25.01.2018 Views

white_paper_on_data_protection_in_india_171127_final_v2

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.2 Horiz<strong>on</strong>tality of Applicati<strong>on</strong> (Public versus Private Sector)<br />

There is a large amount of pers<strong>on</strong>al <strong>data</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g processed by public and private entities alike.<br />

Further, an important dimensi<strong>on</strong> of the right to privacy is civil rights and surveillance, which<br />

<strong>in</strong>volves the State. 203 Data protecti<strong>on</strong> laws <strong>in</strong> jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>s such as the EU apply to the<br />

Government, as well as private entities as far as their process<strong>in</strong>g activities are c<strong>on</strong>cerned. The<br />

(Australian) Privacy Act c<strong>on</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s thirteen Australian Privacy Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples (APPs) which apply<br />

to some private entities and most Australian and Norfolk Island government entities. In<br />

Canada, however, two separate laws apply to public and private entities. The Privacy Act<br />

1983 (Canada Privacy Act) applies to the federal government <strong>in</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>s, and the PIPEDA<br />

applies to bus<strong>in</strong>esses.<br />

There is a need to ensure that an <strong>in</strong>dividual‘s <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong>al privacy is protected through a<br />

comprehensive <strong>data</strong> protecti<strong>on</strong> law which applies across the board. Additi<strong>on</strong>ally, the law may<br />

be devised to provide grounds for process<strong>in</strong>g, and certa<strong>in</strong> reas<strong>on</strong>able exempti<strong>on</strong>s for <strong>data</strong><br />

collected, used, disclosed, reta<strong>in</strong>ed or stored by public entities. However, it is doubtful<br />

whether public entities can be completely excluded from the purview of the <strong>data</strong> protecti<strong>on</strong><br />

law.<br />

The Supreme Court has recognised that legitimate state <strong>in</strong>terest must be protected through<br />

exempti<strong>on</strong>s that may be carved out <strong>in</strong> a <strong>data</strong> protecti<strong>on</strong> law. 204 However, limited exempti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

may be c<strong>on</strong>sidered for well-def<strong>in</strong>ed categories of departments <strong>in</strong> Government or the public<br />

sector and similarly for entities <strong>in</strong> the private sector. In the former category, law enforcement<br />

agencies and <strong>in</strong>telligence agencies may have to be exempted from some of the rigours of the<br />

law. This is dealt with later <strong>in</strong> this White Paper. Sec<strong>on</strong>d, the law may exempt entities such as<br />

charitable <strong>in</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>s or small bus<strong>in</strong>ess enterprises from all or some of the obligati<strong>on</strong>s under<br />

the law. 205 These exempti<strong>on</strong>s will also have to be carefully designed.<br />

2.3 Retrospective Applicati<strong>on</strong><br />

A <strong>data</strong> protecti<strong>on</strong> law will apply ord<strong>in</strong>arily to <strong>data</strong> collected, used, stored, disclosed, reta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

etc. after the legislati<strong>on</strong> enters <strong>in</strong>to force. However, it may also apply to <strong>data</strong> that has been<br />

collected, used, stored, disclosed, reta<strong>in</strong>ed etc. before the law was enacted. The <strong>data</strong><br />

protecti<strong>on</strong> law will impose significant obligati<strong>on</strong>s for all entities <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the collecti<strong>on</strong>,<br />

use, disclosure, retenti<strong>on</strong> and storage of pers<strong>on</strong>al <strong>data</strong>. To ensure effective implementati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

the law should c<strong>on</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a transitory provisi<strong>on</strong> to ensure that all obligati<strong>on</strong>s are reas<strong>on</strong>able, and<br />

are complied with <strong>in</strong> the given time-frame. The provisi<strong>on</strong> for retrospective applicati<strong>on</strong> may<br />

also be c<strong>on</strong>sidered for certa<strong>in</strong> reas<strong>on</strong>able obligati<strong>on</strong>s such as ensur<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>tegrity and<br />

c<strong>on</strong>fidentiality of <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong> that is already <strong>in</strong> c<strong>on</strong>trol of the processor. However, certa<strong>in</strong><br />

203 Joseph A. Cannataci, ‗Report of the Special Rapporteur <strong>on</strong> the right to privacy‘, Human Rights Council,<br />

A/HRC/31/64 (2016).<br />

204 Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Uni<strong>on</strong> of India & Ors. (2017) 10 SCALE 1.<br />

205 See for <strong>in</strong>stance Secti<strong>on</strong> 6 D, Canada Privacy Act<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!