Advanced Trauma Life Support ATLS Student Course Manual 2018
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
282<br />
APPENDIX C n <strong>Trauma</strong> Care in Mass-Casualty, Austere, and Operational Environments<br />
dictates how patients are triaged and prioritized, what<br />
injury types or patterns exceed the local capabilities or<br />
available expertise, and which resources are in short<br />
supply or unavailable.<br />
These factors will include the following:<br />
••<br />
How many and what type of medical personnel<br />
are available?<br />
••<br />
What medical and surgical expertise or<br />
specialties are available?<br />
••<br />
What is the amount and type of blood products<br />
available?<br />
••<br />
What are the critical supply shortages, if any?<br />
••<br />
Is resupply on short notice available, including<br />
blood products?<br />
••<br />
Is there a need to initiate a fresh whole-blood<br />
drive?<br />
••<br />
What is the available source of oxygen, and<br />
how much supply is currently available?<br />
••<br />
Is direct communication with the next phase of<br />
care available if a transfer is required?<br />
••<br />
What is the tactical situation, and is security<br />
adequate?<br />
The fluidity and potential chaos inherent to the<br />
austere environment dictate the importance of the<br />
zero survey in practice.<br />
Triage decisions and initial care priorities may change<br />
rapidly as situational factors and care capacity of the<br />
facility evolve over time and between events. In this<br />
environment, as personnel and supply resources<br />
become more limited, triage decisions become<br />
increasingly difficult.<br />
Quaternary Survey<br />
Although the standard <strong>ATLS</strong> course emphasizes<br />
preparation of the injured patient for transfer from<br />
the initial facility to a trauma center, this is typically<br />
a single transfer over a relatively short distance by a<br />
fully equipped medical team. In contrast, a patient in<br />
the operational environment may undergo multiple<br />
sequential transfers over prolonged distances while<br />
initial resuscitation is ongoing. It is not uncommon for a<br />
patient to undergo a major damage control surgery and<br />
then be placed into the medical evacuation continuum<br />
within minutes to hours of surgery and/or injury. These<br />
transfers are often by helicopter in an environment<br />
that makes continuous care exceedingly challenging.<br />
Therefore, to minimize the likelihood of problems or<br />
complications arising during transport, strict attention<br />
must be paid to completely preparing the patient for<br />
safe transportation.<br />
The quaternary survey formalizes this preparation<br />
for transfer. It should be repeated for each successive<br />
transfer in the medical evacuation chain. In the<br />
operational setting, the time in transit may be a matter<br />
of minutes—or it may be many hours. This unknown<br />
must be considered not only in preparation for transport<br />
but also in deciding readiness for transport. En route<br />
care capabilities must also be considered because<br />
of potential variation in transportation facilities,<br />
available en route care providers, equipment, supplies<br />
and medications, environment, and the potential for<br />
external threats.<br />
Assessing the patient’s response to resuscitation<br />
is critical. The potential of meeting desirable end<br />
points of resuscitation versus the local resources<br />
available to meet these end points are real and<br />
important considerations. Although it is certainly<br />
desirable to ensure that a severely injured patient is<br />
clinically “stable,” has had a complete and thorough<br />
evaluation with identification of all injuries, and has<br />
been fully resuscitated to standard end points, this<br />
is often not practical or possible in the operational<br />
environment. The limited supply of critical resources<br />
such as blood products and the limited holding<br />
capacity of the most forward treatment facilities<br />
(such as the Forward Surgical Team) make prolonged<br />
care and sustained massive transfusions logistically<br />
impossible. Thus, often the better of two suboptimal<br />
choices must be made, and the patient is placed into<br />
the transport system much sooner or in a more tenuous<br />
phase of resuscitation than is frequently done in the<br />
civilian setting.<br />
The following are additional considerations as<br />
patients are prepared for movement within the<br />
operational environment:<br />
••<br />
Will weather or hostile action prevent<br />
movement of casualties?<br />
••<br />
What supportive treatments must accompany<br />
the patient (ventilator, suction, etc.), and what<br />
potential en route problems or malfunctions<br />
could occur?<br />
••<br />
Will the evacuation team have the skills<br />
to manage a critically ill patient and the<br />
supportive equipment accompanying<br />
the patient?<br />
• • What medications, fluids, blood products, and<br />
other resuscitative or supportive treatments<br />
can be realistically and reliably administered<br />
during the transport?<br />
n BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS