massing,<br />

organization and use that can be<br />

generally applied to a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

contexts.<br />

Bump-Out<br />

Parking<br />

Façade<br />

An extension <strong>of</strong> the sidewalk into<br />

the adjacent parking lane, used to<br />

accommodate a wider boulevard<br />

and minimize pedestrian crossing<br />

distances.<br />

front property line<br />

The exterior wall <strong>of</strong> a building.<br />

front property line<br />

front angular plane<br />

45°<br />

rear angular plane<br />

DRAFT<br />

45°<br />

rear property line


Fine Grain Fabric<br />

Human-scaled<br />

This condition is generally found<br />

within the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre.<br />

Buildings having narrow façades<br />

and which are organized in a<br />

compact manner, facing the street<br />

are referred to as having a “fine<br />

grain fabric”.<br />

Refers to the scale <strong>of</strong> development<br />

which contributes to the perception<br />

<strong>of</strong> sympathetic and proportional<br />

buildings or other features in the<br />

built environment.<br />

Low-Rise Building Refers to buildings that are four<br />

storeys in height or less.<br />

Material Treatment Refers to a design aesthetic which<br />

is either applied to the surface <strong>of</strong><br />

a street, open space, or building<br />

façade - such as concrete sidewalks<br />

or brick building façades.<br />

Mid-Rise Building Generally refers to buildings that<br />

are five to eight storeys in height.<br />

DRAFT<br />

xiii


xiv <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

Mixed-use Building Refers to multiple types <strong>of</strong> uses within<br />

a building or set <strong>of</strong> buildings. This may<br />

include a combination <strong>of</strong> residential,<br />

employment, retail, institutional, or<br />

other land uses. In Downtown areas,<br />

retail at grade with residential above<br />

is recommended. Outside <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Downtown, retail at grade with <strong>of</strong>fice<br />

space above may be more appropriate.<br />

Pedestrian-<br />

Supportive<br />

Pedestrian<br />

Perception Zone<br />

Private Realm<br />

An environment designed to make<br />

pedestrian movement safe, attractive<br />

and comfortable for all ages and<br />

abilities; considerations include<br />

separation <strong>of</strong> pedestrian and auto<br />

circulation, street furniture, clear<br />

signage, safety, visibility, shade,<br />

lighting, materials, trees, boulevard<br />

width, intersection treatment, curb<br />

cuts, ramps and landscaping.<br />

The upper floors <strong>of</strong> a building’s<br />

front façade that are pushed back<br />

from the building base to lessen the<br />

perception <strong>of</strong> excessive building<br />

height.<br />

Refers to any space that is owned<br />

by an individual. Private space<br />

that is used by the public (i.e.<br />

building courtyards, plazas, etc. is<br />

considered semi-private space.<br />

front property line<br />

RESIDENTIAL<br />

front property line<br />

REAR PROPERTY LINE<br />

OFFICE<br />

RETAIL<br />

DRAFT<br />

rear angular plane<br />

PRIVATE REALM<br />

RESIDENTIAL<br />

FRONT PROPERTY LINE<br />

45°<br />

rear property line


Projections<br />

Public Realm<br />

Rear Lane<br />

Rhythm<br />

Refers to a component <strong>of</strong> external<br />

building design and articulation,<br />

where horizontal and/or vertical<br />

building elements extrude from<br />

the main structure <strong>of</strong> the building,<br />

creating an element <strong>of</strong> depth and<br />

visual complexity. Examples <strong>of</strong><br />

projections include ro<strong>of</strong> overhangs,<br />

awnings, and balconies.<br />

Refers to spaces that are owned by<br />

the <strong>City</strong> and publicly accessible, for<br />

example, sidewalks, parkettes and<br />

bike paths.<br />

front property line<br />

front property line<br />

A vehicular road located at the rear<br />

<strong>of</strong> lots, providing access to service<br />

areas and parking. Building stepbacks<br />

adjacent to rear lanes are<br />

determined using an angular plane<br />

from adjacent residential uses.<br />

Refers to the pattern <strong>of</strong> building<br />

frontages along a streetscape,<br />

paying particular attention to lot<br />

widths, building entrance and<br />

glazing locations and proportions,<br />

etc.<br />

FRONT PROPERTY LINE<br />

PUBLIC REALM<br />

DRAFT<br />

front angular plane<br />

property line<br />

FRONT PROPERTY LINE<br />

xv


xvi <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

Right-<strong>of</strong>-Way<br />

Set-backs<br />

Siting/Building<br />

Orientation<br />

Step-backs<br />

The part <strong>of</strong> the street space that is<br />

publicly owned and lies between<br />

the property lines.<br />

Typically refers to the distance<br />

between a property line and the<br />

front, side or rear <strong>of</strong> a building.<br />

The location and positioning <strong>of</strong> a<br />

building on its site, generally taking<br />

into account its relationship to<br />

adjoining properties, building and<br />

street boundaries.<br />

Refers to the setting back <strong>of</strong> the<br />

upper storeys <strong>of</strong> a building. Front<br />

and side step-backs help to create<br />

a transition between built form<br />

<strong>of</strong> varying heights and provide<br />

appropriate separation between<br />

adjacent buildings and/or open<br />

spaces.<br />

front<br />

property line<br />

Right-Of-Way<br />

DRAFT<br />

front<br />

property line<br />

Set-back<br />

STEP-BACKS


Storey<br />

Streetscape<br />

Street wall<br />

A habitable level within a building,<br />

excluding raised basements.<br />

The distinguishing elements and<br />

character <strong>of</strong> a particular street<br />

as created by its width, degree <strong>of</strong><br />

curvature, paving materials, design<br />

<strong>of</strong> street furniture, pedestrian<br />

amenities and the set-back and<br />

form <strong>of</strong> surrounding buildings.<br />

The condition <strong>of</strong> enclosure along<br />

a street created by the fronts<br />

<strong>of</strong> buildings, and enhanced by<br />

the continuity and height <strong>of</strong> the<br />

enclosing buildings.<br />

Transition Refers to the physical design<br />

elements <strong>of</strong> a building which<br />

contribute to a sense <strong>of</strong> transition<br />

between mid-rise buildings on the<br />

Avenues and adjacent buildings<br />

which are <strong>of</strong>ten low-rise residential<br />

buildings on flanking local streets.<br />

Transitions may be achieved<br />

through use <strong>of</strong> building set-backs,<br />

step-backs, heights and massing.<br />

50m Depth<br />

5 storeys<br />

Requires approx’<br />

33m Depth<br />

4 storeys<br />

2 storeys<br />

DRAFT<br />

>33m<br />

xvii


DRAFT


Appendix C<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

Checklist<br />

DRAFT


<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong><br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong><br />

<strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

DEVELOPERS CHECKLIST<br />

PREPaRED by:<br />

Brook McIlroy<br />

Oct. 2012<br />

DRAFT<br />

01


DRAFT


Applicant Information<br />

Project Name:<br />

Project Address:<br />

Project <strong>Design</strong> Team:<br />

Applicant Name:<br />

Applicant Telephone:<br />

Land owner:<br />

Project Description:<br />

Applicant e-mail:<br />

DRAFT<br />

1


2 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DEVELOPERS CHECKLIST<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> Guideline Checklist<br />

This checklist is intended to assist the development<br />

community and the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Barrie</strong> in ensuring appropriately<br />

designed developments within the intensification areas.<br />

Those submitting development applications should<br />

familiarize themselves with the <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s, and then complete this<br />

checklist as a part <strong>of</strong> the approvals process. The <strong>City</strong> should<br />

review the checklist and work with the proponents to ensure<br />

new development meets the <strong>City</strong>’s goals and intent as outlined<br />

in these guidelines.<br />

Using the Checklist<br />

Applicants should complete the checklist by responding to<br />

each item. When the guideline does not apply, check “N/A”<br />

and <strong>of</strong>fer an explanation <strong>of</strong> exemption in the comments area.<br />

A page reference to the full guideline is provided for each<br />

item in the checklist should the applicants require more<br />

information on the intent <strong>of</strong> that guideline.<br />

In the event <strong>of</strong> a phased or temporary development<br />

application, the applicant must demonstrate that the design<br />

does not preclude future development phases or additions<br />

from meeting the guidelines.<br />

Applicants should provide a written description <strong>of</strong> how their<br />

project meets the intent <strong>of</strong> the guidelines.<br />

As there are some guidelines that are specific to the location <strong>of</strong><br />

the subject land, the applicant must ensure that all guidelines<br />

that are relevant to their location be addressed.<br />

DRAFT


3.1 Natural Heritage Feature, Parks and Open Spaces<br />

3.1.1 Natural Heritage Features<br />

3.1.2 Parks and Open Spaces<br />

Page #<br />

<strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

32 a) Environmental Protection<br />

<strong>Area</strong>s are preserved where<br />

possible.<br />

32 b) Adjacent natural heritage<br />

features, parks and open<br />

spaces are connected.<br />

32 c) Sensitive natural heritage<br />

features are adequately<br />

buffered.<br />

32 d) Higher density buildings are<br />

adjacent to natural heritage<br />

features.<br />

32 e) Natural drainage networks<br />

are maintained.<br />

33 a) A significant amount <strong>of</strong> the<br />

park perimeter is surrounded<br />

by streets.<br />

33 b) Parks are distributed within<br />

a 10-minute walk <strong>of</strong> most<br />

residents.<br />

33 c) New parks and open spaces<br />

link with existing natural<br />

heritage features, parks and<br />

open spaces.<br />

33 d) Parks and open spaces serve<br />

the diverse needs <strong>of</strong> the<br />

community.<br />

33 e) Larger tree species are<br />

provided in parks and open<br />

spaces.<br />

33 f) Park entrances provide<br />

appropriate amenities.<br />

33 g) Pedestrian connections are<br />

flexible to accommodate<br />

emergency and maintenance<br />

vehicles.<br />

Complies<br />

Partially Complies<br />

Does Not Comply<br />

N/A<br />

DRAFT<br />

Comments<br />

3


4 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DEVELOPERS CHECKLIST<br />

3.1 Natural Heritage Feature, Parks and Open Spaces<br />

3.1.3 Semi-Private Open Spaces<br />

3.1.4 Multi-Use Trails<br />

Page #<br />

<strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

34 a) Semi-private open spaces<br />

are directly accessible from<br />

public sidewalks.<br />

34 b) Semi-private open spaces<br />

are constructed <strong>of</strong> materials<br />

similar to the main buildings.<br />

34 c) Semi-private open spaces<br />

should be in view <strong>of</strong> occupied<br />

indoor areas.<br />

34 d) Buildings include semiprivate<br />

ro<strong>of</strong>top amenity<br />

space.<br />

34 e) Interior courtyards maximize<br />

sun exposure.<br />

34 f) Paving materials is high<br />

quality, and low maintenance.<br />

34 g) Site furnishings are<br />

manufactured from high<br />

quality, durable materials.<br />

34 h) Plant materials are low<br />

maintenance, and placed to<br />

ensure clear views.<br />

35 a) New trails create a linked<br />

trail network.<br />

35 b) Trails link to core activity<br />

areas.<br />

35 c) Recreational trails reflect the<br />

open space they occupy.<br />

35 d) Multi-use trails distinguish<br />

between walking and cycling<br />

areas.<br />

35 e) Nature trails include multiple<br />

access points.<br />

35 f) Trails include adequate<br />

amenities.<br />

35 g) Trails in sensitive natural<br />

environments are made <strong>of</strong><br />

low impact materials.<br />

Complies<br />

Partially Complies<br />

Does Not Comply<br />

N/A<br />

DRAFT<br />

Comments


3.2 Streets and Streetscapes<br />

3.2.1 Green Street <strong>Design</strong><br />

Page #<br />

<strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

37 a) Streets within the<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s have<br />

