13.12.2012 Views

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

record indicates that aviation fuel productivity has increased considerably. ICAO estimates that, while aggregate<br />

fuel consumption for <strong>the</strong> 1976-90 period grew approximately 60%, world civil air traffic (passengers, freight, <strong>and</strong><br />

mail combined) increased about 150%. These figures are explained by an increased average load factor, a more<br />

optimal aircraft fleet mix, greater engine efficiency, <strong>and</strong> improved system capacity (Balashov <strong>and</strong> Smith, 1992). The<br />

amount of fuel consumed <strong>and</strong> fuel productivity affect airline profits <strong>and</strong> ticket prices.<br />

Of interest to <strong>the</strong> policymaker is <strong>the</strong> effect of a change in fuel price on airline cost <strong>and</strong> fare structures <strong>and</strong> on<br />

passenger <strong>and</strong> cargo dem<strong>and</strong>. Figure 10-1 shows <strong>the</strong> percentage of total annual airline expense attributable to fuel<br />

cost for U.S. <strong>and</strong> world airlines over time <strong>and</strong> compares changes in this ratio against changes in <strong>the</strong> index of fuel<br />

prices for <strong>the</strong> United States <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> world. Data for <strong>the</strong> figure were extracted from industry <strong>and</strong> ICAO published<br />

sources (ICAO, 1996b; Aerospace Industries Association of America, 1998). The data indicate that average fuel<br />

cost across <strong>the</strong> industry has recently represented about 11-15% of operating costs, but has been higher during<br />

times of high fuel prices (e.g., nearly 30% in <strong>the</strong> early 1980s). Fur<strong>the</strong>r analyses of <strong>the</strong> impact of fuel prices on<br />

dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> industry profitability are needed.<br />

Against <strong>the</strong> background of <strong>the</strong>se underlying trends, <strong>the</strong> potential role of mitigation measures is considered in fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

reducing <strong>the</strong> growth of aircraft emissions by forcing technology, changing industry practices, <strong>and</strong> dampening growth<br />

in traffic.<br />

10.4.2. Regulatory Measures<br />

Atmospheric environmental impacts associated with aviation emissions include greenhouse gas emissions, ozone<br />

depletion, acidification, <strong>and</strong> impact on local air quality. Cruise altitude (above 900 m) aircraft emissions of interest<br />

are CO 2 , NO x , particulates <strong>and</strong> aerosols, sulfur compounds, <strong>and</strong> H 2 O. Ground-level (altitude below 900 m) aircraft<br />

emissions of interest to local air quality issues are NO x , carbon moNO x ide (CO), unburned hydrocarbons (HC), <strong>and</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r volatile organic compounds. Ground-level CO 2 emissions from aircraft are of interest because of <strong>the</strong>ir effects<br />

on climate. This section examines more fully two technology-based means for mitigating <strong>the</strong> adverse effects of<br />

aviation emissions.<br />

10.4.2.1. Operational Means to Reduce Emissions<br />

Figure 10-1: Comparison of annual fuel<br />

expense as percentage of total annual<br />

operating expense for world <strong>and</strong> U.S.<br />

airlines against world fuel <strong>and</strong> oil <strong>and</strong><br />

U.S. fuel cost indicies, 1970-96.<br />

The environmental aim of air traffic system modernization <strong>and</strong> operational measures is to reduce fuel consumption, hence emissions, through improvement in <strong>the</strong><br />

overall efficiency of <strong>the</strong> air traffic system. For 1995, U.S. airlines reported a 79% "on-time" arrival rate for all domestic flights (i.e., flights arriving within 15 minutes of<br />

schedule), including canceled flights <strong>and</strong> those with mechanical delays. For 1996, this figure was 75%. This decline indicates <strong>the</strong> scope of current congestion <strong>and</strong><br />

delay problems (U.S. Department of Transportation, 1998).<br />

U.S. Federal <strong>Aviation</strong> Administration (FAA) data show that annual system delays of 15 minutes or longer (as a percent of total operations) have declined steadily from<br />

2.2% in 1989 to 1.2% in 1997. Over that period, 55-70% of <strong>the</strong>se delays were caused by wea<strong>the</strong>r; 25-35% were caused by terminal volume <strong>and</strong> closed runways <strong>and</strong><br />

taxiways (U.S. Federal <strong>Aviation</strong> Administration, 1977). FAA estimates of <strong>the</strong> total cost for air carrier delay (operating plus passenger time costs) grew from $6.5 billion<br />

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/aviation/153.htm (3 von 6)08.05.2008 02:44:43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!