white_paper_on_data_protection_in_india_171127_final_v2
data protection clauses adopted by the European Commission 330 (d) standard data protection clauses adopted by a supervisory authority and approved by the Commission 331 (e) an approved code of conduct pursuant to Article 40; or (f) an approved certification mechanism pursuant to Article 42 together with binding and enforceable commitments of the controller. At present, the European Commission has deemed Andorra, 332 Argentina, 333 Canada, 334 Switzerland, 335 Faeroe Island, 336 Guernsey, 337 Israel, 338 Isle of Man, 339 Jersey, 340 New Zealand, 341 Uruguay 342 and the US (via the Privacy Shield) to be adequate. 330 Article 93(2), EU GDPR. 331 Article 93(2), EU GDPR. 332 Commission Decision dated 19 October 2010 and notified under document C(2010) 7084, available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32010D0625 (last accessed 30 October 2017); Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, ‗Opinion 7/2009 on the level of protection of personal data in the Principality of Andorra‘, European Commission (1 December 2009), available at: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/article-29/documentation/opinionrecommendation/files/2009/wp166_en.pdf (last accessed 30 October 2017). 333 Commission Decision dated 30 June 2003 and notified under document (2003/490/EC), available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1415636698083&uri=CELEX:32003D0490 (last accessed 30 October 2017); Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, ‗Opinion 4/2002 by the Working Party on the level of protection of personal data in Argentina‘, European Commission (3 October 2002), available at: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/article-29/documentation/opinionrecommendation/files/2002/wp63_en.pdf (last accessed 30 October 2017). 334 Commission Decision dated 20 December 2001 and notified under document 2002/2/EC, available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32002D0002&qid=1415699250815 (last accessed 17 November 2017); Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Opinion 2/2001 on the adequacy of the Canadian Personal Information and Electronic Documents Act, European Commission (26 January 2001), available at: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/article-29/documentation/opinionrecommendation/files/2001/wp39_en.pdf (last accessed 30 October 2017). 335 Commission Decision dated 26 July 2000 and notified under document C (2000) 2304, available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1415700329280&uri=CELEX:32000D0518 (last accessed 17 November 2017); Working Party on the Protection of Individuals with regard to the Processing of Personal Data, ‗Opinion No. 5/99 on The level of protection of personal data in Switzerland‘, European Commission (7 June 1999), available at: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/article-29/documentation/opinionrecommendation/files/1999/wp22_en.pdf (last accessed 17 November 2017). 336 Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, ‗Opinion 9/2007 on the level of protection of personal data in the Faroe Islands‘, European Commission (9 October 2007), available at: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/dataprotection/article-29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/files/2007/wp142_en.pdf (last accessed 30 October 2017). 337 Commission Decision dated 21 November 2003, and notified under document number C(2003) 4309, available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1415701941268&uri=CELEX:32003D0821 (last accessed 30 October 2017); Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, ‗Opinion 5/2003 on the level of protection of personal data in Guernsey‘, European Commission (13 June 2003), available at: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/article-29/documentation/opinionrecommendation/files/2003/wp79_en.pdf (last accessed 30 October 2017). 338 Commission Decision dated 31 January 2011, and notified under document C(2011) 332, available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1415701992276&uri=CELEX:32011D0061 (last accessed 30 October 2017); Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, ‗Opinion 6/2009 on the level of protection of personal data in Israel‘, European Commission (1 December 2009), available at: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/dataprotection/article-29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/files/2009/wp165_en.pdf (last accessed 30 October 2017). 339 Commission Decision dated 28 April 2004, and notified under document C(2004) 1556; available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1415702956426&uri=CELEX:32004D0411 (last accessed 30 October 2017); Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, ‗Opinion 6/2003 on the level of protection of personal data in the Isle of Man‘, European Commission (21 November 2003), available at: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/article-29/documentation/opinionrecommendation/files/2003/wp82_en.pdf (last accessed 30 October 2017). 340 Commission Decision dated 8 May 2008, notified under document C(2008)1746, available at: http://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1415703064772&uri=CELEX:32008D0393 (last accessed 30 October 2017); Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, ‗Opinion 8/2007 on the level of protection of personal 64
