SPACES Sept issue 2017
URBAN PLANNING When roads are designed and constructed explicitly for vehicles, such as in the case of highways or some urban roads, vehicles are a priority by default because no one is supposed to walk along an expressway. But when a pedestrian street is turned into a caroverfriendly road, to whom should it first belong – to people who walk or to them who drive? Many developing countries, particularly in Europe, are known for good public transportation system including pedestrianization, and it is not uncommon to see high-ranking officials or politicians walking, using public transportation or even cycling. In contrast, our bureaucrats and politicos prefer to bask in the glory of gaadi suwidha. Walking is vehemently discouraged in our cities, to say the least. Pedestrians are seen as lesser beings. Walking has become a serious “urban crime” for which punishment could sometimes be as severe as “death by accident”. In cities, people are busy. Communication (with fellow citizens) may not be a priority but commuting (to jobs in particular) is important. Private cars have become a “necessity” now, and in case one forgets just how necessary car, auto dealers and bankers are there to remind with offers of budget-friendly cars and budget-friendlier auto loans. Moreover, cars are seen as a “savior” – they protect from dust and air pollution, enhance social status, and save from the humiliation of travelling in a crowded, stinky public bus with a foul-mouthed conductor. If we keep on adding vehicles and building more roads or destroying more streets for them, where would we arrive? 40 / SPACES SEPTEMBER 2017
URBAN PLANNING RECLAIMING STREETS The street networks in the old settlements of our cities were built for navigation on foot. In the course of time, some streets were widened and some not, but they somehow became “motorable” roads. Two-wheelers first laid claims on the roads, followed next by four-wheelers, and then by vehicles of any size technically possible. The sharp turns and numerous junctions and paths that crisscross these streets were not meant to facilitate vehicular traffic – not even two-wheelers. As a result, these streets are often always choked with vehicles. The vehicular abuse of streets has continued but it is time to correct the mistakes. In many countries, particularly in Europe, cities are transforming car-friendly areas into car-claimed, pedestrian-friendly zones. Barcelona is transforming nearly 60 percent of streets currently used by cars into public spaces. Paris is also slashing the number of lanes on major axes and redesigning seven major squares to reduce vehicle lanes and parking. Seoul’s Cheonggyecheon Restoration Project is legendary in urban planning circles: the city replaced a major highway with smaller roads and green infrastructure without deteriorating traffic situation in the city. If the city planners of Barcelona, Paris or Seoul have done the “unthinkable” and yet emerged victorious, what is holding us back? Past efforts to pedestrianize old neighborhoods in Kathmandu have met with little success. The benefits of pedestrianization might not have been clear to the skeptics. Studies on pedestrianization and traffic-calming schemes in Germany and United Kingdom over years have shown that shops inside pedestrian areas benefit more than those outside, and parts of the increased turnover is transferred to landowners (or locals). Likewise, a recent study by EMBARQ on the pedestrianization of Istanbul’s historic peninsula has found that locals were largely happy with the results that included decreased noise levels and improved air quality. Studies around the world show that on an average, cars are parked 95 percent of the time or more which implies that most of the time, cars just occupy scarce urban space. Land is a scarce resource, and should not be wasted on roads and vehicles at the expense of better use of land. It is not enough to build pedestrianfriendly roads but to build more compact, walkable neighborhoods that require less commuting and have more public space. Humans first learn to walk, then run and then to drive. This is how the priority for using urban space should be set. • SEPTEMBER 2017 SPACES / 41
- Page 1 and 2: Vol 13 N o. 04 SEPTEMBER 2017 ART A
- Page 3 and 4: SEPTEMBER 2017 SPACES / 3
- Page 5: STILL STRUGGLING WITH WOODEN / ALLU
- Page 9 and 10: and floating 3:1 right shares of th
- Page 11 and 12: SEPTEMBER 2017 SPACES / 11
- Page 13 and 14: SEPTEMBER 2017 SPACES / 13
- Page 15 and 16: NEWS MONSOON PRINTMAKING WORKSHOP 2
- Page 17 and 18: NEWS SAMAAHIT The second solo exhib
