31.01.2018 Views

Social Impact Investing

Social Impact Investing

Social Impact Investing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SOCIAL IMPACT INVESTMENT: BUILDING THE EVIDENCE BASE<br />

is being devolved to the sub-central level for administration (around 10% of total). All countries under the<br />

45 degree line receive devolved funds to some degree. Notably, in Australia and the United States<br />

sub-central governments only administer their own revenues; in Japan, some sub-central revenues are<br />

administered at the central level.<br />

5.54 For SII, as noted above, not only will this shift of funds create levels of uncertainty about streams<br />

of revenue etc. to social enterprise where it exists, but the information on the share of revenue administered<br />

at different levels highlights the potential for SII to function differently in different countries (nationally<br />

administered services will have different ‘business’ plans compared to locally administered services, for<br />

example in the areas of fixed capital and employee ‘banks’, economies of scale, underlying legislation and<br />

reporting/auditing mechanisms).<br />

Figure 5.9 How much of central government funds are devolved to local authorities for social interventions<br />

varies widely<br />

Note: G7 countries and Australia are highlighted.<br />

Source: OECD (2013b).<br />

5.4 Evaluating what works in social service provision<br />

5.55 The evidence on social outcomes and social spending shown sections 5.2 and 5.3 can be used to<br />

highlight challenges and opportunities for SII. However, together these only highlight the space into which<br />

SII might move, and they do not provide any clear messages as to how to implement processes that might<br />

‘fill these social outcome gaps’.<br />

5.56 This section reviews briefly the mix of evidence on good practice in public service provision in<br />

the area of elderly care and childcare, highlighting potential opportunities for SII. What is most evident is<br />

that better data and evaluations are needed. Chapter 7 discusses briefly ways to address this gap, and<br />

provides a point of departure for meaningful outcome measurement for impact evaluation in this area.<br />

5.4.1 Good practice in service provision<br />

5.57 Reading the data on social outcomes above alongside the data on public interventions clearly<br />

shows continued and sometimes expanding social need in the context of increases of public spending in<br />

most social sectors. In particular, the areas of elderly care and childcare stand out as priorities. For SII to<br />

© OECD 2015 75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!