Advanced Trauma Life Support ATLS Student Course Manual 2018
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ABDOMINAL TRAUMA 201<br />
surgical support and where transfer of injured children<br />
is planned are justified in forgoing the CT evaluation<br />
before transport to definitive care.<br />
Injured children who require CT scanning as an<br />
adjunctive study often require sedation to prevent<br />
movement during the scanning process. Thus, a<br />
clinician skilled in pediatric airway management and<br />
pediatric vascular access should accompany an injured<br />
child requiring resuscitation or sedation who undergoes<br />
CT scan. CT scanning is not without risk. Fatal cancers<br />
are predicted to occur in as many as 1 in 1000 patients<br />
who undergo CT as children. Thus, the need for accurate<br />
diagnosis of internal injury must be balanced against<br />
the risk of late malignancy. Every effort should be made<br />
to avoid CT scanning before transfer to a definitive<br />
trauma center, or to avoid repeat CT upon arrival at a<br />
trauma center, unless deemed absolutely necessary.<br />
When CT evaluation is necessary, radiation must be<br />
kept As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA).<br />
To achieve the lowest doses possible, perform CT<br />
scans only when medically necessary, scan only<br />
when the results will change management, scan<br />
only the area of interest, and use the lowest radiation<br />
dose possible.<br />
Focused Assessment Sonography in <strong>Trauma</strong><br />
Although FAST has been used as a tool for the evaluation<br />
abdominal injuries in children since the 1990s, the<br />
efficacy of this modality has been the subject of debate<br />
resulting from reports of relatively low sensitivity and<br />
high false negative rates. However, FAST is widely used<br />
as an extension of the abdominal examination in injured<br />
children; it offers the advantage that imaging may be<br />
repeated throughout resuscitation and avoids ionizing<br />
radiation. Some investigators have shown that FAST<br />
identifies even small amounts of intra-abdominal blood<br />
in pediatric trauma patients, a finding that is unlikely to<br />
be associated with significant injury. If large amounts<br />
of intra-abdominal blood are found, significant injury<br />
is more likely to be present. However, even in these<br />
patients, operative management is indicated not by the<br />
amount of intraperitoneal blood, but by hemodynamic<br />
abnormality and its response to treatment. FAST is<br />
incapable of identifying isolated intraparenchymal<br />
injuries, which account for up to one-third of solid<br />
organ injuries in children. Clinically significant intraabdominal<br />
injuries may also be present in the absence<br />
of any free intraperitoneal fluid. In summary, FAST<br />
should not be relied upon as the sole diagnostic test<br />
to rule out the presence of intra-abdominal injury.<br />
If a small amount of intra-abdominal fluid is found<br />
and the child is hemodynamically normal, obtain a<br />
CT scan.<br />
Diagnostic Peritoneal Lavage<br />
Diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) may be used to<br />
detect intra-abdominal bleeding in children who have<br />
hemodynamic abnormalities and cannot be safely<br />
transported to the CT scanner, and when CT and FAST<br />
are not readily available and the presence of blood<br />
will lead to immediate operative intervention. This is<br />
an uncommon occurrence, as most pediatric patients<br />
have self-limited intra-abdominal injuries with no<br />
hemodynamic abnormalities. Therefore, blood found<br />
by DPL would not mandate operative exploration in a<br />
child who is otherwise stable.<br />
Use 10 ml/kg warmed crystalloid solution for the<br />
lavage. The delicacy of the child's abdominal wall can<br />
lead to uncontrolled penetration of the peritoneal<br />
cavity and produce iatrogenic injury, even when an<br />
open technique is used. DPL has utility in diagnosing<br />
injuries to intra-abdominal viscera only; retroperitoneal<br />
organs cannot be evaluated reliably by this technique.<br />
Evaluation of the effluent from the DPL is the same in<br />
children as it is in adults.<br />
Only the surgeon who will ultimately treat the child<br />
should perform the DPL, since this procedure can<br />
interfere with subsequent abdominal examinations<br />
and imaging upon which the decision to operate may<br />
be partially based.<br />
Nonoperative Management<br />
Selective, nonoperative management of solid organ<br />
injuries in children who are hemodynamically normal<br />
is performed in most trauma centers, especially<br />
those with pediatric capabilities. The presence of<br />
intraperitoneal blood on CT or FAST, the grade of<br />
injury, and/or the presence of a vascular blush does<br />
not necessarily mandate a laparotomy. Bleeding from<br />
an injured spleen, liver, or kidney generally is selflimited.<br />
Therefore, a CT or FAST that is positive for<br />
blood alone does not mandate a laparotomy in children<br />
who are hemodynamically normal or stabilize rapidly<br />
with fluid resuscitation. If the child’s hemodynamic<br />
condition cannot be normalized and the diagnostic<br />
procedure performed is positive for blood, perform a<br />
prompt laparotomy to control hemorrhage.<br />
For nonoperative management, children must<br />
be treated in a facility with pediatric intensive care<br />
capabilities and under the supervision of a qualified<br />
surgeon. In resource-limited environments, consider<br />
operatively treating abdominal solid organ injuries.<br />
Angioembolization of solid organ injuries in children<br />
is a treatment option, but it should be performed only<br />
in centers with experience in pediatric interventional<br />
procedures and ready access to an operating room. The<br />
n BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS