9420.pdf

More documents

Recommendations

Info

NovaTec Consultants Inc.. Village of Ucluelet, 1993b. Sewage Lagoon Treatment Plant Study - a Report to NovaTec Consultants Inc.. Home Plant Water/Wastewater Audit - a Report to Canadian Fishing Company, 1993c NovaTec Consultants Inc. and EVS Environment Consultants. Wastewater Characterization of Fish Processing Plant Effluents - a Report to Water Quality/Waste Management Committee, Fraser River Estuary Management Program, 1994 NovaTec Consultants Inc.. Guideline Manual for Sewage Lagoon Design, Optimization and Operation to Achieve Non-Acutely Toxic Effluent - a Draft Report to B.C. Environment, 1994 Ohhashi H.. Treating Waste Waters Containing Proteins from Fish and Whale Processing. Chem. Abst., VOI 81, 126574f, 1974 Ohshima T., S. Toru. and K. Chiaki. New Science and Tech., 4, 6, 1993 Okumura A. and K. Uetana. Treatment of and Environment, 15, 1/2, 1992 Developments in Surimi Technology. Food Fish Processing Wastes in Japan. Industry Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, 1993 (pers. comm. with Mr. Tim McFetridge and Mr. Kent Ash baker). Oshima H., K. Toriyabe and Y. Nagata. Treatment of the Waste Water from the Fisheries Industry. Chem Abs., 7996591 y, 1973 , Pesenon 1.6., E.V. Porkhal, A.P. Baranova and A.N. Zabbarov. Composition of Waste Water from Fish-processing Plants. Chem Abs., 81, 175709n, 1974 Riddle M.J and K. Shikaze. Characterization and Treatment of Fish Processing Plant Effluents in Canada. Proc.: 4th Nat. Symp. on Food Processing Wastes, Washington, DC, 1973 115
Sasaki S., K. Yamazaki, T. Uno and T. Tanemura. Studies on Fluidized-bed Activatedsludge Process. Treatment of Wastewater form Fisheries by Fluidized Activated Carbon Bed. Chem Abs., 93, 119769t, 1980 Sasaki S., K. Yamazaki, T. Uno and T. Tanemura. Treatment of Fish Processing Wastaewater by Activated Sludge in a Fluidized Carbon Bed. Chem Abs., 93, 100962d, 1980a Sasaki S., K. Yamazaki, T. Uno and T. Tanemura. Studies on Activated Sludge Process with Granular Activated Carbon. Treatment of Fish Processing Waste Water by, Fluidized Activated Carbon Bed. Chem. Abs., 94, 70746n, 1981 Sato T. and K. Ishida. Removing Oils, Fats and Proteins from Waste Waters from the Fishery and Livestock Industry. Chem. Abs., 81, 126568g, 1974 Shifrin S. M., I.B. Pesenson and A.N. Zabbarov. Mechanical Cleaning of Waste Waters from Fish Canneries. Chem Abs., 76, 131 182c, 1972 Shifrin S. M., I.B. Pesenson and A.N. Zabbarov. Removal of Fat and Suspended after from Wastewaters of Fish-canning Enterprises. Chem Abs., 78, 151286j, 1973 Steiner N. and R. Gee. Plant Experience Using Hydrogen Peroxide for Enhanced Flotation and BOD Removal. Environmental Progress, 11, 4, 1992 Stone E. F., H.J. Barnett, P.J. Hunter, G.C. Roberts and R.W. Nelson. Processing Wastewater from Two Mechanized Salmon Canneries. Marine Fisheries Review, 43, 1, 1981 Stuiber D.A. and J.T. Quigley. Wastewater Treatment in Fish Processing. Proc.: 16th Conference on Great Lakes Research, Ohio State Univ., Huron, Ohio, 1973 Takamizawa K., Z. Inoue and A. Honda. Wastewater Treatment of Kamboko Processing Plant (l). An Investigation into the Actual State of Wastewater Discharge and for a Method Reducing Its Organic Loading. Chem. Abs., 104, 212615v, 1986 Takei M.. Coagulant from Seaweeds. Chem Abs., 89, 11709b, 1978 116
Page 2 and 3:
Environment Canada Industrial Progr
