13.12.2012 Views

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

Concern that chlorofluorocarbons might destroy ozone was first raised in <strong>the</strong> 1970s. Following <strong>the</strong> general realization that <strong>the</strong>se human-generated chemicals<br />

posed a real threat to <strong>the</strong> ozone layer, <strong>the</strong> Vienna Convention for <strong>the</strong> Protection of <strong>the</strong> Ozone Layer was adopted in 1985. Shortly afterwards, <strong>the</strong> Antarctic<br />

ozone hole was discovered, leading to renewed pressure to control ozone-depleting substances. In 1987, <strong>the</strong> Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete<br />

<strong>the</strong> Ozone Layer was agreed; it has since been ratified by more than 160 countries. Initially, <strong>the</strong> Montreal Protocol imposed clear limits on <strong>the</strong> future<br />

production of chlorofluorocarbons <strong>and</strong> halons only; as scientific evidence about ozone depletion has mounted, however, <strong>the</strong> Protocol has been modified to<br />

include o<strong>the</strong>r chemicals.<br />

As a direct result of <strong>the</strong>se controls, <strong>the</strong>re have been marked reductions in emissions of <strong>the</strong>se substances into <strong>the</strong> atmosphere; assuming full compliance with<br />

<strong>the</strong> Protocol, <strong>the</strong>se reductions will result in reduced atmospheric amounts of chlorine <strong>and</strong> bromine. However, <strong>the</strong> magnitude of <strong>the</strong> ozone loss at any given<br />

time depends on a number of factors. Although <strong>the</strong> amount of chlorine <strong>and</strong> bromine clearly is important, o<strong>the</strong>r influences include <strong>the</strong> temperature of <strong>the</strong><br />

ozone layer, <strong>the</strong> atmosphere's chemical composition, <strong>and</strong> long-term changes in atmospheric circulation related to climate change. How all of <strong>the</strong>se factors<br />

evolve over coming decades will determine future ozone amounts as chlorine <strong>and</strong> bromine are reduced.<br />

Source: WMO, 1999.<br />

For both of <strong>the</strong>se issues, <strong>the</strong> effects from aviation are part of a larger picture. Human-generated emissions at <strong>the</strong> Earth's surface can be carried aloft <strong>and</strong> affect <strong>the</strong><br />

global atmosphere. The unique property of aircraft is that <strong>the</strong>y fly several kilometers above <strong>the</strong> Earth's surface. The effects of most aircraft emissions depend strongly<br />

on <strong>the</strong> flight altitude <strong>and</strong> whe<strong>the</strong>r aircraft fly in <strong>the</strong> troposphere or stratosphere. The effects on <strong>the</strong> atmosphere can be markedly different from <strong>the</strong> effects of <strong>the</strong> same<br />

emissions at ground level.<br />

A number of aircraft emissions can affect climate. Carbon dioxide CO2 ) <strong>and</strong> water (H2O) do so directly; o<strong>the</strong>r effects (e.g., production of ozone in <strong>the</strong> troposphere,<br />

alteration of methane lifetime, formation of contrails <strong>and</strong> modified cirrus cloudiness) are indirect. The emissions that can affect stratospheric ozone (i.e., nitrogen<br />

oxides, particulates, <strong>and</strong> water vapor) do so indirectly by modifying <strong>the</strong> chemical balance in <strong>the</strong> stratosphere. There has been sustained long-term growth in civil air<br />

transportation. For example, over <strong>the</strong> past 10 years, passenger traffic on scheduled airlines has increased by 60%. Over <strong>the</strong> next 10 to 15 years, dem<strong>and</strong> for air travel<br />

is expected to grow by about 5% per year (Airbus, 1997; Boeing, 1997; Brasseur et al., 1998), though <strong>the</strong>re are likely to be regional variations in dem<strong>and</strong>. In contrast,<br />

no such increase in <strong>the</strong> numbers of military aircraft is anticipated; <strong>the</strong>y are expected to remain static or even decrease. As a consequence, fuel use <strong>and</strong> emissions<br />

produced by future military activities are expected to be a decreasing part of <strong>the</strong> total from aviation (see Chapter 9).<br />

<strong>Aviation</strong> fuel currently corresponds to 2-3% of <strong>the</strong> total fossil fuels used worldwide. Of this total, <strong>the</strong> majority (> 80%) is used by civil aviation. By comparison, <strong>the</strong> whole<br />

transportation sector currently accounts for 20-25% of all fossil fuel consumption. Thus, <strong>the</strong> aviation sector consumes 13% of <strong>the</strong> fossil fuel used in transportation; it is<br />

<strong>the</strong> second biggest sector after road transportation, which consumes 80% (IPCC, 1996b).<br />

Given <strong>the</strong> continued growth of aviation, a number of questions have been raised regarding <strong>the</strong> future effects of aviation emissions on <strong>the</strong> global environment. For<br />

example, if supersonic aircraft (which fly primarily in <strong>the</strong> stratosphere) were to be introduced in significant numbers, what special effects might <strong>the</strong>re be, <strong>and</strong> what tradeoffs<br />

might be possible?<br />

Answering such questions involves consideration of a number of complex issues <strong>and</strong><br />

assumptions about <strong>the</strong> future growth, technology trends, <strong>and</strong> operational practices of <strong>the</strong> aircraft<br />

industry. In <strong>the</strong> past, for example, fuel efficiency has improved dramatically over time, so total<br />

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/aviation/014.htm (3 von 4)08.05.2008 02:41:26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!