14.05.2018 Views

2. Int'l Tax Update Significant Developments in the Global Tax System - Andrew Seidler

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Help<strong>in</strong>g with tax challenges wherever you are <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> world<br />

INTERNATIONAL TAX UPDATE:<br />

SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE GLOBAL TAX SYSTEM<br />

Bucharest, 11 April 2018


Presenter<br />

<strong>Andrew</strong> <strong>Seidler</strong><br />

Partner, RSM UK<br />

andrew.seidler@rsmuk.com<br />

+44 20 3201 8615<br />

• International <strong>Tax</strong> Partner, RSM London<br />

• 20 years <strong>in</strong>ternational tax experience across range of taxes<br />

• Chair of RSM International European <strong>Tax</strong> Centre of Excellence<br />

• Author of Tolley’s International <strong>Tax</strong> Plann<strong>in</strong>g 2017-18 and 2018-19 (forthcom<strong>in</strong>g).<br />

2


Overview<br />

BEPS<br />

<strong>Global</strong> <strong>Tax</strong><br />

Reform<br />

US <strong>Tax</strong><br />

Reform<br />

BREXIT<br />

3


Corporate Changes


Corporate changes<br />

<strong>Tax</strong> change Post reform law Considerations<br />

Reduced Corporate <strong>Tax</strong><br />

Rate & Move to Territorial<br />

Type <strong>System</strong><br />

• Reduced 21 percent flat corporate<br />

federal <strong>in</strong>come tax rate from 35<br />

percent, generally effective Jan. 1,<br />

2018<br />

• Companies need to consider whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

flow-through or corporate structure is<br />

most efficient<br />

• Investor make up?<br />

Net Operat<strong>in</strong>g Loss (NOL)<br />

rules<br />

• Limits NOL deduction to 80 percent<br />

of taxable <strong>in</strong>come for NOLs aris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

years beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g after Dec. 31, 2017<br />

• Elim<strong>in</strong>ates NOL carrybacks for NOLs<br />

aris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> years end<strong>in</strong>g after Dec. 31,<br />

2017<br />

• NOLs generally carried forward<br />

<strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>itely if <strong>the</strong>y arise <strong>in</strong> years<br />

end<strong>in</strong>g after Dec. 31, 2017<br />

• Fiscal year taxpayers with years<br />

end<strong>in</strong>g after Dec. 31, 2017 cannot<br />

carryback losses<br />

• Limited impact on state NOLs as<br />

many states have <strong>the</strong>ir own NOL<br />

deduction provisions<br />

5


International tax provisions: Repatriation and DRD<br />

<strong>Tax</strong> Change Post Reform Law Considerations<br />

One-time deemed<br />

repatriation tax on foreign<br />

deferred earn<strong>in</strong>gs (effective<br />

for tax years beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<br />

before January 1, 2018)<br />

• Foreign deferred earn<strong>in</strong>gs are taxed<br />

at 15.5 or 8 percent based on<br />

balance sheet attributes (cash &<br />

cash equivalents vs. non-cash<br />

assets, respectively).<br />

• Election to defer payment over 8<br />

years<br />

• Determ<strong>in</strong>e applicability at portfolio and<br />

owner level<br />

• <strong>Significant</strong> diligence item as well as<br />

cash flow concern<br />

• Need to understand E&P on all<br />

impacted companies<br />

• Many states will treat <strong>the</strong> repatriation<br />

as Subpart F <strong>in</strong>come subject to full or<br />

partial dividend received deduction<br />

Dividend Received<br />

Deduction/ Participation<br />

Exemption (effective for<br />

distributions made after<br />

Dec. 31, 2017)<br />

• Certa<strong>in</strong> foreign dividends non-taxable<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> US<br />

• Certa<strong>in</strong> ga<strong>in</strong>s on sale of foreign<br />

subsidiaries will not be subject to<br />

U.S. federal <strong>in</strong>come tax<br />

• Applicable to C-Corporations with<br />

foreign corporation(s)<br />

• Corporate structure may be benefit<br />

due to participation exemptions<br />

• How significant are foreign earn<strong>in</strong>gs?<br />

6


Corporate changes<br />

<strong>Tax</strong> change Post reform law Considerations<br />

Immediate Expens<strong>in</strong>g –<br />

Bonus Depreciation<br />

• 100 percent bonus depreciation<br />

through 2022, <strong>the</strong>n phased out<br />

through 2026<br />

• Applies to new and used property<br />

acquired and retroactive to assets<br />

placed <strong>in</strong> service after Sept. 27,<br />

2017<br />

• Adds more importance to purchase<br />

price allocation agreements<br />

• Asset deals are even more attractive<br />

• States may not conform<br />

• Immediate expens<strong>in</strong>g benefit is<br />

reduced to <strong>the</strong> extent it generates an<br />

NOL<br />

Corporate Alternative<br />

M<strong>in</strong>imum <strong>Tax</strong> (AMT) & AMT<br />

Credit<br />

• Repeals corporate AMT for tax years<br />

beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g after Dec. 31, 2017<br />

• Credits can be refundable<br />

• Refundable credit is an unexpected<br />

benefit<br />

7


UK Plann<strong>in</strong>g Considerations: Dividend Exemption<br />

To qualify for dividend exemption <strong>the</strong> US<br />

must be a C Corp: many family companies<br />

(even sizeable ones) and f<strong>in</strong>ancial services<br />

entities are transparent <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> US, too.<br />

The effect of subpart F or check<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> box<br />

for disregard is current year US taxation<br />

(with foreign tax credit) as opposed to an<br />

exempt dividend.<br />

Dividend exemption has an impact on<br />

deferral plann<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Entity<br />

classification<br />

US<br />

UK<br />

Entity<br />

classification<br />

Non-US Affiliate<br />

EU<br />

Customer


UK Plann<strong>in</strong>g Considerations: NOL Limitation<br />

In <strong>the</strong> UK, <strong>the</strong> strategy for foreign profits often took<br />

<strong>in</strong>to account <strong>the</strong> current and brought forward NOL<br />

position <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> US:<br />

• In <strong>the</strong> past <strong>the</strong>re was no credit for foreign tax if<br />

NOLs – <strong>the</strong> strategy was to defer tax on profits by<br />

avoid<strong>in</strong>g Subpart F and regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> UK<br />

subsidiary – to pay a dividend at a later date;<br />

• This is no longer relevant if all foreign dividends<br />

are exempt;<br />

• Absolute rate of foreign tax becomes more<br />

important though, as it is not safe to assume <strong>the</strong><br />

effective tax will be higher of US and overseas<br />

tax rates (with <strong>the</strong> US usually be<strong>in</strong>g higher);<br />

• Plann<strong>in</strong>g to use foreign tax to frank <strong>the</strong> tax on <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> 20% profits not covered by NOLs;<br />

• NOLs no longer fully cover disposals for example<br />

of exported IP.<br />

US<br />

UK<br />

UK<br />

EU<br />

Customer


UK Plann<strong>in</strong>g Considerations: Deemed Repatriation<br />

• This is a tax charge as if <strong>the</strong> funds<br />

had been repatriated to <strong>the</strong> US – <strong>the</strong><br />

cash does not have to be repatriated<br />

(although <strong>the</strong> tax will need fund<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

but <strong>the</strong> tax can be spread);<br />

• Is <strong>the</strong> cash accessible? Has it been<br />

tied up <strong>in</strong> acquisitions and f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g?<br />

IP Co<br />

US<br />

Ireland<br />

In some<br />

groups this<br />

will be UK<br />

• If <strong>the</strong> UK is an <strong>in</strong>termediate parent<br />

company is any structur<strong>in</strong>g required<br />

whilst <strong>the</strong> UK has access to EU<br />

directives to ensure WHT free access<br />

to <strong>the</strong> cash?<br />

F<strong>in</strong> Co<br />

UK<br />

EU EUEU<br />

EU<br />

Customer


Withhold<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Tax</strong>es After Brexit<br />

• With <strong>the</strong> UK outside <strong>the</strong> EU <strong>the</strong> Parent<br />

Subsidiary Directive will no longer elim<strong>in</strong>ate<br />

dividend withhold<strong>in</strong>g taxes on payments to<br />

<strong>the</strong> UK: treaty rates will apply and <strong>the</strong>se<br />

are commonly 5%.<br />

• Where dividends are exempt from tax – <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> UK and now <strong>the</strong> US – withhold<strong>in</strong>g taxes<br />

represent additional tax.<br />

• Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands has just changed its law to<br />

exempt dividends from withhold<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

US<br />

UK<br />

Dividend WHT UK US<br />

Ireland 15/5% 15/5%<br />

Germany 15/5% 15/5/0%<br />

Ireland<br />

Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />

Germany<br />

Luxembourg 15/5% 15/5/0%<br />

Belgium 10/0% 15/5/0%


Withhold<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Tax</strong>es After Brexit<br />

• Hold<strong>in</strong>g EU based activities <strong>in</strong> branches<br />

or partnerships.<br />

UK<br />

• Germany:<br />

• Conversion of a company to a<br />

partnership does not trigger taxes<br />

domestically <strong>in</strong> Germany;<br />

• Partners pay tax <strong>in</strong> Germany at rates<br />

equivalent to German corporate rates;<br />

• Dividends between German resident<br />

companies should be exempt from tax;<br />

• Under <strong>the</strong> Organschaft (fiscal unity)<br />

<strong>the</strong> German group parent pays tax on<br />

behalf of <strong>the</strong> group members as if <strong>the</strong>y<br />

were one.<br />

GmbH1<br />

KG<br />

GmbH2<br />

EU o<strong>the</strong>r


Withhold<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Tax</strong>es and <strong>the</strong> Digital Economy<br />

(UK Government Position Paper)


Withhold<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Tax</strong>es and <strong>the</strong> Digital Economy<br />

Progress of Profit Split from last resort<br />

moth to method of choice;<br />

The 3% Revenues <strong>Tax</strong> is a hybrid tax:<br />

• It will have to be expressed as tax on<br />

profits o<strong>the</strong>rwise treaties will not<br />

apply;<br />

• It is on gross <strong>in</strong>come and so behaves<br />

like a withhold<strong>in</strong>g tax;<br />

• In operation it may be more like an<br />

<strong>in</strong>direct tax.<br />

Is its purpose is to pave <strong>the</strong> way for<br />

someth<strong>in</strong>g that is better, but would have<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rwise been unacceptable? CCCTB.<br />

Profit Split<br />

Digital<br />

Economy<br />

F<strong>in</strong>al<br />

Model<br />

CCCTB<br />

3%<br />

Revenues<br />

<strong>Tax</strong><br />

Digital<br />

Economy<br />

Interim<br />

Measure


Common Consolidated Corporate <strong>Tax</strong> Base<br />

On 15 March 2018 <strong>the</strong> European Parliament approved proposals for directives for <strong>the</strong> Common<br />

Corporate <strong>Tax</strong> Base and <strong>the</strong> Common Consolidated Corporate <strong>Tax</strong> Base.<br />

The directives will <strong>in</strong>itially be b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g on groups with revenues exceed<strong>in</strong>g EUR 750m but this<br />

threshold will be lowered reach<strong>in</strong>g zero after seven years.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>tended implementation date is 1 January 2020.<br />

The Common Consolidated Corporate <strong>Tax</strong> Base provides <strong>the</strong> method of consolidation and <strong>the</strong><br />

formula for allocat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> tax base of a multi-national company between Member States. The<br />

allocation formula is based on headcount, sales, data collection and assets, each hav<strong>in</strong>g equal<br />

weight.<br />

Headcount<br />

Sales<br />

Data<br />

Collection<br />

Assets


Common Corporate <strong>Tax</strong> Base<br />

• A def<strong>in</strong>ition of digital permanent establishment:<br />

• Revenues exceed<strong>in</strong>g EUR 5m pa derived remotely from users <strong>in</strong> a members state,<br />

• where at least 1,000 registered <strong>in</strong>dividual users per month visited <strong>the</strong> digital platform or<br />

• at least 1,000 digital contracts have been concluded per month with customers or users<br />

<strong>in</strong> a member state<br />

• or <strong>the</strong> volume of digital content collected by <strong>the</strong> taxpayer <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> year exceed10% of <strong>the</strong><br />

group’s overall stored content;<br />

• Amendments to R&D tax <strong>in</strong>centives to limit <strong>the</strong> credit to 10% of <strong>the</strong> R&D staff costs, with a<br />

maximum threshold of EUR 20m for such costs;<br />

• Limits <strong>the</strong> deductibility of f<strong>in</strong>ance costs to 10% of EBITDA or EUR1m if higher;<br />

• Limits <strong>the</strong> carry forward of losses to five years;<br />

• Disallowance of expenses paid to beneficiaries located <strong>in</strong> a jurisdiction considered to be a tax<br />

haven accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes;<br />

• Amendments to <strong>the</strong> classification of CFCs;<br />

• Amendments to double tax treaties so that <strong>the</strong> parties agree to ensure that tax is paid where<br />

economic activities take place and add anti avoidance/anti tax-evasion clauses.<br />

• Provides for an EU wide tax identification number.


