16.12.2017 Views

Fall 2017 JPI

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In all of the aforementioned accounts, we come across a spontaneous form of racism, which<br />

is auto-referential in the way that it frames Turks as an “honorable” people who have fought for their<br />

land, and hetero-referential in framing Syrians as “cowards” who chose to escape from warfare. This<br />

is a form of racism that erupted due to the increase of immigrants in Turkey, simultaneously with<br />

many other forms of racism in every country that has been affected by the Syrian refugee crisis.<br />

Yet, it is actually the word crisis that problematizes it all. As mentioned before, Syrians were<br />

not a group that were primarily targeted with hate speech in Turkey prior to 2014. 34 However, as<br />

Etienne Balibar suggests, the hate speech had roots in the country already. The formation of the<br />

Turkish national identity relies on the people’s ability to fight. Narratives of never having been<br />

colonized and always fighting back have been continuously utilized in politics and in daily life. In<br />

schools, every pupil is taught that Turks are a “military nation.” The term, coined by Ayse Gul Altinay<br />

refers to the continuous reproduction of equation citizenship with being the nation’s soldier. The<br />

Turkish military is deemed synonymous with the Turkish national identity. 35<br />

Although the overwhelming power of the military, which was present for the most part of<br />

Turkey’s history, 36 has been diminished by the JDP government, this certainly does not mean that the<br />

“military nation” is also in decay. Narratives of heroism and martyrdom are used widely in the public<br />

discourse, reproducing the myth. The nation is built around being a “military nation”—the most<br />

important cultural, social and political characteristic 37 that forms the imagined community. Sayings like<br />

“Every Turk is born a soldier” are great representations of the general mindset of Turkish<br />

nationalism. 38 Turkey’s “revolution from above” made sure that the military occupied center stage in<br />

the development of a national identity. Starting with the War of Independence, militarism has been a<br />

strong feature of Turkish politics.<br />

However, it is not confined to politics. It also intervenes in daily life. Every male Turkish<br />

citizen faces compulsory conscription. History and social studies lessons in public schools are taught<br />

very militaristically, constantly emphasizing the importance of the army in the establishment of the<br />

country. Furthermore, there are compulsory National Security lessons at the high school level, which<br />

are taught by military officers, who expect a soldierly attitude during class. This means military salutes<br />

at the beginning and the end and a strict form of lecture where the students rarely speak. 39 This is the<br />

national identity that Balibar speaks of in the context of the emergence of crisis racism, which is<br />

generally independent from class and status identities. 40 Turkishness is defined by military heroism, it<br />

has continuously been defined by it since 1923. It is a much stronger narrative than “Turkish<br />

hospitality,” as the Syrian case illustrates.<br />

The military nation myth is so normalized that it is difficult to pinpoint it, especially as a local<br />

who was raised within the educational system and community, but its sudden eruptions as forms of<br />

hate speech and racism gives a hint of what the essence of the Turkish national project is. And this<br />

essence lies in the roots of what brought all voting bases together in the highly polarized Turkish<br />

context. It is in the essence of Turkishness to fight. Welcoming people who “did not fight” and<br />

“escaped” into the Turkish nation instead, means an intervention to the essence, which helps to<br />

34 Arslan, Ensari and Tekin. Medyada Nefret Söylemi.<br />

35 Altınay, The Myth of the Military Nation, 24.<br />

36 Ahmad, Feroz, The Making of Modern Turkey. London: Routledge, 1993.<br />

37 Altınay, The Myth of the Military Nation: Militarism, Gender, and Education in Turkey, 29-31.<br />

38 Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso, 1991.<br />

39 Altınay, The Myth of the Military Nation: Militarism, Gender, and Education in Turkey, 161.<br />

40 Balibar. Race, Nation, Class. 219.<br />

<strong>JPI</strong> <strong>Fall</strong> <strong>2017</strong>, pg. 26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!