Children of Incarcerated Parents

More documents

Recommendations

Info

demonstrate that there is a vision and values for Oregonians to do things differently. We’re not at a place where we ultimately want to be in terms of being able to care for and lift up the health and wellbeing of children with incarcerated parents.” The law also creates the Task Force on Children of Incarcerated Parents, which is expected to develop recommendations for how the rights enshrined in the bill can be implemented in the criminal justice system and across Oregon’s state agencies. “A system of advocacy that starts at the time of arrest” needs to be developed, said Jessica Katz, the director of Family Preservation Project, a program of the YWCA of Greater Portland that operates four programs inside Coffee Creek Correctional Facility, Oregon’s only women’s prison. That includes training police officers to ask parents, as they’re being arrested, if they have children in need of attention. “And if you ask, ‘Do you have kids?’ that’s not enough,” Katz said. “You have to have a response when you get a ‘yes.’” Allowing children to safely visit their parents while in prison is another priority of advocates, and Kersten said that increased communication with children to help them understand what being in prison means and what has happened to the one they love is important to reduce feelings of isolation and abandonment. “The barriers for them to see that parent are just unbelievable,” Kersten said. “People think that somebody is arrested, lock them up, and the family is better off. That’s not the case. Just because their parent is locked up doesn’t mean they don’t love that parent.” Department of Corrections spokesperson Betty Bernt said that the bill of rights will serve as a set of guiding principles. “While we may not be able to remove the obstacles and traumas faced by children of incarcerated parents, we can help to create a system that recognizes their needs and prioritizes their rights,” she said. Kersten calls this population of Oregon children – even though they number 1 in 10 – “invisible,” a group that demands attention. “They’re everywhere,” she said. “They’re in our midst.” Page 70 of 109
VII. Prof. William Julius Wilson William Julius Wilson (born December 20, 1935) is an American sociologist. He taught at the University of Chicago from 1972 to 1996 before moving to Harvard University. Wilson is Lewis P. and Linda L. Geyser University Professor at Harvard University. He is one of 24 University Professors, the highest professional distinction for a Harvard faculty member. After receiving a Ph.D. from Washington State University in 1966, Wilson taught sociology at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, before joining the University of Chicago faculty in 1972. In 1990 he was appointed the Lucy Flower University Professor and director of the University of Chicago's Center for the Study of Urban Inequality. He joined the faculty at Harvard in July 1996. He is affiliated with the Malcolm Wiener Center for Social Policy at the John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University's Hutchins Center for African and African American Research, as Page 71 of 109
Page 2 and 3:
Turning the Improbable Into the Exc
Page 4 and 5:
Page 4 of 109
Page 6 and 7:
Page 6 of 109
Page 8 and 9:
6. 1 We disseminate Quarterly publi
Page 10 and 11:
Page 10 of 109
Page 12 and 13:
Page 12 of 109
Page 14 and 15:
Page 14 of 109
Page 16 and 17:
overwhelming amount of stress and c
Page 18 and 19:
incarcerated parents to foster the
Page 20 and 21: causality, researchers have found a
Page 22 and 23: pregnancies leading to greater divo
Page 24 and 25: there has been a 13% decline in int
Page 26 and 27: to 90% of all US families. Accordin
Page 28 and 29: conciseness what 'everyone knew': t
Page 30 and 31: had contributed to apparent lower a
Page 32 and 33: ule of anthropology: That in all kn
Page 34 and 35: consequence of the social bias wome
Page 36 and 37: Sexual Violence A form of sexual vi
Page 38 and 39: Measures of Poverty An important as
Page 40 and 41: and have adequate shelter can make
Page 42 and 43: statistically determine the impover
Page 44 and 45: Policies Decision-Making Power Deci
Page 46 and 47: to parent teacher conferences. A re
Page 48 and 49: Also notable regarding the rise in
Page 50 and 51: Interestingly, the United States is
Page 52 and 53: women entered the workforce, divorc
Page 54 and 55: of 1996, instituted work requiremen
Page 56 and 57: prevalence of chronic illness, lead
Page 58 and 59: addition, many European countries o
Page 60 and 61: Amachi is an organization that part
Page 62 and 63: IMPACT Family Counseling, Inc. ALAS
Page 64 and 65: Amachi/Big Brothers Big Sisters of
Page 66 and 67: SOUTH CAROLINA Clemson University T
Page 68 and 69: Roots. “Children of incarcerated
Page 72 and 73: well as Harvard's Department of Soc
Page 74 and 75: In his book Still the Promised City
Page 76 and 77: When Work Disappears When Work Disa
Page 78 and 79: Notes _____________________________
Page 80 and 81: Page 80 of 109
Page 82: AMACHI: MENTORING CHILDREN OF PRISO
Page 85 and 86: Public/Private Ventures is a nation
Page 87 and 88: AMACHI
Page 89 and 90: AMACHI
Page 91 and 92: ii AMACHI
Page 93 and 94: In fact, according to a U.S. Senate
Page 95 and 96: A growing number of additional citi
Page 97 and 98: 6 AMACHI
Page 99 and 100: THE MODEL Drawing on research on ef
Page 101 and 102: Each month, pastors received a repo
Page 105 and 106: LOCATING AND ENROLLING THE CHILDREN
Page 107 and 108: Even women whose children were not
Page 109 and 110: The first step was to deliver the m
Page 111 and 112: P/PV staff tried to contact the pas
Page 113 and 114: While Amachi would help the congreg
Page 115 and 116: Table 2: Mentor Demographics Number
Page 119 and 120: Table 3: Number and Percentage of M
Page 121 and 122:
The Amachi matches included in thos
Page 123 and 124:
Table 5: Number of Matches, Mentors
Page 125 and 126:
changes in their lives that affecte
Page 127 and 128:
BBBS Surveys Data collected by Big
Page 129 and 130:
38 AMACHI
Page 131 and 132:
1. A combination of four factors wa
Page 133 and 134:
4. There was leadership that was ab
Page 135 and 136:
to the program’s early success. D
Page 137 and 138:
was privately funded, the pastor wa
Page 139:
APPENDIX: CHURCHES PARTNERING IN AM
Page 142 and 143:
Page 82 of 109
Page 144 and 145:
Mentoring Children of Incarcerated
Page 146 and 147:
Table of Contents I. Introduction.
Page 148 and 149:
I. Introduction In his State of the
Page 150 and 151:
II. Identify Programs in Your Commu
Page 152 and 153:
III. Find the Right Partner Quality
Page 154 and 155:
• Pre-service training for all ne
Page 156 and 157:
IV. Refining the Partnership The in
Page 158 and 159:
• Interest & ability to conduct m
Page 160 and 161:
The Center for Children of Incarcer
Page 162 and 163:
Page 84 of 109
Page 164 and 165:
Ch i l d r e n o f In c a rc e r at
Page 166 and 167:
Ch i l d r e n o f In c a r c e r a
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 86 of 109
Page 184 and 185:
Advocacy Foundation Publishers The
Page 186 and 187:
XVI for Drug-Free Communities Landm
Page 188 and 189:
Vol. VIII 2022 ComeUnity ReEngineer
Page 190 and 191:
Vol. XV 2029 Inner-Cities Revitaliz
Page 192 and 193:
The e-Advocate Monthly Review 2018
Page 194 and 195:
The e-Advocate Journal of Theologic
Page 196 and 197:
Issue Title Quarterly Vol. I 2015 I
Page 198 and 199:
The e-Advocate Juvenile Justice Rep
Page 200 and 201:
2018 - The Theological Law Firm Aca
Page 202 and 203:
Page 106 of 109
Page 204 and 205:
www.TheAdvocacyFoundation.org Page
show all

Children of Incarcerated Parents

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?