20.12.2017 Views

En Voyage - Issue #8

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Business<br />

BY MARK BOUSFIELD,<br />

RAVENSCROFT GROUP MANAGING DIRECTOR<br />

RAVENSCROFT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT<br />

WHAT DO I KNOW?<br />

BUT LORD KNOWS EVERYBODY'S TALKING<br />

'BOUT EXPONENTIAL GROWTH<br />

AND THE STOCK MARKET CRASHING IN<br />

THEIR PORTFOLIOS<br />

What do I know? Ed Sheeran, 2017<br />

Let’s step back in time a whopping 18 months. At the<br />

beginning of June 2016 quite a few things were certain<br />

in most prognosticators’ minds. Firstly, David Cameron<br />

(remember him?) was the increasingly powerful UK<br />

Prime Minister with a tight-but-workable majority against<br />

a dead-in-the-water Labour Party led by Jeremy Corbyn.<br />

Secondly, as a consequence of this (and despite no<br />

little chuntering) under Cameron’s leadership, the UK<br />

was about to reaffirm its membership of the EU and<br />

take a leading role in what was an increasingly sceptical<br />

assembly. Thirdly, Angela Merkel was the most powerful<br />

woman in the world and Chancellor of a Germany<br />

unchallenged in its de facto leadership of the EU.<br />

Finally, since she was running against a reality show<br />

host and all-round joke, Hillary Clinton was a shoo-in<br />

to become the 45th President of the United States.<br />

How do you like me now?<br />

If you’re the type who likes to use world events and<br />

politics instead of fundamental valuation to inform your<br />

investment decisions – and still believes in their own<br />

intellectual perspicacity – then I’m sorry to say that in<br />

2017 you’ve almost certainly got it badly wrong. Again.<br />

This is not to inveigh against those attempting to<br />

use their education and experience to plot their way<br />

through life while trying to make sense of what goes<br />

on around them. After all, what else can we reasonably<br />

do? But it is to point out, yet again, that things rarely<br />

go to plan – and that forecasting is a mug’s game.<br />

Of course, with hindsight all of us can confidently<br />

state that the warning signs were there. But how<br />

many of us made investment decisions based on the<br />

correct outcome? Who, to put it crudely, put their<br />

money where their mouth was? Not very many, by our<br />

reckoning, since, despite the apocalyptic Brexit and<br />

Trump forecasts put forward by the UK Treasury, the<br />

EU, the IMF and just about every financial and media<br />

institution you can name, global markets have basically<br />

been on a one-way tear. None of this is to say that they<br />

won’t reverse – they will – but it does mean that expert<br />

forecasting is absolutely worthless, especially when it<br />

is seasoned with a large pinch of political partiality.<br />

Take this famous answer to the question of US<br />

market recovery (it suffered a minor bump) from the<br />

New York Times’ Nobel-laureate economist in the<br />

days after Trumpageddon. Starting with a pouting<br />

“frankly, it’s hard to care much…” he went on to say<br />

that “…a first-pass answer is never.” You can take<br />

two things from that. One, Paul Krugman allowed<br />

emotion to cloud his judgement (which is interesting<br />

for a ‘rational’ economist); and, two, that his advice<br />

would have lost you a hell of a lot of money!<br />

Here’s the thing. Psychologists can very clearly explain<br />

to you all the reasons why we continually make these<br />

mistakes; indeed, many other behavioural economics<br />

Nobel prizes have been awarded for precisely these<br />

insights. But their explanations also encompass why we<br />

can, on the one hand, ‘know’ why, but, on the other, be<br />

completely unable to overcome our own biases. It would<br />

be funny if it weren’t quite so tragic (and expensive).<br />

As we depart 2017, the world’s (2016 vintage) most<br />

powerful woman may or may not be able to form<br />

a coalition government and thereby limp, much<br />

diminished, into 2018. The UK may or may not remain<br />

part of the EU Single Market – or even the EU – as a<br />

result of endlessly acrimonious negotiations that will<br />

occupy the front page until at least 29 March 2019; this<br />

may or may not precipitate a Labour government led<br />

by a bloke who thinks that Venezuela is a beacon of<br />

economic and social progress. Donald Trump may or<br />

may not be impeached by the Russians (only kidding).<br />

And Guernsey may or may not get an education policy.<br />

To sum up Ravenscroft’s thoughts about what’s<br />

to come in 2018? We have absolutely no idea…<br />

99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!