Advanced Trauma Life Support ATLS Student Course Manual 2018
SURGICAL MANAGEMENT 123 individuals who anticipate the need for this procedure receive proper training from a neurosurgeon. Penetrating Brain Injuries n FIGURE 6-12 Blood loss from scalp wounds can be extensive, especially in children. Depressed Skull Fractures For patients with depressed skull fractures, a CT scan is valuable in identifying the degree of depression and, importantly, excluding the presence of an intracranial hematoma or contusion. Generally, depressed skull fractures require operative elevation when the degree of depression is greater than the thickness of the adjacent skull, or when they are open and grossly contaminated. Less severe depressed fractures can often be managed with closure of the overlying scalp laceration, if present. Intracranial Mass Lesions Intracranial mass lesions should be managed by a neurosurgeon. If a neurosurgeon is not available in the facility that initially receives a patient with an intracranial mass lesion, early transfer to a hospital with neurosurgical capabilities is essential. In exceptional circumstances, a rapidly expanding intracranial hematoma can be imminently lifethreatening and may not allow time for transfer if neurosurgical care is a considerable distance away, such as in austere or remote areas. Emergency craniotomy in a rapidly deteriorating patient by a nonneurosurgeon should be considered only in extreme circumstances. Surgeons properly trained in the procedure should perform this surgery, but only after discussing the lesion with and obtaining the advice of a neurosurgeon. There are few indications for a craniotomy performed by a non-neurosurgeon. This procedure is justified only when definitive neurosurgical care is unavailable. The Committee on Trauma strongly recommends that CT scanning of the head is strongly recommended to evaluate patients with penetrating brain injury. Plain radiographs of the head can be helpful in assessing bullet trajectory and fragmentation, as well as the presence of large foreign bodies and intracranial air. However, when CT is available, plain radiographs are not essential. CT and/or conventional angiography are recommended with any penetrating brain injury and when a trajectory passes through or near the skull base or a major dural venous sinus. Substantial subarachnoid hemorrhage or delayed hematoma should also prompt consideration of vascular imaging. Patients with a penetrating injury involving the orbitofacial or pterional regions should undergo angiography to identify a traumatic intracranial aneurysm or arteriovenous (AV) fistula; when an injury of this kind is identified, surgical or endovascular management is recommended. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can play a role in evaluating injuries from penetrating wooden and other nonmagnetic objects. The presence on CT of large contusions, hematomas, and intraventricular hemorrhage is associated with increased mortality, especially when both hemispheres are involved. Prophylactic broad-spectrum antibiotics are appropriate for patients with penetrating brain injury, open skull fracture, and CSF leak. (Management of Penetrating Brain Injury guidelines, L3 recommendation). Early ICP monitoring is recommended when the clinician is unable to assess the neurological examination accurately, the need to evacuate a mass lesion is unclear, or imaging studies suggest elevated ICP. It is appropriate to treat small bullet entrance wounds to the head with local wound care and closure in patients whose scalp is not devitalized and who have no major intracranial pathology. Objects that penetrate the intracranial compartment or infratemporal fossa and remain partially exteriorized (e.g., arrows, knives, screwdrivers) must be left in place until possible vascular injury has been evaluated and definitive neurosurgical management established. Disturbing or removing penetrating objects prematurely can lead to fatal vascular injury or intracranial hemorrhage. Burr hole craniostomy/craniotomy, which involves placing a 10- to 15-mm drill hole in the skull, has been advocated as a method of emergently diagnosing accessible hematomas in patients with rapid neurologic deterioration who are located in austere or remote regions where neurosurgeons and imaging are n BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS
124 CHAPTER 6 n Head Trauma not readily available. Unfortunately, even in very experienced hands, these drill holes are easily placed incorrectly, and they seldom result in draining enough of the hematoma to make a clinical difference. In patients who need an evacuation, bone flap craniotomy (versus a simple burr hole) is the definitive lifesaving procedure to decompress the brain. Trauma team members should make every attempt to have a practitioner trained and experienced in doing the procedure perform it in a timely fashion. Prognosis All patients should be treated aggressively pending consultation with a neurosurgeon. This is particularly true of children, who have a remarkable ability to recover from seemingly devastating injuries. Brain Death A diagnosis of brain death implies that there is no possibility for recovery of