13.12.2012 Views

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

Aviation and the Global Atmosphere

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Atmosphere</strong><br />

10.2.2. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) does not specifically refer to emissions from aviation, its coverage includes<br />

emissions from all sources. One of <strong>the</strong> commitments in <strong>the</strong> Convention is that parties to <strong>the</strong> Convention compile national inventories of <strong>the</strong>ir emissions sources<br />

(UNFCCC, 1992).<br />

IPCC guidelines provide advice on <strong>the</strong> quantification of aviation emissions (IPCC, 1996e). Even after aviation emissions have been quantified, an important distinction<br />

is whe<strong>the</strong>r such emissions are domestic or international. For domestic flights, emissions are considered to be part of <strong>the</strong> national inventory of <strong>the</strong> country within which<br />

<strong>the</strong> flights occur. The IPCC guidelines require international aviation emissions to be estimated by <strong>the</strong> country where <strong>the</strong> fuel is sold, although such emissions are not to<br />

be included in that country's total emissions. For international flights, <strong>the</strong> problem is how to allocate <strong>the</strong> emissions (referred to as "emissions from international aviation<br />

bunker fuels" in UNFCCC terminology, although "international" is not always specified) to national inventories. A similar problem exists for shipping.<br />

In an attempt to resolve this problem, <strong>the</strong> UNFCCC Subsidiary Body for Scientific <strong>and</strong> Technological Advice (SBSTA) has been presented with <strong>the</strong> following allocation<br />

options for emissions from international aviation <strong>and</strong> marine bunker fuels (UNFCCC, 1996):<br />

. Option 1-No allocation<br />

. Option 2-Allocation of global bunker sales <strong>and</strong> associated emissions to parties in proportion to <strong>the</strong>ir national emissions<br />

. Option 3-Allocation according to <strong>the</strong> country where <strong>the</strong> bunker fuel is sold<br />

. Option 4-Allocation according to <strong>the</strong> nationality of <strong>the</strong> transporting company, or to <strong>the</strong> country where an aircraft or ship is registered, or to <strong>the</strong> country of <strong>the</strong><br />

operator<br />

. Option 5-Allocation according to <strong>the</strong> country of departure or destination of an aircraft or vessel; alternatively, emissions related to <strong>the</strong> journey of an aircraft or<br />

vessel shared by <strong>the</strong> country of departure <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> country of arrival<br />

. Option 6-Allocation according to <strong>the</strong> country of departure or destination of passengers or cargo; alternatively, emissions related to <strong>the</strong> journey of passengers<br />

or cargo shared by <strong>the</strong> country of departure <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> country of arrival<br />

. Option 7-Allocation according to <strong>the</strong> country of origin of passengers or owner of cargo<br />

. Option 8-Allocation to a party of all emissions generated in its national space.<br />

SBSTA subsequently noted that <strong>the</strong>re were three separate issues: adequate <strong>and</strong> consistent inventories, allocation of emissions, <strong>and</strong> control options. Appropriate<br />

allocation of responsibility for emissions from international bunker fuels would be connected to inventory <strong>and</strong> control issues. Reviewing <strong>the</strong> foregoing eight options,<br />

SBSTA decided that Options 1, 3, 4, 5, <strong>and</strong> 6 should be <strong>the</strong> basis for fur<strong>the</strong>r work on this issue (UNFCCC, 1997).<br />

To date, however, <strong>the</strong>re has been no agreement among parties to <strong>the</strong> Convention on which option to choose. At Kyoto in December 1997, <strong>the</strong> Conference of Parties to<br />

<strong>the</strong> UNFCCC urged SBSTA to elaborate fur<strong>the</strong>r on <strong>the</strong> inclusion of emissions from fuel sold to aircraft <strong>and</strong> ships engaged in international transport in overall<br />

greenhouse gas inventories (UNFCCC, 1998a).<br />

The Kyoto Protocol to <strong>the</strong> UNFCCC, which has not yet entered into force, requires Annex I (industrialized) countries to reduce <strong>the</strong>ir collective emissions of greenhouse<br />

gases by approximately 5% by 2008-2012 compared with 1990 levels, with <strong>the</strong> reduction varying from country to country. The agreed-on targets apply to national totals<br />

of greenhouse gases. Consequently, each Annex I country can determine how <strong>the</strong> various emission-producing sectors in its economy should be called upon to assist<br />

in achieving <strong>the</strong> country's national target.<br />

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/aviation/151.htm (2 von 3)08.05.2008 02:44:40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!