(ii) Binding Corporate Rules BCR are internal rules (such as codes of conduct) which are adopted by a multi-national group of companies. BCRs define the global policy of the multi-national group of companies with regard to the international transfers of personal data within the same corporate group, to entities located in countries, which do not provide an adequate level of protection. 343 Multinational companies use BCRs in order to adduce adequate safeguards for the protection of the privacy and fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals within the meaning of Article 47 of the EU GDPR. 344 (iii) Model Contractual Clauses The European Commission has the power to decide that certain standard contractual clauses offer sufficient safeguards with respect to data protection while undertaking transfer of data to non-EU/EEA countries. 345 As of date, the European Commission has issued two sets of standard contractual clauses: one for transfers from data controllers to data controllers established outside the EU/EEA; and one set for the transfer to processors established outside the EU/EEA. 346 Transfers of data made under these contracts are deemed to be protected under the EU GDPR. Since it is often difficult for stakeholders to comply with the ‗adequate level‘ of protection for cross-border data transfers, alternatives such as Model Contract Clauses may play a crucial role in practice. The use of these alternatives should be facilitated for data controllers in any Member State. data in Jersey‘, European Commission (17 November 2007), available at: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/dataprotection/article-29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/files/2007/wp141_en.pdf (last accessed 30 October 2017). 341 Commission Decision dated 19 December 2012 on the level of protection of personal data by New Zealand, notified under document C (2012) 9557, available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?qid=1415703506367&uri=CELEX:32013D0065 (last accessed 30 October 2017); Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, ‗Opinion 11/2011 on the level of protection of personal data in New Zealand‘, European Commission (4 April 2011), available at: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/article- 29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/files/2011/wp182_en.pdf (last accessed 30 October 2017). 342 Commission Decision dated 21 August 2012, on the level of protection of personal data by the Eastern Republic of Uruguay, notified under document C (2012) 5704, available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?qid=1417090893822&uri=CELEX:32012D0484 (last accessed 30 October 2017); Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, ‗Opinion 6/2010 on the level of protection of personal data in the Eastern Republic of Uruguay‘, European Commission (12 October 2010), available at: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/dataprotection/article-29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/files/2010/wp177_en.pdf (last accessed 30 October 2017). 343 European Commission, ‗Overview on Binding Corporate Rules‘, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/dataprotection/international-transfers/binding-corporate-rules/index_en.htm (last accessed 30 October 2017). 344 European Commission, ‗Overview on Binding Corporate Rules‘, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/dataprotection/international-transfers/binding-corporate-rules/index_en.htm (last accessed 30 October 2017). 345 European Commission, ‗Frequently Asked Questions Relating to Transfers of Personal Data From The EU/EEA To Third Countries‘, 11, (2009), available at: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/policies/privacy/docs/international_transfers_faq/international_transfers_faq.pdf (last accessed 29 October 2017). 346 European Commission, ‗Model Contracts for the Transfer of Personal Data to Third Countries‘, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/international-transfers/transfer/index_en.htm (last accessed 30 October 2017). 65
- Page 23 and 24: Constitution - the right against un
- Page 25 and 26: visits at night and regular surveil
- Page 27 and 28: or necessary for legal compliance.
- Page 29 and 30: Aadhaar based authentication which
- Page 31 and 32: tested as per the contemporary Indi
- Page 33 and 34: man and woman must be kept in mind.
- Page 35 and 36: of the law. Second, the ease of cro
- Page 37 and 38: ambit of the term organisation. 191
- Page 39 and 40: 1. What are your views on what the
- Page 41 and 42: 2.2 Horizontality of Application (P
- Page 43 and 44: a. The law could regulate personal
- Page 45 and 46: This distinction between data and i
- Page 47 and 48: (iv) Pseudonymisation and Anonymisa
- Page 49 and 50: that the information is not in the
- Page 51 and 52: CHAPTER 4: SENSITIVE PERSONAL DATA
- Page 53 and 54: protection. Subject to an evaluatio
- Page 55 and 56: South Africa The POPI Act defines p
- Page 57 and 58: a. All personal data processed must
- Page 59 and 60: an employee of the controller who g
- Page 61 and 62: . Clear bifurcation of roles and as
- Page 63 and 64: 7.2 Specific Exemptions and Interna
- Page 65 and 66: In India, collection of statistical
- Page 67 and 68: of imposition of similar nature.‘
- Page 69 and 70: mechanism to provide prior approval
- Page 71 and 72: 1. What are your views on including
- Page 73: To facilitate the cross-border tran
- Page 77 and 78: individual to take action to enforc
- Page 79 and 80: CHAPTER 9 : DATA LOCALISATION 9.1 I
- Page 81 and 82: (iii) IT-BPO/BPM Industrial Growth
- Page 83 and 84: amounts of computer hardware, they
- Page 85 and 86: In Indonesia, the regulation regard
- Page 87 and 88: Distribution of Insurance Products)
- Page 89 and 90: Another advantage of relying on con
- Page 91 and 92: individuals may find it impossible
- Page 93 and 94: that the collection is reasonably n
- Page 95 and 96: CHAPTER 2: CHILD’S CONSENT 2.1 In
- Page 97 and 98: the cloud service provider as to st
- Page 99 and 100: The PIPEDA does not specifically de
- Page 101 and 102: 7. How can the requirement for pare
- Page 103 and 104: mechanism still continues to play a
- Page 105 and 106: 3.3 International Practices Despite
- Page 107 and 108: (CALOPPA) 466 and the GLB Act requi
- Page 109 and 110: CHAPTER 4: OTHER GROUNDS OF PROCESS
- Page 111 and 112: This ground covers two types of sce
- Page 113 and 114: that there may be certain situation
- Page 115 and 116: CHAPTER 5: PURPOSE SPECIFICATION AN
- Page 117 and 118: collected for more than one purpose
- Page 119 and 120: enable data controllers to understa
- Page 121 and 122: CHAPTER 6: PROCESSING OF SENSITIVE
- Page 123 and 124: may instrumentally be caused if the
(ii)<br />
B<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g Corporate Rules<br />
BCR are <strong>in</strong>ternal rules (such as codes of c<strong>on</strong>duct) which are adopted by a multi-nati<strong>on</strong>al<br />
group of companies. BCRs def<strong>in</strong>e the global policy of the multi-nati<strong>on</strong>al group of companies<br />
with regard to the <strong>in</strong>ternati<strong>on</strong>al transfers of pers<strong>on</strong>al <strong>data</strong> with<strong>in</strong> the same corporate group, to<br />
entities located <strong>in</strong> countries, which do not provide an adequate level of protecti<strong>on</strong>. 343<br />
Mult<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>al companies use BCRs <strong>in</strong> order to adduce adequate safeguards for the protecti<strong>on</strong><br />
of the privacy and fundamental rights and freedoms of <strong>in</strong>dividuals with<strong>in</strong> the mean<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
Article 47 of the EU GDPR. 344<br />
(iii) Model C<strong>on</strong>tractual Clauses<br />
The European Commissi<strong>on</strong> has the power to decide that certa<strong>in</strong> standard c<strong>on</strong>tractual clauses<br />
offer sufficient safeguards with respect to <strong>data</strong> protecti<strong>on</strong> while undertak<strong>in</strong>g transfer of <strong>data</strong> to<br />
n<strong>on</strong>-EU/EEA countries. 345 As of date, the European Commissi<strong>on</strong> has issued two sets of<br />
standard c<strong>on</strong>tractual clauses: <strong>on</strong>e for transfers from <strong>data</strong> c<strong>on</strong>trollers to <strong>data</strong> c<strong>on</strong>trollers<br />
established outside the EU/EEA; and <strong>on</strong>e set for the transfer to processors established outside<br />
the EU/EEA. 346 Transfers of <strong>data</strong> made under these c<strong>on</strong>tracts are deemed to be protected<br />
under the EU GDPR. S<strong>in</strong>ce it is often difficult for stakeholders to comply with the ‗adequate<br />
level‘ of protecti<strong>on</strong> for cross-border <strong>data</strong> transfers, alternatives such as Model C<strong>on</strong>tract<br />
