9420.pdf
9420.pdf
9420.pdf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
7.2.7 Waste Disposal<br />
Waste ‘disposal options are an important consideration when selecting wastewater<br />
treatment options. As shown in Section 5.1.4, most offal generated in B.C. is presently<br />
sent to reduction or is used for pet/mink food. These uses would not be available for<br />
sludge generated by DAF, particularly if chemicals are used in the treatment. The only<br />
options left for this kind of waste would be landfilling, or comporting. As cost for both<br />
these waste disposal options is on a per-weight basis, sludge dewatering would probably<br />
be required to keep disposal costs low. However, this would further increase the capital<br />
and operating costs of wastewater treatment by DAF. Comporting facilities charge<br />
between $30 and $80 per tonne of offal. At the landfill of the City of Vancouver, normal<br />
tipping fees ($69/tonne) apply to fish waste with the added requirement that it must be<br />
possible to handle the waste with a front-end loader, and that the waste must be odour<br />
free, which generally requires the waste to be frozen.<br />
The problems of dealing with waste generated by wastewater treatment would be<br />
minimized by using in-house waste reduction measures. Also, screening is preferable to<br />
DAF, as the solids collected by screens are generally disposed of with other fish offal and<br />
may be sent to reduction plants.<br />
7.2.8 In-house Modifications<br />
In-house modification to implement the methods outlined in Sections 5.2 and 6 for water<br />
conservation and wastewater minimization are considered the first step towards lowering<br />
the contaminant load discharged from fish processing plants. Plants can make use of a<br />
large number of low tech modifications to achieve these goals. Ideally, to make the most<br />
efficient use of money spent for new equipment or equipment modifications, a water and<br />
wastewater audit should be conducted first to determine the areas with the greatest<br />
potential for water conservation and wastewater minimization. As outlined above, these<br />
modifications may be associated with savings due to the following:<br />
●<br />
●<br />
●<br />
●<br />
lower water consumption;<br />
smaller contaminant load;<br />
smaller wastewater treatment systems (if required); and<br />
more efficient production methods.<br />
96