31.01.2018 Views

Social Impact Investing

Social Impact Investing

Social Impact Investing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

17 Love Relationship Online dating<br />

Reception<br />

It is often difficult or not possible to compare <strong>Social</strong> Earnings Ratio with other forms of<br />

financial measurement. Comparing S/E to other social impact tools is something that is<br />

more common. <strong>Social</strong> Return on Investment (SROI) is one example of this and is quite<br />

a popular search on most search engines. When its results are compared to that of<br />

S/E's, its clear that SROI has a greater amount of coverage.<br />

It could be argued that the history of SROI and the fact it was released in 2002, nine<br />

years prior to S/E, could indicate why it has a greater number of search engine results.<br />

Equally, HACT claims to "have created the largest bank of methodologically consistent<br />

and robust social values ever produced." By this they are referring to a database of<br />

financial proxy data which can be used in conjunction to SROI, although in August 2015<br />

they have criticised SROI comprehensively in the "Seven Principle Problems of SROI."<br />

Continuing with the comparison, in 2014 Lord Loomba presented a report to the House<br />

of Lords, "<strong>Social</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> Analysis", which included metrics from Business in the<br />

Community and Benefit Corporation, as well as SROI and S/E. The steep rise in S/E<br />

take-up in 2013 represents the automation of the metric and not necessarily any<br />

indication of quality. A 'big-data' approach has been provided by CSR-Hub who have<br />

harvested 417 metrics; in May 2014 they announced an MoU with CCEG to explore<br />

S/E.<br />

S/E has undergone considerable analysis and critique in recent years. Most recent<br />

comparing IIRC (International Integrated Reporting Council) to S/E, concluding<br />

"Together, the Framework and the S/E Ratio provide a powerful set of metrics and<br />

analysis for both founders and funders to evaluate value as well as strategic risk."<br />

Earlier in 2015, The Guardian wrote: "Since 2013, there has certainly been an increase<br />

in the number of online measurement tools. But the challenge of calculating social<br />

impact goes back to the early 1990s. One measure, called LM3, allows organisations to<br />

calculate the local economic impact, while another, called SROI, calculates social return<br />

on investment. But both are very complex and are based on lots of assumptions that the<br />

people who do the evaluation will have to identify, agree and sign off." Perhaps we need<br />

a simpler tool such as the social earnings ratio, which doesn’t require lots of<br />

assumptions and is based on a one-size-fits-all approach."<br />

The focus on the broad context of applications of S/E have drawn sometimes heated<br />

debate amongst the international academic and social innovation community in Italy,<br />

Romania, and Russia. Mohammad Yunus, a Nobel Prize laureate, has also spoken<br />

publicly about the framework. These discussions surrounding the concept of a 'universal<br />

metric' draw both praise and scepticism.<br />

Criticism of the timeframes to calculate the data has been made, with many wondering<br />

how accurate statistics be drawn in such a short period of time. other debates about the<br />

Page 78 of 140

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!