Clauses may play a crucial role <strong>in</strong> practice. The use of these alternatives should be facilitated<br />
for <strong>data</strong> c<strong>on</strong>trollers <strong>in</strong> any Member State.<br />
<strong>data</strong> <strong>in</strong> Jersey‘, European Commissi<strong>on</strong> (17 November 2007), available at: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/<strong>data</strong>protecti<strong>on</strong>/article-29/documentati<strong>on</strong>/op<strong>in</strong>i<strong>on</strong>-recommendati<strong>on</strong>/files/2007/wp141_en.pdf<br />
(last accessed 30<br />
October 2017).<br />
341 Commissi<strong>on</strong> Decisi<strong>on</strong> dated 19 December 2012 <strong>on</strong> the level of protecti<strong>on</strong> of pers<strong>on</strong>al <strong>data</strong> by New Zealand,<br />
notified under document C (2012) 9557, available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalc<strong>on</strong>tent/EN/TXT/?qid=1415703506367&uri=CELEX:32013D0065<br />
(last accessed 30 October 2017); Article 29<br />
Data Protecti<strong>on</strong> Work<strong>in</strong>g Party, ‗Op<strong>in</strong>i<strong>on</strong> 11/2011 <strong>on</strong> the level of protecti<strong>on</strong> of pers<strong>on</strong>al <strong>data</strong> <strong>in</strong> New Zealand‘,<br />
European Commissi<strong>on</strong> (4 April 2011), available at: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/<strong>data</strong>-protecti<strong>on</strong>/article-<br />
29/documentati<strong>on</strong>/op<strong>in</strong>i<strong>on</strong>-recommendati<strong>on</strong>/files/2011/wp182_en.pdf (last accessed 30 October 2017).<br />
342 Commissi<strong>on</strong> Decisi<strong>on</strong> dated 21 August 2012, <strong>on</strong> the level of protecti<strong>on</strong> of pers<strong>on</strong>al <strong>data</strong> by the Eastern<br />
Republic of Uruguay, notified under document C (2012) 5704, available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalc<strong>on</strong>tent/EN/TXT/?qid=1417090893822&uri=CELEX:32012D0484<br />
(last accessed 30 October 2017); Article 29<br />
Data Protecti<strong>on</strong> Work<strong>in</strong>g Party, ‗Op<strong>in</strong>i<strong>on</strong> 6/2010 <strong>on</strong> the level of protecti<strong>on</strong> of pers<strong>on</strong>al <strong>data</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Eastern<br />
Republic of Uruguay‘, European Commissi<strong>on</strong> (12 October 2010), available at: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/<strong>data</strong>protecti<strong>on</strong>/article-29/documentati<strong>on</strong>/op<strong>in</strong>i<strong>on</strong>-recommendati<strong>on</strong>/files/2010/wp177_en.pdf<br />
(last accessed 30<br />
October 2017).<br />
343 European Commissi<strong>on</strong>, ‗Overview <strong>on</strong> B<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g Corporate Rules‘, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/<strong>data</strong>protecti<strong>on</strong>/<strong>in</strong>ternati<strong>on</strong>al-transfers/b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g-corporate-rules/<strong>in</strong>dex_en.htm<br />
(last accessed 30 October 2017).<br />
344 European Commissi<strong>on</strong>, ‗Overview <strong>on</strong> B<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g Corporate Rules‘, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/<strong>data</strong>protecti<strong>on</strong>/<strong>in</strong>ternati<strong>on</strong>al-transfers/b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g-corporate-rules/<strong>in</strong>dex_en.htm<br />
(last accessed 30 October 2017).<br />
345 European Commissi<strong>on</strong>, ‗Frequently Asked Questi<strong>on</strong>s Relat<strong>in</strong>g to Transfers of Pers<strong>on</strong>al Data From The<br />
EU/EEA To Third Countries‘, 11, (2009), available at:<br />
http://ec.europa.eu/justice/policies/privacy/docs/<strong>in</strong>ternati<strong>on</strong>al_transfers_faq/<strong>in</strong>ternati<strong>on</strong>al_transfers_faq.pdf (last<br />
accessed 29 October 2017).<br />
346 European Commissi<strong>on</strong>, ‗Model C<strong>on</strong>tracts for the Transfer of Pers<strong>on</strong>al Data to Third Countries‘, available at:<br />
http://ec.europa.eu/justice/<strong>data</strong>-protecti<strong>on</strong>/<strong>in</strong>ternati<strong>on</strong>al-transfers/transfer/<strong>in</strong>dex_en.htm (last accessed 30<br />
October 2017).<br />
65