Digital Economy Interim Measure<br />

Example:<br />

For every £100 of revenue £3 of<br />

tax is due.<br />

The profits required to generate<br />

£3 of tax under traditional<br />

methods is different <strong>in</strong> each<br />

country –shown <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> graph.<br />

The green l<strong>in</strong>e represents<br />

potential double tax relief<br />

limitation <strong>in</strong> relation to say <strong>the</strong> US.<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0


Digital Economy Interim Measure<br />

Effect of <strong>in</strong>terim measure:<br />

• Some sectors <strong>the</strong> 3% revenues based tax would <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>the</strong> tax take<br />

• Tak<strong>in</strong>g out centralised costs, most tech sectors would experience and effective tax rise<br />

Sector<br />

NP%<br />

2012<br />

NP%<br />

2018<br />

Information Technology 16.7 17.5<br />

Communications/Telecom 6.2 11.5<br />

Pharma, Life Sciences,<br />

Biotech<br />

19.5 26.9<br />

Media, Broadcast 10.1 1<strong>2.</strong>2<br />

<strong>Tax</strong> at<br />

20%<br />

3.5<br />

<strong>2.</strong>3<br />

5.4<br />

<strong>2.</strong>5<br />

Data from S&P 2012 and CSI Market.com 2018


BEPS Measures:<br />

Anti-hybrid rules<br />

Interest Limitation


US Outbound Acquisition<br />

Typical simple structure <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> past for<br />

an outbound acquisition from <strong>the</strong> US:<br />

applied <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r jurisdictions too:<br />

• Dutch BV/CV<br />

• Double Lux co for debt<br />

Acquisition<br />

US<br />

UK<br />

Holdco<br />

Non-US Affiliate<br />

Interest<br />

Interest<br />

group relief<br />

UK


Anti-hybrid provisions


US Hybrid Rules<br />

A “hybrid entity” is any entity that is:<br />

• Fiscally transparent for US tax purposes but<br />

not transparent under foreign law, or<br />

• Fiscally transparent for foreign law<br />

purposes, but not transparent for US tax<br />

purposes.<br />

A “hybrid transaction” is any transaction, series<br />

of transactions, agreement, or <strong>in</strong>strument<br />

• treated as <strong>in</strong>terest or royalties for US federal<br />

tax purposes<br />

• but not treated as <strong>in</strong>terest or royalties by <strong>the</strong><br />

country <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> related party is resident.<br />

US hybrid<br />

entity<br />

Acquisition<br />

US<br />

UK<br />

Holdco<br />

Non-US Affiliate<br />

UK<br />

Not a US<br />

hybrid<br />

transaction<br />

Interest<br />

Interest<br />

group relief


US Hybrid Counteraction<br />

The Act denies a deduction for any disqualified<br />

related party amount paid or accrued pursuant<br />

to a hybrid transaction or by or to a hybrid<br />

entity.<br />

US hybrid<br />

entity<br />

US<br />

Disqualified<br />

related party<br />

amount<br />

Interest<br />

A “disqualified related party amount” is any<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest or royalty paid to a related party where<br />

<strong>the</strong> related party<br />

• does not <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> payment <strong>in</strong> its <strong>in</strong>come<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> country <strong>in</strong> which it is a resident or<br />

• is allowed a deduction with respect to <strong>the</strong><br />

amount <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> country <strong>in</strong> which it is a<br />

resident.<br />

Acquisition<br />

UK<br />

Holdco<br />

Non-US Affiliate<br />

UK<br />

Interest<br />

group relief<br />

Treasury Regulations expected.


UK approach<br />

Type Mismatch <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g Primary Response Defensive Rule Scope<br />

D/NI Ch 3: F<strong>in</strong>ancial Instruments Deny payer deduction<br />

Related parties and structured<br />

Include as ord<strong>in</strong>ary <strong>in</strong>come<br />

arrangements<br />

D/NI Ch 4: Hybrid Transfers Deny payer deduction<br />

Related parties and structured<br />

Include as ord<strong>in</strong>ary <strong>in</strong>come<br />

arrangements<br />

D/NI Ch 5: Hybrid Payer Deny payer deduction<br />

Control group and structured<br />

Include as ord<strong>in</strong>ary <strong>in</strong>come<br />

arrangements<br />

D/NI<br />

Ch 6 Transfers by<br />

Permanent Establishments<br />

Deny deduction to UK PE No limitation on response<br />

D/NI Ch 7: Hybrid Payee Deny payer deduction<br />

Include as ord<strong>in</strong>ary <strong>in</strong>come Control group and structured<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestor, <strong>the</strong>n LLP arrangements<br />

