06.04.2018 Views

Children of Incarcerated Parents

Children of Incarcerated Parents

Children of Incarcerated Parents

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Measures <strong>of</strong> Poverty<br />

An important aspect <strong>of</strong> analyzing the feminization <strong>of</strong> poverty is the understanding <strong>of</strong> how<br />

it is measured. It is inaccurate to assume that income is the only deprivation that affects<br />

women’s poverty. To examine the issue from a multidimensional perspective, there<br />

must first be accurate and indices available for policy makers interested in gender<br />

empowerment. Often aggregate indices are criticized for their concentration on<br />

monetary issues, especially when data on women's income is sparse and groups<br />

women into one large, undifferentiated mass. Three indexes <strong>of</strong>ten examined are<br />

Gender-related Development Index, Gender Empowerment Measure, and Human<br />

Poverty Index. The first two are gendered- indices, in that they specifically gather data<br />

on women to evaluate gender inequalities, and are useful in understanding disparities in<br />

gender opportunities and choices. HPI, however, focuses on deprivation measures<br />

rather than income measures. GDI adjusts the Human Development Index in three<br />

ways:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Shows longevity, or life-expectancy <strong>of</strong> females and males<br />

Education or knowledge<br />

Decent standard <strong>of</strong> living<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> this index is to rank countries according to both their absolute level <strong>of</strong> human<br />

development and relative scores on gender equality. Although this index has increased<br />

government attention to gender inequality and development, its three measures have<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten been criticized for neglecting important aspects. Its relevance, however, continues<br />

to be integral to the understanding <strong>of</strong> the feminization <strong>of</strong> poverty, as countries with lower<br />

scores may then be then stimulated to focus on policies to assess and reduce gender<br />

disparities. GEM measures female political and income opportunities through:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Analyzing how many seats <strong>of</strong> government are occupied by women<br />

Proportion <strong>of</strong> management positions occupied by women<br />

Female share <strong>of</strong> jobs<br />

Estimated female to male income ratio<br />

HPI is a multidimensional, non-income based approach. It takes into consideration four<br />

dimensions:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Survival<br />

Knowledge<br />

Decent standard <strong>of</strong> living<br />

Social participation<br />

This index is useful in understanding and illuminating the differences between human<br />

poverty (which focuses on the denial <strong>of</strong> basic rights, such as dignity and freedom) and<br />

income poverty. For example, despite the U.S.'s high income stability, it is also ranked<br />

among the highest developed nations in human poverty. In her article, "Towards a<br />

Gendered Human Poverty Measure", Elizabeth Durbin critiques HPI and expands on<br />

Page 38 <strong>of</strong> 109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!