RiskUKOctober2017
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Qualifications: The Future of Fire<br />
Detection and Alarm Practitioners<br />
What’s the future for<br />
those working in the<br />
fire detection and<br />
alarms sector? Given<br />
that staring into a<br />
crystal ball will likely<br />
not help in finding the<br />
answer, Martin<br />
Duggan analyses the<br />
facts and looks at the<br />
reasons why there’s a<br />
growing trend towards<br />
both the need for<br />
professional<br />
qualifications in this<br />
sector and also a<br />
requirement to upskill<br />
and grow the market<br />
through the provision<br />
of quality services<br />
Martin Duggan:<br />
General Manager at the Fire<br />
Industry Association<br />
64<br />
www.risk-uk.com<br />
Here in the UK, the problem at present is<br />
that there’s no ‘upfront’ legal requirement<br />
for a formal qualification in the fire<br />
detection profession. Technically speaking,<br />
there’s nothing to stop anyone, however<br />
unqualified they may be, from commissioning a<br />
fire alarm system.<br />
To make matters worse, that applies whether<br />
the unqualified individual is installing or<br />
designing a system for a small office, a nuclear<br />
power station or even a large hospital, where<br />
the risks could be exponential if matters are not<br />
handled properly. It’s likely that only after a<br />
disaster has played out would poor<br />
workmanship be discovered, which means that<br />
many ‘problems’ remain undetected.<br />
Currently, the only necessity is written into<br />
the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005,<br />
which states that the individual must be<br />
“competent” – but the definition is vague. The<br />
best we have is in the guidance documents<br />
which state the following: “A person with<br />
sufficient training and experience or knowledge<br />
and other qualities to enable him/her to<br />
properly assist in undertaking the preventative<br />
and protective measures.”<br />
The fire detection and alarm industry has a<br />
‘company’ competency benchmark, specifically<br />
the third party certification schemes: BAFE<br />
SP203-1 or LPS 1014. These are supported –<br />
again somewhat vaguely, it must be said –<br />
within the guidance documents by the<br />
statement that: “Third party certification<br />
schemes for fire protection products and<br />
related services are an effective means to<br />
providing the fullest possible assurances,<br />
offering a level of quality, reliability and safety<br />
that non-certificated products may lack.”<br />
Each scheme is different, but essentially each<br />
one provides an independent audit of a<br />
company to help prove quality and competency.<br />
Part of the inspection process is to look at staff<br />
and how they’re trained and selected.<br />
These schemes are generally very good and<br />
the audits strong, which is precisely why the<br />
Fire Industry Association (FIA) has always<br />
supported them and made them the criteria for<br />
membership acceptance.<br />
A qualification should raise the competence<br />
bar to a new level and provide an extra layer of<br />
knowledge and expertise. Not only will it help<br />
to bolster an individual technician’s credentials,<br />
but will also afford companies a competitive<br />
advantage, and especially so if they can<br />
demonstrate that all of their technicians are<br />
qualified. This would provide for a much easier<br />
check within the company scheme inspections.<br />
Purchasing decisions<br />
Consumers and purchasers in today’s world are<br />
more and more savvy, often placing more effort<br />
into finding out what sort of service they’ll<br />
receive and at what price. They’re also starting<br />
to fully understand their responsibilities and<br />
are looking at how they can mitigate risk.<br />
While price alone might lead the way on<br />
some purchasing decisions, that isn’t always<br />
the case. Many discerning purchasers will look<br />
to discover if they’re receiving a good level of<br />
service for their money.<br />
This is where EN 16763: 2017 Services for Fire<br />
Safety Systems and Security Systems is useful.<br />
Although not mandatory, it helps to set out<br />
minimum education requirements for staff in<br />
the industry. EN 16763 clearly defines the level<br />
of education those working in the fire and<br />
security services industries should have at their<br />
disposal. According to EN 16763, those working<br />
within fire detection and alarm services should<br />
hold a Level 3 qualification on the European<br />
Qualifications Framework.<br />
To assist those companies in preparation for<br />
adopting this standard, and to further improve<br />
the level of training available for service<br />
technicians, the FIA has worked to develop four<br />
new qualifications in the field of fire detection<br />
and alarms aimed at the four main job roles<br />
within the fire detection and alarm services<br />
sector. These four roles are the designer,<br />
installer, maintainer and commissioner.<br />
The new qualifications are one stage higher<br />
than those mentioned in the European<br />
Qualifications Framework (as a UK Level 3 is the<br />
equivalent of a European Level 4, and the<br />
European Standard calls for Level 3) and<br />
equivalent to an A-Level within the UK.<br />
Method of differentiation<br />
Why did the FIA become involved? We provide a<br />
service to our members and they want to<br />
increase the knowledge and understanding of<br />
their workforce and new recruits. They wish to<br />
differentiate themselves from the ‘cowboys’.<br />
Also, the FIA is a not-for-profit organisation<br />
so any money made either goes back into<br />
training and development or research.