CNSA Targeting

More documents

Recommendations

Info

LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS Coordinator of Maissade Survey Harold Maass Survey Field Director Emile Pharrel Accounting and Logistics Stephanie Pierre Supervisor of Telphone surveys Almathe Jean Almathe Jean Field Survey Supervisors Renaud Previllon Egain Ambeau Syvestre Prophet Telephone Surveyors Keely Brookes Erika Childs Nahomie Jeannis Vanessa Henry Dieula Lacombe Field Surveyors Markenson Emile Othelo Bisnet Jeudy Lidnor Evens Paul Bernard Kerline Vaval Christine Jean Simon Leonne Milfleur Andre Donald Ernst Vertus Gregory Mondely Gregory Jean Baptiste Lanel Pierre Chadson Pierre Rony Desire Sabine Vilfort Jimmy Plaisir
Acknowledgements The research presented here was made possible by support from CNSA, WFP, and FAO. Biases, opinions, or shortcomings should be attributed to the consultant. However, there are individuals whose contributions should be duly recognized. Most importantly, Gary Mathieu, Director of CNSA, under the auspices of which the work was carried out; Nathalie Lamaute- Brisson, who supervised the consultant, providing advice, direction, and ultimately wellinformed and insightful feedback; Raphy Favre, WFP consultant who initiated the undertaking and diligently helped the consultant focus on a broad topic; Cedric Charpentier, who took over as principal WFP contact and just as diligently carried the research to its conclusion; and Jean- Carell Norceide, WFP consultant present in CNSA who facilitated meetings and contacts and otherwise made communication among the many people involved easier than it otherwise would have been. Not to be left out are those who served on the steering committee, focusing the work and providing feedback and guidance that successfully brought it to a conclusion. These included: ARISTE Sonel FAO ARTHUR Anne FAES BARRETO Carolina PAM BRUTUS Jn Robert UNAG CADET Marie Florence USAID COULANGE Mesadieu Erline UNAG DEBROUWER Thomas ACF DESIR Elie Melech FAO ElLISEE Dagobert ONPES ERNEST Manirambona FAO FABIUS Anais FAES FLIPPINI Suze Perry PAM FRANCOIS Hary USAID GUERISMA Jyminor USAID LAMOUR Frantz ONPES LAURENT Carell USAID MATHIEU Gary CNSA OLIVIER Djems Ministere Delegue aux Droits de l'Homme et la Lutte contre la Pauvrete PIRIOU Cedric Extreme ACF /CLIO RENARD Antoine PAM SATHYR Desilhomme CNSA SAVAGE Ron USAID THOMAS Hans Muller FAES TORRES Jordi OXFAM
Page 1: COORDINATION NATIONALE DE LA SÉCUR
Page 5 and 6: Humanitarian Aid Beneficiary Target
Page 7 and 8: Distribution Mechanism.............
Page 9 and 10: Figure 44: Size of Gardens in NW…
Page 11 and 12: 2 3) agro-pastoral plateau. 4) agro
Page 13 and 14: 4 that provides information on cons
Page 15 and 16: 6 Having said all that, the simple
Page 17 and 18: 8 The First Lady Sophia Martell
Page 19 and 20: 10 With respect to this objective o
Page 21 and 22: 12 The Targeting Problem Definition
Page 23 and 24: 14 validate whether or not the
Page 25 and 26: 16 Beneficiary Unit Overview The ul
Page 27 and 28: 18 Proxy Means Testing (searching f
Page 29 and 30: 20 On the other hand, when local CB
Page 31 and 32: 22 Practical self-selection should
Page 33 and 34: 24 between departments and ecologic
Page 35 and 36: 26 Figure 16: Coping Strategy Index
Page 37 and 38: 28 Figure 20: Source ECVH 2001 or H
Page 39 and 40: 30 Figure 22: The Evolving Characte
Page 41 and 42: 32 beneficiaries. During the course
Page 43 and 44: 34 Agriculture, livestock rearing,
Page 45 and 46: 36 Figure 25 Hurricanes Since Year
Page 47 and 48: 38 such that during the course of t
Page 49 and 50: 40 to derive statistically valid in
Page 51 and 52: 42 first, the natural environment a
Page 53 and 54:
44 Head of household is married co
Page 55 and 56:
46 Dependency ratio: As the number
Page 57 and 58:
48 Table 2: Most Common Beneficiary
Page 59 and 60:
50 informal urban economy, not leas
Page 61 and 62:
52 2009:chapt 13). When presented w
Page 63 and 64:
54 in rural areas are more than lik
Page 65 and 66:
56 Food Consumption Score: Consumpt
Page 67 and 68:
58 deforestation, but that, far mor
Page 69 and 70:
60 to differentiate between househo
Page 71 and 72:
62 Figure 42: Figure 14: Extended H
Page 73 and 74:
64 Beneficiary Selection in Haiti I
Page 75 and 76:
66 Regarding the effectiveness of t
Page 77 and 78:
68 household organization in Haiti.
Page 79 and 80:
70 Figure 50: Paired Beneficiary Pr
Page 81 and 82:
72 In evaluating CBO here is what w
Page 83 and 84:
74 Gwoupman, Gwoupman emerged durin
Page 85 and 86:
76 When the international community
Page 87 and 88:
78 The Difference Today: Migration
Page 89 and 90:
80 on for the past 200 years allegi
Page 91 and 92:
82 that thrive on donations for “
Page 93 and 94:
84 Question 7: In view of weak crit
Page 95 and 96:
86 capital of his or her family, fr
Page 97 and 98:
88 o Kiosk Strategy. Surveyors coor
Page 99 and 100:
90 Figure 61: Map Maissade 1 Figure
Page 101 and 102:
92 Comparison: Kiosk versus Random
Page 103 and 104:
94 Figure 64: Respondent/Notab-Geog
Page 105 and 106:
96 5. The Rest of the Targeting Cha
Page 107 and 108:
98 Figure 68: Type of Organization
Page 109 and 110:
100 3) A third way has to do with g
Page 111 and 112:
102 Feedback Strategy Monitoring Mo
Page 113 and 114:
104 6. The Model The model that fol
Page 115:
106 Figure 70 HUMANITARIAN AID TARG
Page 118 and 119:
Beneficiary Detection in Haiti 108
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
show all

CNSA Targeting

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?