enhanced landscaping.<br />

37 b) Street trees are placed to<br />

grow to maturity under urban<br />

soil conditions.<br />

37 c) Streets near the Bay and<br />

key entrances to the <strong>Urban</strong><br />

Growth Centre have a high<br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> tree planting.<br />

38 d) Existing street trees are<br />

preserved.<br />

38 e) Supplemental street trees are<br />

provided where the existing<br />

tree canopy is reaching the<br />

end <strong>of</strong> its life-cycle.<br />

38 f) Street trees are planted with<br />

appropriate soil volume.<br />

38 g) The use <strong>of</strong> soil cells has been<br />

considered.<br />

38 h) Soil infrastructure is<br />

improved on boulevards.<br />

38 i) Street trees are <strong>of</strong>fset a<br />

minimum <strong>of</strong> 1.5 metres from<br />

the curb.<br />

38 j) Trees are spaced at 6.0 to<br />

9.0 metre intervals based on<br />

mature size.<br />

38 k) High branching trees will not<br />

interfere with large vehicles.<br />

38 l) Street trees and landscaping<br />

are locally adapted species.<br />

38 m) Shrub and ground cover<br />

planting is utilized in open<br />

tree pits.<br />

38 n) Shrubs and ground cover are<br />

tolerant <strong>of</strong> urban conditions.<br />

38 o) Seasonal appeal is<br />

considered for all planting.<br />

Complies<br />

Partially Complies<br />

Does Not Comply<br />

N/A<br />

DRAFT<br />

Comments<br />

5


6 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DEVELOPERS CHECKLIST<br />

3.2 Streets and Streetscapes<br />

3.2.2 Boulevard <strong>Design</strong><br />

3.2.3 Crosswalks<br />

Page #<br />

<strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

40 a) Boulevards reflect their<br />

adjacent land use.<br />

40 b) Continuous sidewalks are<br />

provided on both sides <strong>of</strong> all<br />

streets.<br />

40 c) Sidewalks are at least 2.1<br />

metres wide.<br />

40 d) Sidewalks are constructed <strong>of</strong><br />

brushed concrete.<br />

40 e) Sidewalks are continuous<br />

across driveways.<br />

40 f) Feature paving bands are<br />

used where appropriate.<br />

40 g) Boulevards are planted with<br />

street trees in the Street<br />

Furniture and Landscape<br />

Zone.<br />

40 h) Benches, bicycle locks,<br />

and pedestrian lighting are<br />

located within the Street<br />

Furniture and Landscape<br />

Zone.<br />

40 i) In areas with retail at grade,<br />

a 1.1 metre wide transition<br />

zone is provided.<br />

40 j) Principles <strong>of</strong> LID are applied<br />

where possible.<br />

41 a) Crosswalks are continuous<br />

and connected to adjacent<br />

sidewalks.<br />

41 b) Crosswalks conform to the<br />

Ontarians with Disabilities<br />

Act.<br />

41 c) Crosswalks are clearly<br />

designated.<br />

41 d) Mid-block connections at<br />

high-volume locations.<br />

41 e) Traffic signals allow adequate<br />

time to clear the crossing.<br />

Complies<br />

Partially Complies<br />

Does Not Comply<br />

N/A<br />

DRAFT<br />

Comments


3.2 Streets and Streetscapes<br />

3.2.4 Street Furniture<br />

3.2.5 Public Art<br />

3.2.6 Signage<br />

Page #<br />

<strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

42 a) Street furnishings provide<br />

a consistent and unified<br />

streetscape appearance.<br />

42 b) Street furnishings are placed<br />

in a coordinated manner.<br />

42 c) Street furniture does<br />

not impact sidewalk<br />

maintenance.<br />

43 a) Public art pieces are durable<br />

and easily maintained.<br />

43 b) Public art is place-specific.<br />

43 c) Public art is physically and<br />

visually accessible.<br />

43 d) Sites with public art pieces<br />

include landscaping that<br />

complements the piece.<br />

43 e) Where appropriate, sites are<br />

reserved for groupings <strong>of</strong><br />

complementary pieces.<br />

44 a) A comprehensive wayfinding<br />

strategy has been developed.<br />

44 b) Signs are carefully located to<br />

ensure they do not impede<br />

sightlines.<br />

44 c) Kiosks are located in highly<br />

active pedestrian areas.<br />

44 d) Kiosks do not impede<br />

pedestrian circulation.<br />

44 e) Kiosk size minimizes visual<br />

impacts while providing<br />

adequate space to post<br />

information.<br />

44 f) Street furniture does not<br />

include signage.<br />

Complies<br />

Partially Complies<br />

Does Not Comply<br />

N/A<br />

DRAFT<br />

Comments<br />

7


8 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DEVELOPERS CHECKLIST<br />

