31.01.2018 Views

Social Impact Investing

Social Impact Investing

Social Impact Investing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Impact</strong> Investments:<br />

An emerging asset class<br />

Global Research<br />

29 November 2010<br />

technical assistance facility, which may subsidize fund costs and allow fund<br />

managers to charge market-rate fees to investors. Maintaining fee levels in line with<br />

traditional investments will help remove one potential barrier to attracting impact<br />

investment capital in the short term. However, in the long term, some impact<br />

investment fund managers may be able to justify higher fees by providing valueadded<br />

services (such as rigorous impact investment measurement)for which investors<br />

could be willing to pay.<br />

Figure 17: Management fees<br />

Histogram of survey answers.<br />

Total # of investments = 374; Total size of investments = $582m<br />

Figure 18: Carry fees<br />

Histogram of survey answers.<br />

Total # of investments = 233; Total size of investments = $254m<br />

500<br />

400<br />

Number of deals<br />

Notional, USD mm<br />

200<br />

150<br />

Number of deals<br />

Notional, USD mm<br />

300<br />

100<br />

200<br />

50<br />

100<br />

-<br />

-<br />

0-4.9% 5-9.9% 10-<br />

15-<br />

20-<br />

25-<br />

30% +<br />

0-0.9% 1-1.9% 2-2.9% 3-3.9% 4-4.9% 5-6.9%<br />

14.9%<br />

19.9%<br />

24.9%<br />

29.9%<br />

Source: GIIN, J.P. Morgan.<br />

Source: GIIN, J.P. Morgan. Carry defined as % of fund's return retained by general partners.<br />

<strong>Impact</strong> measurement systems are currently overwhelmingly proprietary<br />

Our survey also asked respondents to reveal what type of social impact measurement<br />

system they were using (if any). The choices were: a proprietary system, the system<br />

employed by the investee company or fund (the recipient of the investment funds), or<br />

a third party system. As Figure 19 illustrates, an overwhelming 85% of respondents<br />

are currently using a proprietary impact measurement system, and 13% use the<br />

investee’s system. Only 2% of impact investors currently employ a third-party<br />

system and very few reported using an investee’s system. We anticipate this profile<br />

to change as systems for measuring impact, such as IRIS, achieve broad adoption<br />

across impact investors 38 .<br />

38 For more on the IRIS metrics, see appendix.<br />

36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!