16.12.2017 Views

Fall 2017 JPI

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 2: Determinants of Effective Number of Legislative Parties<br />

(1) (2) (3) (4)<br />

log(District Magnitude) -0.126 0.0198 -2.672 ∗∗∗<br />

(-0.61) (0.09) (-4.05)<br />

Proximity of Presidential -3.366 ∗∗∗ -3.647 ∗∗∗ -2.059 ∗∗<br />

and Legislative Elections (-4.63) (-4.74) (-3.07)<br />

Proximity 1.283 ∗∗∗ 1.261 ∗∗∗ 0.822 ∗∗∗<br />

X Effective Number of Presidential Candidates (5.97) (5.26) (4.22)<br />

Ethnopolitical Fragmentation 3.402 -0.677 -1.917<br />

(1.53) (-0.33) (-1.85)<br />

Ethnopolitical Group Concentration 2.096 ∗ 0.0771 -0.823 ∗<br />

(2.23) (0.09) (-2.28)<br />

Ethnopolitical Fragmentation -2.410 0.656<br />

X Concentration (-1.72) (0.49)<br />

District Magnitude X Fragmentation<br />

1.701 ∗∗∗<br />

X Concentration (4.30)<br />

Constant 2.773 ∗∗∗ 0.103 2.387 6.103 ∗∗∗<br />

(8.65) (0.09) (1.92) (5.37)<br />

Observations 53 53 53 53<br />

R 2 0.43 0.18 0.52 0.65<br />

F 12.11 3.623 8.251 14.53<br />

t statistics in parentheses<br />

∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001<br />

<strong>JPI</strong> <strong>Fall</strong> <strong>2017</strong>, pg. 60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!