BAKER HUGHES - Drilling Fluids Reference Manual
Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids Using these screening parameters will yield a designed drill-in fluid that will create a filter cake which will mechanically seal off all pore openings exposed to the well bore, remain intact during the completion phase, and be easily removed for the production (or injection) of oil and/or gas. The Proposed Drill-In and Completion Program Prior to testing and recommending a drill-in fluid, fundamental details about an operator’s reservoir must be known. Recording information on the items listed below will assist those involved to decide what application exists and which fluid should be selected for that application. Local Environmental Regulations Reservoir Characteristics Reservoir fluid composition (oil, gas, or formation water) Lithology (sandstone, limestone, etc.) Cementation (consolidated, unconsolidated, fractured) Quantity and type of clays present Operator Recommendation/Plan Slim or large hole Completion technique (gravel pack, non-gravel pack) Hole geometry (horizontal, vertical, or high-angle) Note: To learn more about the effects of a drill-in fluid on a particular type of completion, refer to the Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids Drill-In Fluids Manual As previously listed, the drill-in fluid must be subjected to the following testing to ensure adequate protection of a producing reservoir. Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids Reference Manual Revised 2006 1-35
Hydraulics Leak-Off Control Tests Permeability Plugging Test Apparatus Spurt and cumulative leak-off into a producing reservoir is a concern because of its effect on permeability. Altering the chemistry and/or disturbing in-situ particles in a producing zone are the most common formation damage mechanisms, and must be controlled. Control of filtrate loss into a producing formation is an important factor to consider when designing a drill-in fluid. The Permeability plugging test apparatus helps determine the bridging characteristics of the drill-in fluid. A low initial spurt filtration and low final filtration are desirable. Net Breakout Pressure Determination Breakout Pressure The ability to deposit a filter cake that is easily removed when the reservoir is produced is a major attribute of drill-in fluids. Some drill-in fluids deposit filter cakes that are easily removed by flowing the well, while other deposits require remedial treatments to remove skin damage. Net breakout is the difference in pressure required for oil flow before fluid-off or “mud-off” (recorded while determining initial permeability) and the pressure required to initiate flow after fluid-off. Determining the net breakout pressure before and after acidizing is useful in selecting a drill-in fluid. A fluid that requires little or no procedural clean-up after drill-in is superior to one involving a series of specialized steps to remove the filter cake. Return Permeability Tests Hassler Cell Permeameter This test procedure determines the effect a drill-in fluid has on reservoir permeability. The return permeability set-up is designed to simulate flow through a core sample under downhole conditions. The set-up allows flow through a core (or simulated core) from two opposite directions under controlled temperature and pressure. A high-percentage return permeability indicates minimum formation damage. Sandpack Permeameter This test procedure determines the effect of a drill-in fluid on an unconsolidated sand reservoir. The return permeability set-up is designed to simulate flow through a core sample under down hole conditions. The set-up allows flow through a core (or simulated core) from two opposite directions under controlled temperature and pressure. A high-percentage return is desirable. Reference Manual Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids 1-36 Revised 2006
- Page 2 and 3: Drilling Fluids Reference Manual Ch
- Page 4 and 5: Chapter 1 Table of Contents Fundame
- Page 6 and 7: Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids Return
- Page 8 and 9: Fundamentals of Drilling Fluids Cha
- Page 10 and 11: Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids Contro
- Page 12 and 13: Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids Physic
- Page 14 and 15: Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids Newton
- Page 16 and 17: Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids Figure
- Page 18 and 19: Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids Contin
- Page 20 and 21: Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids The fl
- Page 22 and 23: Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids As def
- Page 24 and 25: Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids Figure
- Page 26 and 27: Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids Table
- Page 28 and 29: Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids Gel St
- Page 30 and 31: Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids drilli
- Page 32 and 33: Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids Time T
- Page 34 and 35: Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids Then,
- Page 36 and 37: Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids Low-Gr
- Page 38 and 39: Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids The pH
- Page 40 and 41: Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids Exampl
- Page 44 and 45: Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids Drill-
- Page 46 and 47: Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids MBT (M
- Page 48 and 49: Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids At dif
- Page 50 and 51: Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids Figure
- Page 52 and 53: Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids Primar
- Page 54 and 55: Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids Nomenc
- Page 56 and 57: Formation Mechanics Chapter Two For
- Page 58 and 59: Table of Contents List of Figures F
- Page 60 and 61: Formation Mechanics • 3 million g
- Page 62 and 63: Formation Mechanics Hydration Mecha
- Page 64 and 65: Formation Mechanics Attapulgite Fig
- Page 66 and 67: Formation Mechanics in the outer si
- Page 68 and 69: Formation Mechanics • Calcareous
- Page 70 and 71: Formation Mechanics called “bio
- Page 72 and 73: Formation Mechanics Reservoir Press
- Page 74 and 75: Formation Mechanics Selecting the p
- Page 76 and 77: Formation Mechanics Figure 2-12 Pho
- Page 78 and 79: Water-Based Drilling Fluids Chapter
- Page 80 and 81: Figure 3-7 The Sodium Chloride Stru
- Page 82 and 83: Water-base Drilling Fluids Chapter
- Page 84 and 85: Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids Atomic
- Page 86 and 87: Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids Isotop
- Page 88 and 89: Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids Atoms
- Page 90 and 91: Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids Table
Hydraulics<br />
Leak-Off Control Tests<br />
Permeability Plugging Test Apparatus<br />
Spurt and cumulative leak-off into a producing reservoir is a concern because of its effect on<br />
permeability. Altering the chemistry and/or disturbing in-situ particles in a producing zone are the<br />
most common formation damage mechanisms, and must be controlled. Control of filtrate loss into a<br />
producing formation is an important factor to consider when designing a drill-in fluid.<br />
The Permeability plugging test apparatus helps determine the bridging characteristics of the drill-in<br />
fluid. A low initial spurt filtration and low final filtration are desirable.<br />
Net Breakout Pressure Determination<br />
Breakout Pressure<br />
The ability to deposit a filter cake that is easily removed when the reservoir is produced is a major<br />
attribute of drill-in fluids. Some drill-in fluids deposit filter cakes that are easily removed by flowing<br />
the well, while other deposits require remedial treatments to remove skin damage. Net breakout is the<br />
difference in pressure required for oil flow before fluid-off or “mud-off” (recorded while determining<br />
initial permeability) and the pressure required to initiate flow after fluid-off. Determining the net<br />
breakout pressure before and after acidizing is useful in selecting a drill-in fluid.<br />
A fluid that requires little or no procedural clean-up after drill-in is superior to one involving a series<br />
of specialized steps to remove the filter cake.<br />
Return Permeability Tests<br />
Hassler Cell Permeameter<br />
This test procedure determines the effect a drill-in fluid has on reservoir permeability. The return<br />
permeability set-up is designed to simulate flow through a core sample under downhole conditions.<br />
The set-up allows flow through a core (or simulated core) from two opposite directions under<br />
controlled temperature and pressure.<br />
A high-percentage return permeability indicates minimum formation damage.<br />
Sandpack Permeameter<br />
This test procedure determines the effect of a drill-in fluid on an unconsolidated sand reservoir. The<br />
return permeability set-up is designed to simulate flow through a core sample under down hole<br />
conditions. The set-up allows flow through a core (or simulated core) from two opposite directions<br />
under controlled temperature and pressure. A high-percentage return is desirable.<br />
<strong>Reference</strong> <strong>Manual</strong><br />
Baker Hughes <strong>Drilling</strong> <strong>Fluids</strong><br />
1-36 Revised 2006