QHA_March 2018_Electronic_s
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS with Sarah Tilby<br />
THE PERILS OF TAKING A CASUAL<br />
EMPLOYEE OFF THE ROSTER<br />
<strong>QHA</strong> REVIEW | 46<br />
A COMMON QUESTION RECEIVED BY THE <strong>QHA</strong><br />
EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS DEPARTMENT IS<br />
WHETHER AN EMPLOYER CAN SIMPLY STOP<br />
OFFERING A CASUAL ANY SHIFTS WITHOUT ANY<br />
RISK OF A CLAIM SUCH AS UNFAIR DISMISSAL.<br />
The answer is – whilst a casual employee does not<br />
have an entitlement to a set number of hours, it isnt as<br />
easy or risk-free as you might think!<br />
A recent Fair Work Commission (FWC) decision,<br />
Corina Shears v Playford City Soccer and Community<br />
Club Inc T/A Angle Vale Tavern [2017] FWC 6267<br />
illustrates this risk.<br />
Mrs Corina Shears, the applicant in this decision,<br />
worked as a casual employee in the gaming lounge<br />
and bistro at the Angle Vale Tavern from February<br />
2017. From the time she commenced employment up<br />
until early September 2017, she was absent from work<br />
for around 17 days – the bulk of these absences being<br />
unpaid personal leave for which Mrs Shears provided a<br />
medical certificate.<br />
Between 7 and 10 September, Mrs Shears was absent<br />
on unpaid personal leave and had provided a medical<br />
certificate for these dates. Her employer was aware<br />
that she was suffering “significant physical symptoms”,<br />
which the employer was concerned about given her role<br />
included food handling. Management made a decision<br />
to ask Mrs Shears to provide a medical clearance prior<br />
to her returning to work, rather than asking for just a<br />
standard medical certificate listing the days for which<br />
she was unfit for work. Commissioner Hampton, the<br />
FWC member who heard Mrs Shears’ unfair dismissal<br />
application, agreed that the decision to seek a medical<br />
clearance was an appropriate course of action.<br />
Where Commissioner Hampton started to find issues<br />
with the employer’s process was during a phone call<br />
made by the employer’s venue manager, Mr Josh<br />
Callery, to Mrs Shears on 9 September 2017.<br />
Mrs Shears claimed that the discussion during this<br />
phone call involved Mr Callery telling her she was being<br />
let go “due to always being sick and or my child being<br />
sick” and that she “now will have more time to be a<br />
mum”.<br />
Mr Callery disputed this version of events given by Mrs<br />
Shears. He provided a written document to the FWC<br />
explaining the context of why he called Mrs Shears on<br />
this day, as well as his version of what was said during<br />
the phone call.<br />
Mr Callery had noted in this document that the amount<br />
of time Mrs Shears was having off from work due to<br />
illness was having an impact on other employees. As<br />
venue manager he felt he had to make the decision to<br />
take Mrs Shears off the roster, in the best interests of<br />
Mrs Shears’ health, other staff and customers.<br />
Mr Callery explained in the document he told Mrs<br />
Shears several things during the phone call, including:<br />
• she was not dismissed, but that “there won’t be<br />
any hours at the moment” for her, because she<br />
needed to take care of her health, and because<br />
the tavern could not also give her any hours<br />
around her restricted availability, which was due<br />
to her running her own business. (She ran a<br />
hairdressing business during the day, but had<br />
regularly been receiving evening shifts);<br />
• the tavern had been receiving complaints from<br />
customers about her attitude and manner, “so<br />
it was best for all involved that she resolve her<br />
personal issues”;<br />
• once she was feeling better, he could meet<br />
with her to “go over these issues of reliability<br />
and availability and performance with a view<br />
[emphasis added] to putting her back in [sic] the<br />
roster”.<br />
A few days after the 9 September phone call, Mrs<br />
Shears lodged an unfair dismissal application.