31.01.2018 Views

Social Impact Investing

Social Impact Investing

Social Impact Investing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SOCIAL IMPACT INVESTMENT: BUILDING THE EVIDENCE BASE<br />

In addition to objective information on financial performance from expenditures and sales (and other forms of<br />

revenues), the new wave of surveys launched in 2014 also includes a number of questions regarding social<br />

enterprises’ access to finance. As an example, the 2014 SESS for Alberta explicitly asks whether access to loans,<br />

access to grants or cash-flow management were a significant challenge for social enterprises. Together with objective<br />

financial information, survey results can provide a baseline estimate for the scope for SII in each Province.<br />

Source : Elson and Hall (2013); http://www.sess.ca/english/<br />

6.17 In addition, some types of social ventures belong to various associations and networks. This is,<br />

for example, the case of the Cooperative Association in Germany. The existence of such associations can<br />

help with sampling. Moreover, associations of specific types of delivery organisations (e.g. cooperatives)<br />

may also collect data on members. It is often in the interest of associations to disclose some information<br />

about their members for promotion purposes. Some organisations involved in SII activity also maintain<br />

directories of delivery organisations. This is, for example, the case of some NPIs active in SII such as the<br />

Groupe SOS in France, or financial intermediaries that share a list of its portfolio companies (e.g.<br />

Oltreventure; ClearlySo). 25 These associations and networks can be a key interlocutor in future data<br />

collection efforts.<br />

6.18 Analysing the demand side of the SII framework involves a number of challenges. First, it is not<br />

yet clear what type of organisation should be considered within the scope of SII. For example the<br />

discussions are still evolving in terms of what exactly can be considered a social enterprise. Literature<br />

shows that social enterprise definitions have changed across time and geographies (Kerlin, 2010), and is<br />

strongly influenced by differences in social context. As an example, in the analysis of the 2013 Alberta<br />

SESS above, Elson et al. (2013) note that the definition of social enterprises “excludes social purpose<br />

business ventures and other forms of socially responsible business activity by the private sector, as well as<br />

enterprising activities by all orders of government”. Changing definitions over time result in challenges for<br />

data interpretation. Focusing on the social intent of organisations, as described in Section 4, could help in<br />

identifying the demand side of the SII framework. However, collecting data based on social intent would<br />

require an objective and consensual measurement of intent.<br />

6.19 Teasdale et al (2013) show how different criteria to identify social enterprises in the UK, used in<br />

surveys over time, has resulted in biased estimates of the growth of the social enterprise sector<br />

(Figure 6.1). While for example initial surveys such as the ECOTEC, 2003 could understate the full extent<br />

of the social enterprise population (Type I error), the ASBS dataset compiled in 2007 might have included<br />

companies that are beyond the scope of the social enterprise concept (Type II error) — Type I and Type II<br />

errors are discussed at length in Section 6.4. Therefore, any interpretation of the increase from around<br />

5 300 social enterprises in 2003 to around 60 000 in 2007 must take into account changing criteria over<br />

time.<br />

6.20 Second, legal forms do not match what could be understood as an SII investee. Even if they did,<br />

these would not necessarily be comparable across countries. Due to the different systems, taxonomy varies<br />

from country to country. As an example, “solidarity” companies in France are not directly comparable to<br />

social cooperatives in Italy or community interest companies in the UK. In mapping the social enterprise<br />

sector across EU countries, Wilkinson et al. (2014) finds a wide range of legal forms and classifications in<br />

different countries.<br />

25 . Oltreventure’s directory can be found at http://www.oltreventure.com/index.php/investimenti/riepilogo.<br />

ClearlySo provides a directory of social enterprises around the world, available at<br />

http://www.clearlyso.com/directory.html.<br />

84 © OECD 2015

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!