Delegate Guidebook

07.09.2017 Views

It’s not a question of whether or not somebody will say out loud the truth that they deeply believe in, it’s just that it becomes on the nose when there is no subtext. The only time, generally, when we write on the nose dialogue without subtext is in fantasy writing or sci-fi, where characters are allegorical types- -hero, villain, etc., allegorical types not to be mistaken for realistic characters. In various forms of symbolic writing we do write on the nose. We eliminate the subconscious mind, because the subconscious, or even the unsaid conscious mind, makes people realistic. In fantasy, you don’t want realism, you want symbolism. In those cases you do write on the nose without a subtext. That is the exception. The strategy to answer that question is to put underneath an awareness, a life underneath the dialogue, conscious/subconscious drives the audience can become aware of that contradicts or contrasts with what the character is actually saying. Writers often write in their own voice. Are there any tricks writers can use to create more pronounced and contrasting voices for their characters? The goal of any beautiful cast design or any well-told story is that every character is distinctively different from every other character. How great these differences are between characters depends. But, obviously you do not want redundancy. You do not want two people speaking exactly the same. And you certainly don’t necessarily want them talking in the writer’s voice. You want to distinguish each character and give them an individual speech style. The reason we create character specific voices, even within the same culture, is to differentiate those characters one from the other in order to tell the story all the better, because you avoid redundancy. If characters react the same, speak the same, do the same things, if two characters are repeating each other, one of them has to be removed from the story to avoid repetitiousness. Fine writing is specific writing. You have to find not your voice as a writer, but character specific voices and the key to character specific voices is vocabulary. You go into the character’s mind and you look for all of those objects, all of those actions that are unique to this character’s experience that express themself in word choices. There is grammar and sentence constructions that could also be character specific. The place to start is vocabulary. People differentiate themselves by the choice of words and they find their choice of words in their vocabulary, and their vocabulary is the result of the sum total of their cultural experience. Every sporting event they’ve ever attended, every book they’ve ever read, every concert they’ve ever been to, every department store they’ve ever shopped. How they have lived and interacted with their culture in every possible way has given them their specific vocabulary and vocabulary is the most critical step in making dialogue character-specific. Do you have any tips on editing dialogue so that it lands on the listener with greater weight? The famous “omit needless words” from Strunk and White’s “The Elements 58

of Style” (Note for readers: an American English writing style guide) is the guiding principle here. You edit dialogue by eliminating all unnecessary words short of turning dialogue into a telegram (laughs). One of the most important steps is not only economy, but the placement of the key word. Every sentence, generally, has a word or phrase within it that completes its meaning. It could be the verb, it could be the noun, but it’s a word or phrase that if you took it out of that line of dialogue it wouldn’t make any sense. The key then is where you do you place that key word—at the beginning, in the middle or toward the end? I urge people to use the periodic sentence. It’s the suspense sentence. It’s the sentence you cannot know the meaning of until you hear the very last word. By delaying the meaning until the end of the line the audience then has to listen with curiosity wondering “What is this character saying?” When the last word or phrase lands at the end of the sentence, suddenly the sentence has greater impact. If you do it the other way, if you start the sentence with the key word, then everything after it is a modifier. It risks losing interest. Now, you can’t have every single line of dialogue end on its key word because that becomes repetitious and it doesn’t sound like conversation. You always mix periodic sentence with cumulative sentences in order to create a conversational tone. Generally speaking, withholding the meaning until the end of the line gives greater weight or impact to every single speech. Does character determine dialogue or the other way around? Yes, character determines dialogue. On the other hand, suppose you found a wonderful style of speech that really fascinates you and then it leads you to ask the question, “What kind of person would talk like that?” As a result the inspiration you found in the dialogue urges you to create a character who actually would use that kind of dialogue. In those cases the dialogue creates the character, but they are rare. When you write from the inside out, as I advocate in my teachings, dialogue is the final step, it’s the frosting on the cake. You create characters, you bring them into conflict, out of that you create story and then ultimately you have to find ways for them to speak. Ninety-nine percent of the time as you create the character the character then has to have a true speech style. There are exceptions when dialogue or speech style actually becomes the inspiration for a character, but those are the exceptions. What advice would you offer a writer starting a redraft, with particular emphasis on dialogue? First and foremost, eliminate all unnecessary dialogue. Write as lean as you can. At the same time you have to think about the nature of the particular characters and some characters are loquacious, but they have to be loquacious in the most economical way possible. If there’s a fault in writing dialogue that needs to be addressed as you rewrite, it tends to be overwriting. Say the absolute maximum with the fewest possible words and yet retain the 59

It’s not a question of whether or not<br />

somebody will say out loud the truth<br />

that they deeply believe in, it’s just that it<br />

becomes on the nose when there is no<br />

subtext. The only time, generally, when<br />

we write on the nose dialogue without<br />

subtext is in fantasy writing or sci-fi,<br />

where characters are allegorical types-<br />

-hero, villain, etc., allegorical types not<br />

to be mistaken for realistic characters.<br />

In various forms of symbolic writing<br />

we do write on the nose. We eliminate<br />

the subconscious mind, because the<br />

subconscious, or even the unsaid<br />

conscious mind, makes people realistic.<br />

In fantasy, you don’t want realism, you<br />

want symbolism. In those cases you do<br />

write on the nose without a subtext. That<br />

is the exception. The strategy to answer<br />

that question is to put underneath<br />

an awareness, a life underneath the<br />

dialogue, conscious/subconscious drives<br />

the audience can become aware of that<br />

contradicts or contrasts with what the<br />

character is actually saying.<br />

Writers often write in their own<br />

voice. Are there any tricks writers<br />

can use to create more pronounced<br />

and contrasting voices for their<br />

characters?<br />

The goal of any beautiful cast design or<br />

any well-told story is that every character<br />

is distinctively different from every other<br />

character. How great these differences<br />

are between characters depends. But,<br />

obviously you do not want redundancy.<br />

You do not want two people speaking<br />

exactly the same. And you certainly don’t<br />

necessarily want them talking in the<br />

writer’s voice. You want to distinguish<br />

each character and give them an<br />

individual speech style.<br />

The reason we create character specific<br />

voices, even within the same culture, is<br />

to differentiate those characters one from<br />

the other in order to tell the story all the<br />

better, because you avoid redundancy.<br />

If characters react the same, speak<br />

the same, do the same things, if two<br />

characters are repeating each other,<br />

one of them has to be removed from<br />

the story to avoid repetitiousness. Fine<br />

writing is specific writing.<br />

You have to find not your voice as a<br />

writer, but character specific voices and<br />

the key to character specific voices is<br />

vocabulary. You go into the character’s<br />

mind and you look for all of those<br />

objects, all of those actions that are<br />

unique to this character’s experience that<br />

express themself in word choices. There<br />

is grammar and sentence constructions<br />

that could also be character specific.<br />

The place to start is vocabulary. People<br />

differentiate themselves by the choice of<br />

words and they find their choice of words<br />

in their vocabulary, and their vocabulary<br />

is the result of the sum total of their<br />

cultural experience. Every sporting<br />

event they’ve ever attended, every book<br />

they’ve ever read, every concert they’ve<br />

ever been to, every department store<br />

they’ve ever shopped. How they have<br />

lived and interacted with their culture in<br />

every possible way has given them their<br />

specific vocabulary and vocabulary is<br />

the most critical step in making dialogue<br />

character-specific.<br />

Do you have any tips on editing<br />

dialogue so that it lands on the<br />

listener with greater weight?<br />

The famous “omit needless words”<br />

from Strunk and White’s “The Elements<br />

58

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!