D/NI Ch 8: Mult<strong>in</strong>ational Payee Deny payer deduction<br />

Control group and structured<br />

arrangements<br />

DD Ch 9: Hybrid Entity Deny <strong>in</strong>vestor deduction Deny payer deduction<br />

Related parties and structured<br />

arrangements<br />

Dual resident company deny<br />

deduction<br />

DD<br />

D/NI<br />

Ch 10: Dual Territory<br />

Mult<strong>in</strong>ational company: deny<br />

parent jurisdiction deduction<br />

Ch 11: Imported Mismatches Deny payer deduction<br />

Tolley’s International <strong>Tax</strong> Plann<strong>in</strong>g 2017/18<br />

Mult<strong>in</strong>ational company:<br />

deny deduction to UK PE<br />

No limitation on response<br />

Control group and structured<br />

arrangements


UK approach compared to US<br />

Type Mismatch <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Primary Response<br />

D/NI<br />

Ch 3: F<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

Instruments<br />

Deny payer deduction<br />

D/NI Ch 4: Hybrid Transfers Deny payer deduction<br />

D/NI Ch 5: Hybrid Payer Deny payer deduction<br />

D/NI<br />

Ch 6 Transfers by<br />

Permanent<br />

Deny deduction to UK PE<br />

Establishments<br />

D/NI Ch 7: Hybrid Payee Deny payer deduction<br />

D/NI<br />

Ch 8: Mult<strong>in</strong>ational<br />

Payee<br />

Deny payer deduction<br />

DD Ch 9: Hybrid Entity Deny <strong>in</strong>vestor deduction<br />

Dual resident company<br />

deny deduction<br />

DD<br />

D/NI<br />

Ch 10: Dual Territory<br />

Ch 11: Imported<br />

Mismatches<br />

Mult<strong>in</strong>ational company:<br />

deny parent jurisdiction<br />

deduction<br />

Deny payer deduction<br />

US hybrid<br />

entity<br />

Acquisition<br />

US<br />

UK<br />

Holdco<br />

Non-US Affiliate<br />

UK<br />

Not a US<br />

hybrid<br />

transaction?<br />

Interest<br />

Interest<br />

group relief<br />

Who has to disallow first?


Hybrids and s<strong>in</strong>gle member disregards<br />

Type Mismatch <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Primary Response<br />

D/NI<br />

Ch 3: F<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

Instruments<br />

Deny payer deduction<br />

D/NI Ch 4: Hybrid Transfers Deny payer deduction<br />

D/NI Ch 5: Hybrid Payer Deny payer deduction<br />

D/NI<br />

Ch 6 Transfers by<br />

Permanent<br />

Deny deduction to UK PE<br />

Establishments<br />

D/NI Ch 7: Hybrid Payee Deny payer deduction<br />

D/NI<br />

Ch 8: Mult<strong>in</strong>ational<br />

Payee<br />

Deny payer deduction<br />

DD Ch 9: Hybrid Entity Deny <strong>in</strong>vestor deduction<br />

Dual resident company<br />

deny deduction<br />

DD<br />

D/NI<br />

Ch 10: Dual Territory<br />

Ch 11: Imported<br />

Mismatches<br />

Mult<strong>in</strong>ational company:<br />

deny parent jurisdiction<br />

deduction<br />

Deny payer deduction<br />

Not a US<br />

disqualified<br />

related party<br />

amount<br />

by nature<br />

US<br />

Cost Plus<br />

US hybrid<br />

entity<br />

US<br />

UK<br />

I<br />

Not a US<br />

hybrid entity<br />

FA 2018 fix<br />

for dual<br />

<strong>in</strong>clusion<br />

<strong>in</strong>come<br />

EU<br />

Customer


Interest Limitation


Interest deduction limitations<br />

<strong>Tax</strong> Change<br />

New Interest<br />

Deduction<br />

Limitation<br />

Post Reform Law<br />

• Limits <strong>the</strong> net <strong>in</strong>terest expense<br />

deduction to 30 percent of adjusted<br />

taxable <strong>in</strong>come (ATI)<br />

• For 2018 through 2021, ATI will<br />

approximate earn<strong>in</strong>gs before<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest, taxes, depreciation and<br />

amortization (EBITDA)<br />

• After 2021, ATI will approximate<br />

earn<strong>in</strong>gs before <strong>in</strong>terest and taxes<br />

(EBIT)<br />

• Disallowed <strong>in</strong>terest generally may<br />

be carried forward <strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>itely<br />

• Limitation does not apply to<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>esses with an average<br />

gross receipts of ≤$25 million<br />

USD and certa<strong>in</strong> agricultural,<br />

farm<strong>in</strong>g and real estate<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>esses<br />

• “Net <strong>in</strong>terest expense” so back<br />

to back loans rema<strong>in</strong> viable for<br />

<strong>in</strong>tercompany f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

activities<br />

• Real property trade or<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>esses that use ADS and<br />

farm<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>esses may elect<br />

not to be subject to <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest deduction limitation<br />

28


Interest deduction – comparison with UK<br />

Small company exemption:<br />

• US def<strong>in</strong>ed de m<strong>in</strong>imis by type companies<br />

and nature of trade;<br />

• UK def<strong>in</strong>es de m<strong>in</strong>imis as amount of<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest £2m.<br />

Allowable amount:<br />

• US def<strong>in</strong>es it by fixed ration of ATI;<br />

• UK def<strong>in</strong>es it by fixed ration of tax EBITDA<br />

or group debt ratio is larger.<br />

IP Co<br />

US<br />

Ireland<br />

Non-US Affiliate<br />

External<br />

Plann<strong>in</strong>g to spread <strong>the</strong> deduction <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

group – excessive disallowance if<br />

concentrated too narrowly - limitation on net<br />

expense.<br />

F<strong>in</strong> Co<br />

UK<br />

EU EUEU<br />

UK Th<strong>in</strong> Capitalisation as an overlay on <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>terest restriction gives rise to tax leakage.


GILTI<br />

FDII<br />

BEAT


<strong>Global</strong> Intangible<br />

Low <strong>Tax</strong>ed Income<br />

GILTI


International tax provisions: GILTI M<strong>in</strong>imum <strong>Tax</strong><br />

<strong>Tax</strong> change Post reform law Considerations<br />

<strong>Global</strong> Intangible<br />

Low <strong>Tax</strong>ed Income<br />

(GILTI) (effective for<br />

tax years beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<br />

after Dec. 31, 2017)<br />

• Targeted at foreign<br />

corporations that earn a<br />

high rate of return on <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

<strong>in</strong>tangible assets<br />

• Much broader than<br />

<strong>in</strong>tangible hold<strong>in</strong>g<br />

companies<br />

• All <strong>in</strong>dustries<br />

• Calculates tax on amount<br />

over net deemed tangible<br />

<strong>in</strong>come<br />

• GILTI applies to any CFC<br />

• C corporations receive a<br />

deduction aga<strong>in</strong>st GILTI<br />

equal to 50 percent<br />

• Expectation is that many CFCs will be<br />

subject to GILTI<br />

• Effectively a 10.5 percent m<strong>in</strong>imum tax<br />

CFC is owned by a domestic C Corp<br />

• Eligible for partial foreign tax credit<br />

offset<br />

• New diligence item<br />

32


GILTI Example Calculation<br />

GILTI Calculation<br />

QBAI 200<br />

Rout<strong>in</strong>e % of return – 10% 10%<br />

Net deemed tangible return 20<br />

Net CFC tested <strong>in</strong>come 120<br />

Net deemed tangible return (20)<br />

GILTI 100<br />

US <strong>Tax</strong> Calculation<br />

GILTI 100<br />

Allowed deduction (50% of GILTI) 50<br />

US <strong>Tax</strong>able Income 50<br />

<strong>Tax</strong> Rate 21%<br />

US <strong>Tax</strong> (A) 10.5<br />

Qualified bus<strong>in</strong>ess asset <strong>in</strong>vestment (“QBAI”):<br />

Equals <strong>the</strong> CFC’s average aggregate adjusted bases<br />

for specified tangible property.<br />

Rout<strong>in</strong>e return is 10% x QBAI - Net Interest Expense<br />

Interest expense less allocable <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong>come<br />

taken <strong>in</strong>to account <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g net tested <strong>in</strong>come.<br />

Net CFC tested <strong>in</strong>come: The excess (if any) of <strong>the</strong><br />

aggregate tested <strong>in</strong>come of each CFC less <strong>the</strong><br />

aggregate tested loss of each CFC.<br />

Example assumes no foreign taxes paid – generally<br />

80% of foreign taxes paid (subject to limitations) may<br />

be available to offset US taxes paid on GILTI


UK Plann<strong>in</strong>g Considerations: GILTI Income Sources<br />

What is <strong>the</strong> impact on R&D and Patent<br />

box type arrangements which trigger<br />

foreign tax breaks?<br />

Product and<br />

Brand<br />

US<br />

Not compliant with <strong>the</strong> Nexus<br />

requirement <strong>in</strong> BEPS – some countries<br />

may impose withhold<strong>in</strong>gs on royalties.<br />

IP Co<br />

Ireland<br />

R&D<br />

<strong>in</strong>tangibles<br />

from buy <strong>in</strong><br />

Although <strong>the</strong> GILTI tax rate is 10.5%<br />

and so comparable to <strong>the</strong> rates under<br />

some preferred IP regimes,<br />

• The tax base is foreign <strong>in</strong>come over<br />

an IRS accepted base level, and so<br />

• The foreign <strong>in</strong>come may not be<br />

repatriated to US to claim foreign<br />

tax credit.<br />

F<strong>in</strong> Co<br />

UK<br />

Customer<br />

related<br />

<strong>in</strong>tangibles<br />

EU EUEU


Foreign Derived Intangible Income<br />

FDII


Foreign Derived Intangible Income Deduction – FDII<br />

<strong>Tax</strong> change Post reform law Considerations<br />

Foreign Derived<br />

Intangible Income<br />

(FDII) (effective for<br />

tax years beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<br />

after Dec. 31,<br />

2017)<br />

• Deduction results <strong>in</strong> an<br />

effective 13.125 percent<br />

• Applicable for Domestic C<br />

corporations with gross<br />

<strong>in</strong>come generated by<br />

revenues to foreign<br />

customers for foreign use<br />

• Products & services<br />

revenue with respect to<br />

property not located<br />

with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> US<br />

• Requires base<br />

calculations of “tangible”<br />

<strong>in</strong>come and <strong>in</strong>tangible<br />

<strong>in</strong>come<br />

• Consider us<strong>in</strong>g C corporations to take<br />

advantage of FDII deductions<br />

• Need to identify and document<br />

qualification of this deduction<br />

• Sales to domestic unrelated parties before<br />

f<strong>in</strong>al overseas sale elim<strong>in</strong>ates benefit<br />

• New diligence item<br />

36


FDII Example<br />

US<br />

Corp<br />

US<br />

sales<br />

$500<br />

Revenue<br />

$1,000<br />

Revenue<br />

Non US<br />

related or<br />

unrelated<br />

U.S. Corp.<br />

P&L<br />

Sales of products for use <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> U.S. 500.0<br />

Sales of products for use outside <strong>the</strong> U.S. 1,000.0<br />

Total deductiable eligible revenue 1,500.0<br />

COGS 300.0<br />

Gross profit 1,200.0<br />

Allocable deductions (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Interest) 100.0<br />

Potential FDII eligible <strong>in</strong>come 1,100.0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>come/(deduction) for non-FDII eligible activities -<br />

<strong>Tax</strong>able <strong>in</strong>come 1,100.0<br />

Qualified Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Asset Investments (QBAI) 500.0


FDII Example<br />

Step 1: Determ<strong>in</strong>e Deduction Eligible Income (DEI)<br />

Gross <strong>in</strong>come 1,200.0<br />

Less Subpart F <strong>in</strong>come -<br />

Less GILTI <strong>in</strong>come -<br />

Less F<strong>in</strong>ancial services <strong>in</strong>come -<br />

Less Dividend received from CFC -<br />

Less Domestic oil and gas extraction <strong>in</strong>come -<br />

Less foreign branch <strong>in</strong>come -<br />

Adjusted Gross Income 1,200.0<br />

Less Allocable deductions 100.0<br />

DEI 1,100.0 A<br />

Step 2: Reduce by Rout<strong>in</strong>e Return<br />

QBAI 500.0<br />

Apply Rout<strong>in</strong>e Return Factor 10.0%<br />

Less Interest expense <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> allocable deductions w/o <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong>come -<br />

Rout<strong>in</strong>e Return 50.0 B<br />

Step 3: Determ<strong>in</strong>ed Deemed Intangible Income (DII)<br />

(DEI - (10% x QBAI)) 1,050.0 C = A - B


FDII Example<br />

Step 4: Determ<strong>in</strong>e Ratio of Foreign-derived deduction eligible <strong>in</strong>come (FDDEI) to DEI<br />

Foreign revenue 1,000.0<br />

COGS 200.0<br />

Gross profit 800.0<br />

Allocable deductions 66.7<br />

FDDEI 733.3 D<br />

FDDEI / DEI ratio<br />

66.7% E = D / A<br />

Step 5: Determ<strong>in</strong>e Foreign Derived Intangible Income (FDII)<br />

Determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>itial FDII (DII x (FDDEI/DEI)) 700.0<br />

Less Limitation of FDII based on taxable <strong>in</strong>come -<br />

FDII 700.0<br />

Step 6: Determ<strong>in</strong>e FDII Deduction<br />

FDII Deduction factor 37.5%<br />

FDII Deduction 26<strong>2.</strong>5


FDII Example Summary<br />

<strong>Tax</strong>able <strong>in</strong>come 1,100.0<br />

FDII Deduction 26<strong>2.</strong>5<br />

Adjusted <strong>Tax</strong>able Income 837.5<br />

<strong>Tax</strong> Rate 21.0%<br />

Total <strong>Tax</strong> 175.9<br />

U.S. Corp. ETR 15.989%


UK Plann<strong>in</strong>g Considerations: FDII<br />

Purpose is to encourage groups to<br />

ei<strong>the</strong>r br<strong>in</strong>g IP back to <strong>the</strong> US or to<br />

leave it <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> US.<br />

Beneficial tax rate (13.125%) applies<br />

to US sales to foreign customers.<br />

Does not apply to <strong>in</strong>come taxed on a C<br />

Corporation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> US from<br />

disregarded subsidiaries.<br />

IP Co<br />

US<br />

Ireland<br />

F<strong>in</strong> Co<br />

UK<br />

EU EUEU


Base Erosion Anti-abuse <strong>Tax</strong><br />

BEAT


BEAT – Base Erosion Anti-Abuse <strong>Tax</strong><br />

<strong>Tax</strong> change Post reform law Considerations<br />

43<br />

Base Erosion<br />

and Anti Abuse<br />

<strong>Tax</strong> (BEAT)<br />

(effective for tax<br />

years beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<br />

after Dec. 31,<br />

2017)<br />

• 10% m<strong>in</strong>imum tax on U.S. corporations (5% for<br />

2018).<br />

• Applies where 10% of ‘modified taxable<br />

<strong>in</strong>come’ (MTI) exceeds regular tax.<br />

• MTI is taxable <strong>in</strong>come without regard to base<br />

erosion tax benefit (i.e., no deduction for base<br />

erosion payments).<br />

• Base erosion payments <strong>in</strong>clude any deductible<br />

amount paid/accrued to a foreign related party.<br />

• Includes payments for depreciable property or<br />

<strong>in</strong>surance payment.<br />

• Excludes items that reduce gross receipts (like<br />

cost of goods sold).<br />

• Threshold for related party status 25 percent<br />

vote or value.<br />

BEAT applies to U.S.<br />

corporations not treated as<br />

flow-through (e.g. S corps,<br />

REITS, RICs).<br />

USD 500 million of domestic<br />

gross receipts if base erosion<br />

percentage is 3 percent or<br />

higher.<br />

Members of U.S. consolidated<br />

group are treated as s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

corporation.


UK Plann<strong>in</strong>g Considerations: BEAT Outbound<br />

• COGS is outside <strong>the</strong> scope of BEAT:<br />

ensure all COGS items are properly<br />

identified.<br />

US<br />

• Equity contributions to fund R&D /<br />

cost shar<strong>in</strong>g arrangements with<br />

foreign affiliates.<br />

IP Co<br />

Equity<br />

Ireland<br />

Manufacturer<br />

F<strong>in</strong> Co<br />

UK<br />

EU EUEU


UK Plann<strong>in</strong>g Considerations: BEAT Inbound<br />

• Inbound parent / subsidiary loans<br />

could be replaced by parentguaranteed<br />

third-party loans and so<br />

avoid BEAT (however see Interest<br />

Limitation).<br />

Service agreements<br />

UK<br />

US<br />

External debt with<br />

parent guarantee


QUESTIONS


Brexit Monitor<br />

Visit https://www.rsmuk.com/ideas-and-<strong>in</strong>sights/brexit-monitor for news and <strong>in</strong>formation about Brexit


<strong>Tax</strong> Reform Resource Center<br />

Visit our tax reform resource center for more <strong>in</strong>formation on how legislation can affect your bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

and tax plann<strong>in</strong>g. www.rsmus.com/taxreform


THANK YOU

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!