14.12.2012 Views

Pharmacy Continence Care - Bladder and Bowel Website

Pharmacy Continence Care - Bladder and Bowel Website

Pharmacy Continence Care - Bladder and Bowel Website

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

One pharmacy indicated involvement in a previous project (the Hunter pilot). Later<br />

recruitment also enlisted another three pharmacies that had been involved in the Tasmanian<br />

Divisions of General Practice project.<br />

3.4 Timeframes<br />

The recruitment of pharmacies commenced in October 2004 <strong>and</strong> was finalised during<br />

January 2005. Once the NOVA staff identified that the most effective way to communicate<br />

with pharmacies was by fax <strong>and</strong> by telephone, preferably in the morning, communication<br />

became streamlined. Email is not a form of communication commonly used by pharmacies<br />

<strong>and</strong> was discarded as ineffective for this group.<br />

The <strong>Pharmacy</strong> Initial Questionnaire (PIQ) was administered to pharmacies during March<br />

2005 at the same time as the training materials were being finalised <strong>and</strong> sent out <strong>and</strong> the<br />

train-the-trainer program was being provided to the trainers.<br />

Due to availability of both pharmacies <strong>and</strong> training staff, training commenced in mid April<br />

<strong>and</strong> was completed by the end of the first week in May. The different timing of school<br />

holidays across the jurisdictions became an unexpected consideration for timing of the<br />

training program.<br />

Three months after the completion of training at each pharmacy, the <strong>Pharmacy</strong> Exit<br />

Questionnaire (PEQ) was administered by telephone (August 2005). Thirty-two of the 46<br />

participating pharmacies were interviewed for the PEQ. Follow-up calls endeavouring to<br />

arrange an interview time were made to each of the non-responding pharmacies. Two to<br />

three telephone calls were required to secure an interview time, <strong>and</strong> non-responding<br />

pharmacies were unable to provide firm time for interview by the nominated staff member<br />

within the time period for the follow-up survey.<br />

3.5 <strong>Pharmacy</strong> implementation of the Program<br />

As part of the Program, pharmacies were encouraged to seek feedback from their customers<br />

to gauge their satisfaction with the service they received from the pharmacy in relation to<br />

continence care. A template for a customer feedback questionnaire was provided in the<br />

training materials. Sixteen of the 32 respondents to the PEQ had sought such feedback (see<br />

Figure 6).<br />

16.2<br />

16<br />

15.8<br />

15.6<br />

15.4<br />

15.2<br />

15<br />

14.8<br />

14.6<br />

14.4<br />

Pharmacies that collected feedback from customers<br />

16<br />

15<br />

YES NO<br />

Pharmacies that<br />

collected feedback from<br />

customers<br />

Figure 6: Pharmacies that collected feedback from customers<br />

Of those pharmacies that had sought feedback, eleven (69 per cent) reported that<br />

customers had expressed satisfaction with services provided to them. This is a reflection of<br />

pharmacy perception of consumer satisfaction <strong>and</strong> not a collected data item, as the project<br />

Final Report<br />

17<br />

NOVA Public Policy<br />

<strong>Pharmacy</strong> <strong>Continence</strong> <strong>Care</strong> Project

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!