Page 4 and 5:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document was
Page 6 and 7:
TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEM’EN
Page 8 and 9:
5.4 5.5 BEST 6.1 6.2 6.3 5.3.4.2 Ot
Page 10 and 11:
Figure 2.1 Figure 2.2 Figure 2.3 Fi
Page 12 and 13:
Table 5.8 Table 5.9 Table 5.10 Tabl
Page 14 and 15:
1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Terms of Referen
Page 16 and 17:
2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 2.1 Genera
Page 18 and 19:
1992a). In 1990, approximately 70 %
Page 20 and 21:
Development of aquiculture (husband
Page 22 and 23:
REDUCTION PLANT Q \ \ PRINCE RUPERT
Page 24 and 25:
2.4 Review of Current Regulations 2
Page 26 and 27:
2.4.3 Municipal and Regional Bylaws
Page 28 and 29:
Table 3.1 Water Consumption Rates -
Page 30:
3.2 Wastewater Characteristics 3.2.
Page 33 and 34:
Table 3.4 Contaminant Concentration
Page 35 and 36:
3.2.2 Fish Processing Facilities in
Page 37 and 38:
Table 3.7 Production-based Contamin
Page 39 and 40:
which are permitted to grind and di
Page 41 and 42:
4 PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY The five ma
Page 43 and 44:
---- ,,, ,,, > “\ - Y’ I r ----
Page 45 and 46:
VESSEL-HOLD WATER PACKERS AND RECIR
Page 47 and 48:
&& a- * I ---- ————-— --
Page 49 and 50:
4.4 Herring Processing 4.4.1 Genera
Page 51 and 52:
Raw shrimp are held on ice for abou
Page 53 and 54:
~ PRODUCT — WASTEWATER ----- WATE
Page 55 and 56:
-+ \ /’WATER’l \~uPPLY/ ‘T-
Page 57 and 58:
5 WATER AND WASTE MANAGEMENT 5.1 Cu
Page 59 and 60:
Information Grind and Discha Coarse
Page 61:
Table 5.1 Permit Summary ———-
Page 64 and 65:
offal with wastewater, which is the
Page 66 and 67:
equipment clean and to flush offal
Page 68 and 69:
Table 5.4 Solid Waste Generation at
Page 70 and 71:
process water. However, different r
Page 72 and 73:
5.2.4 Contaminant Reduction Several
Page 74 and 75:
Fine screening is generally used as
Page 76 and 77:
to coagulate proteins, cooling and
Page 78 and 79: Table 5.6 Summary of FM Proceeding
Page 80 and 81: 5.3.4.3 Enhanced Gravity Settling T
Page 82 and 83: To the knowledge of the authors, on
Page 84 and 85: To the knowledge of the authors, no
Page 86 and 87: 5.3.6.2 Hydrocyclones Hydrocyclones
Page 88 and 89: Solid wastes generated by seafood p
Page 90 and 91: Table 5.10 Results of Applications
Page 92 and 93: 5.4.9 Bone Meal Experiment conducte
Page 94 and 95: The comporting operation consists o
Page 96 and 97: ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
Page 98 and 99: ● / use of finer mesh screens (do
Page 100 and 101: 7 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS 7.1 Review of t
Page 102 and 103: wholesale and landed values as a me
Page 104 and 105: 7.2 Processing Technology Treatment
Page 106 and 107: (~nuJ!WU Jo %) SONICINVl u) (9 I <
Page 108 and 109: conservation and the implementation
Page 110 and 111: In-house modifications can result i
Page 112 and 113: Table 7.3 Expected Efficiency of Wa
Page 114 and 115: Table 7.4 Assumptions used for Econ
Page 116 and 117: quo had been maintained. For each t
Page 118 and 119: All cost estimates involving DAF un
Page 120 and 121: meet toxicity limits. However, biol
Page 122 and 123: BIBLIOGRAPHY Aegis Management Servi
Page 124 and 125: Fukuda H. and H. Nakatani. Treatmen
Page 126 and 127: Johnson R.A. and S.M. Gallanger. Us
Page 130: ( Takei M.. Treatment of Waste Wate
show all

9420.pdf

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?