Wastewater Characterization of Fish Processing Plant Effluents

More documents

Recommendations

Info

STRAIT OF \ GEORGIA BURRARD INLET k- FRASER RIVER Q“ NORTH =2& ARM- NEW WES NET CO . SHEARER \ ~[ BRITISH FRASER /F- RIVER SOUTH ARM a’ COLUMBIA SEAFOOD d 7RODUCTS BELLA COOLA FISHERIES LTD. LTD = ‘F’SHER’ESLTD bfp o ‘LIONS’ GATE FISHERIES LTD. w>\ S.M. PRODUCTS LTD. / (. .\ FIGURE 1 LOCATION OF FISH PROCESSING PLANTS
The terms of reference also included site assessment of the Great Northern Packing facility which discharges into Burrard Inlet. 2. To conduct a one to two day site assessment of the operational practices at all processing facilities listed above on the basis of the information gathered in Task 1. The operational assessments were intended to assist in determining the frequency and quantity of chemical and waste streams reaching the receiving water environment. The site assessments were to include the following: @ Document the process streams from raw materials handling to final product shipment at each facility. @ Provide an overview of waste management practices for pollution control at source, and comment on the relative effectiveness of the technologies employed. @ Describe waste treatment facilities including physical structures, design principles, controlling parameters, and overall system capacity. @ Identify and classify wastewater streams including process discharges and site runoff, potential contaminants, spill containment structures, and point(s) of release to the receiving environment. @ Review and describe (if available) the wastewater collection system. @ Identify relevant analytical parameters and adequacy of flow measurement techniques. @ Identify final effluent sample collection and flow measurement stations, and any specific field equipment needs. @ Describe any proposed changes to the wastewater treatment process which may affect future effluent quality. FREMP 03/21/1994 Fish Processing Plant Effluent 4
Page 2 and 3: WASTEWATER CHARACTERIZATION OF’ F
Page 4 and 5: WASTEWATER CHARACTERIZATION OF FISH
Page 6 and 7: waters. Effluent toxicity was demon
Page 8 and 9: Mr. Chris Coleman (Ocean Fisheries
Page 10 and 11: 2.9.3 Thawing and Roe Popping . . .
Page 12 and 13: 6 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS . . . . . .
Page 14 and 15: LIST OF FIGURES page No Figure 1 Lo
Page 16 and 17: GENERAL GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS B
Page 18 and 19: 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background In Ju
Page 22 and 23: 1.3 Scope The scope of the study wa
Page 24 and 25: 2 REVIEW OF TYPICAL FISH PROCESSING
Page 26 and 27: , VESSEL-HOLD WATER PACKERS & RECIR
Page 28 and 29: Although the iron butcher can be us
Page 30 and 31: wash water, mixed with guts and blo
Page 32 and 33: The primary product of herring proc
Page 34 and 35: 3 REVIEW OF TYPICAL WASTE MANAGEMEN
Page 36 and 37: \ PROCESS WATER AND OFFAL @t4auoNo
Page 38 and 39: A more extreme version of offal sep
Page 40 and 41: fact that the pump rate of two pump
Page 42 and 43: All yard drains are connected to th
Page 44 and 45: NAME Bella Coola Fisheries Ltd. OWN
Page 46 and 47: the facility discharges screened ef
Page 48 and 49: NAME British Columbia Packers Limit
Page 50 and 51: contaminated waste stream to the re
Page 52 and 53: ~ E%!!!ii LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PROPER
Page 54 and 55: 4.3.2 Description of Processes Grea
Page 56 and 57: effluent discharge runs along the w
Page 58 and 59: 4.4.2 Description of Processes Vess
Page 60 and 61: 4.5 New West Net Co. Ltd. 4.5.1 Fac
Page 62 and 63: I +0 06 + LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOCATI
Page 64 and 65: 4.6.1 Facility Description Ocean is
Page 66 and 67: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: FRESH & FROZEN P
Page 68 and 69: A steady stream of bloody water gen
Page 70 and 71:
NAME Shearer Seafood Products Ltd.
Page 72 and 73:
place on-site. The processing build
Page 74 and 75:
NAME S.M. Products Ltd. OWNER S.M.
Page 76 and 77:
5 SAMPLE COLLECTION AND TESTING MET
Page 78 and 79:
(and supplied effluent to the bottl
Page 80 and 81:
determined for effluent from Ocean,
Page 82 and 83:
Algal Growth Stimulation/Inhibition
Page 84 and 85:
In addition to the field QA/QC prog
Page 86 and 87:
@ SOP manuals: SOP manuals are main
Page 88 and 89:
Only a small fraction of TS was in
Page 90 and 91:
Table 2 Summary of Physical/Chemica
Page 92 and 93:
The lowest ammonia concentrations w
Page 94 and 95:
Table 3 Summary of Toxicity Test Re
Page 96 and 97:
6.2.1 Rainbow Trout The endpoints m
Page 98 and 99:
were more toxic to Ceriodaphnia tha
Page 100 and 101:
Effluent samples exhibited a wide r
Page 102 and 103:
ainbow trout (LC50 = 42 % effluent)
Page 104 and 105:
7 ESTIMATION OF CONTAMINANT LOADING
Page 106 and 107:
Table 5 presents estimated annual c
Page 108 and 109:
8 CONCLUSIONS The fish processing a
Page 110 and 111:
REFERENCES APHA, AWWA and WEF. 1992
Page 112 and 113:
FREMP Fish Processing Plant Effluen
Page 114 and 115:
MOELP PERMIT SUMMARY (cent’d) Nam
Page 116 and 117:
Biochemical — Oxygen Demand (BOD5
Page 118 and 119:
Total Suspended Solids (TSS) - hist
Page 120 and 121:
FREMP Fish Processing Plant Effluen
Page 122 and 123:
B.C.PACKERS Metal (total and dissol
Page 124 and 125:
; — E ❑ .C 2 c m c c v c z c v
Page 126 and 127:
— — % 5 1- —
Page 128 and 129:
OCEAN FISHERIES Metals (total and d
Page 130 and 131:
FACILITY A RESULTS Ammonia Nitrogen
Page 132 and 133:
FACILITY C RESULTS Ammonia Nitrogen
Page 134 and 135:
CONTAMINANT LOADINGS Facility lelia
Page 136 and 137:
CONTAMINANT LOADINGS (cent’d) Fac
Page 138 and 139:
CONTAMINANT LOADINGS (cent’d) Sam
Page 140 and 141:
EVS CONSULTANTS LABORATORY QA/QC PR
Page 142 and 143:
contamination and maintenance of ap
Page 144 and 145:
Research Inc. maintains instrument
Page 146:
Spike - a known amount of analyte i
show all

Wastewater Characterization of Fish Processing Plant Effluents

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?