brain function. Most experts agree that the diagnosis of brain death requires meeting these criteria: •• Glasgow Coma Scale score = 3 •• Nonreactive pupils •• Absent brainstem reflexes (e.g., oculocephalic, corneal, and doll’s eyes, and no gag reflex) •• No spontaneous ventilatory effort on formal apnea testing •• Absence of confounding factors such as alcohol or drug intoxication or hypothermia Ancillary studies that may be used to confirm the diagnosis of brain death include: •• Electroencephalography: No activity at high gain •• CBF studies: No CBF (e.g., isotope studies, Doppler studies, xenon CBF studies) •• Cerebral angiography Certain reversible conditions, such as hypothermia or barbiturate coma, can mimic brain death; therefore, consider making this diagnosis only after all physiological parameters are normalized and central nervous system function is not potentially affected by medications. Because children are often able to recover from extremely severe brain injuries, carefully consider diagnosing brain death in these patients. If any doubt exists, especially in children, multiple serial exams spaced several hours apart are useful in confirming the initial clinical impression. Notify local organ procurement agencies about all patients with the diagnosis or impending diagnosis of brain death before discontinuing artificial life support measures. The team leader must: TeamWORK •• Ensure that the team is capable of managing a primary brain injury to the best possible outcome by preventing secondary brain injury. •• Recognize the importance of managing the airway to ensure patients with head injuries do not experience unnecessary hypoxia. •• Recognize the need to involve neurosurgical expertise at an appropriate stage and in a timely fashion, particularly when a patient requires surgical intervention. •• Ensure the timely transfer of patients with TBI to a trauma center when it is required. •• However, the team leader must ensure that patients with significant head injuries are transferred to facilities where they can be appropriately monitored and observed closely for signs of deterioration. •• Because some patients require neurosurgical intervention early, be able to prioritize the treatment of brain injury with other lifethreatening injuries such as hemorrhage. Manage the discussion between representatives of different surgical specialties to ensure the patient’s injuries are treated in the correct sequence. For example, a patient who is exsanguinating from a pelvic fracture requires control of the bleeding before being transferred for a neurosurgical procedure. Chapter Summary 1. Understanding basic intracranial anatomy and physiology is vital to managing head injury. n BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Page 125 and 126: 72 CHAPTER 4 n Thoracic Trauma Seco
- Page 127 and 128: 74 CHAPTER 4 n Thoracic Trauma A B
- Page 129 and 130: 76 CHAPTER 4 n Thoracic Trauma Spec
- Page 131 and 132: 78 CHAPTER 4 n Thoracic Trauma temp
- Page 133 and 134: 80 CHAPTER 4 n Thoracic Trauma 18.
- Page 135 and 136: ABDOMINAL AND 5 PELVIC TRAUMA When
- Page 137 and 138: 84 CHAPTER 5 n Abdominal and Pelvic
- Page 139 and 140: 86 CHAPTER 5 n Abdominal and Pelvic
- Page 141 and 142: 88 CHAPTER 5 n Abdominal and Pelvic
- Page 143 and 144: 90 CHAPTER 5 n Abdominal and Pelvic
- Page 145 and 146: 92 CHAPTER 5 n Abdominal and Pelvic
- Page 147 and 148: 94 CHAPTER 5 n Abdominal and Pelvic
- Page 149 and 150: 96 CHAPTER 5 n Abdominal and Pelvic
- Page 151 and 152: 98 CHAPTER 5 n Abdominal and Pelvic
- Page 153 and 154: 100 CHAPTER 5 n Abdominal and Pelvi
- Page 155 and 156: 6 HEAD TRAUMA The primary goal of t
- Page 157 and 158: 104 CHAPTER 6 n Head Trauma Head in
- Page 159 and 160: 106 CHAPTER 6 n Head Trauma fibrous
- Page 161 and 162: 108 CHAPTER 6 n Head Trauma n FIGUR
- Page 163 and 164: 110 CHAPTER 6 n Head Trauma table 6
- Page 165 and 166: 112 CHAPTER 6 n Head Trauma covery.
- Page 167 and 168: 114 CHAPTER 6 n Head Trauma n FIGUR
- Page 169 and 170: 116 CHAPTER 6 n Head Trauma n FIGUR
- Page 171 and 172: 118 CHAPTER 6 n Head Trauma n FIGUR
- Page 173 and 174: 120 CHAPTER 6 n Head Trauma necessa
- Page 175: 122 CHAPTER 6 n Head Trauma Use 0.2
- Page 179: 126 CHAPTER 6 n Head Trauma 18. Mar
- Page 182 and 183: CHAPTER 7 Outline Objectives iNtrod
- Page 184 and 185: ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY 131 B A n FI
- Page 186 and 187: RIGHT INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS FOR N
- Page 188 and 189: DOCUMENTATION OF SPINAL CORD INJURI
- Page 190 and 191: SPECIFIC TYPES OF SPINAL INJURIES 1
- Page 192 and 193: RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION 139 Penetra
- Page 194 and 195: GENERAL MANAGEMENT 141 When the low
- Page 196 and 197: GENERAL MANAGEMENT 143 them to the
- Page 198 and 199: BIBLIOGRAPHY 145 Bibliography 1. Bi
- Page 201 and 202: 8 MUSCULOSKELETAL TRAUMA Injuries t
- Page 203 and 204: 150 CHAPTER 8 n Musculoskeletal Tra
- Page 205 and 206: 152 CHAPTER 8 n Musculoskeletal Tra
- Page 207 and 208: 154 CHAPTER 8 n Musculoskeletal Tra
- Page 209 and 210: 156 CHAPTER 8 n Musculoskeletal Tra
- Page 211 and 212: 158 CHAPTER 8 n Musculoskeletal Tra
- Page 213 and 214: 160 CHAPTER 8 n Musculoskeletal Tra