3.2 Streets and Streetscapes<br />

3.2.7 Transit Amenities<br />

3.2.8 Lighting<br />

3.2.9 Utilities<br />

Page #<br />

<strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

45 a) Transit shelters include basic<br />

amenities.<br />

45 b) In high pedestrian traffic<br />

areas, transit stops include<br />

a shelter for weather<br />

protection.<br />

45 c) Sidewalks connect directly to<br />

transit shelters.<br />

45 d) Transit stops have barrierfree<br />

access.<br />

45 e) Transit shelters are located<br />

300mm from the sidewalk to<br />

allow for snow clearing.<br />

46 a) Lighting minimizes the<br />

impacts <strong>of</strong> light pollution.<br />

46 b) Downcast pedestrian-scale<br />

lighting is provided in high<br />

traffic areas.<br />

46 c) Lighting is located within<br />

the Street Furniture and<br />

Landscape Zone.<br />

46 d) Additional pedestrianscale<br />

lighting is provided in<br />

areas with a high volume <strong>of</strong><br />

pedestrian activity.<br />

46 e) New lighting complies with<br />

the <strong>City</strong>’s Dark Sky Policy<br />

47 a) Where possible, utilities are<br />

buried below grade.<br />

47 b) Above grade utilities are<br />

grouped where feasible.<br />

47 c) Utilities are incorporated into<br />

building design.<br />

47 d) New and innovative solutions<br />

for integrated utility services<br />

have been explored.<br />

Complies<br />

Partially Complies<br />

Does Not Comply<br />

N/A<br />

DRAFT<br />

Comments


3.3 Parking<br />

3.3.1 On-Street Parking<br />

3.3.2 Bicycle Parking<br />

Page #<br />

<strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

48 a) Parallel on-street parking is<br />

provided over perpendicular<br />

parking.<br />

48 b) On-street parking is situated<br />

within bump-outs, where<br />

appropriate.<br />

48 c) Bump-outs are landscaped<br />

with street trees or low level<br />

ground cover.<br />

48 d) Where appropriate,<br />

permeable paving is<br />

considered.<br />

49 a) Bicycle parking is provided at<br />

regular intervals.<br />

49 b) Bicycle parking is located<br />

close to building entrances.<br />

49 c) Bicycle posts do not impede<br />

pedestrian movement.<br />

49 d) Post-and-ring bicycle parking<br />

is used.<br />

49 e) Bicycle storage facilities are<br />

provided at public parks and<br />

open spaces.<br />

Complies<br />

Partially Complies<br />

Does Not Comply<br />

N/A<br />

DRAFT<br />

Comments<br />

9


10 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DEVELOPERS CHECKLIST<br />

4.1 Development <strong>of</strong> Large Parcels<br />

4.1.1 Community Structure<br />

4.1.2 Lot Size Variety<br />

Page #<br />

<strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

54 a) The existing road network<br />

is expanded to improve<br />

connectivity.<br />

54 b) A connected network<br />

<strong>of</strong> streets and blocks is<br />

provided.<br />

54 c) New streets are based on a<br />

modified grid pattern.<br />

54 d) A variety <strong>of</strong> block sizes and<br />

shapes are provided.<br />

54 e) Block lengths do not exceed<br />

250 metres.<br />

54 f) Where blocks exceed<br />

250 metres, a mid-block<br />

pedestrian connection is<br />

provided.<br />

54 g) Mid-block pedestrian<br />

connections are a minimum<br />

width <strong>of</strong> 3.5 metres.<br />

54 h) Rear lanes are provided to<br />

reduce the need for street<br />

driveways.<br />

56 a) Lot shapes are rectilinear<br />

where possible.<br />

56 b) Corner lots are adequately<br />

sized to accommodate setback<br />

requirements on both<br />

streets.<br />

56 c) Lots adjacent to amenity<br />

areas support higher density<br />

development.<br />

Complies<br />

Partially Complies<br />

Does Not Comply<br />

N/A<br />

DRAFT<br />

Comments


4.1 Development <strong>of</strong> Large<br />

Parcels<br />

4.2 Access and Parking<br />

4.1.3 Transit Supportive <strong>Design</strong><br />

4.2.1 Surface Parking<br />

Page #<br />

<strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

57 a) A mix <strong>of</strong> land uses and higher<br />

densities are promoted<br />

around key locations.<br />

57 b) Access to local transit routes<br />

should is located within<br />

a 10-minute (500 metre)<br />

walking distance <strong>of</strong> most<br />

residents.<br />

57 c) Auto dependent uses are<br />

discouraged.<br />

57 d) Transit facilities are located<br />

at public places.<br />

57 e) Trails and bicycle routes link<br />

to transit facilities.<br />

59 a) Large areas <strong>of</strong> uninterrupted<br />

parking are avoided.<br />

59 b) Surface parking is located at<br />

the rear <strong>of</strong> buildings.<br />

59 c) Buffers are provided between<br />

parking areas and sidewalks.<br />

59 d) Surface parking areas are<br />

broken into smaller parking<br />

courts.<br />

59 e) 1 tree is provided for every 8<br />

parking spaces.<br />

59 f) Principles <strong>of</strong> LID applied<br />

adjacent to the waterfront.<br />

59 g) Parking screening does not<br />

obstruct the primary façade.<br />

59 h) Distinctive pavement and/or<br />

markings are used to indicate<br />

pedestrian crossings.<br />

59 i) Pedestrian-scaled lighting is<br />

provided along pathways.<br />

59 j) Preferential parking for<br />

bicycles, energy efficient<br />

vehicles and car-share.<br />

59 k) Where appropriate,<br />

permeable paving is used to<br />

promote drainage.<br />

Complies<br />

Partially Complies<br />

Does Not Comply<br />

N/A<br />

DRAFT<br />

Comments<br />

11


12 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DEVELOPERS CHECKLIST<br />

4.2 Access and Parking<br />

4.2.2 Structured Parking<br />

4.2.3 Lanes and Alleys<br />

Page #<br />

<strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

51 a) Where appropriate, parking<br />

structures are developed with<br />

active at-grade uses.<br />

51 b) 50% <strong>of</strong> the building frontage<br />

(and side on a corner building)<br />

is a use other than parking.<br />

51 c) A vertical mix <strong>of</strong> parking,<br />

residential and/or <strong>of</strong>fice is<br />

provided where appropriate.<br />

51 d) Vehicular parking access is<br />

located at the rear and/or<br />

side <strong>of</strong> buildings.<br />

51 e) Pedestrian entrances for<br />

parking structures are<br />

located adjacent to main<br />

building entrances.<br />

51 f) Parking within a structure<br />

is screened from view at<br />

sidewalk level.<br />

53 a) The paved area <strong>of</strong> laneways<br />

provide adequate space for<br />

emergency vehicles.<br />

53 b) <strong>Area</strong>s at the end <strong>of</strong> laneways<br />

are reserved for snow<br />

storage.<br />

53 c) Laneways provide variety in<br />

building form and set-backs.<br />

53 d) Rear façade is equal in quality<br />

to the front façade.<br />

53 e) Where feasible, laneways<br />

are considered as places<br />

to accommodate future<br />

intensification (i.e. granny<br />

flats).<br />

53 f) The primary façade <strong>of</strong><br />

buildings do not face the<br />

laneway.<br />

53 g) Laneways with residential<br />

adjacencies are aesthetically<br />

pleasing.<br />

Complies<br />

Partially Complies<br />

Does Not Comply<br />

N/A<br />

DRAFT<br />

Comments


4.2 Access and Parking<br />

4.3 General Building <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

4.2.4 Servicing and Loading<br />

4.3.1 Building Orientation and Site Layout<br />

Page #<br />

<strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

54 a) Loading docks and service<br />

areas are located at the side<br />

or rear <strong>of</strong> buildings.<br />

54 b) Garbage storage is<br />

accommodated internally.<br />

54 c) Servicing enclosures are<br />

constructed <strong>of</strong> materials<br />

that complement the main<br />

building.<br />

54 d) Service and refuse areas are<br />

paved with an impervious<br />

surface.<br />

54 e) Service and refuse areas do<br />

not encroach into the exterior<br />

side or front yard set-back.<br />

54 f) Loading and service<br />

areas occupy the full rear<br />

yard (provided adequate<br />

landscape edge and buffer<br />

treatments are provided).<br />

66 a) Buildings are positioned to<br />

frame abutting streets.<br />

66 b) Buildings abutting natural<br />

heritage features or open<br />

spaces create opportunities<br />

for easy access and viewing.<br />

66 c) Main building entrances<br />

are directly accessible from<br />

public sidewalks.<br />

66 d) The front streetwall <strong>of</strong><br />

buildings is built to the front<br />

property line.<br />

66 e) A minimum <strong>of</strong> 75% <strong>of</strong> a<br />

building’s frontage is built to<br />

the applicable set-back line.<br />

66 f) The remaining 25% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

building frontage is set back<br />

up to 5m to accommodate<br />

public spaces.<br />

Complies<br />

Partially Complies<br />

Does Not Comply<br />

N/A<br />

DRAFT<br />

Comments<br />

13


14 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DEVELOPERS CHECKLIST<br />

4.3 General Building <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

4.3.2 Building Heights<br />

4.3.3 Minimum Ground Floor Height<br />

4.3.4 Front Façade Step-backs<br />

Page #<br />

<strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

67 a) Buildings generally range<br />

between 4 to 8-storeys.<br />

67 b) The maximum height<br />

(8-storeys) is only achieved<br />

where buildings comply with<br />

all other design guidelines.<br />

67 c) Taller buildings are located at<br />

key landmark areas.<br />

d) Taller buildings are located on<br />

sites where lot size, set-backs,<br />

step-backs, and building<br />

67<br />

transitions can be made to<br />

neighbouring properties.<br />

e) All new buildings achieve<br />

a minimum height <strong>of</strong> 7.5m<br />

(2-storeys).<br />

68 a) Ground floor heights are a<br />

minimum <strong>of</strong> 4.5m.<br />

68 b) Ground levels are free <strong>of</strong> any<br />

significant grade changes to<br />

promote barrier-free access<br />

and retail activity.<br />

69 a) A 45-degree angular plane<br />

has been applied at a height<br />

equivalent to 80% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

width <strong>of</strong> the right-<strong>of</strong>-way.<br />

69 b) On wider right-<strong>of</strong>-ways,<br />

an additional “pedestrian<br />

perception step-back” has<br />

been provided.<br />

69 c) Step-backs are a minimum <strong>of</strong><br />

1.5m.<br />

Complies<br />

Partially Complies<br />

Does Not Comply<br />

N/A<br />

DRAFT<br />

Comments


4.3 General Building <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

4.3.5 Side Building Set-backs<br />

4.3.6 Side Building Step-backs<br />

4.3.7 Transition to Neighbourhoods<br />

Page #<br />

<strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

70 a) New buildings built to the<br />

side property line (with no<br />

windows).<br />

a) New buildings maintain a<br />

minimum 5.5 metre distance<br />

from existing adjacent<br />

buildings.<br />

70 b) New buildings, set back at<br />

least 5.5 metres from the<br />

property.<br />

70 c) Additional set-backs are<br />

included where existing<br />

buildings have their primary<br />

windows on the side face.<br />

71 a) The building’s uppermost<br />

storeys step back sideways<br />

where properties have wider<br />

frontages.<br />

71 b) Narrow sites are limited to<br />

their maximum permitted<br />

height based on side stepback<br />

requirements.<br />

72 a) Buildings step back sideways<br />

5.5 metres above 80% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

building’s permitted height.<br />

72 b) Side step-backs are provided<br />

above the minimum building<br />

height to create a more<br />

“porous” streetwall.<br />

72 c) Upper storey side Step-backs<br />

are not required for buildings<br />

that are 20 metres (6 storeys)<br />

or less.<br />

Complies<br />

Partially Complies<br />

Does Not Comply<br />

N/A<br />

DRAFT<br />

Comments<br />

15


16 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DEVELOPERS CHECKLIST<br />

4.3 General Building <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

4.3.8 Building Articulation<br />

Page #<br />

<strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

72 a) The façades <strong>of</strong> large<br />

buildings express individual<br />

commercial or residential<br />

units.<br />

72 b) The design and material<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> buildings is<br />

consistent.<br />

72 c) Lots facing parks and<br />

open spaces are subject to<br />

architectural and landscaping<br />

controls.<br />

72 d) Buildings at key intersections<br />

emphasize their focal nature.<br />

72 e) Buildings incorporate<br />

architectural details where<br />

possible.<br />

72 f) A significant amount <strong>of</strong> the<br />

building frontage on the<br />

ground floor and at building<br />

base levels is clear glazed.<br />

72 g) Buildings are oriented to<br />

73<br />

provide vistas to Kempenfelt<br />

Bay.<br />

h) Retail entrances are<br />

expressed and detailed in<br />

a variety <strong>of</strong> ways including<br />

large entry awnings, canopies<br />

or double-height glazing.<br />

73 i) Where residential uses are<br />

included above retail uses,<br />

a separate entrance is<br />

provided.<br />

73 j) Secondary entrances are<br />

accessible, but not the<br />

dominant entrance.<br />

73 k) Building frontages that<br />

exceed 12 meters in width are<br />

divided into smaller units.<br />

Complies<br />

Partially Complies<br />

Does Not Comply<br />

N/A<br />

DRAFT<br />

Comments


4.3 General Building <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

4.3.9 Ro<strong>of</strong>s and Ro<strong>of</strong>scapes<br />

Page #<br />

<strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

74 a) Mechanical penthouses<br />

do not penetrate the<br />

recommended angular<br />

planes.<br />

74 b) Mechanical penthouses are<br />

be designed and clad with<br />

materials that complement<br />

the main building façades.<br />

74 c) The portion <strong>of</strong> the building<br />

ro<strong>of</strong> that is not used for a<br />

mechanical penthouse is<br />

occupied by green ro<strong>of</strong>s and/<br />

or useable outdoor amenity<br />

space.<br />

74 d) Sustainable technologies,<br />

such as photovoltaic panels,<br />

are provided on the ro<strong>of</strong>s <strong>of</strong><br />

buildings.<br />

Complies<br />

Partially Complies<br />

Does Not Comply<br />

N/A<br />

DRAFT<br />

Comments<br />

17


18 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DEVELOPERS CHECKLIST<br />

4.3 General Building <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

4.3.10 Materials<br />

Page #<br />

<strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

75 a) New buildings and<br />

developments utilize building<br />

materials chosen for their<br />

functional and aesthetic<br />

qualities, as well as their<br />

energy and maintenance<br />

efficiency.<br />

75 b) All exterior building finishes<br />

demonstrate a high quality <strong>of</strong><br />

workmanship, durability and<br />

ease <strong>of</strong> maintenance.<br />

75 c) Building materials used as<br />

intended, and not to replicate<br />

other materials.<br />

75 d) Finished materials extend to<br />

all sides <strong>of</strong> the building.<br />

75 e) Ground floor incorporate a<br />

minimum <strong>of</strong> 60% glazing.<br />

75 f) Building materials facing<br />

public streets do not include<br />

synthetic siding sytems,<br />

mirror/heavily tinted glass<br />

panels, and unadorned<br />

concrete block.<br />

75 g) Blank walls are avoided<br />

where new developments are<br />

adjacent to existing parking<br />

areas.<br />

75 h) Where possible, construction<br />

materials are recycled.<br />

75 i) Efforts have been made to<br />

purchase materials from<br />

demolition sales, salvage<br />

contractors and used<br />

materials dealers.<br />

75 j) New construction materials<br />

are locally sourced.<br />

Complies<br />

Partially Complies<br />

Does Not Comply<br />

N/A<br />

DRAFT<br />

Comments


5.1 Mixed-Use and Residential Avenue <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

5.1.1 Prominent Streets<br />

5.1.2 Boulevard <strong>Design</strong><br />

5.1.3 Crosswalks<br />

Page #<br />

<strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

80 a) Prominent streets create a<br />

sense <strong>of</strong> entrance and arrival,<br />

contributing to community<br />

image and identity.<br />

80 b) Taller buildings, typically at<br />

a 1:1 ratio with the width<br />

<strong>of</strong> the right-<strong>of</strong>-way, are<br />

concentrated at key areas<br />

along prominent streets.<br />

80 c) Development meets a high<br />

standard <strong>of</strong> design.<br />

80 d) The most prominent entrance<br />

features are located adjacent<br />

to Highway 400, where the<br />

entrance to the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth<br />

Centre begins, and at the<br />

<strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes.<br />

80 e) Minor entrances are located<br />

on Duckworth Street, Bayfield<br />

Street, and Dunlop Street, to<br />

signal the transition into the<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Growth Centre.<br />

81 a) On streets with right-<strong>of</strong>-way<br />

widths greater than 30m, the<br />

minimum boulevard width is<br />

6m.<br />

81 b) In special areas, the minimum<br />

boulevard width is 8m.<br />

82 a) Mid-block crosswalks<br />

are provided on large<br />

development sites every 100-<br />

215m.<br />

82 b) Concrete or painted lines are<br />

used for crosswalk where the<br />

length is significant.<br />

Complies<br />

Partially Complies<br />

Does Not Comply<br />

N/A<br />

DRAFT<br />

Comments<br />

19


20 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DEVELOPERS CHECKLIST<br />

5.2 Mixed-Use Main Street <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

5.2.1 Pedestrian-Uses<br />

5.2.2 Parks and Open Spaces<br />

Page #<br />

<strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

88 a) Auto-focused uses (i.e. carwash,<br />

drive-through) are<br />

not included as part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

development.<br />

88 a) <strong>Urban</strong> parks are located<br />

throughout the <strong>Urban</strong> Growth<br />

Centre to ensure all residents<br />

are within a 10-minute<br />

(500m) walking distance <strong>of</strong><br />

outdoor amenity space.<br />

88 b) Corner lots, some mid-block<br />

lots, and irregularly shaped<br />

lots are developed into<br />

small urban parks where<br />

appropriate.<br />

88 c) <strong>Urban</strong> parks are a minimum<br />

<strong>of</strong> 0.15 hectares in size.<br />

88 d) Parks and open spaces<br />

connect to natural heritage<br />

features through multi-use<br />

trails and tree-lined streets.<br />

88 e) Wherever possible, higherdensity<br />

developments<br />

provide semi-private open<br />

spaces.<br />

88 f) Cash-in-lieu provided for<br />

enhancements to nearby<br />

parkland.<br />

Complies<br />

Partially Complies<br />

Does Not Comply<br />

N/A<br />

DRAFT<br />

Comments


5.2 Mixed-Use Main Street <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

5.2.3 Boulevard <strong>Design</strong><br />

5.2.4 Heritage Context Infill<br />

Page #<br />

<strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

89 a) On streets with ROW widths<br />

less than 30m, the minimum<br />

boulevard width is 4.8m.<br />

89 b) Pedestrian amenities within<br />

the boulevard reflect the<br />

existing heritage character.<br />

89 c) Public art is provided at key<br />

intersections.<br />

89 d) Where possible, new<br />

development is set back to<br />

accommodate increased<br />

boulevard requirements.<br />

89 e) Opportunities to narrow the<br />

street have been explored<br />

with the <strong>City</strong>’s Engineering<br />

Department.<br />

89 f) “Bump-Out” parking<br />

accommodates wider<br />

boulevards.<br />

89 g) On-street parking is not<br />

removed to accommodate a<br />

wider boulevard.<br />

89 h) Where narrow boulevards<br />

are retained, all efforts have<br />

been made to satisfy the<br />

general recommendations in<br />

Sections 3.2.1 and 3.2.2.<br />

90 a) Alterations to existing<br />

buildings match the preestablished<br />

set-back <strong>of</strong><br />

adjacent buildings.<br />

90 b) Where streets lack a<br />

continuous building frontage,<br />

new developments contain<br />

a set-back that reflects<br />

an average between the<br />

adjacent buildings.<br />

90 c) Infill buildings have<br />

sympathetic scale, massing,<br />

and height.<br />

Complies<br />

Partially Complies<br />

Does Not Comply<br />

N/A<br />

DRAFT<br />

Comments<br />

21


22 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DEVELOPERS CHECKLIST<br />

5.2 Mixed-Use Main Street<br />

5.2.4 Heritage Context Infill<br />

Page #<br />

<strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

90 d) Heritage buildings have been<br />

retained and restored.<br />

90 e) Heritage properties are<br />

limited to their existing<br />

height.<br />

90 f) New buildings have a heightto-width<br />

ratio that is similar<br />

to existing heritage buildings.<br />

91 g) New buildings have<br />

sympathetic windows, ro<strong>of</strong>lines,<br />

entrances, ground floor<br />

treatment and materials.<br />

91 h) Original façade materials<br />

have not be changed.<br />

91 i) Where possible, windows and<br />

doors have been restored and<br />

made energy efficient.<br />

91 j) Buildings are not be altered<br />

against their initial stylistic<br />

intent.<br />

91 k) Additions or renovations<br />

reintegrate key aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

heritage design.<br />

91 l) Storefront design maintains<br />

a heritage rhythm and<br />

character through recessed<br />

entries and large bay<br />

windows.<br />

92 m) Additions or renovations<br />

use materials that match<br />

or enhance the original<br />

structure.<br />

92 n) Where appropriate, heritage<br />

structures have been retained<br />

and incorporated into new<br />

developments.<br />

92 o) A heritage pr<strong>of</strong>essional has<br />

been involved to ensure the<br />

most appropriate renovation<br />

techniques and materials.<br />

Complies<br />

Partially Complies<br />

Does Not Comply<br />

N/A<br />

DRAFT<br />

Comments


5.3 Established Residential Street <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

5.3.2 New Residential Buildings<br />

Page #<br />

<strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

96 a) Rear yard parking is provided<br />

over front yard parking.<br />

96 b) Private and/or semi-private<br />

outdoor amenity space is<br />

provided for ground floor<br />

units.<br />

96 c) The minimum lot frontage for<br />

townhouse units with front<br />

attached garages is 6 metres<br />

with the garage not exceeding<br />

50% <strong>of</strong> the width <strong>of</strong> the<br />

building’s frontage.<br />

96 d) End units in a townhouse<br />

place windows and entrances<br />

facing the public street.<br />

96 e) Public walkways within<br />

townhouse developments<br />

provide safe and direct<br />

access between public<br />

streets, parking and other<br />

site areas.<br />

96 f) Common open space such as<br />

children’s playgrounds are<br />

provided.<br />

Complies<br />

Partially Complies<br />

Does Not Comply<br />

N/A<br />

DRAFT<br />

Comments<br />

23


24 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DEVELOPERS CHECKLIST<br />

5.4 <strong>Intensification</strong> Node <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

Page #<br />

<strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

100 a) Development reflects the<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong> a Mixed-<br />

Use and Residential Avenue.<br />

100 b) In the short-term,<br />

redevelopment is focused on<br />

the <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes.<br />

100 c) Development creates<br />

attractive gateways.<br />

100 d) Nodes function as<br />

neighbourhood focal points.<br />

100 e) The highest densities are<br />

located at the <strong>Intensification</strong><br />

Nodes.<br />

100 f) Taller buildings are provided<br />

at <strong>Intensification</strong> Nodes.<br />

100 g) Corner buildings emphasize<br />

their focal nature and<br />

visibility.<br />

100 h) Taller buildings are limited to<br />

appropriate sites.<br />

100 i) The minimum boulevard<br />

width is 8m.<br />

100 j) The Nodes are centres <strong>of</strong><br />

information.<br />

100 k) Cycling facilities are provided.<br />

100 l) Nodes are connected to key<br />

destinations in the <strong>City</strong>.<br />

Complies<br />

Partially Complies<br />

Does Not Comply<br />

N/A<br />

DRAFT<br />

Comments


5.5 Gateway <strong>Area</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

Page #<br />

<strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

102 a) Gateway areas are<br />

highlighted through a<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> public/private<br />

initiatives.<br />

102 b) New development creates<br />

memorable landmarks<br />

to assist with <strong>City</strong>-wide<br />

wayfinding.<br />

102 c) Where possible, gateway<br />

areas should have a higher<br />

order <strong>of</strong> streetscaping.<br />

102 d) Gateway areas function<br />

as meeting and gathering<br />

spaces.<br />

102 e) Wayfinding signage provides<br />

directions to key <strong>City</strong><br />

destinations.<br />

102 f) Wayfinding signage is wellintegrated<br />

into buildings,<br />

public art pieces, etc. to<br />

minimize visual clutter.<br />

102 g) Landscaping accommodates<br />

more decorative species.<br />

102 h) Opportunities for significant<br />

public art pieces are<br />

encouraged.<br />

102 i) Gateways are specially lit to<br />

highlight unique features at<br />

night.<br />

Complies<br />

Partially Complies<br />

Does Not Comply<br />

N/A<br />

DRAFT<br />

Comments<br />

25


26 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> for <strong>Barrie</strong>’s <strong>Intensification</strong> <strong>Area</strong>s - DRAFT<br />

5.5 Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

Page #<br />

<strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

104 a) There is a high concentration<br />

<strong>of</strong> people working and/or<br />

living within a 10 minute walk<br />

(500m) walk.<br />

104 b) Plans encourage a mix <strong>of</strong><br />

uses near the station.<br />

105 c) New local roads provide<br />

efficient connections.<br />

105 d) Weather protected paths<br />

provide connections between<br />

transit modes.<br />

105 e) Local trails provide direct<br />

links to transit routes.<br />

105 f) Auto dependent uses are<br />

discouraged.<br />

105 g) Opportunities to limit surface<br />

parking have been explored,<br />

where possible.<br />

105 h) Transit facilities are located<br />

at public places.<br />

105 i) Clearly defined pedestrian<br />

routes are provided.<br />

105 j) High quality street furniture<br />

is provided to encourage<br />

interaction.<br />

105 k) Open spaces are provided to<br />

encourage socialization.<br />

105 l) Wayfinding signage is<br />

provided throughout the<br />

Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong>.<br />

105 m) Landmark features are<br />

provided at Major Transit<br />

Station <strong>Area</strong>s.<br />

Complies<br />

Partially Complies<br />

Does Not Comply<br />

N/A<br />

DRAFT<br />

Comments


5.5 Major Transit Station <strong>Area</strong><br />

<strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

5.7 Lakeshore Drive<br />

Page #<br />

<strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

106 n) The station building is<br />

designed and massed as a<br />

landmark building.<br />

106 o) Buildings provide a<br />

continuous weather<br />

protected connection to the<br />

station.<br />

106 p) Buildings have a pedestrian<br />

scaled building base.<br />

106 q) The main station entrance<br />

includes pedestrian<br />

amenities.<br />

106 r) The transit station includes<br />

an abundance <strong>of</strong> bicycle<br />

parking.<br />

106 a) Station design adheres to the<br />

principles <strong>of</strong> CPTED.<br />

110 a) Taller buildings are<br />

encouraged adjacent to<br />

Lakeshore Drive.<br />

110 b) Lakeshore Drive, and streets<br />

that connect directly to<br />

Lakeshore Drive, have<br />

enhanced streetscape<br />

treatments.<br />

110 c) The boulevard width is 8m<br />

to accommodate a double<br />

row <strong>of</strong> street trees and a<br />

transition zone.<br />

Complies<br />

Partially Complies<br />

Does Not Comply<br />

N/A<br />

DRAFT<br />

Comments<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!