14.12.2012 Views

Data Center LAN Migration Guide - Juniper Networks

Data Center LAN Migration Guide - Juniper Networks

Data Center LAN Migration Guide - Juniper Networks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Data</strong> <strong>Center</strong> <strong>LAN</strong> <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

Network Challenge and Solutions for Virtual Servers<br />

Server virtualization has introduced a new layer of software to the data center called the hypervisor. This layer<br />

allows multiple dissimilar operating systems, and the applications running within them, to share the server’s physical<br />

resources such as CPU, memory, and I/O using entities called virtual machines (VMs). A Virtual Ethernet Bridge (VEB)<br />

within the physical server switches traffic between the VMs and applications running within the same server, as well<br />

as between VMs and external network resources. Instead of interfacing directly to the physical NICs, the applications<br />

now talk to “virtual ports” on the internal VEB (or vSwitch). This creates virtual network endpoints, each with its own<br />

virtual IP and MAC addresses. Unique to server virtualization, a virtual switch (vSwitch) is a Layer 2 switch with limited<br />

function and security. Physical switches (or pSwitches) like the EX Series Ethernet Switches are actual pieces of<br />

network equipment.<br />

The network design for server virtualization requires an organization to consider the connections between the<br />

vSwitch and the pSwitch, including network functionality such as V<strong>LAN</strong> tagging and link aggregation (LAG) between<br />

network nodes. As VM to physical server ratios increase, server-based networking becomes more complex and<br />

may require multiple virtual switches, different V<strong>LAN</strong>s, QoS tags, security zones, and more. Adding this amount of<br />

network processing to physical server infrastructures adds a great deal of overhead to their loads. It also requires<br />

more networking functionality to be added into hypervisors. To reduce this overhead and simplify operations, an<br />

alternative approach, strategically, is to use a Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA), where servers remain focused<br />

on application processing, and the hypervisor has visibility into the network, delegating switching tasks to collaborating<br />

physical switches. Networking for a large number of physical and logical servers can be simplified by attaching many of<br />

them to the wide configuration of a single <strong>Juniper</strong> Virtual Chassis switch. As previously described, EX Series switches,<br />

initially, the EX4200, can be logically combined into a single switch spanning over 400 physical server access ports and<br />

supporting several thousand virtual machines using Virtual Chassis technology.<br />

It is important to note that vSwitches and pSwitches are not competing technologies. The IEEE standards body is<br />

working on solving vSwitch issues within its VEPA standards working group. VEPA proposes to offload all switching<br />

activities from hypervisor-based vSwitches to the actual physical switches. In addition, VEPA proposes to ease<br />

management issues. The IEEE 802.1Qbg (Edge Virtual Bridging) and 802.1Qbh (Bridge Port Extension) VEPA standards<br />

specify how to move networking from virtual servers to dedicated physical Ethernet switches. This will help by<br />

concentrating networking functions into equipment that is purpose-built for tasks, enhancing performance, security,<br />

and management within the data centers. It will also help reduce computing overhead on virtual servers, allowing the<br />

CPU cycles to be spent on application processing as opposed to networking tasks. Offloading switching activities from<br />

hypervisor-based vSwitches will also result in an increase in the supported number of VMs. Most importantly, a ratified<br />

VEPA standard will be universal as opposed to a vendor-specific, proprietary solution. For more information on VEPA,<br />

please see: www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2008/new-congdon-vepa-1108-v01.pdf.<br />

In addition to Virtual Chassis and VEPA-based forwarding, a management application such as Junos Space Virtual<br />

Control allows users to monitor, manage, and control the virtual network environments that support virtualized servers<br />

deployed in the data center. Virtual Control provides a consolidated solution for network administrators to gain end-toend<br />

visibility into, and control over, both virtual and physical networks from a single management screen.<br />

Network Automation and Orchestration<br />

Automation is a crucial tool for running a scalable and resilient data center at all levels. When developing an<br />

automation plan, it often works well to partition functions to be covered by the automation platforms and detail how<br />

these functions map into operations teams and data center domains. Within these boundaries, an open architecture<br />

should be selected that addresses the functions across the respective equipment suppliers’ platforms and maps them<br />

to the appropriate applications. In a multivendor infrastructure, a difference typically exists in the level at which vendor<br />

integration occurs—sometimes integration is possible in a multivendor application, and in other cases the integration<br />

is less complete and some number of each vendor’s specific tools needs to be kept in service to accomplish the<br />

necessary tasks.<br />

38 Copyright © 2012, <strong>Juniper</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>, Inc.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!