14.12.2012 Views

Data Center LAN Migration Guide - Juniper Networks

Data Center LAN Migration Guide - Juniper Networks

Data Center LAN Migration Guide - Juniper Networks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Data</strong> <strong>Center</strong> <strong>LAN</strong> <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

Figure 13 below depicts an EX4200 Virtual Chassis top-of-rack access layer deployment.<br />

TOR DEPLOYMENT<br />

L2/L3 Switch<br />

Access Layer Preinstallation Tasks<br />

L2/L3 Switch<br />

EX4200 Virtual Chassis EX4200<br />

Virtual Chassis<br />

Figure 14: EX4200 top-of-rack access layer deployment<br />

Legacy Aggregation Layer<br />

Access Layer<br />

• One of the first tasks is to determine space requirements for the new equipment. If the new access layer switches are<br />

to be housed in new racks, make sure that there is adequate space for the racks in the POD or data center. Or, if it is<br />

a switch refresh, ensure that there is sufficient space in the existing racks to accommodate the new switches. If the<br />

existing racks have the capacity, the eventual switchover becomes a matter of simply switching server cables from<br />

the old switches to the new ones. New racks are usually involved when a server refresh is combined with a switch<br />

refresh. It is assumed that data center facilities already have the power, cooling, airflow, and cabling required for any<br />

new equipment being provisioned.<br />

• In a top-of-rack configuration, the EX4200 with Virtual Chassis technology can be logically viewed as a single<br />

chassis horizontally deployed across racks. It is important to understand the traffic profiles, since this determines the<br />

number of required uplinks. If the traffic flows are predominantly between servers, often referred to as “east-west”<br />

traffic, fewer uplinks to the core network layer are required since inter-server traffic primarily traverses the Virtual<br />

Chassis’ 128 Gbps backplane. The number of uplinks required is also a function of acceptable oversubscription<br />

ratios, which can be easily tuned as per the Virtual Chassis Best Practices section. The EX4200 with Virtual Chassis<br />

technology may also be used in an end-of-row deployment taking these same considerations into account.<br />

• When connecting to an existing non-<strong>Juniper</strong> aggregation layer switch, it’s important to use open standard protocols<br />

such as 802.1Q for trunking V<strong>LAN</strong>s and Multiple V<strong>LAN</strong> Registration Protocol (MVRP) if V<strong>LAN</strong> propagation is desired.<br />

To ensure interoperability, one of the standards-based STPs (IEEE STP, Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol, or Multiple<br />

Spanning Tree Protocol) should also be used.<br />

• If they exist, company standard IOS-based access layer configurations should be collected. They can be quickly and<br />

easily converted into Junos OS using <strong>Juniper</strong>’s I2J translation tool as previously described.<br />

• To simplify the deployment process and ensure consistent configurations when installing multiple access layer<br />

switches, Junos OS automation tools such as AutoInstall may be used. Refer to the following for more information:<br />

www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos-security/junos-security96/junos-security-admin-guide/configautoinstall-chapter.html.<br />

• To further save time and ensure consistency, configuration files may be generated in advance, and then uploaded to<br />

a Trivial File Transfer Protocol (TFTP)/HTTP or FTP server for later downloading. The operations support systems<br />

(OSS) in place for switch provisioning and configuration management determine the type of server to use.<br />

• To test feature consistency and feature implementations for the new <strong>Juniper</strong> access layer switches, a proof-ofconcept<br />

(PoC) lab could be set up, as previously noted. Feature and compatibility testing is greatly reduced with a<br />

single OS across all platforms such as Junos OS, which maintains a strict, serial release cycle. Feature testing in a<br />

36 Copyright © 2012, <strong>Juniper</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>, Inc.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!