SPACES Sept issue 2017

spacesnepalmarketing
from spacesnepalmarketing More from this publisher
12.10.2017 Views

URBAN PLANNING When roads are designed and constructed explicitly for vehicles, such as in the case of highways or some urban roads, vehicles are a priority by default because no one is supposed to walk along an expressway. But when a pedestrian street is turned into a caroverfriendly road, to whom should it first belong – to people who walk or to them who drive? Many developing countries, particularly in Europe, are known for good public transportation system including pedestrianization, and it is not uncommon to see high-ranking officials or politicians walking, using public transportation or even cycling. In contrast, our bureaucrats and politicos prefer to bask in the glory of gaadi suwidha. Walking is vehemently discouraged in our cities, to say the least. Pedestrians are seen as lesser beings. Walking has become a serious “urban crime” for which punishment could sometimes be as severe as “death by accident”. In cities, people are busy. Communication (with fellow citizens) may not be a priority but commuting (to jobs in particular) is important. Private cars have become a “necessity” now, and in case one forgets just how necessary car, auto dealers and bankers are there to remind with offers of budget-friendly cars and budget-friendlier auto loans. Moreover, cars are seen as a “savior” – they protect from dust and air pollution, enhance social status, and save from the humiliation of travelling in a crowded, stinky public bus with a foul-mouthed conductor. If we keep on adding vehicles and building more roads or destroying more streets for them, where would we arrive? 40 / SPACES SEPTEMBER 2017

URBAN PLANNING RECLAIMING STREETS The street networks in the old settlements of our cities were built for navigation on foot. In the course of time, some streets were widened and some not, but they somehow became “motorable” roads. Two-wheelers first laid claims on the roads, followed next by four-wheelers, and then by vehicles of any size technically possible. The sharp turns and numerous junctions and paths that crisscross these streets were not meant to facilitate vehicular traffic – not even two-wheelers. As a result, these streets are often always choked with vehicles. The vehicular abuse of streets has continued but it is time to correct the mistakes. In many countries, particularly in Europe, cities are transforming car-friendly areas into car-claimed, pedestrian-friendly zones. Barcelona is transforming nearly 60 percent of streets currently used by cars into public spaces. Paris is also slashing the number of lanes on major axes and redesigning seven major squares to reduce vehicle lanes and parking. Seoul’s Cheonggyecheon Restoration Project is legendary in urban planning circles: the city replaced a major highway with smaller roads and green infrastructure without deteriorating traffic situation in the city. If the city planners of Barcelona, Paris or Seoul have done the “unthinkable” and yet emerged victorious, what is holding us back? Past efforts to pedestrianize old neighborhoods in Kathmandu have met with little success. The benefits of pedestrianization might not have been clear to the skeptics. Studies on pedestrianization and traffic-calming schemes in Germany and United Kingdom over years have shown that shops inside pedestrian areas benefit more than those outside, and parts of the increased turnover is transferred to landowners (or locals). Likewise, a recent study by EMBARQ on the pedestrianization of Istanbul’s historic peninsula has found that locals were largely happy with the results that included decreased noise levels and improved air quality. Studies around the world show that on an average, cars are parked 95 percent of the time or more which implies that most of the time, cars just occupy scarce urban space. Land is a scarce resource, and should not be wasted on roads and vehicles at the expense of better use of land. It is not enough to build pedestrianfriendly roads but to build more compact, walkable neighborhoods that require less commuting and have more public space. Humans first learn to walk, then run and then to drive. This is how the priority for using urban space should be set. • SEPTEMBER 2017 SPACES / 41

URBAN PLANNING<br />

RECLAIMING STREETS<br />

The street networks in the old<br />

settlements of our cities were built for<br />

navigation on foot. In the course of<br />

time, some streets were widened and<br />

some not, but they somehow became<br />

“motorable” roads. Two-wheelers first<br />

laid claims on the roads, followed next<br />

by four-wheelers, and then by vehicles<br />

of any size technically possible. The<br />

sharp turns and numerous junctions<br />

and paths that crisscross these streets<br />

were not meant to facilitate vehicular<br />

traffic – not even two-wheelers. As a<br />

result, these streets are often always<br />

choked with vehicles. The vehicular<br />

abuse of streets has continued but it is<br />

time to correct the mistakes.<br />

In many countries, particularly in Europe,<br />

cities are transforming car-friendly areas<br />

into car-claimed, pedestrian-friendly<br />

zones. Barcelona is transforming nearly<br />

60 percent of streets currently used by<br />

cars into public spaces. Paris is also<br />

slashing the number of lanes on major<br />

axes and redesigning seven major<br />

squares to reduce vehicle lanes and<br />

parking. Seoul’s Cheonggyecheon<br />

Restoration Project is legendary<br />

in urban planning circles: the city<br />

replaced a major highway with smaller<br />

roads and green infrastructure without<br />

deteriorating traffic situation in the city.<br />

If the city planners of Barcelona, Paris<br />

or Seoul have done the “unthinkable”<br />

and yet emerged victorious, what is<br />

holding us back?<br />

Past efforts to pedestrianize old<br />

neighborhoods in Kathmandu have<br />

met with little success. The benefits<br />

of pedestrianization might not have<br />

been clear to the skeptics. Studies on<br />

pedestrianization and traffic-calming<br />

schemes in Germany and United<br />

Kingdom over years have shown that<br />

shops inside pedestrian areas benefit<br />

more than those outside, and parts of<br />

the increased turnover is transferred<br />

to landowners (or locals). Likewise,<br />

a recent study by EMBARQ on the<br />

pedestrianization of Istanbul’s historic<br />

peninsula has found that locals were<br />

largely happy with the results that<br />

included decreased noise levels and<br />

improved air quality.<br />

Studies around the world show that on<br />

an average, cars are parked 95 percent<br />

of the time or more which implies that<br />

most of the time, cars just occupy scarce<br />

urban space. Land is a scarce resource,<br />

and should not be wasted on roads and<br />

vehicles at the expense of better use of<br />

land. It is not enough to build pedestrianfriendly<br />

roads but to build more<br />

compact, walkable neighborhoods that<br />

require less commuting and have more<br />

public space.<br />

Humans first learn to walk, then run<br />

and then to drive. This is how the<br />

priority for using urban space should<br />

be set. •<br />

SEPTEMBER <strong>2017</strong> <strong>SPACES</strong> / 41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!