- Page 215 and 216: 162 CHAPTER 8 n Musculoskeletal Tra
- Page 217 and 218: 164 CHAPTER 8 n Musculoskeletal Tra
- Page 219 and 220: 166 CHAPTER 8 n Musculoskeletal Tra
- Page 221 and 222: 9 THERMAL INJURIES The most signifi
- Page 223 and 224: 170 CHAPTER 9 n Thermal Injuries Th
- Page 225 and 226: 172 CHAPTER 9 n Thermal Injuries Ch
SURGICAL MANAGEMENT 123<br />
individuals who anticipate the need for this procedure<br />
receive proper training from a neurosurgeon.<br />
Penetrating Brain Injuries<br />
n FIGURE 6-12 Blood loss from scalp wounds can be extensive,<br />
especially in children.<br />
Depressed Skull Fractures<br />
For patients with depressed skull fractures, a CT scan<br />
is valuable in identifying the degree of depression and,<br />
importantly, excluding the presence of an intracranial<br />
hematoma or contusion. Generally, depressed skull<br />
fractures require operative elevation when the degree<br />
of depression is greater than the thickness of the<br />
adjacent skull, or when they are open and grossly<br />
contaminated. Less severe depressed fractures can<br />
often be managed with closure of the overlying scalp<br />
laceration, if present.<br />
Intracranial Mass Lesions<br />
Intracranial mass lesions should be managed by a<br />
neurosurgeon. If a neurosurgeon is not available in<br />
the facility that initially receives a patient with an<br />
intracranial mass lesion, early transfer to a hospital<br />
with neurosurgical capabilities is essential. In<br />
exceptional circumstances, a rapidly expanding<br />
intracranial hematoma can be imminently lifethreatening<br />
and may not allow time for transfer if<br />
neurosurgical care is a considerable distance away,<br />
such as in austere or remote areas. Emergency<br />
craniotomy in a rapidly deteriorating patient by a nonneurosurgeon<br />
should be considered only in extreme<br />
circumstances. Surgeons properly trained in the<br />
procedure should perform this surgery, but only after<br />
discussing the lesion with and obtaining the advice of<br />
a neurosurgeon.<br />
There are few indications for a craniotomy performed<br />
by a non-neurosurgeon. This procedure is justified only<br />
when definitive neurosurgical care is unavailable.<br />
The Committee on <strong>Trauma</strong> strongly recommends that<br />
CT scanning of the head is strongly recommended to<br />
evaluate patients with penetrating brain injury. Plain<br />
radiographs of the head can be helpful in assessing<br />
bullet trajectory and fragmentation, as well as the<br />
presence of large foreign bodies and intracranial air.<br />
However, when CT is available, plain radiographs are<br />
not essential. CT and/or conventional angiography are<br />
recommended with any penetrating brain injury and<br />
when a trajectory passes through or near the skull base<br />
or a major dural venous sinus. Substantial subarachnoid<br />
hemorrhage or delayed hematoma should also prompt<br />
consideration of vascular imaging. Patients with a<br />
penetrating injury involving the orbitofacial or pterional<br />
regions should undergo angiography to identify a<br />
traumatic intracranial aneurysm or arteriovenous<br />
(AV) fistula; when an injury of this kind is identified,<br />
surgical or endovascular management is recommended.<br />
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can play a role<br />
in evaluating injuries from penetrating wooden and<br />
other nonmagnetic objects. The presence on CT of<br />
large contusions, hematomas, and intraventricular<br />
hemorrhage is associated with increased mortality,<br />
especially when both hemispheres are involved.<br />
Prophylactic broad-spectrum antibiotics are appropriate<br />
for patients with penetrating brain injury,<br />
open skull fracture, and CSF leak. (Management of Penetrating<br />
Brain Injury guidelines, L3 recommendation). Early<br />
ICP monitoring is recommended when the clinician<br />
is unable to assess the neurological examination<br />
accurately, the need to evacuate a mass lesion is<br />
unclear, or imaging studies suggest elevated ICP.<br />
It is appropriate to treat small bullet entrance wounds<br />
to the head with local wound care and closure in<br />
patients whose scalp is not devitalized and who have<br />
no major intracranial pathology.<br />
Objects that penetrate the intracranial compartment<br />
or infratemporal fossa and remain partially<br />
exteriorized (e.g., arrows, knives, screwdrivers) must<br />
be left in place until possible vascular injury has been<br />
evaluated and definitive neurosurgical management<br />
established. Disturbing or removing penetrating<br />
objects prematurely can lead to fatal vascular injury or<br />
intracranial hemorrhage.<br />
Burr hole craniostomy/craniotomy, which involves<br />
placing a 10- to 15-mm drill hole in the skull, has been<br />
advocated as a method of emergently diagnosing<br />
accessible hematomas in patients with rapid neurologic<br />
deterioration who are located in austere or remote<br />
regions where neurosurgeons and imaging are<br />
n BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS