Children of Incarcerated Parents

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ENDNOTES 1 “What Happens to Children?” Federal Resource Center for Children of Prisoners, n.d., p. 1. Child Welfare League of America. ww.cwla.org/programs/incarcerated/cop_whathappens.htm. 2 Personal communication from Arlene F. Lee. Director, Federal Resource Center for Children of Prisoners, Child Welfare League of America, Inc., April 16, 2003. 3 Denise Johnston,“Children of Criminal Offenders,” n.d., pp. 3-4. Center for Children of Incarcerated Parents. www.facsnet.org/specials/youth/johnston-kids.php3. 4 Senate Report 106-404: Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Related Agencies Appropriation Bill, 2001. September 8, 2000, p. 56. 5 Christopher J. Mumola.“Incarcerated Parents and Their Children.” Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. August 2000. U.S. Department of Justice:Washington, DC, p. 4. About 64 percent of mothers in state prison and 84 percent of those in federal prison reported living with their minor children prior to admission, compared to 44 percent and 55 percent of fathers, respectively. 6 “What Happens to Children?,” p. 1. 7 Joseph P.Tierney and Jean Baldwin Grossman, with Nancy L. Resch. Making a Difference:An Impact Study of Big Brothers Big Sisters. 1995. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures. 8 Since its inception, Amachi has also received funding from the Corporation for National Service through a partnership with the Mid-Atlantic Network of Youth & Family Services (MANYCorps), as well as TANF (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families) funds through the City of Philadelphia. In addition,The William E. Simon Foundation has provided funding for the project. 9 Amachi in Chester is funded by The Pew Charitable Trusts. In addition to The Pinkerton Foundation,The Bodman Foundation provides funding for Amachi in Brooklyn. 10 Cynthia L. Sipe. Mentoring:A Synthesis of P/PV’s Research: 1988-1995. 1996. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures. 11 Rev.W.Wilson Goode, Sr. From Clubhouse to Lighthouse:A Dialogical Approach to Congregational Transformation. May 2000, Doctoral Dissertation. Eastern Baptist Theological Seminary. 12 Figures are based on the “Angel Tree” list of children in Philadelphia. Prison Fellowship Ministries, 2000. 13 Of the two churches, one felt that the mentoring project should be the work of the government, not the church; the other feared the contamination of the church’s prophetic mission and was opposed to federal funding flowing to the church. Even after learning that Amachi ENDNOTES 45
was privately funded, the pastor was still opposed because he felt that one day federal money would become part of the program. 14 All quotations are from the Church Overview Forms completed by churches that are partners in Amachi. 15 See Carla Herrera, Cynthia L. Sipe, and Wendy S. McClanahan. Mentoring School-Age Children: Relationship Development in Community-Based and School-Based Programs. April 2000.The National Mentoring Partnership and Public/Private Ventures, p. 18; and Jean E. Rhodes. “What’s Race Got To Do With It?” March 2002. Research Corner. National Mentoring Partnership. www.mentoring.org/research_corner/mar_background.adp. 16 Herrera, p. 18. 17 See, for example, Church-Based Mentoring:A Program Manual for Mentoring Ministries, which suggests that church members might feel uncomfortable about personal interviews and background checks. United Way of Southeastern Pennsylvania’s Volunteer Centers, 1994. 18 See Jean Baldwin Grossman and Amy Johnson.“Assessing the Effectiveness of Mentoring Programs.” Contemporary Issues in Mentoring,Jean B. Grossman (ed.) 1999. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures. 19 Sipe, pp. 9-11. 20 See Grossman for a discussion of the duration of mentor-youth relationships in the BBBS evaluation. 21 “Amachi Evaluation Results.” Big Brothers Big Sisters Southeastern Pennsylvania, 2002.The questionnaires were administered to approximately 30 volunteers and 30 parent/caregivers. 22 Sipe, pp. 9-11. 23 The upper part of this range is somewhat higher than the average cost per match found in a 1998 survey of 52 mentoring programs.That cost was $1,114, but the survey included both group mentoring (which is less expensive but untested as an effective intervention) and oneto-one mentoring.The survey also did not examine outcomes for youth in the mentoring programs, so it is not possible to relate the costs to program effectiveness. See Douglas L. Fountain and Amy Arbreton.“The Cost of Mentoring.” Contemporary Issues in Mentoring,Jean B. Grossman (ed.) 1999. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures. 46 AMACHI
