31.01.2018 Views

Social Impact Investing

Social Impact Investing

Social Impact Investing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SOCIAL IMPACT INVESTMENT: BUILDING THE EVIDENCE BASE<br />

Table 5.1: Although younger and older cohorts have experienced little change in unemployment risks, more<br />

unemployed people are out of work for a year or more<br />

Long-term<br />

unemployment<br />

(2013)<br />

Unemployment (55 to 64<br />

years, 2013)<br />

Dropout rates<br />

for youth aged<br />

20-24 (2011)<br />

NEET rates (2011)<br />

Male Female 15-19 20-24<br />

Australia 19.2 (4.4) 4.3 (0.6) 3.2 (0.3) 13.9 7.8 (1.4) 11.7 (1.0)<br />

Canada 12.7 (4.9) 6.9 (-1.1) 5.8 (0.1) 8.3 7.7 (0.5) 14.6 (0.9)<br />

France 40.4 (5.1) 7.5 (1.1) 6.5 (0.5) 14.5 7.1 (0.8) 20.3 (2.4)<br />

Germany 44.7 (-0.8) 6.2 (-1.8) 5.3 (-2.8) 12.1 3.5 (-0.7) 12.6 (-2.7)<br />

Italy 56.9 (12.5) 6.7 (2.9) 4.1 (1.4) 20.5 11.4 (1.2) 28.4 (5.8)<br />

Japan 41.2 (12.7) 4.4 (-1.0) 2.8 (-0.5) … 10.1 (2.5) …<br />

United Kingdom 36.3 (11.8) 5.4 (-0.5) 3.8 (0.9) 12.4 9.5 (-1.2) 19.1 (1.1)<br />

United States 25.9 (9.7) 5.6 (-1.5) 5.0 (-1.0) 9.0 7.1 (0.8) 18.5 (2.3)<br />

OECD countries 35.3 (11.6) 6.1 (-0.1) 5.0 (0.0) 15.0 8.2 (0.1) 18.5 (2.4)<br />

Note: Employment figures are rates in given years, figures in parentheses record the difference in the rates compared to 5 years<br />

previously. Dropout rates are for the share of 20-24 year-olds having left school and not holding an upper secondary degree.<br />

Source: OECD dot.stat employment and education series, 2014c, OECD 2014d.<br />

5.13 Educational dropout rates also represent a variable challenge across countries and a predictor of<br />

hard-to-place inactive youth; preventing dropouts from education is realistic and measureable intervention<br />

space for SII, with as many as 1 in 7 older youth not leaving school with only a lower-secondary.<br />

Figure 5.2 maps the NEET rates for older youth to the dropout rates, and shows that in all cases, with the<br />

exception of Australia, it is unlikely to be low education alone that inhibits the activity of youth as NEET<br />

rates outstrip drop-out rates. In Canada, Italy, the United Kingdom and the United States the difference<br />

might suggest an unmet demand for services to place qualified youth into work.<br />

Figure 5.2 Australia has the most success in activating low skilled youth<br />

Note: Both series are for 2011. Data for Japan are missing. Dropout rates are for the share of 20-24 year-olds having left school and<br />

not holding an upper secondary degree.<br />

Source: OECD dot.stat education series, 2014c, OECD 2014d.<br />

5.14 In the area of employment support, a number of countries are encouraging SII through the<br />

introduction of <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> Bonds (SIBs), including one to reduce youth unemployment in the United<br />

Kingdom, see Chapter 5 for details.<br />

© OECD 2015 61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!