- Page 19 and 20: SEPTEMBER 2017 SPACES / 19
- Page 21 and 22: SEPTEMBER 2017 SPACES / 21
- Page 23 and 24: ALL NEPAL ASIAN PAINTS DESIGN COMPE
- Page 25 and 26: REVIEWS were announced. The winner
- Page 27 and 28: SEPTEMBER 2017 SPACES / 27
- Page 29 and 30: ARCHITECTURE SOME GUIDING PHILOSOPH
- Page 31 and 32: ARCHITECTURE SEPTEMBER 2017 SPACES
- Page 33 and 34: ARCHITECTURE “OUR HERITAGE AND CU
- Page 35 and 36: BASU BABU TIWARI, CONSULTING ENGINE
- Page 37 and 38: URBAN PLANNING TEXT : Kirti Kusum J
- Page 39: URBAN PLANNING SEPTEMBER 2017 SPACE
- Page 43 and 44: SEPTEMBER 2017 SPACES / 43
- Page 45 and 46: ARCHITECTURE El Museo del Prado en
- Page 47 and 48: ARCHITECTURE and creates a module a
- Page 49 and 50: ARCHITECTURE SEPTEMBER 2017 SPACES
- Page 51 and 52: INTERIOR SEPTEMBER 2017 SPACES / 51
- Page 53 and 54: INTERIOR are together after a day
- Page 55 and 56: INTERIOR Majority of us are familia
- Page 57 and 58: INTERIOR When it comes for home imp
- Page 59 and 60: INTERIOR SAPPHIRE BLUE GRANITE Sapp
- Page 61 and 62: SEPTEMBER 2017 SPACES / 61
- Page 63 and 64: ARCHITECTURE paradigm shift in the
- Page 65 and 66: ART When in 2005 I first beheld the
- Page 67 and 68: ART SEPTEMBER 2017 SPACES / 67
- Page 69 and 70: SEPTEMBER 2017 SPACES / 69
- Page 71 and 72: SEPTEMBER 2017 SPACES / 71
- Page 73 and 74: VINYL PLANKS They are PVC planks th
- Page 75 and 76: ARCHITECTURAL ART DIGEST SEPTEMBER
- Page 77 and 78: SEPTEMBER 2017 SPACES / 77
- Page 79 and 80: SEPTEMBER 2017 SPACES / 79
- Page 81 and 82: SEPTEMBER 2017 SPACES / 81
- Page 83 and 84: SEPTEMBER 2017 SPACES / 83
URBAN PLANNING<br />
RECLAIMING STREETS<br />
The street networks in the old<br />
settlements of our cities were built for<br />
navigation on foot. In the course of<br />
time, some streets were widened and<br />
some not, but they somehow became<br />
“motorable” roads. Two-wheelers first<br />
laid claims on the roads, followed next<br />
by four-wheelers, and then by vehicles<br />
of any size technically possible. The<br />
sharp turns and numerous junctions<br />
and paths that crisscross these streets<br />
were not meant to facilitate vehicular<br />
traffic – not even two-wheelers. As a<br />
result, these streets are often always<br />
choked with vehicles. The vehicular<br />
abuse of streets has continued but it is<br />
time to correct the mistakes.<br />
In many countries, particularly in Europe,<br />
cities are transforming car-friendly areas<br />
into car-claimed, pedestrian-friendly<br />
zones. Barcelona is transforming nearly<br />
60 percent of streets currently used by<br />
cars into public spaces. Paris is also<br />
slashing the number of lanes on major<br />
axes and redesigning seven major<br />
squares to reduce vehicle lanes and<br />
parking. Seoul’s Cheonggyecheon<br />
Restoration Project is legendary<br />
in urban planning circles: the city<br />
replaced a major highway with smaller<br />
roads and green infrastructure without<br />
deteriorating traffic situation in the city.<br />
If the city planners of Barcelona, Paris<br />
or Seoul have done the “unthinkable”<br />
and yet emerged victorious, what is<br />
holding us back?<br />
Past efforts to pedestrianize old<br />
neighborhoods in Kathmandu have<br />
met with little success. The benefits<br />
of pedestrianization might not have<br />
been clear to the skeptics. Studies on<br />
pedestrianization and traffic-calming<br />
schemes in Germany and United<br />
Kingdom over years have shown that<br />
shops inside pedestrian areas benefit<br />
more than those outside, and parts of<br />
the increased turnover is transferred<br />
to landowners (or locals). Likewise,<br />
a recent study by EMBARQ on the<br />
pedestrianization of Istanbul’s historic<br />
peninsula has found that locals were<br />
largely happy with the results that<br />
included decreased noise levels and<br />
improved air quality.<br />
Studies around the world show that on<br />
an average, cars are parked 95 percent<br />
of the time or more which implies that<br />
most of the time, cars just occupy scarce<br />
urban space. Land is a scarce resource,<br />
and should not be wasted on roads and<br />
vehicles at the expense of better use of<br />
land. It is not enough to build pedestrianfriendly<br />
roads but to build more<br />
compact, walkable neighborhoods that<br />
require less commuting and have more<br />
public space.<br />
Humans first learn to walk, then run<br />
and then to drive. This is how the<br />
priority for using urban space should<br />
be set. •<br />
SEPTEMBER <strong>2017</strong> <strong>SPACES</strong> / 41