04.12.2017 Views

Advanced Trauma Life Support ATLS Student Course Manual 2018

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

282<br />

APPENDIX C n <strong>Trauma</strong> Care in Mass-Casualty, Austere, and Operational Environments<br />

dictates how patients are triaged and prioritized, what<br />

injury types or patterns exceed the local capabilities or<br />

available expertise, and which resources are in short<br />

supply or unavailable.<br />

These factors will include the following:<br />

••<br />

How many and what type of medical personnel<br />

are available?<br />

••<br />

What medical and surgical expertise or<br />

specialties are available?<br />

••<br />

What is the amount and type of blood products<br />

available?<br />

••<br />

What are the critical supply shortages, if any?<br />

••<br />

Is resupply on short notice available, including<br />

blood products?<br />

••<br />

Is there a need to initiate a fresh whole-blood<br />

drive?<br />

••<br />

What is the available source of oxygen, and<br />

how much supply is currently available?<br />

••<br />

Is direct communication with the next phase of<br />

care available if a transfer is required?<br />

••<br />

What is the tactical situation, and is security<br />

adequate?<br />

The fluidity and potential chaos inherent to the<br />

austere environment dictate the importance of the<br />

zero survey in practice.<br />

Triage decisions and initial care priorities may change<br />

rapidly as situational factors and care capacity of the<br />

facility evolve over time and between events. In this<br />

environment, as personnel and supply resources<br />

become more limited, triage decisions become<br />

increasingly difficult.<br />

Quaternary Survey<br />

Although the standard <strong>ATLS</strong> course emphasizes<br />

preparation of the injured patient for transfer from<br />

the initial facility to a trauma center, this is typically<br />

a single transfer over a relatively short distance by a<br />

fully equipped medical team. In contrast, a patient in<br />

the operational environment may undergo multiple<br />

sequential transfers over prolonged distances while<br />

initial resuscitation is ongoing. It is not uncommon for a<br />

patient to undergo a major damage control surgery and<br />

then be placed into the medical evacuation continuum<br />

within minutes to hours of surgery and/or injury. These<br />

transfers are often by helicopter in an environment<br />

that makes continuous care exceedingly challenging.<br />

Therefore, to minimize the likelihood of problems or<br />

complications arising during transport, strict attention<br />

must be paid to completely preparing the patient for<br />

safe transportation.<br />

The quaternary survey formalizes this preparation<br />

for transfer. It should be repeated for each successive<br />

transfer in the medical evacuation chain. In the<br />

operational setting, the time in transit may be a matter<br />

of minutes—or it may be many hours. This unknown<br />

must be considered not only in preparation for transport<br />

but also in deciding readiness for transport. En route<br />

care capabilities must also be considered because<br />

of potential variation in transportation facilities,<br />

available en route care providers, equipment, supplies<br />

and medications, environment, and the potential for<br />

external threats.<br />

Assessing the patient’s response to resuscitation<br />

is critical. The potential of meeting desirable end<br />

points of resuscitation versus the local resources<br />

available to meet these end points are real and<br />

important considerations. Although it is certainly<br />

desirable to ensure that a severely injured patient is<br />

clinically “stable,” has had a complete and thorough<br />

evaluation with identification of all injuries, and has<br />

been fully resuscitated to standard end points, this<br />

is often not practical or possible in the operational<br />

environment. The limited supply of critical resources<br />

such as blood products and the limited holding<br />

capacity of the most forward treatment facilities<br />

(such as the Forward Surgical Team) make prolonged<br />

care and sustained massive transfusions logistically<br />

impossible. Thus, often the better of two suboptimal<br />

choices must be made, and the patient is placed into<br />

the transport system much sooner or in a more tenuous<br />

phase of resuscitation than is frequently done in the<br />

civilian setting.<br />

The following are additional considerations as<br />

patients are prepared for movement within the<br />

operational environment:<br />

••<br />

Will weather or hostile action prevent<br />

movement of casualties?<br />

••<br />

What supportive treatments must accompany<br />

the patient (ventilator, suction, etc.), and what<br />

potential en route problems or malfunctions<br />

could occur?<br />

••<br />

Will the evacuation team have the skills<br />

to manage a critically ill patient and the<br />

supportive equipment accompanying<br />

the patient?<br />

• • What medications, fluids, blood products, and<br />

other resuscitative or supportive treatments<br />

can be realistically and reliably administered<br />

during the transport?<br />

n BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!