Page 2 and 3:
Turning the Improbable Into the Exc
Page 4 and 5:
Page 4 of 109
Page 6 and 7:
Page 6 of 109
Page 8 and 9:
6. 1 We disseminate Quarterly publi
Page 10 and 11:
Page 10 of 109
Page 12 and 13:
Page 12 of 109
Page 14 and 15:
Page 14 of 109
Page 16 and 17:
overwhelming amount of stress and c
Page 18 and 19:
incarcerated parents to foster the
Page 20 and 21:
causality, researchers have found a
Page 22 and 23:
pregnancies leading to greater divo
Page 24 and 25:
there has been a 13% decline in int
Page 26 and 27:
to 90% of all US families. Accordin
Page 28 and 29:
conciseness what 'everyone knew': t
Page 30 and 31:
had contributed to apparent lower a
Page 32 and 33:
ule of anthropology: That in all kn
Page 34 and 35:
consequence of the social bias wome
Page 36 and 37:
Sexual Violence A form of sexual vi
Page 38 and 39:
Measures of Poverty An important as
Page 40 and 41:
and have adequate shelter can make
Page 42 and 43:
statistically determine the impover
Page 44 and 45:
Policies Decision-Making Power Deci
Page 46 and 47:
to parent teacher conferences. A re
Page 48 and 49:
Also notable regarding the rise in
Page 50 and 51:
Interestingly, the United States is
Page 52 and 53:
women entered the workforce, divorc
Page 54 and 55:
of 1996, instituted work requiremen
Page 56 and 57:
prevalence of chronic illness, lead
Page 58 and 59:
addition, many European countries o
Page 60 and 61:
Amachi is an organization that part
Page 62 and 63:
IMPACT Family Counseling, Inc. ALAS
Page 64 and 65:
Amachi/Big Brothers Big Sisters of
Page 66 and 67:
SOUTH CAROLINA Clemson University T
Page 68 and 69:
Roots. “Children of incarcerated
Page 70 and 71:
demonstrate that there is a vision
Page 72 and 73:
well as Harvard's Department of Soc
Page 74 and 75:
In his book Still the Promised City
Page 76 and 77:
When Work Disappears When Work Disa
Page 78 and 79:
Notes _____________________________
Page 80 and 81:
Page 80 of 109
Page 82:
AMACHI: MENTORING CHILDREN OF PRISO
Page 85 and 86: Public/Private Ventures is a nation
Page 87 and 88: AMACHI
Page 89 and 90: AMACHI
Page 91 and 92: ii AMACHI
Page 93 and 94: In fact, according to a U.S. Senate
Page 95 and 96: A growing number of additional citi
Page 97 and 98: 6 AMACHI
Page 99 and 100: THE MODEL Drawing on research on ef
Page 101 and 102: Each month, pastors received a repo
Page 105 and 106: LOCATING AND ENROLLING THE CHILDREN
Page 107 and 108: Even women whose children were not
Page 109 and 110: The first step was to deliver the m
Page 111 and 112: P/PV staff tried to contact the pas
Page 113 and 114: While Amachi would help the congreg
Page 115 and 116: Table 2: Mentor Demographics Number
Page 119 and 120: Table 3: Number and Percentage of M
Page 121 and 122: The Amachi matches included in thos
Page 123 and 124: Table 5: Number of Matches, Mentors
Page 125 and 126: changes in their lives that affecte
Page 127 and 128: BBBS Surveys Data collected by Big
Page 131 and 132: 1. A combination of four factors wa
Page 133 and 134: 4. There was leadership that was ab
Page 135: to the program’s early success. D
Page 139: APPENDIX: CHURCHES PARTNERING IN AM
Page 142 and 143: Page 82 of 109
Page 144 and 145: Mentoring Children of Incarcerated
Page 146 and 147: Table of Contents I. Introduction.
Page 148 and 149: I. Introduction In his State of the
Page 150 and 151: II. Identify Programs in Your Commu
Page 152 and 153: III. Find the Right Partner Quality
Page 154 and 155: • Pre-service training for all ne
Page 156 and 157: IV. Refining the Partnership The in
Page 158 and 159: • Interest & ability to conduct m
Page 160 and 161: The Center for Children of Incarcer
Page 164 and 165: Ch i l d r e n o f In c a rc e r at
Page 166 and 167: Ch i l d r e n o f In c a r c e r a
Page 184 and 185: Advocacy Foundation Publishers The
Page 186 and 187:
XVI for Drug-Free Communities Landm
Page 188 and 189:
Vol. VIII 2022 ComeUnity ReEngineer
Page 190 and 191:
Vol. XV 2029 Inner-Cities Revitaliz
Page 192 and 193:
The e-Advocate Monthly Review 2018
Page 194 and 195:
The e-Advocate Journal of Theologic
Page 196 and 197:
Issue Title Quarterly Vol. I 2015 I
Page 198 and 199:
The e-Advocate Juvenile Justice Rep
Page 200 and 201:
2018 - The Theological Law Firm Aca
Page 202 and 203:
Page 106 of 109
Page 204 and 205:
www.TheAdvocacyFoundation.org Page
show all

Children of Incarcerated Parents

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?