9420.pdf

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Johnson R.A. and S.M. Gallanger. Use of Coagulant to Treat Seafood Processing Wastewater. JWPCF, 56, 8, 1984 Johnson R.A. and K.L. Lindley. Use of Hydrocyclones to Treat Seafood-processing Wastewaters. JWPCF, 54, 12, 1882 Khosid E.V, V.V. Sverkanovaand T.K. Sokolova. Studies of the Quality of Water from Industrial Fish-canning Industry Processing in Order to Recycle the Water. Cehm. Abs., 99, 163790r, 1983 Knorr D.. Recovery and Utilization of Chitin and Chitosan in Food Processing Waste Management. Food Technology, January 1991 Krofta M., L.K. Wang and C.D. Pollman. Treatment of Seafood Processing Wastewater by Dissolved Air Flotation Carbon Adsorption and Free Chlorination. Proc.: 43rd lnd.Waste Conf., Purdue Univ., Lafayette, Indiana, 1988 Lee M. C.. Surimi Process Technology. Food Technology, 38, 11, 1984 Lewis, W. J.. Uncertainty in pH and Temperature Corrections for Ammonia Toxicity. Journal WPCF, Vol 60, No 11, 1988 Lin S. S., P.B. Liao and M.W. Cochrane. A Wastewater Treatment Study for Skokomish Salmon Processing Plant. Chem Abs., 90, 60709f, 1979 Matsuura R., K. Akaike, K. Sakai and T. Sate. Treatment of Wastewater form Marineproduct Processing for Recycling. Chem Abs., 87, 140750r, 1977 Matsuura R., K. Akaike, K. Sakai and T. Sate. Electrolytic Treatment of Wastewaters form Sea Food Processing. Chem Abs., 91, 216249q, 1979 Mauldin A. F. and A.J. Szabo. Gulf Shrimp Canning Plant Wastewater Processing EPA 660/2-74-061, Washington, DC, 1974 . Miller M. M., J. Kolhonen and G. H.. Export Opportunities for US Fishery Products. Marine Fisheries Review, 35, 5/6, 1973 113
Ming-Lesage Development Inc.. The Canadian Fisheries Waste Stream: The Pacific Coast Situation - a Report for Industry, Science and Technology Canada, 1991. Murakami D., H. Itoh, K. Hashimoto, Y. Funayama and K. Ejiri. Treatment of Fish Processing Wastewater by Electrolysis-flotation and by Activated Sludge. Chem Abs., 90,28593c, 1979 Naizumi M., T. Yamazaki and T. Kimura. Treatment of Marine Product Processing Wastewaters. Chem Abs., 97, 90698p, 1982 Nakazono S.. Proteins from Wastewater from Marine Food Processing Plants. Chem. Abs., 97, 214573r,.1 982 Nielsen L. A., R.J. Price and P.A. Carroad. Water Re-use in Processing Pacific Shrimp. , J. of Food Sci., 48, 4, 1983 Niki H., T. Kate, E. Deya and S. Igarashi, Recovery of Proteins from Effluent of Fish Meat in Producing Surimi and Utilization of Recovered Protein. Che. Abs., 103, 69950x, 1985 Ninomiya K., T. Ookawa and T. Tsuchiya. Studies on More Efficient Utilization of Water-soluble Proteins. 1. Recovery of Water Soluble Proteins in Wastewater of Fish Processing Plants by Ultrafiltration. Chem. Abs., 103, 86694j, 1985 Nishioka F. and Y. Shimizu. Characteristic of Fish Meat Protein Materials. IX. Recovery of Proteins from Washings of Minced Fish Meat by a pH-shifting method. Chem. Abs., 99, 4260b, 1983 Nomata Hand K. Toriyabe. Utilization and Treatment of Wastes from the Fisheries Industry. Il. Treatment of Fatty Scum by Microorganisms. Chem. Abs., 104, 212539y, 1986 NovaTec Consultants Inc.. Wastewater Collection, Treatment and Disposal - a Report to B.C. Packers Limited, 1990. NovaTec Consultants Inc.. Wastewater Handling in Selected Fish Processing Plants in Northern Europe - a Report to Fisheries Council of B. C., 1993a ,. 114 .
Page 2 and 3:
Environment Canada Industrial Progr
Page 4 and 5:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document was
Page 6 and 7:
TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEM’EN
Page 8 and 9:
5.4 5.5 BEST 6.1 6.2 6.3 5.3.4.2 Ot
Page 10 and 11:
Figure 2.1 Figure 2.2 Figure 2.3 Fi
Page 12 and 13:
Table 5.8 Table 5.9 Table 5.10 Tabl
Page 14 and 15:
1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Terms of Referen
Page 16 and 17:
2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 2.1 Genera
Page 18 and 19:
1992a). In 1990, approximately 70 %
Page 20 and 21:
Development of aquiculture (husband
Page 22 and 23:
REDUCTION PLANT Q \ \ PRINCE RUPERT
Page 24 and 25:
2.4 Review of Current Regulations 2
Page 26 and 27:
2.4.3 Municipal and Regional Bylaws
Page 28 and 29:
Table 3.1 Water Consumption Rates -
Page 30:
3.2 Wastewater Characteristics 3.2.
Page 33 and 34:
Table 3.4 Contaminant Concentration
Page 35 and 36:
3.2.2 Fish Processing Facilities in
Page 37 and 38:
Table 3.7 Production-based Contamin
Page 39 and 40:
which are permitted to grind and di
Page 41 and 42:
4 PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY The five ma
Page 43 and 44:
---- ,,, ,,, > “\ - Y’ I r ----
Page 45 and 46:
VESSEL-HOLD WATER PACKERS AND RECIR
Page 47 and 48:
&& a- * I ---- ————-— --
Page 49 and 50:
4.4 Herring Processing 4.4.1 Genera
Page 51 and 52:
Raw shrimp are held on ice for abou
Page 53 and 54:
~ PRODUCT — WASTEWATER ----- WATE
Page 55 and 56:
-+ \ /’WATER’l \~uPPLY/ ‘T-
Page 57 and 58:
5 WATER AND WASTE MANAGEMENT 5.1 Cu
Page 59 and 60:
Information Grind and Discha Coarse
Page 61:
Table 5.1 Permit Summary ———-
Page 64 and 65:
offal with wastewater, which is the
Page 66 and 67:
equipment clean and to flush offal
Page 68 and 69:
Table 5.4 Solid Waste Generation at
Page 70 and 71:
process water. However, different r
Page 72 and 73:
5.2.4 Contaminant Reduction Several
Page 74 and 75:
Fine screening is generally used as
Page 76 and 77: to coagulate proteins, cooling and
Page 78 and 79: Table 5.6 Summary of FM Proceeding
Page 80 and 81: 5.3.4.3 Enhanced Gravity Settling T
Page 82 and 83: To the knowledge of the authors, on
Page 84 and 85: To the knowledge of the authors, no
Page 86 and 87: 5.3.6.2 Hydrocyclones Hydrocyclones
Page 88 and 89: Solid wastes generated by seafood p
Page 90 and 91: Table 5.10 Results of Applications
Page 92 and 93: 5.4.9 Bone Meal Experiment conducte
Page 94 and 95: The comporting operation consists o
Page 96 and 97: ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
Page 98 and 99: ● / use of finer mesh screens (do
Page 100 and 101: 7 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS 7.1 Review of t
Page 102 and 103: wholesale and landed values as a me
Page 104 and 105: 7.2 Processing Technology Treatment
Page 106 and 107: (~nuJ!WU Jo %) SONICINVl u) (9 I <
Page 108 and 109: conservation and the implementation
Page 110 and 111: In-house modifications can result i
Page 112 and 113: Table 7.3 Expected Efficiency of Wa
Page 114 and 115: Table 7.4 Assumptions used for Econ
Page 116 and 117: quo had been maintained. For each t
Page 118 and 119: All cost estimates involving DAF un
Page 120 and 121: meet toxicity limits. However, biol
Page 122 and 123: BIBLIOGRAPHY Aegis Management Servi
Page 124 and 125: Fukuda H. and H. Nakatani. Treatmen
Page 128 and 129: NovaTec Consultants Inc.. Village o
Page 130: ( Takei M.. Treatment of Waste Wate
show all

9420.pdf

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?